Table Of ContentVirginia Commonwealth University
VCU Scholars Compass
Theses and Dissertations Graduate School
2011
The Effectiveness of Religion-Affiliated Nonprofit
Organizations in Social Services: A Survey Study of
Nursing Homes in Virginia
Bulent Ucar
Virginia Commonwealth University
Follow this and additional works at:http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd
Part of thePublic Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons
© The Author
Downloaded from
http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/2640
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please [email protected].
© Bulent Ucar                                  2011 
All Rights Reserved
The Effectiveness of Religion-Affiliated Nonprofit Organizations 
in Social Services: A Survey Study of Nursing Homes in Virginia 
 
 
 
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of 
Doctor of Philosophy at Virginia Commonwealth University. 
 
 
by 
 
 
Bulent Ucar 
B.A., Marmara University, Turkey, 1996 
M.P.A., Fatih University, Turkey, 2000 
 
 
 
 
Director: Dr. Blue E. Wooldridge 
L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Virginia Commonwealth University 
Richmond, Virginia 
December, 2011
ii 
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  
 
  I would like to thank to those who have helped me during a long, and sometimes 
frustrating process. First of all, I thank my dissertation committee chair Dr. Blue Wooldridge, 
committee members, Dr. Robyn L Diehl, Dr. J. James Cotter and Dr. Nancy B Stutts. They 
have guided me with their comments and insights despite their own busy schedules. They all 
put fortward a genuine afford to make this study better.  
  I owe many thanks to previous and current administrators of the PhD program. To 
mention just a few names here, Dr. Michael D. Pratt who was formerly director of the 
program, Betty M. Moran who was the program's previous secretary and was like a good 
mom for all of us, and Richard F. Huff who is the current graduate programs coordinator. As 
busy he is, he has always helped me and other students to work through the administrative 
process of education smoothly and easily.   
  I would like to thank those nursing home administrators who helped me to better 
understand  nursing  home  settings  and  fill  out  survey  questionnaires  in  Virginia.  Many 
nursing home administrators did not only respond to the survey, but they also forwarded it to 
some other nursing home administrators who they knew that would fill out the questionnaire. 
I am really grateful for all the help. 
  I  owe  genuine  thanks  to  my  family,  particularly  my  wife  and  my  brother  who 
supported me in many ways. I also would like to thank my friends Bilgin Erdogan and Ozkan 
Erenler (big brother) who supported me when I stumbled financially. Their help, at a time 
when no one wanted to help, will never be forgotten. They showed how important friends are 
for a man. Also, thanks to many friends whose names are not mentioned here.
iii 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS  
 
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...............................................................................   ii 
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................  iii 
LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................  viii 
LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................  xi 
ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................  xii 
CHAPTER I ........................................................................................................  1 
INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................  1 
Problem Statement and Purpose of the Study ………………………………………………..  3 
Theoretical Perspective ………………………………………………………………............  4 
Theory Borrowing Concept ………………………………………………………………...  18 
Importance of the Study …………………………………………………………………….  21 
Data and Methods …………………………………………………….............  24 
Selection and Collection of the Data Set …………………………………………………...  24 
The Secondary Data ………………………………………………………………………...  26 
Research Design …………………………………………………………………………  28 
Research Questions and Hypotheses ………………………………………………………..  28 
Definition of Terms …………………………………………………………………………  30 
Outline of the Study ………………………………………………………………………...  33 
CHAPTER II ………………………………………………………………………………..  35 
THE CHARITABLE CHOICE INITIATIVE ……………………………………………...  35
iv 
 
What Is the Charitable Choice Initiative? …………………………………………………..  36 
Implementation of the Charitable Choice Initiative and Criticism …………………………  41 
Is Charitable Choice Initiative Unconstitutional?  ………………………………………….  47 
CHAPTER III ………………………………………………………………………………. 56 
LITERATURE REVIEW …………………………………………………………………..  56 
What Is Organizational Effectiveness?  …………………………………………………….  59 
What Is a Faith Based Organization? .....................................................................................  62 
Scope and Scale of Faith Based Organizations ......................................................................  67 
Role of Religion in Self Regulation and Social Service Provision ........................................  74 
The Effectiveness of Faith Based Programs in Healthcare Related Services ……................  95 
CHAPTER IV ……………………………………………………………………………..  100 
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ...............................................................  100 
The Research Questions and Hypotheses ............................................................................  101 
Variables ..............................................................................................................................  102 
DATA SETS ........................................................................................................................  108 
The Secondary Data .............................................................................................................  108 
Making Conditions Equal ....................................................................................................  114 
The Survey ...........................................................................................................................  115 
Conducting the Survey .........................................................................................................  115 
Protection of Human Research Subjects and Ethical Issues ................................................  118 
DATA MEASUREMENT ...................................................................................................  119 
Data Coding and Analysis ....................................................................................................  121 
Reliability and Validity Issues .............................................................................................  125 
CHAPTER V ........................................................................................................................  129 
DATA ANALYSES AND FINDINGS ...............................................................................  129
v 
 
Sample Size and Ownership Characteristics ........................................................................  130 
Reliability Tests for the Level of Religiosity Variables …………………………………..  136 
Diognostic Tests for Determining the Internal 
Consistency of Religiosity Categories .................................................................................  137 
Institutional Characteristics by the Ownership Type ……………………………………...  139 
Reliability Tests for Dependent Variables ………………………………………………...  145 
Reliability Test for Health Inspection Deficiency Variable ……………………………….  145 
Health Inspection Deficiencies by Type of Ownership …………………………………...  147 
Reliability Test for Long-Stay (Chronic Care) Variable ......................................................  149 
Testing Internal Consistency of Long-Stay (Chronic Care) and Short-Stay 
(Post-Acute) Patient Quality Measures ................................................................................  151 
Exclusion Process of Sub-Variables for Internal Consistency of Long-Stay 
(Chronic Care) Patient Quality Care Measure Variable …………………………………..  151 
Reliability Test for Short-Stay (Post-Acute) Patient Quality Care Measures ……………..  153 
Descriptive Statistics for Two Patient Outcome Quality 
Care Measure Variables .......................................................................................................  155 
BIVARIATE CORRELATIONS .........................................................................................  159 
Correlations Between Indepedent Variables ........................................................................  159 
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION ANALYSES ................................................................  164 
Diognastic Tests for Three Regression Modals ...................................................................  164 
Mean Independence .............................................................................................................  164 
Collinearity Assumption …………………………………………………………………..  165 
Homoscedasticity Assumption …………………………………………………………….  167 
Hypothesis Testing for Health Inspection Deficiencies …………………………………...  172 
Hypothesis Testing for Long-Stay Patient Quality Care Measures ….................................  176
vi 
 
Hypothesis Testing for Short-Stay Patient Quality Care Measures ……………………….  179 
Comparing the Findings to the Similar Studies …………………………………………...  183 
CHAPTER VI ……………………………………………………………………………..  185 
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, DISCUSSION 
AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................................................  185 
Summary and Discussion .....................................................................................................  185 
Research Questions and Hypotheses ....................................................................................  187 
The Impact of Interacting Variables ....................................................................................  190 
Approaches to the Analyses and Theory Testing ................................................................  196 
Policy Implications ..............................................................................................................  198 
Limitations of the Study …………………………………………………………………...  203 
Recommendations for Future Studies ……………………………………………………..  205 
References .........................................................................................................................  209 
APPENDICES .....................................................................................................................  239 
APPENDICES A ..................................................................................................................  239 
Survey questionnaire that was prepared for this study …………………………………....  239 
APPENDICES B ..................................................................................................................  242 
Methodology for Constructing the Staring Ratings ……………………………………...  242 
Health Inspection Domain ………………………………………………………………..  242 
Scoring Rules …………………………………………………………………………….  242 
APPENDICES C ..................................................................................................................  246 
Calculation of Organizational Religiosity Scores Based on 
Answers Given to the Related Survey Questions on Four Levels .......................................  246 
APPENDICES D ..................................................................................................................  247 
APPENDICES E ..................................................................................................................  248
vii 
 
APPENDICES F ..................................................................................................................  249 
VITA ....................................................................................................................................  251
viii 
 
LIST OF TABLES 
Table 1: Dependent Variables, Their Definitions and Sources ............................................  103 
Table 2: Independent Variables, Their Definitions, Sources 
and Level of Measurements ………………………………………………………….........  105 
Table 3: Control Variables, Their Definitions, Sources and Level of Measurements …….. 103 
Table 4: Independent Variables and Their Coding ………………………………………..  123 
Table 5: Control Variables and Their Coding ……………………………………………..  124 
Table 6: Number and Percentage of Nursing Homes by Type of Ownership …………….  131 
Table 7: Responses Given to the Survey Questionnaire ......................................................  134 
Table 8: Case Processing Summary for Organizational Religiosity ....................................  137 
Table 9: Reliability Statistics for Organizational Religiosity ..............................................  137 
Table 10:  Case Processing Summary for Staff Religiosity ……………………………….  138 
Table 11: Reliability Statistics for Staff Religiosity ………………………………………. 138 
Table 12: Case Processing Summary for Service Religiosity ……………………………..  138 
Table 13: Reliability Statistics for Service Religiosity ………………………………….… 138 
Table 14: Case Processing Summary for Overall Religiosity Score ……………….……..  139 
Table 15: Reliability Statistics …………………………………………………………….. 139 
  Table 16: Institutional Characteristics of Nursing Homes in 
  Virginia by the Ownership Type …………………………………………………………..  143 
  Table 17: Health Inspection Deficiency Categories by Type of Ownership ……………...  146 
Table 18: Case Processing Summary ……………………………………………………...  146 
Table 19: Reliability Statistics …………………………………………………………….. 146
Description:needs of their community (Printz, 1998; Graddy and Ye, 2006; Gilman, 2002; Modesto, 2006;. Ragen . be tested if it is provable in different settings.