Table Of ContentOUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
Understanding and Measuring Morphological
Complexity
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
Understanding and
Measuring
Morphological
Complexity
Editedby
MATTHEW BAERMAN, DUNSTAN BROWN,
AND GREVILLE G. CORBETT
1
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
3
GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,ox26dp,
UnitedKingdom
OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford.
ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship,
andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof
OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries
©editorialmatterandorganizationMatthewBaerman,DunstanBrown,and
GrevilleG.Corbett2015
©thechapterstheirseveralauthors2015
Themoralrightsoftheauthorshavebeenasserted
FirstEditionpublishedin2015
Impression:1
Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin
aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe
priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted
bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics
rightsorganization.Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe
aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe
addressabove
Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform
andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer
PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress
198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016,UnitedStatesofAmerica
BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData
Dataavailable
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2014947260
ISBN 978–0–19–872376–9
Printedandboundby
CPIGroup(UK)Ltd,Croydon,cr04yy
LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand
forinformationonly.Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials
containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork.
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
Contents
ListofFiguresandTables vii
ListofAbbreviations xi
ListofContributors xiii
PartI. WhatisMorphologicalComplexity?
Understandingandmeasuringmorphologicalcomplexity:Anintroduction
MatthewBaerman,DunstanBrown,andGrevilleG.Corbett
Dimensionsofmorphologicalcomplexity
StephenR.Anderson
PartII. UnderstandingComplexity
Rhizomorphomes,meromorphomes,andmetamorphomes
ErichR.Round
Morphologicalopacity:RulesofreferralinKanumverbs
MarkDonohue
MorphologicalcomplexityàlaOneida
Jean-PierreKoenigandKarinMichelson
Gender–numbermarkinginArchi:Smalliscomplex
MarinaChumakinaandGrevilleG.Corbett
PartIII. MeasuringComplexity
Contrastingmodesofrepresentationforinflectionalsystems:Some
implicationsforcomputingmorphologicalcomplexity
GregoryStumpandRaphaelA.Finkel
Computationalcomplexityofabstractivemorphology
VitoPirrelli,MarcelloFerro,andClaudiaMarzi
Patternsofsyncretismandparadigmcomplexity:ThecaseofOldand
MiddleIndicdeclension
PaoloMilizia
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
vi Contents
LearningandthecomplexityofØ-marking
SebastianBankandJochenTrommer
References
LanguagesIndex
NamesIndex
SubjectIndex
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
List of Figures and Tables
Figures
Figure3.1 Kayardildclausestructureandattachmentoffeatures 31
Figure3.2 Featureswhichpercolateontowordω 34
Figure5.1 Ahierarchyofnom-index 80
Figure5.2 Ahierarchyofpersonvalues 80
Figure5.3 Ahierarchyofgendervalues 80
Figure5.4 Ahierarchyofnumbervalues 80
Figure6.1 Typesofsimpledynamicverbsaccordingtothephonological
shapeoftheirperfectivestem(total142) 112
Figure8.1 One-to-oneandone-to-manyrelationsin
one-node-per-variableandmany-nodes-per-variableneural
networks 146
Figure8.2 Atwo-levelfinitestatetransducerfortheItalianirregularform
vengono‘theycome’ 150
Figure8.3 OutlinearchitectureofaTSOMandatwo-dimensional20×20
TSOM 152
Figure8.4 Topologicalpropagationoflong-termpotentiationand
long-termdepressionoftemporalre-entrantconnectionsover
twosuccessivetimesteps;andword-graphrepresentationof
Germanpastparticiples 154
Figure8.5 Topologicaldispersionofsymbolsontemporaland
spatio-temporalmaps,plottedbytheirpositionininputwords 157
Figure8.6 Alignmentplotsofthefindenparadigmonatemporal(left)
andaspatio-temporal(right)map 158
Figure8.7 (Topological)dispersionvaluesacrossactivationpatterns
triggeredbyselectedinflectionalendingsontemporaland
spatio-temporalmapsforItalianandGermanknownword
forms,andonunknownwordforms 159
Figure8.8 BMUactivationchainsforvediamo-vedete-crediamoona
20×20map(left)andtheirword-graphrepresentation(right) 160
Figure8.9 Correlationcoefficientsbetweenalignmentscoresandrecall
scoresfornovelwords,plottedbyletterpositionsrelativetothe
stem-endingboundary 161
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
viii ListofFiguresandTables
Figure8.10 Stemdispersionover<PREF-X,X >pairsinItalianand
Germanverbforms.Dispersionvaluesaregivenasafractionof
100overthemap’sdiagonal 163
Figure9.1 Agraphrepresentingtherelativefrequenciesof
morphosyntacticpropertycombinationsinOldIndicadjectival
paradigms 172
Tables
Table3.1 Morphometypesandtheirmodeofcategorization 29
Table3.2 Inflectionalfeaturesandtheirpotentialvalues 32
Table3.3 Featuresforwhichlexicalstemscaninflect 37
Table3.4 Inflectionalfeaturesandtheirmorphomicexponents 51
Table3.5 Phonologicalexponentsofmorphomes 51
Table4.1 Inflectionforampl‘laughat’withdifferentsubjects,objects,
andtenses 56
Table4.2 FreepronounsinKanum,absolutive,andergativeforms 56
Table4.3 Kanumverbalinflection 57
Table4.4 Inflectionformakr‘roast’withdifferentsubjects,objects,and
tenses 61
Table4.5 Opacityandtransparencyinpronominalsystems 62
Table4.6 Tensedistinctionsportmanteauwithagreementaffixes 62
Table4.7 Pronominaldistinctionsintheidealizedagreementaffixes 63
Table4.8 Takeoversintheobjectprefixesfortwoverbs 63
Table4.9 Referralsintheobjectprefixes 64
Table4.10 Referralsintenseaffixes 64
Table4.11 Referralsinthesubjectsuffixes 64
Table5.1 Oneidaprenominalprefixes(C-stemallomorphs) 73
Table5.2 Thenineteenpossiblecategoriesofsemanticindices 79
Table5.3 Numberofmorphsineachstemclassfromwhichallother
fifty-sevenformscanbededuced 88
Table5.4 Numberandpercentageofstemsofeachclassintwelvetexts 89
Table6.1 AgreeinglexicalitemsintheArchidictionary 95
Table6.2 SyncretismpatternA 98
Table6.3 SyncretismpatternB 98
Table6.4 Archiprefixes 98
Table6.5 Archiinfixes,SetI 98
OUPCORRECTEDPROOF–FINAL,5/3/2015,SPi
ListofFiguresandTables ix
Table6.6 Archiinfixes,SetII 99
Table6.7 Archisuffixes 99
Table6.8 Partialparadigmoffirstandsecondpersonpronouns 102
Table6.9 Verbsofsimilarphonology,butdifferentpatternsofrealizing
agreement 111
Table7.1 Orthographicformsoftheverbsin(1) 121
Table7.2 Hearer-orientedplatfortheverbsin(1) 122
Table7.3 Speaker-orientedplatfortheverbsin(1) 123
Table7.4 Morphologicalindicesemployedinthespeaker-orientedplat 124
Table7.5 Twohypotheticalplats 125
Table7.6 PlatrepresentingahypotheticalsystemofICs 127
Table7.7 Inflectionclasses,exponences,anddistillationsinthetwoplats 128
Table7.8 4-MPSentropy(×100)ofthefourdistillationsinTable7.7 129
Table7.9 Distinctexponencesineachofthefourdistillations 129
Table7.10 TraditionalprincipalpartsoffiveLatinverbs 130
Table7.11 Optimaldynamicprincipal-partsetsofthreeverbs(H-Oplat) 131
Table7.12 Dynamicprincipal-partsetsinthetwoplats 132
Table7.13 Dynamicprincipal-partnumbersinthetwoplats 132
Table7.14 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforcastintheH-Oplat 133
Table7.15 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforcast(S-Oplat) 133
Table7.16 Numberofviableoptimaldynamicprincipal-partsets 134
Table7.17 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforpass(H-Oplat) 134
Table7.18 Candidateprincipal-partsetsforpass(S-Oplat) 135
Table7.19 Densityofviabledynamicprincipal-partsetsamongall
candidatesetshavingthesamenumberofmembers 135
Table7.20 ICpredictabilityoftwelveverbsintheH-OandS-Oplats 137
Table7.21 CellpredictabilitymeasuresforthirteenverbsintheH-Oand
S-Oplats 138
Table7.22 Predictivenessofaverb’scells,averagedacrossverbs 139
Table7.23 Predictivenessofaverb’spast-tensecellintheH-OandS-Oplats 139
Table9.1 Relativefrequenciesofinflectionalvaluesonthebasisof
Lanman(1880) 171
Table9.2 OldIndic-a-/-a¯-adjectivedeclensionandrelativefrequencies
ofthesetsofinflectionalvaluearraysassociatedwiththe
differentexponents 173
Description:This book aims to assess the nature of morphological complexity, and the properties that distinguish it from the complexity manifested in other components of language. Of the many ways languages have of being complex, perhaps none is as daunting as what can be achieved by inflectional morphology: th