Table Of ContentHOW A POTENTIAL CURE FOR ALS
WAS FOUND IN JUST 2 WEEKS
USING
FREE & PUBLICLY AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
ON THE INTERNET
AND THE “TOP-DOWN”
RESEARCH TECHNIQUE
Jeff T. Bowles
Warning:
This book is not yet really a book, and it is not yet
finished. But my father, a Stanford-educated MD, urged me to get the
word out as soon as possible about my discovery of a hormonal
treatment that should CURE ALS--or at least stop further progression.
He liked the theory so much and believed it was so compelling that
anyone with ALS should learn how two harmless hormones--
melatonin and progesterone, taken in high doses--should CURE or at
least HALT ALS!
In this book, I reveal the big clues and the logic that led to this new
theory, as well as a protocol that has been helping an ALS sufferer to
stop its progression. I am quite sure it will work. I believe it would be
unethical to sit on this potentially life-saving information while
continuing to research and edit this book.
YOU WILL WANT TO BUY THIS
BOOK-IN-PROGRESS IF YOU OR A
LOVED ONE HAS ALS
.
IF YOU JUST HAVE A GENERAL INTEREST IN THE TOPIC,
PLEASE WAIT FOR ANOTHER MONTH OR TWO FOR THE
FINISHED PRODUCT.
If you do jump the gun and buy this unfinished book, I include my
email address at the end, and if you contact me I will send you a
finished version of the book for free when it is done.
Date of this draft- September 15, 2015.
Introduction
I recently published a little e-Book on Amazon.com with a long crazy
title. ”The Miraculous Results of extremely high doses of the
sunshine hormone vitamin D3.”
In it I detailed my year-long experiment taking “dangerously” high
doses of Vitamin D3 and how it dramatically improved my health and
well-being.
In the D3 book I discussed the miracle of the medical database called
Pub Med. This is a database that contains abstracts (abstracts are
basically just short summaries) of all the medical and science
experiments that have been published since 1967. It is kind of like the
Google of studies of diseases and experiments which are generally
correct and devoid of most of the flotsam and jetsam you get from the
unfiltered internet.
I also bragged in that book, that almost anyone could find the cure for
almost any disease with at most 30 days of research using Pub Med,
even without knowing much about science! An outrageous claim! But
I believe it to be true.
After the publication of my Vitamin D3 book I was surprised that it
became kind of a minor best seller in the e-book world. I had included
my email address in the book so readers could tell me things that
happened to them with their own experiments with extremely high
dose Vitamin D3 therapy. I was a bit surprised by some of the
responses. Some said super-high doses cured their asthma, psoriasis,
chronic wounds, and all sorts of things. You can get a feel for the
curative powers of Vitamin D3 by reading the book reviews of the
book at Amazon at the link:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005FCKN2S
One of the readers contacted me and told me she had recently been
diagnosed with ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), also known as
Lou Gehrig’s disease. She was hoping that high dose D3 might be
useful in treating her fatal condition. She told me her doctors told her
she had only about 2 to 4 years left to live!
I told her I would look into it. After an initial peak into the data, what
I found was very depressing. About 90% of ALS victims are dead and
gone in 2 to 4 years. They gradually lose control of their nerves and
suffer from involuntary movements all the time, and eventually the
nerves in their breathing muscles get affected and they often die of
suffocation. Before this happens, doctors often extend their lives a
short time by giving them a tracheotomy--which is cutting a hole in
their throat so they don’t have to try and breathe through their
mouths. Not a nice way to go!
There is only one drug approved by the FDA to treat ALS, called
Riluzole (Rilutek). It only extends their lives about 5 months, and
costs $1,400 a month! What a racket!
Based on the prior boast in my book that a cure for any disease, if it
exists, could be found in 30 days or less of research on Pub Med. I
told her, “Don’t worry, I’ll find you a cure.”
I think she believed me! And I think I believed me! So just like that, I
decided to start reading all 11,200 abstracts in Pub Med that included
a reference to ALS.
To me it just seemed like a big jigsaw puzzle, which my mother had
me work on a lot as a child. Nothing more than a 500 piece puzzle as
a kid--but after years of working them as a child, I eventually came up
with a simple strategy for puzzles, and I developed quite a bit of
enjoyment from seeing the puzzle slowly come together. It was
especially rewarding at the end, when everything was becoming clear
and the pieces were getting easier and easier to put in their proper
places. That was the best part.
Putting in the last puzzle piece was anticlimactic. The best part was
when you were still a bit confused--then all of a sudden, you saw how
everything was supposed to fit together. The Eureka moment!
In retrospect, that’s when I could have quit the puzzle unfinished,
since my brain knew how it could be completed. I didn’t have to go
through the extra motions. Completion of the puzzle was not the
reward--just figuring out how it should be completed was the reward.
But I always finished them just to prove the case that I had figured it
out.
What follows is the step-by-step process that I used to develop a
protocol that I believe will stop ALS in its tracks (and can, I believe,
be used for any disease).
Chapter 1—December 18th, 2012
It was December 18th 2012 when I was first contacted by Denise with
this email:
Hi Jeff!
I am reading your book about D3, love it! I am more hopeful now, thank
you!
I was diagnosed with ALS recently, such a shock because my health is
good, weight is low, have exercised since 4 years old when put in a ballet
class. Cholesterol is low, blood pressure is low, have not had any
sweets/sugar for years, my skin at 63 is line free, my friends all ask if
I found the fountain of youth. Not quite-first Neurologist said I will die in
2 to 4 years.
So what is the problem? One is that I never go out in the sun, had limited
sun exposure for 20 years.
I am on a mission to fight the ALS progression and started seeing an
acupuncturist twice a week, and met with a NaturoPath Practitioner in
October and she has me on Adrenal drops, supplements-C, E, B
and Enzymes.
Only last week she started me on D3-3 drops of 2000 IU so 6000 IUs a
day. Could be because I asked her about Vitamin D supplements recently,
and she said "you don't need that you get it from the sun--"! Glad she
changed her mind.
Do you have any other suggestions for me about getting on the healing
path?
Thank you!
Denise
I started working on the problem at this point, using the Pub Med
database, not working all that hard, and I took a few days off.
On the morning of January 8th I believe I had solved the problem of
finding an extremely promising cure for ALS. A total of 21 days! But
only 14, if you take out my few days off. So I guess it might be true.
Anyone can probably find a cure for any disease using the Pub Med
database with the “top-down” approach, which is basically using
jigsaw puzzle solving logic to complete the puzzle. (Of course I am
assuming that the “cure” I have found will work, but I am pretty
confident, and have been successful at these things before.)
The process of completing a Pub Med disease puzzle is simple and it
depends on a few simple assumptions.
The first assumption is that all the studies needed to find a cure for a
disease have been done and are sitting there in the Pub Med database.
The second assumption is that research scientists are basically like
semi-autistic children who are hyper-focused on their little specialties,
and are churning out excellent puzzle pieces, doing a lot of repetitive
work, and are experts in their small fields specific to their puzzle
pieces. But they don’t often try to look at the bigger picture.
The third assumption is that even without any specific knowledge in
the field, anyone of above- average IQ can start looking at all these
puzzle pieces and try to put them together by looking for patterns and
using common sense in creating questions produced from working
with the puzzle pieces. The questions created keep you on the lookout
for even more telling puzzle pieces.
Acting upon these assumptions, I have come up with what I call the
top-down research technique. It is the opposite of the way most
scientists work.
Most scientists spend years and years on the basics, learning more and
more about more and more specific things. Eventually they find
themselves complete experts on very narrow fields of science. The
bottom-up approach I call it.
The top-down approach is the exact opposite. In the past I had spent
years and years studying all sorts of things related to a problem that I
did not fully understand at a deep level (aging)--but instead I tried to
organize a huge number of small facts to see how they related to each
other.
I studied the top of accumulated knowledge--not the bottom. And I
worked my way down, not up. From this I developed a unified theory
of aging and published my first paper on it in 1998.
What does this mean? It means I was always looking for puzzle pieces
to fill in the picture, and when I came across a puzzle piece that
seemed like it was important but I had no idea what it meant--I then
went down--and did some research to try to understand the basics of
the puzzle piece.
For example, with respect to ALS, I kept seeing IG popping up in
ALS studies. I had only a vague idea of what it meant--so I got on
google and googled “IG” and found this:
Immunoglobulin superfamily
The immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) is a large group of cell surface and
soluble proteins that are involved in the recognition, binding,
or adhesion processes of cells. Molecules are categorized as members of
this superfamily based on shared structural features with immunoglobulins (also
known as antibodies); they all possess a domain known as an immunoglobulin
domain or fold. Members of the IgSF include cell surface antigen receptors, co-
receptors and co-stimulatory molecules of the immune system, molecules
involved in antigen presentation to lymphocytes, cell adhesion molecules,
certain cytokine receptors and intracellular muscle proteins. They are commonly
associated with roles in the immune system. The sperm-specific protein Izumo, a
member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, has also been identified as the only
sperm membrane protein essential for sperm-egg fusion.
Immunoglobulin domains
Proteins of the IgSF possess a structural domain known as an immunoglobulin
(Ig) domain. Ig domains re named after the immunoglobulin molecules. They
contain about 70-110 amino acids and are categorised according to their size and
function.[2] Ig-domains possess a characteristic Ig-fold, which has a sandwich-
like structure formed by two sheets of antiparallel beta strands. Interactions
between hydrophobic amino acids on the inner side of the sandwich and highly
conserved disulfide bonds formed between cysteine residues in the B and F
strands, stabilize the Ig-fold. One end of the Ig domain has a section called
the complementarity determining region that is important for the specificity of
