Table Of ContentTHEPRIVATESPHERE
Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture
VOLUME15
SeriesEditor
H.TristramEngelhardt,Jr.,DepartmentofPhilosophy,RiceUniversity,andBaylor
CollegeofMedicine,Houston,Texas
AssociateEditor
KevinWm.Wildes,S.J.,DepartmentofPhilosophyandKennedyInstituteof
Ethics,GeorgetownUniversity,Washington,D.C.
AssistantEditor
LisaRasmussen,UniversityofNorthCarolina,Charlotte,USA
EditorialBoard
StanleyHauerwas,DukeUniversity,Durham,N.C.
MaureenKelley,UniversityofAlabama,Birmingham
TerryPinkard,NorthwesternUniversity,Evanston,Illinois
GriffinTrotter,SaintLouisUniversity,Missouri
Thetitlespublishedinthisseriesarelistedattheendofthisvolume.
THE PRIVATE SPHERE
An Emotional Territory And Its Agent
Mats G.Hansson
UppsalaUniversity,
Sweden
Author
MatsG.Hansson
UppsalaUniversity
Sweden
ISBN:978-1-4020-6651-1 e-ISBN:978-1-4020-6652-8
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2007938403
(cid:2)c 2008SpringerScience+BusinessMediaB.V.
Nopartofthisworkmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,ortransmitted
inanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,microfilming,recording
orotherwise,withoutwrittenpermissionfromthePublisher,withtheexception
ofanymaterialsuppliedspecificallyforthepurposeofbeingentered
andexecutedonacomputersystem,forexclusiveusebythepurchaserofthework.
Printedonacid-freepaper.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
springer.com
Foreword
Thepresentworkhasemergedastheresultofseveralyears’involvementinvarious
multidisciplinary research projects which have been carried out within the Re-
searchProgrammeinBiomedicalEthicsatUppsalaUniversity,nowtheCentrefor
Bioethicsat KarolinskaInstitutetandUppsala University.I am gratefulto various
colleagueswho havetaken part,whetherbrieflyor at length,in discussionsofthe
conceptsofprivacyand integrity.Hearty thanksmustgo to GertHelgesson,Ulrik
vonEssen,PärSegerdahlandRichardWessmanwhohavereadtheinitialversionof
thebookandprovidedusefulcomments.IamparticularlyindebtedtoPärfortaking
the trouble to read the whole manuscript a second time. Arne Öhman and his re-
searchgroupatthePsychologySectionintheDepartmentofClinicalNeurosciences
at KarolinskaInstitutet read an earlier versionof Chapters 3 and 4. This provided
aconstructiveandrewardingdiscussionwhichwasofparticularvaluetomesince
psychologydidnotformpartofmyownprofessionaltraining.SvenDanielssonand
themembersofhisresearchseminarinpracticalphilosophyatUppsalaUniversity
readChapters5and6andofferedconstructivecriticism.Theircriticalviewshelped
me to try to express more clearly the aim of these chapters within the framework
ofthebookasawhole.Allthereadersofthebookorpartsofitcancertainlyhave
reason to wish for further revisions or indeed for a different presentation of the
problem of understanding the role of the agent in the private sphere. I alone am
responsibleforthefinalversionwithwhateverresidualdefectsitmaystillpossess.
I am also grateful to various bodies who have provided the economic support
allowing me to carry out a multidisciplinary research project on questions relat-
ing to integrity. They are: Knut and Alice Wallenberg’s Foundation (the National
BiobankProgramwithinWallenbergConsortiumNorthandSweGene,theSwedish
Council for Social Research, now the Swedish Council for Working Life and So-
cialResearch),theFoundationforStrategicResearch,theEthical,LegalandSocial
Aspects of Genome and Gene Technology Research (ELSA) Programme and the
SwedishAgencyforInnovationSystems,VINNOVA).
v
vi Foreword
Translation
ThemanuscripthasbeentranslatedbyDr.CraigMcKay.Besideshislanguageex-
pertise I have benefitted greatly from his philosophical insights and his personal
interestinquestionsrelatedtoprivacyandintegrity.Ihavereallyenjoyedourcon-
versationsthisspringandIam gratefultohimforthe skill,time andefforthehas
broughttotheprojectatthisfinalstage.
Uppsala,3August2007
MatsG.Hansson
Contents
Introduction....................................................... 1
A New Approachto Understandingthe Conceptsof Privacy
andIntegrity................................................ 1
FourLiteraryContributionsasanIntroductiontoUnderstanding
theConceptofIntegrity ...................................... 3
JuhaniAho .......................................... 3
Carl-ErikafGeijerstam ................................ 6
SvenBarthel ......................................... 7
ThePrivateSpherefromaHistoricalandCulturalPerspective ...... 8
ThePrivateSphereasanEmotionalTerritory–APsychological
andEvolutionaryPerspective.................................. 9
IntegrityasSomethingWhichisMorallyWorthProtecting......... 11
RespectfortheIndividualasaPersonwithMoralandPolitical
Authority–IntegrityfromaPhilosophicalPerspective............. 12
Balancing Seclusion and Participation – Integrity
fromthePerspectiveofMoralPhilosophy,JurisprudenceandtheLaw 13
IntegrityasaQualityWorthyofEsteemandRespect .............. 13
TheRelationshipBetweenPrivacyandIntegrity .................. 14
1 ThePrivateSpherefromaHistoricalandCulturalPerspective ....... 15
1.1 IntheSupposedSeclusionoftheHome ......................... 16
1.2 WhatWilltheNeighboursSay?................................ 22
1.3 PowerOverSpiritualLifeandThought–ThePrivateSpherefrom
aReligiousPerspective....................................... 25
1.4 ToRetirewithaBook–ThePrivateSpherefromaLiteraryPerspective 29
1.5 ToParticipateinDrawingaLineBetweenWhatIsPublicandWhat
IsPrivate................................................... 32
2 The Private Sphere as an Emotional Territory – A Psychological
andEvolutionaryPerspective..................................... 33
2.1 EmotionsWhichAreConstitutiveforaPerson’sPrivateSphere..... 33
2.2 TheEmotionalTerritory’sSignificanceinEvolutionaryDevelopment 38
2.3 Integrity–ACompositePropertyoftheIndividual................ 42
vii
viii Contents
2.4 ThreeCandidates:Fear,EmbarrassmentandPride ................ 43
2.5 The Role of the Emotions in the Establishment of Social
Order–DominanceandSubmission............................ 47
2.6 TheExperienceofSelf ....................................... 49
3 IntegrityasSomethingWorthyofMoralProtection ................. 53
3.1 ATeleologicalPerspectivewithRegardtoIntegrity ............... 54
3.2 The MoralValueofProtectionOriginatinginthe Individual’s
CapacityforSentientExperience............................... 56
3.3 The Moral Value of Protection from the Viewpoint
oftheIndividual’sCapacityforAction.......................... 59
3.4 IntegrityasaSociallySignificantProperty–TheStartingPoint
forMoralIntegrity........................................... 63
4 Respect forthe Individualasa PersonwithMoralandPolitical
Authority–IntegrityfromaPhilosophicalPerspective .............. 71
4.1 IndividualFreedomMeaningfulFirstinaSocialContext .......... 73
4.2 IndividualFreedomExhibitedatDifferentSocialLevels ........... 76
4.3 ANewApproachtoSelf-Determination......................... 78
4.4 SocialRecognition:FromSeparationtoParticipation.............. 80
4.5 RespectforIntegrityasSocialRecognition ...................... 82
4.6 TheIndividualasaPersonwithMoralandPoliticalAuthority ...... 86
4.7 ParticipatingwithKnowledge,InsightandInfluence .............. 88
5 Balancing Seclusion and Participation – Integrity from the
PerspectiveofMoralPhilosophy .................................. 91
5.1 IstheProtectionofPrivateLifeAdequatelyCoveredbyOtherRights? 94
5.2 SocialConventionsShifttheBoundaries ........................ 95
5.3 TheBasicInterestinAvoidingCertainTypesofInsightandInvasion 98
5.4 TheValueofaDifferentiatedSocialLife ........................ 99
5.5 Non-interferenceDoesNotSolvetheDilemmaofBalancingInterests101
5.6 BasisforBalancingInterests ..................................103
6 Legal Protection– Privacyand Integrity fromthe Perspective
ofJurisprudenceandtheLaw ....................................109
6.1 TheDeclarationsSettheBasicTone............................110
6.2 TheSignificanceofthePrivateSphereforDemocracy.............113
6.3 TheRighttoProtectWhatIsOne’sOwn ........................114
6.4 LegislationArrivesattheSameResultbutinDifferentWays .......116
6.5 FocussingonaCarefulLegalProcess...........................118
6.6 TheLimitationsoftheConsentNorm...........................123
6.7 RespectforPrivateLifeasaComplementtotheConsent ..........125
7 IntegrityasaQualityWorthyofEsteemandRespect................133
7.1 TheContinuityoftheConceptofIntegrity.......................133
7.2 BeingTruetoOneselfandOthers ..............................135
Contents ix
7.3 IntegrityasBothaPersonalandSocialProperty..................140
7.4 InContactwiththeInternalGoalofanActivity ..................141
7.5 TheMoralSubstancePsychologicallyGrounded .................144
8 ConclusionsandApplications.....................................151
8.1 Conclusions ................................................151
8.1.1 WhatIsIntegrity?.....................................151
8.1.2 WhyOughtOnetoRespectanIndividual’sIntegrity?.......152
8.1.3 HowShouldtheInterestofIntegritybeWeighedAgainst
OtherInterests?......................................153
8.2 Ethical Considerations Involved in Balancing Interests
inBiobankResearch .........................................154
8.2.1 BiosamplesTakenforDifferentPurposes .................154
8.2.2 GeneticsasHyperbole.................................156
8.2.3 ToBeLeftinPeacebutattheSameTimetoParticipate .....158
8.2.4 ToParticipateintheDevelopmentofMedicalKnowledge ...160
8.2.5 TheIntegrityoftheResearcherandPersonsinAuthority ....161
References.........................................................163
Index .............................................................173
Description:The non-interference perspective is common when theorizing about the protection of the private life of individuals and their families. However, this accepted way of looking at things, leads our thoughts astray. It fails to do justice to the interests both in being left in peace but at the same time