Table Of Content`````
Registered No. HSE–49/2016. [Price : . 1-25 Paise.
TTTTTHHHHHEEEEE TTTTTEEEEELLLLLAAAAANNNNNGGGGGAAAAANNNNNAAAAA GGGGGAAAAAZZZZZEEEEETTTTTTTTTTEEEEE
PART - I EXTRAORDINARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 24 ] HYDERABAD, TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2016.
NOTIFICATIONS BY HEADS OF DEPARTMENTS Etc.
––––x––––
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES
FINALISATION OF INTEGRATED SENIORITY LIST OF ACTOS OF ZONE-VI FOR THE PANEL YEAR
2009-10 – SHOW CAUSE.
Ref: 1. Show Cause Notice in reference C (DX)/434/2015, dt.23-06-2015 for 2009-10 by the Addl. Commissioner
(CT), O/o the Commissioner (CT), Telangana State.
2. Objections of Smt B.Parijatha, ACTO dt.07-07-2015 of Hyderabad (R) Nodal (CT) Division.
3. Objections of Sri B.Ramkishan Rao, ACTO, O/o CTO, Hydernagar Circle dt.4-7-2015.
4. Objections of S/Sri R.Pandu and N.Venkatesh ACTOs dt.2-7-2015 and dt.6-7-2015, working in the offices
of CTO, Saroornagar Circle and Madhapur Circle, Hyderabad.
5. Objections of Sri K.Bheekya, ACTO O/o DC (CT) Hyderabad (R) Division dt.6-7-2015 and 14-8-2015.
6. Objections of A.UmamaheshwarRao, ACTO, O/o CTO, S.D.Road, Begumpet (CT) Division, dt.6-7-2015.
7. Objections of B.Shyam, DCTO (Manager) O/o the DC (CT) Hyderabad (R) Division dt.19-6-2015.
8. Objections of Smt B. Navarathna, ACTO, O/o CTO, Abids, dt. 6-7-2015.
9. Objections of Sri G. Suresh Kumar, ACTO, O/o DC(CT), Secunderabad Division, dt. 6-7-2015.
10. Objections of Sri Ch. Sudhakar Rao, ACTO, O/o DC(CT), Charminar Division, dt. 6-7-2015.
11. Objections of Sri K. Seetharam, ACTO, O/o CTO, Maredpally, dt. 6-7-2015.
12. Objections of Sri G. Shiva Rao, ACTO, O/o CTO,Srinagar Colony, dt. 1-7-2015.
13. Objections of Sri R. Sridhar, ACTO, O/o CTO, Mahankali Street, dt. 1-7-2015.
14. Objections of Sri P. Pragathi Kumar, ACTO, O/o CTO, Somajiguda, dt. 19-8-2015.
15. Objections of Sri C. Ramkishan, ACTO, O/o DC(CT), Nizamabad and (4) others, dt. 6-7-2015.
16. Objection of Smt T. Indira, ACTO, O/o CTO, Hydernagar, dt. 4-7-2015.
17. TS CCTs Ref. No. C2/1/2014, dt. 5-6-2014.
CCT’s Ref.No.C(DX)/434/2015;- In the reference 1st cited, Show cause notice was issued proposing to finalise
the integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone-VI comprising the Commercial Taxes Nodal Divisions of Secunderabad
and Hyderabad Rural Nodal Divisions for the panel year 2009-10 and invited objections, if any, from the affected
persons.
[1]
G-655/1.
2 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
2. In pursuance of the above show cause notice the certain individuals filed objections in the references 2nd to 16th
cited and their objections are discussed as under:
a) Objections of Smt B.Parijatha, ACTO:-
It is her contention that she belongs to S.C. Community and native of Telangana region. She was originally
selected as ACTO by the APPSC, Hyderabad in the year 2007 under Direct Recruitment quota and allotted to the Unit
of Appointment of DC (CT) Guntur Nodal Division in Zone-III, where she joined on 22-10-2007. Subsequently,
through the orders of the Government G.O.Rt.No.599 Rev.(CT-I) Dept., Dt.22-4-2010, she was transferred to the
Unit of Appointment of DC (CT) Hyderabad (R) Nodal Division in Zone-IV under mutual transfer with Smt K.Sujatha,
ACTO of Zone-VI. As such, she has requested for seniority in the cadre of ACTO in the panel year 2007-08 instead
of in the panel year 2009-10 at Sl.No.81. In support of this view, she relied on the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme
Court in C.A.No.4662/2007 dtd.28-7-2011 and C.A.No.4455/2008 dtd.16-7-2008 by contending that as per rule 33
(B) of State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, all the Direct Recruits ACTOs should be given placement in the
seniority list of ACTOs enbloc with reference to merit based on marks of the selection authority and the orders of the
Government in G.O.Ms.No.960 Rev (CT-I) Dept., Dt.10-9-2009 and the orders of the DC (CT) Guntur Nodal
Division dt.31-1-2013 in which Smt K.Sujatha was transrferred to Zone-III from Zone-VI on mutual basis with her
was given seniority in the panel year 2007-08 in Zone-III.
The individual has requested for inclusion in the panel year 2007-08 in Zone-VI.
Reply to the objection:
The above contention of Smt.B.Parijatha has been examined with reference to rule 34 of the State and Subordinate
Service Rules, 1996 and G.O.Ms.No.599 Rev. (CT-I) Dept., Dt.22-4-2010. The rule 34 envisages that where as
integrated or common seniority list of a particular class, or category or grade in any service belonging to different
units of appointment has to be prepared for the purpose of promotion or appointment by transfer to a class or category
having different units of appointment or for any other purpose, such an integrated or common seniority list shall be
prepared with reference to the provision of sub-rule (a) of rule 33, provided that the seniority list of the persons inter-
se belonging to the same units shall not be disturbed. This would mean that the integrated seniority list should be
based on the seniority list of the respective units of appointment, in this case it is Hyderabad (R) Nodal (CT) Division
under Zone-VI. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) of this nodal division has included her name only in the panel year
/ seniority list of the year 2009-10. Therefore, her name is rightly proposed in the panel year 2009-10 in the integrated
seniority list of Zone-VI, in terms of rule 34 of the State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996, read with Government
order referred to above. As such, she cannot be placed in the panel year 2007-08.
The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court taken support by her, has no application in this case. In the
judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court the issue that came up for consideration was whether a seniority between Direct
Recruits should be with reference to selection at roster point or as per the merit with reference to marks. The Hon’ble
Supreme Court answered the issue that seniority between the Direct Recruits of the same batch should be with
reference to marks. As Smt. B.Parijatha, DR ACTO was initially selected and appointed as ACTO in Zone-III and
subsequently on mutual transfer to Zone-VI through the above G.O, has to take last rank below the last regular
candidate in the new unit in Zone-VI. Her joining in Zone VI would fall in the panel year 2009-10.
The name of the individual was placed at Sl. No. 81 in the proposed integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone
VI (show cause notice dated 23-6-2015) based on the seniority list of ACTOs of Hyderabad (Rural) Nodal Division
finalised vide Proc.No.E1/166/2012, dt. 1-4-2015.
Further, the individual filed representation before the Government with similar request, the issue is pending
with Government. After receipt of Government orders, necessary action will be taken accordingly.
Therefore, her objections are devoid of merits and over ruled.
b) Objection of Sri G. Shiva Rao, ACTO:-
The individual has stated that he belongs to SC community. He further stated that in the proposed integrated
seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI, dated 23-6-2015, his name is placed at Sl.No.71 and there is no mention regarding
his community against his name. The individual requested to mention as SC against his name during finalization of
the integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI.
Reply to the objection:
The above objection has been examined with reference to seniority list of ACTOs of Secundernabad Nodal
Division finalized vide Rc. No. A2/14/2012, dt. 14-5-2015 and records, his name was placed at against 41 SC roster
point in the said list. Therefore, his request is considered.
January 12, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 3
c) Objection of Sri R. Sridhar, ACTO:-
The individual has stated that he belongs to SC community. He further stated that in the proposed integrated
seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI dated 23-6-2015, his name is placed at Sl. No. 86 and there is no mention
regarding his community against his name. The individual requested to mention as SC against his name during
finalization of the integration seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI.
Reply to the objection:
The above objection has been examined with reference to seniority list of ACTOs of Secunderabad Nodal
Division finalized vide Rc. No. A2/14/2012, dated 14-5-2015 and records, his name was placed against 52 SC roster
point in the said list. Therefore, his request is considered.
d) Objection of Sri P. Pragathi Kumar, ACTO:-
The individual has stated that he belongs to SC community and appointed through APPSC Group-II in the year
2009 under SC category. He further stated that in the proposed integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI dated
23-6-2015, his name is placed at Sl. No. 34 and there is no mention regarding his community against his name. The
individual requested to mention as SC against his name in the integrated seniority list.
Reply to the objection:
The above objection has been examined with reference to merit list communicated by APPSC and found that he
was appointed against SC roster point. Therefore, the objection of the individual is considered.
e) Objections of Sri A.Uma Maheshwar Rao and Sri Ch. Sudhakar Rao and Sri K. Seetha Ram, Smt B.
Navarathna, and Sri G. Suresh Kumar, ACTOs:-
The above individuals have filed common objections as detailed below:
1. They have stated that they objected for their placements in the seniority list of Secunderbad Nodal Division
finalised vide ref. dated 14-5-2015 and placing of DR’s “ENMASSE” and non inter-spersing of Rank
Promotees and DR’s as per Rule 3 of AP State Commercial Tax Subordinate Service Rules. The
Dy.Commissioner(CT) has finalized the seniority contrary to Special Rule as well as Rule 4 of AP State and
Subordinate Service Rules.
2. They stated that in the circumstances as no alternative is left they have appealed to the esteemed Commissioner
vide letter dated 23-5-2015 as per Rule 23 of AP State & Subordinate Service Rules as an Appellate
Authority. In the mean while when they have made a representation to the Government for issuing clarification
of interpretation of Rules, before issuing of final seniority list, the Government vide Memo dated 11-06-
2015 issued clarification for finalizing the Seniority list but by the time the said memo was issued the
seniority list was already finalized and this issue they brought to the notice of benign Commissioner in their
representation. But no Orders were passed on their appeal.
3. They stated that the Additional Commissioner (CT) issued a show cause notice on 23-06-2015 for integration
of seniority list of Hyderabad Rural and Secunderabad Nodal Division. Then they have made another
representation to Government vide letter dated 26-6-2015. The Government issued clear clarification which
is in un mincing words clearly explained how to follow the rules while fixing seniority in the cadre of ACTO
referring to Rule 3 of Special Rules as well as Rule 4 of AP State and Subordinate Service Rules.
Finally they requested to consider the (2) Government Memos dated 11-6-2015 and 29-6-2015 and set aside the
final seniority list of ACTOs of Secunderabad Nodal Division and direct the Dy.Commissioner (CT), Secunderabad
Nodal Division to finalise the seniority list ACTOs in true and strict conformity with Government Memo’s dated
11-6-2015 and 29-6-2015 and requested to direct the Addl.Commissioner(CT) not to proceed with the integration of
seniority list of Secunderabad and Hyderabad Rural Nodal Divisions as per the show cause notice dated 23-6-2015.
Reply to the objections:
The Deputy Commissioners (CT), Hyderabad Rural and Secunderabad Nodal Divisions vide their letters
dated 19-6-2015 and 3-7-2015 respectively have informed that they have followed instructions issued by the Government
from time to time while finalizing the seniority list of ACTOs from 2009-10 to 2012-13.
Further, certain appeal petitions are filed against the said finalised seniority lists of Hyderabad (Rural) and
Secunderabad Nodal Divisions. This office has proceeded with the work of integration of the seniority lists of ACTOs
4 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
for the panel year 2009-10, with an assumption that the appeals filed by the individuals are prima facie legally and
factually incorrect, pending disposal of the appeals.
Later, the Government have also withdrawn their instructions issued in Memo dated 29-6-2015 vide Government
Memo 7-8-2015.
The appeals filed by certain individuals were disposed of by the Commissioner (CT) separately on 9-12-2015,
as per the directions of the Hon’ble APAT dated 19-11-2015 in O.A. No. 4820 of 2015, O.A. No. 4581/2015 with
C.A. No. 736/2015 and VMA No. 1021/2015, VMA No. 1159/2015 and O.A. No. 4882/2015.
Therefore, the objections filed by the above individuals are not sustainable and over-ruled.
f) Objections of Sri B.Shyam, DCTO:-
It is his contention Sri B.Shyam has stated that against the seniority list / panels of the ACTOs for the years,
2009-10 to 2012-13, as finalised by the Appointing Authority i.e., Deputy Commissioner (CT) Hyderabad (R) Division,
he filed an appeal and without disposing his appeal, issuing of the present integrated show cause notice to finalise the
integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone-VI for a fraction period 2009-10 is incorrect and without proper examination.
It is his second contention that placing all the Direct Recruits numbering of 2009 batch enbloc in the integrated show
cause notice of ACTOs is contrary to clarificatory instructions of Government in Memo No.5683/CT.I/2014, Rev
(CT.I) Dept., dated 29-6-2015. It is his third contention that all upgraded 114 posts of ACTOs in G.O.Ms.No.201
Finance (SMPC) Dept., dated 24-5-2005 shall be earmarked to the Rank Promotees in the year 2005 itself as those
posts being temporary in nature and no apportionment should be made to the Direct Recruits. Though, initially these
posts apportioned to Rank Promotees but subsequently a part of these posts also apportioned to the Direct Recruits,
which is contrary to rule 4 (b) of the State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996.
Reply to the objection:
The above objections have been carefully examined with reference to relevant records. The individual was
already included in the panel year 2008-09 in the integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone-VI dated 27-09-2012.
Pursuant to this inclusion, he was already promoted as Deputy Commercial Tax Officer in Zone-VI. As such, he has
no locus-standi to raise the above objections for the integrated seniority list of the panel years 2009-10.
Accordingly his objections are over-ruled.
g) Objections of Sri B.Ramakishan Rao, ACTO, Sri C. Ramkishan, ACTO and (4) others, Smt T. Indira,
ACTO and Sri K. Bheekya, ACTO:-
The main contentions of the individuals are against the seniority list / panels of the ACTOs for the years, 2009-
10 to 2012-13, as finalised by the Appointing Authority i.e., Deputy Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad (R) Division,
they filed appeals and without disposing appeals, issuing of the present integrated show cause notice to finalize the
integrated seniority list of ACTOs of Zone-VI for the period 2009-10 is incorrect and without proper examination.
The second contention that placing all the Direct Recruits of 2009 batch enbloc in the integrated show cause notice of
ACTOs is contrary to clarificatory instructions of Government in Memo No.5683/CT.I/2014, Rev (CT.I) Dept.,
dated 29-6-2015. The third contention that all upgraded 114 posts of ACTOs in G.O.Ms.No.201 Finance (SMPC)
Dept., dt .24-5-2005 shall be earmarked to the Rank Promotees in the year 2005 itself as those posts being temporary
in nature and no apportionment should be made to the Direct Recruits. Though, initially these posts apportioned to
Rank Promotees but subsequently a part of these posts also apportioned to the Direct Recruits, which is contrary to
rule 4 (b) of the A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996.
Reply to the objections:
The above objections have been examined with reference to relevant records, Commercial Taxes Subordinate
Service Rules, 1990 and the case law thereon. The appeals of the appellant Sri B.Ramakishan Rao, ACTO, O/o
Hydernagar Circle and others against the seniority list finalised by the Dy.Commissioner (CT) Hyderabad (R) Nodal
Division on 1-4-2015 were dismissed by the Commissioner(CT) on 09-12-2015 giving a speaking order on merits of
their appeals. Further, the orders of the Government in Memo No.5683/CT.I/2014, Rev (CT.I) Dept., dated 29-6-
2015 were subsequently withdrawn by the Government on 7-8-2015. Therefore, the appellants cannot place reliance
on the memo dated 29-6-2015 and seek relief of their seniority in the cadre of ACTO in the panel year 2009-10 above
DRs. All the Direct Recruits numbering 50 would get their seniority with reference to rule 33 (a) & (b) read with rule
36 (1) of the State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 vis-à-vis merit ranking list furnished by the Public Service
Commission. All the Direct Recruits were appointed against the substantive carried forward vacancies that arose at
cycle points 1,4,6 of the earlier years in Ten Point Cycle as prescribed in the Commercial Taxes Subordinate Service
Rules, 1990. Placing all the Direct Recruits enbloc in the seniority list of ACTOs of the panel year 2009-10 of Zone-
January 12, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 5
VI is in-consonance with the various judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, especially the judgment in Civil
Appeal Nos. 7514-7515 of 2005 dated 27-11-2012, in which it was observed that Direct Recruits appointed against
carry forward vacancies should be placed enbloc in the seniority list. The inter-se-seniority between rank promotees
and the Direct Recruits was also dealt by the Hon’ble Tribunal in OA.No.6022 of 2001 and batch dated 22-7-2003
and in OA.No.5058/2004 dated 11-8-2009, answering the issue in favour of Direct Recruits following earlier judgments
of the Hon’ble High Court and Hon’ble Supreme Court. In fact, Government while finalising the seniority of the
CTOs in G.O.Ms.No.1661, Revenue (CT-I) Dept., Dt.25-8-2011, placed all the Direct Recruit CTOs enbloc in
respective panels / Seniority lists with reference to merit list of the Public Service Commission and the Addl.
Commissioner (CT) also followed the same procedure in his orders dated 27-9-2012 in CCT’s Ref. No.DX2/395/
2011 while revising the seniority of ACTOs for the years 2000-01 to 2008-09.
With regard to their third contention, the Government vide its G.O. Ms. No. 201 read with G.O. Ms. No. 561,
dated 13-3-2006 have sanctioned various CTO, DCTO and 114 ACTO posts. Out of these 114 ACTO posts, (26)
posts were allotted to Zone VI and (20) posts are allotted to Hyderabad Rural Division and (6) posts are allotted to
Secunderabad nodal Division and accordingly these posts.
Further, while finalizing the revised seniority list of ACTOs of Zone VI for the panel years 2000-01 to 2008-
09, the incumbents have filed similar objections before the Additional Commissioner (CT) and these objections were
examined in detail and rejected vide CCTs Ref. No. DX2/395/2011-Zone VI, dated 27-9-2012, with the following
observations:
“ Though 26 posts (20 for Hyderabad (Rural) and 6 for Secunderabad nodal divisions) were sanctioned during
2005-06, at that time they were temporary, but now after lapse of 7 years all these vacancies have been substantive,
hence apportioned to DRs also according to their quota. Even assuming that all temporary vacancies have to be filled
with RPs initially, they shall not be entitled to count for seniority from that panel year without any substantive
vacancy and in view of principles laid down by the Hon’ble APAT in O.A. No. 6022/2001 & batch and as modified
in O.A.No 5058/2004 and batch dtd. 11-8-2009”.
Therefore, 114 upgraded ACTO posts in G.O.M.No.201 Finance (SMPC) Dept., dated 24-5-2005, these posts
were temporary initially but after lapse of time of more than 7 years, all these vacancies became substantive and
therefore apportioned to Direct Recruits as per their quota. Even assuming all that temporary vacancies had to be
filled up with Rank Promotees initially, they would not be entitled for seniority from that panel year of 2005-06
without there being any substantive vacancy. Seniority will be determined under rule 33 (a) only with reference to
appointment to a substantive vacancy as per the judgments of the Hon’ble Tribunal in OAs.6022/2001 and batch
dated 22-7-2003 and 5058/2004 and batch dated 11-8-2009.
Sri K. Bheekya, ACTO and others were personally heard on 8 -12-2015, as requested by them. Sri Bheekya,
Sri B.Shyam, Sri B. Ramakishan Rao and others were present during the personal hearing. They reiterated their
contentions put forth in their written objections to the proposed integrated seniority. During personal hearing they
particularly demanded that the clarification issued by Government in Memo No. 3226/CT.1/2014, Revenue (CT.I)
Department, dtd. 26-05-2015 be implemented in favour of them by withdrawing the upgraded ACTO posts allotted to
DRs.
Sri K. Bheekya, also reiterated his objections against the Roster points adopted the Dy.Commissioner(CT),
Hyderabad(Rural) Division while finalizing the seniority.
The contentions put forth by Sri K. Bheekya and others are examined with reference to the relevant records and
Government clarification dated 26-5-2015. The Government in the said Memo while reiterating its earlier clarification
have directed to take necessary action keeping in view of Rule 4(b)(i) of APS & SS Rules.
In this connection it is informed that the Addl.Commissioner(CT), while revising the seniority of ACTOs from
2000-2001 to 2008-09, has already followed the Rule 4(b)(i) of APS & SS Rules and the Judgements of judiciary in
this regard and accordingly apportioned the vacancies among RPs and DR ACTOs.
The objection of Sri Bheekya and Smt T. Indira, ACTOs with regard to Roster points is examined at paras
below.
Therefore, all the above objections / contentions of the individuals are unsustainable and are over-ruled.
h) Common objections of S/Sri R.Pandu and N.Venkatesh ACTOs:-
It is their contention that they were selected as Direct Recruit ACTOs under S.T.quota and appointed as
ACTOs in the Unit of Appointment of Hyderabad (R) Nodal (CT) Division on 7-11-2009 and 9-11-2009. The Dy.
6 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad (R) Division being the appointing authority assigned seniority in the cadre of ACTO
at Sl.Nos.24 and 26 in the panel year of ACTOs of 2009-10. Where as the name of Sri K.Bheekya, ACTO, a Rank
Promotee S.T. candidate was placed at Sl.No.41 in the same seniority list. However, in the integrated show cause
notice issued in the reference dated 23-6-2015 cited, his name is shown at Sl.No.6 above them. It is their plea that a
person who is shown junior to them in the cadre of ACTO in the seniority list of Unit of Appointment cannot be shown
as senior to them in the integrated seniority list which is contrary to Govt. Circular Memo.No.16/Ser.A/93-39 dtd.21-
04-1999. It is also their contention that they would get seniority in the cadre of ACTO from the date of their joining
on 7-11-2009 and 9-11-2009 under rule 33 (a) of State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1990 against their substantive
vacancies which were much earlier to the date of arising of substantive vacancy on 5-8-2010 for Sri K.Bheekya,
ACTO.
As such, they requested for deleting the name of Sri K.Bheekya above their names and to place his name below
their names.
Reply to the objections:
The name of Sri K. Bheekya, ACTO was placed at Sl. No. 6 in the proposed integrated seniority list dated 23-
6-2015 as per para No. 8.
Sri K. Bheekya, ACTO, working in the office of the Dy.Commissioner(CT), Hyderabad Rural Division and
Smt T. Indira, ACTO, working in the office of the CTO, Hydernagar Circle are also disputing the roster points in
seniority list/panels of ACTOs of Hyderabad Rural Division.
The above objections of both DR ACTOs and Sri K. Bheekya and Smt.T.Indira, Rank Promotee ACTOs have
been examined together with reference to the integrated revised seniority list of ACTOs revised by the then Additional
Commissioner (CT) on 27-09-2012 for the years 2000-01 to 2008-09 in respect of Zone-VI, nowhere, the roster
points were mentioned so as to prove the contention of the above two rank promotee ACTOs that the last roster point
ended during the panel year 2008-09 was at 53.
Further, the Dy.Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad (R) Nodal Division being the Appointing Authority in respect
of ACTOs of his nodal division, he would be maintaining roster points and basing on this he would be finalising
seniority lists of ACTOs. As seen from the seniority list finalised by the Dy.Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad (R)
Nodal Division dated 1-4-2015, the last roster point ended was 59 (OC) during the panel year 2008-09 and the panel
year 2009-10 would commence with roster point 60 (OC).
While finalizing the seniority list of ACTOs of Hyderabad Rural Nodal Division dated 1-4-2015, the similar
objection of the individuals was examined in detailed and rejected by the Dy.Commissioner(CT), Hyderabad(Rural)
Division as it is not tenable.
In view of the above, the contentions raised by Sri K. Bheekya and Smt.T. Indira are rejected as they are not
tenable. Further, the objections raised by Sri R. Pandu and Sri N. Venkatesh, DR ACTOs against placement of name
of Sri K.Bheekya, ACTO, at Sl.No.6 in the proposed integrated seniority list are examined and found tenable. Hence
their contentions are allowed.
In view of the above, the name of Sri K. Bheekya, ACTO is deleted from Sl. No. 6 in the integrated seniority list
proposed vide CCTs Ref. No. C(DX)/434/2015, dated 23-6-2015 and placed at appropriate place in the same integrated
seniority list basing on the seniority assigned to him by the Dy.Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad(R) Division.
It is to state that the Commissioner (CT), Hyderabad vide reference 17th cited has delegated the powers to the
Additional Commissioner (CT), with regard to service matters of ACTOs.
Accordingly, orders are passed finalizing the integrated seniority list of ACTO’s of the panel year 2009-10 of
Zone VI as per the Annexure appended to this order.
The finalization of above integrated seniority list is subject to the outcome of SLPs/WPs/OAs pending if any,
before the Hon’ble Courts and disposal of appeals/ revisions pending before the competent authority.
A copy of this order is available on the internet and can be accessed at the address www.tgct.gov.in.
Encl: Annexure.
January 12, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 7
ANNEXURE
INTEGRATED SENIORITY LIST OF ACTOS OF HYDERABAD (RURAL) AND SECUNDERABAD
NODAL DIVISIONS for the panel year 2009-10
(Annexure to CCTs Ref. No. C(DX)/434/2015, dt. 11-12-2015)
Sl.No. Panel YearName of the Individual Date of Birth Nodal Divn Remarks
1 carried
forward A.Narendra Kumar 15-08-1955 Hyd Retired
vacancy
2 carried
forward B.Naga Balaram 14-08-1961 Hyd
vacancy
3 carried
forward B.Vijayasagar Babu(SC) 27-05-1970 Hyd
vacancy
4 2009-10 S.Rameswaraiah 29-08-1959 Hyd
5 2009-10 S.Santosham 06-06-1954 Hyd Retired
6 2009-10 R.V.V.Satyanarayana 12-06-1957 Sec
7 2009-10 T.Viijaya Bhaskar Reddy (DR) (375) 24-07-1981 Hyd
8 2009-10 V.Nagaraju, (DR) (375) 1-3-1982 Sec
9 2009-10 S.Anil Reddy (DR) (375) 24-04-1986 Hyd
10 2009-10 A.Krishna Vardhan Reddy (DR) (374) 15-08-1974 Hyd
11 2009-10 D.Karunakar Reddy (DR) (374) 14-8-1978 Sec
12 2009-10 D.Sridhar Reddy (DR) (373) 10-10-1978 Sec
13 2009-10 P.Srimannarayana (DR) (373) 25-03-1982 Hyd
14 2009-10 D.Srinivas Reddy (DR) (372) 20-3-1981 Sec
15 2009-10 P.Venkata Narasimha Reddy, (DR) (371) 6-1-1967 Sec
16 2009-10 M.Krishna (DR) (371) 15-8-1972 Sec
17 2009-10 B.Krishna Mohan Reddy (DR) (371) 19-1-1976 Sec
18 2009-10 B.Raju (DR) (371) 26-06-1981 Hyd
19 2009-10 P.Krishna Reddy (DR) (370) 08-12-1971 Hyd
20 2009-10 A.Janaki Ramulu (DR) (370) 05-06-1975 Hyd
21 2009-10 Balla Srinivas (DR) ( 370) 14-03-1978 Hyd
22 2009-10 A.Narendar Goud (DR) (368) 10-01-1976 Hyd
23 2009-10 Kappal Murahari (DR) (368) 15-05-1977 Hyd
24 2009-10 S.Upendar (DR) (368) 20-06-1982 Hyd
25 2009-10 Kundella Satyanarayana (DR) (367) 10-08-1978 Hyd
26 2009-10 A.Bhagavanthu,(DR) (365) 13-2-1973 Sec
27 2009-10 B.Lingaiah (DR) (365) 2-4-1981 Sec
28 2009-10 D.Kishan Prasad (DR) (364) 09-06-1970 Hyd Probation
Not
Declared
due to
disciplinary
case
29 2009-10 M.Bindu Madhavi (DR) (361) DR 4-7-1978 Sec
8 TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY [Part-I
Sl.No. Panel Year Name of the Individual Date of Birth Nodal Divn Remarks
30 2009-10 V.Chandramouli (DR) (360) 10-6-1977 Sec
31 2009-10 Ch.Hanumandlu (DR) (359) 5-6-1979 Sec Selected as
CTO
32 2009-10 Rairala Veerababu(SC) (DR) (355) 13-07-1979 Hyd
33 2009-10 Palapati Pragathikumar (SC) (DR) (354) 17-8-1977 Sec
34 2009-10 Tirupalli Vijaya (DR) (354) 10-08-1980 Hyd
35 2009-10 A.Vani (DR) (353) 3-4-1973 Sec
36 2009-10 V.Indira (DR) (353) 5-7-1973 Sec
37 2009-10 Suresh (SC) (DR) (353) 29-02-1977 Hyd
38 2009-10 Adirala Balaiah (SC) (DR) (351) 14-03-1979 Hyd
39 2009-10 Patel Malathi (DR) (351) 09-03-1982 Hyd
40 2009-10 Ch.Nageswari (DR) (351) 3-2-1983 Sec
41 2009-10 Ralhvath Pandu (ST) (DR) (351) 07-05-1983 Hyd
42 2009-10 Balemula Yadagiri(SC) (DR) (350) 13-08-1968 Hyd
43 2009-10 Nenavath Venkatesh (ST) (DR) (350) 12-06-1978 Hyd
44 2009-10 A.Rajyalakshmi,(DR) (347) 18-9-1981 Sec
45 2009-10 B.Sushmitha (DR) (346) 15-5-1985 Sec
46 2009-10 Shaik Fayazuddin (DR)(345) 20-07-1980 Hyd Selected to
Group-I and
relieved
47 2009-10 V.Chandrakala (DR) (345) 15-6-1983 Sec
48 2009-10 Donda Swetha (DR) (344) 07-06-1981 Hyd
49 2009-10 I.Soujanya Naidu (DR) (344) 10-5-1984 Sec
50 2009-10 Mohd.Moosa (DR) (341) 08-07-1970 Hyd
51 2009-10 J.Prashanthi (DR) (333) 26-5-1979 Sec
52 2009-10 P.Sukanya, (DR) (333) 22-3-1982 Sec
53 2009-10 N.Sujatha, (SC) (DR) (316) 4-12-1975 Sec
54 2009-10 B.Aruna Bai (ST) (DR) (316) 27-9-1980 Sec
55 2009-10 Y.Sulochana,(SC) (DR) (311) 12-5-1976 Sec
56 2009-10 K.Venkata Rao 15-08-1958 Hyd
57 2009-10 Shanaz Moin Sec Retired
58 2009-10 T.Indira (SC) 05-04-1968 Hyd
59 2009-10 P.Venkat Rao 01-08-1952 Hyd Retired
60 2009-10 M.Shanker Reddy 19-09-1955 Sec Retired
61 2009-10 J.V.Subrahmanyam 21-09-1958 Sec
62 2009-10 C.Rama Kishan 22-04-1959 Hyd
63 2009-10 R.Kishan 15-10-1957 Hyd
64 2009-10 Heera Lal 12-06-1953 Sec Retired
65 2009-10 B.Anand 21-08-1954 Sec Retired
66 2009-10 C.Krishna 15-03-1959 Sec
67 2009-10 M.Nirmala 14-01-1956 Sec Retired
January 12, 2016] TELANGANA GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY 9
Sl.No. Panel Year Name of the Individual Date of Birth Nodal Divn Remarks
68 2009-10 B.Ramkishan Rao 12-10-1960 Hyd
69 2009-10 S.Sailoo 20-04-1958 Hyd
70 2009-10 G.Shiva Rao (SC) 13-02-1961 Sec
71 2009-10 P.Muralimohan Rao 03-03-1953 Sec Retired
72 2009-10 G.Gopala Krishna 14-11-1956 Sec Retired
73 2009-10 P.Hanumanth Rao 10-10-1953 Sec Retired
74 2009-10 G.Vijaya Seshu Naidu 07-05-1953 Sec Retired
75 2009-10 C.Sudershan 01-07-1955 Sec Retired
76 2009-10 G.S.V.Vijayamani 23-09-1953 Sec Retired
77 2009-10 M.V.Sai Prasad 03-06-1960 Sec
78 2009-10 M.B.Ramulu (SC) 07-10-1955 Hyd Retired
79 2009-10 A.Venkata Rama Rao 04-06-1957 Hyd
80 DR B.Parijatha (SC) (DR) (SPF) 16-09-1973 Hyd
81 2009-10 A.Pentaiah 17-08-1956 Hyd Retired
82 2009-10 G.S.Edwin Moses (PH-OH) 05-02-1962 Sec
83 2009-10 Ch.Sudhakara Rao 02-07-1961 Sec
84 2009-10 J.Veeranna 10-05-1956 Sec Retired
85 2009-10 R.Sridhar (SC) 19-09-1961 Sec
86 2009-10 B.Nava Ratna 03-03-1959 Sec
87 2009-10 A.Uma Maheswara Rao 21-12-1960 Sec
88 2009-10 N.Nehru charan (ST) 03-03-1977 Sec
89 2009-10 K.Bheekya (ST) 10-10-1979 Hyd ACB trap is
case is
pending
90 2009-10 M.Bhushan 17-09-1956 Hyd Retired
Hyd = Hyderabad (Rural) Nodal Division Sec = Secunderabad Nodal Division
K. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY,
Additional Commissioner (CT) I/c.
–––x–––
Printed and Published by the Commissioner of Printing, Government of Telangana at Government Central Press, Chanchalguda, Hyderabad.
G-655/2.
