Table Of ContentProf. Dr. Enderlein's
Teachings in Theory and
Practice
Essential Elements of
Prof. Dr. Enderlein's
Publications
Selected and elucidated by
Dr. med. Maria-M. Bieker
Unappreciated Friend
or
Unsuspected Foe?
Prof. Dr. Enderlein's Teachings in Theory and Practice
Essential Elements of Prof. Dr. Enderlein's Publications
Selected and Elucidated by
Dr. Maria-M. Bieker
Tara Bookshop
384-386 Oxford St
MT HAWTHORN WA 6016
Tel: (08) 9444 4190
Fax: (08) 9444 4192
www.tarabookshop.com.au
Vorbehaltserklaru ng
Dieses Such ist dazu bestimmt, Information uber die behandelten Themen zu vermitteln.
Dieses Such soil lehren und unterhalten. Weder die Autoren noch der Verlag sind im
Faile eines Verlustes oder Schadens, der direkt oder indirekt durch die in diesem Such
enthaltenen Informationen verursacht sein konnte, irgendeiner Person gegenuber ver
antwortlich oder schadenersatzpflichtig.
Disclaimer
The purpose of this book is to provide information about the use of SANUM preparations
for a wide range of medical problems. However, illness can be highly unpredictable, and
the best possible expertise should always be consulted. No liability is accepted by the
author and publishers for any claims arising from the use of any remedy or prescribing
strategy discussed here.
Herausgegeben durch den Semmelweis-Verlag, 0-27316 Hoya
© Copyright by Semmelweis-Verlag
Aile Rechte vorbehalten, insbesondere die der Ubersetzung in fremde Sprachen. Oieses Such oder Teile dieses
Suches durfen ohne schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages in keiner Form -durch Fotokopie, Mikrofilm oder irgend
ein anderes Verfahren - reproduziert werden oder in eine von Maschinen verwendbare Sprache ubersetzt oder
ubertragen werden.
All rights reserved, including those of translations into foreign languages. It is not permitted to reproduce any parts
of this books in any form, copying, printing, microfilming or scanning or audio taping without written permission of
the publisher.
Tous droits reserves, particulierement ces de traduire en une langue etrangere. Sans autorisation par ecrit du editeur
il est interdit de reproduire ce livre ou parts de ce livre en aucune forme - par photocopie, microfilm ou une autre
methode -ou de la traduire en une langue qui peut-etre utiliser par des machines.
Reservado todos los derechos, especial mente los de la traducci6n a idiomas extranjeros. Sin autorizaci6n escrita del
editor original, este libro no puede reproducirse ni parcial no totalmente, en cualquier forma que sea, electr6nica 0
mecanica; mediante fotocopia, mime6grafo 0 cualquier sistema de multicopista, nilo por cualquier sistema de
grabaci6n en disco 0 cinta de ordenador.
Suchumschlag: Y. Harste
Printed in Germany by Oruckerei Adam Prettenhofer GmbH & Co. KG
1. Auflage 2004
Dedication
I dedicate this book to my friend Chrystyne Jackson in Prescott, Arizona, who has, for
many years and at great personal sacrifice, dedicated her life to naturopathic medicine
in general and Dr. Enderlein's teachings in particular. Were it not for her commitment, the
ENDERLEIN name would likely have remained largely unknown in medical circles. I am
also very obliged to Mrs. Jackson above all for having had this book - and other writings
of mine - translated into English.
Thanks
I thank my husband Johannes Bieker, who stood by me patiently and with understan
ding during the creation of this book, as well as Dr. Hartmut Enderlein (Chemnitz,
Germany) and his brother Jorg Enderlein (Ontario, Canada) for their help in procuring
important documents of their great-uncle's, Dr. Gunther Enderlein. My sincere thanks
also to Mrs. Elisenda Queralt de Hawroyd for help by translation of the original Spanish
version into English, and Mrs. Marie-Guadalupe Monso Capellades for her translation
into Catalan.
Note
Besides Enderlein's own drawings, the photographic slides printed in this book were
taken by myself (except Aspergillus and Mucor slides, taken by Institute DSMZ (Braun
schweig, Germany) to the extent that the depicted objects correspond with each other,
the slides document the authenticity of his drawings.
Essen, Germany (spring 2004)
Dr. med. Maria-M. Bieker
4
Foreword
Why this book?
As I was studying medicine at the University of Barcelona in the early fifties, the news
went around that a German scientist had discovered a microbe, present in all human
organisms, which was supposed to be responsible for many diseases. There was end
less speculation. SOCIAS and colleagues in Madrid published their own research
results, as did COlVE and colleagues in Valencia. I later found out that many French sci
entists were occupied with similar research. It was thought that this could be a marvelous
way to help the sick. Even back then, chronic diseases were the bane of medical prac
tice. Homeopathy was also making waves.
later on, things quieted down on this front. As a student, I was hoping to find out more
at a later stage of my studies - but this was not to be, it turned out: I graduated without
having satisfied my curiosity in this regard. My professors seemed not to have heard
anything at all about these developments. Shortly after my final exams, I had an oppor
tunity to go to Germany and work there for a while in a hospital. At that time, Germany
was in all respects a "dreamland" for Spaniards. And so I thought: "Now you'll learn all
about it." Wrong again! There was no noticeable therapeutic progress. The chronically ill
became more and more "chronic", the statistics more depressing every year. Rheuma
tism, allergies, systemic diseases and especially cancer were (and still are) pretty much
incurable.
In the seventies in Munich, the "Deutsche Akademie fUr Akupunktur und Aurikulo
Medizin e.v." [German Academy of Acupuncture and Auricular Medicine] was founded,
whose seminars I attended. It was there that I first became acquainted with homeopathy
and naturopathy, as well as with my highly-esteemed colleague Dr. WOLFGANG GRO
GER. I am very grateful to him, as he was instrumental in seeing to it that Dr. GUNTHER
ENDERLEIN's contributions did not vanish forever from the annals of medicine.
Dr. GROGER defended his contemporary Dr. ENDERlEIN "against all comers" and con
tinued to give lectures and hold seminars until quite recently.
In the pages that follow I shall undertake to present ENDERLEIN's findings as concise
ly as possible, in order to make them accessible to all interested readers, laypersons and
specialists alike.
Dr. ENDERLEIN's findings have great scope. We cannot ignore them any longer, if we
wish, finally, to be successful in combating chronic diseases, including cancer. If this
does not happen, the consequence will be a general deterioration of health - which has
already become very evident.1 People are going to suffer from increasingly serious dis
eases. Our present treatment methods create many chronically ill people. It is going to
get ever more difficult to grow old gracefully and with dignity. To be sure, we all die no
matter how healthy we are - but it makes a big difference how we age and how we one
day die. I don't wish to bore you with statistics, but there is one that has made a great
impression on me: in 1870, the year that monomorphism was "invented", the cancer rate
among Germans was 1 in 2,500; by 1955, it was up to 1 in 5 or 6. These days, every
other person is diagnosed as being in a cancerous or pre-cancerous state.2 No doubt
1 WHO Health Report 1997
2 See Appendix B: newspaper articles No. 1.2. and AK I, p. 41
5
about it: medicine has failed on this front. We know the flowers, branches and leaves of
our "Tree of Life" in great detail, but its roots don't ever seem to have interested us much.
It is precisely in this area that ENDERLEIN investigated intensively. One can certainly
say that contemporary science has made tremendous progress, but mostly in diagnosis:
there hasn't been much change in therapy, and much of it has even been for the worse.
Why is that? Simply put, because we are leaving a very important factor out of conside
ration - namely our Endobiont (or symbiont or roommate or long-term tenant - pick your
preferred term). But which is it to us:
the unappreciated friend or the unsuspected foe?
Dr. ENDERLEIN would have loved the diagnostic options we now have. Even back then,
in the early years of electron microscopy, he was enthused - as can be clearly noticed
in his paper on "Die elektronenoptische Bestatigung" [Electro-optical Corroboration].3
Today's medicine is antiquated in certain areas, failing to keep up with overall develop
ments in other sciences, whose discoveries are far, far greater - e.g. the following from
"Spektrum der Wissenschaft"4 [Spectrum of Science]: "artificial self-reproducing mole
cules"! HEISENBERG, JORDAN, COOPER, PLANCK ascribe "consciousness" to
atoms. ENDERLEIN also accords the Endobiont a "cosmic consciousness", without
which its role in human and animal organisms would not be explicable.5
I am convinced that modern scientific methods will not only confirm ENDERLEIN's work,
but will also build on it to develop farther-reaching research results. Although the deci
sive first step was taken by ENDERLEIN himself, the way he has pointed out must be
followed by us. ENDERLEIN has shown that the differences between living and non
living matter - if there is, indeed, any such thing as nonliving matter - are scarcely
detectable. One needs to come to understand ENDERLEIN's teachings if one wishes to
penetrate into the as yet unknown micro-world. You cannot go straight from grade school
to the university, without having first graduated from high school. "Back to basics!"6 is a
popular slogan in the United States, and one which I would like to heed here. So, off we
go to ENDERLEIN High School!
3 ARCH. Vol. II, No. 1, p. 8 f.
4 Appendix B, No.7, p. 66 ff.
5 AK II, p. 24; AK III, p. 483 ff.
6 Appendix B, No. 3, p. 35
6
Dr. Gunther Enderlein
Born 1872 in Leipzig, died 1968 in Hamburg.
Biologist and zoologist, curator and professor at the Zoological Museum
of the University of Berlin. Member of the Society for Freedom in Science at Oxford
Prof. Weidner's detailed curriculum vitae can be found in the appendix section
at the end of this book.
7
Enderlein's Work Summarized
Dr. ENDERLEIN's findings can be summarized in his own words as follows:?
"Unlike the numerous episodic human diseases that can be attributed to specific patho
gens (e.g. Micrococcus catarrhalis, Bacillus influenzae, Treponema syphiliticum, Pneu
mococcus, etc.), there are two microparasites that are the human species' constant com
panions. Moreover, these two parasites have a certain relationship to each other and can
take each other's place.
The first one we designate as the tubercle bacillus, which exhibits a series of develop
mental stages in the human organism that are responsible for this or that tubercular
disease. In its primitive stages - Protit and Chondrit - it is passed on diaplacentally in
the embryo .... There is an even more dangerous human parasite having a biological
ly/functionally inseparable relationship with Koch's bacillus, which I have called the
Endobiont. ... Millions of years ago, the entire mammalian order was infected by a fun
gus: Mucor racemosus Fresen ....
The Endobiont is thus constantly present in animal bodies and can no longer be - nor
should it be - removed. Yet the conditions of its development determine all focal infes
tation and thus each clinical disease form. In the body, this fungal parasite traverses all
its developmental stages, which can infest all tissues and organs to a greater or lesser
degree. It is precisely this that makes the Endobiont so dangerous to man - and, in turn,
precisely this circumstance accounts for the very exceptional diversity of the fungal infes
tation. A. LESCHKE ascertained that egg and sperm are already infested, unlike tuber
culosis, which involves infection .... In most cases, the Endobiont appears as a carcino
ma and Koch's bacillus as pulmonary tuberculosis. However, for most other diseases,
both parasites can be present at once, especially in the Chondrit stage. Treatment must
therefore take them both into account, since diagnostic differentiation of the infesta
tion is not possible, especially in the primitive stages.8
Hydrogenion concentration (pH) of the blood is shifted by Endobiont activity - and it
needs to be expressly emphasized here that the Endobiont is an enthusiastic protein
feeder."
7 1M Vol. 3, p. 110 ff.
8 AK II, p. 260-261
8
Culture Culminante
The "most dangerous":
Mucor racemosus Fresen
(alias "Endobiont")
The second "companion":
Aspergillus niger van Tieghem
(alias Koch's bacillus)
The above citations summarize the essential aspects of Enderlein's work, the core of
which is the discovery of the symbiosis of man and all mammals with two microorga
nisms. Dr. ENDERLEIN identified these two symbionts as the fungus Mucor racemosus
Fresen (which he named Endobiont) and the fungus Aspergillus niger van Tieghem (the
Koch's bacillus). The term "Endobiont" is composed of the ancient Greek words endon
(inside) and bios (life), and this expresses that the Endobiont is present in all body cells,
even germ cells. By the way, the two microbes are not different species, but come, so to
speak, from the same "family tree". He also made what was probably an even more far
reaching discovery, namely that the thrombocyte is not really a blood cell, but an
advanced Endobiont developmental stage. He arrived at these conclusions as a
result of more than 60 years of scientific research.
I would here like to emphasize, with ENDERLEIN, that "the Endobiont is not found in all
life forms, but rather in all mammals, in which cancer appears. In plants, tumors are
caused by Cynipids (gall wasps) and other fungal species."9 Thus, only man and mam
mals have been living practically from the beginning of their existence in symbiosis with
the Endobiont and Koch's bacillus.
Dr. ENDERLEIN's contribution also consists in having created of a standard systematic
classification for the development and characteristics of microbes and bacteria. His ter
minology - even though some terms are "tongue-twisters", since ENDERLEIN settled on
ancient Greek - brings clarity to the (to this day) bewildering, antiquated and contradic
tory farrago of bacteriological and microbiological terms, that are, often as not, different
designations for the same organism, since they continue to be based on monomorphism.
Many researchers have evidently felt compelled to introduce new names again and
again, in an attempt to establish a presumed priority.
9 1M, No. 5/6, p. 187