Table Of ContentSuicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Level 3, 192 Ann Street 
Brisbane QLD 4000 
 
Ph: (07) 3331 9124 
Fax: (07) 3331 9180 
 
 
www.slatergordon.com.au 
 
Correspondence to: 
   
7 October 2016  Brian Briggs 
  Practice Group Leader 
Military Compensation 
 
 
Senator the Hon. Alex Gallacher 
GPO Box 2487 
Chair of the Senate Foreign Affairs  BRISBANE QLD 4001 
Defence and Trade References Committee   
DX 213 BRISBANE 
C/- Parliament House  
CANBERRA, ACT 2600 
 
 
Dear Senator Gallacher 
 
Re: Inquiry – Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Introduction 
Thank you for your letter dated 8 September 2016 and the invitation to comment on the 
issues of suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel.  
Relevant Legal Background 
I  am  a  legal  practitioner  admitted  in  1987  and  a  Queensland  Law  Society  Accredited 
Specialist in Personal Injury Law. I have specialised exclusively in Military Compensation 
claims under the three compensation schemes, including the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 
1986 (Cth) (VEA), the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (SRCA), and 
the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (Cth) (MRCA) since 2008. 
Military Compensation Matters 
The Military Compensation Group at Slater and Gordon Lawyers (Slater and Gordon) is 
acknowledged  as  the  largest  legal  practice  in  Australia  acting  on  behalf  of  Australian 
Defence  Force  (ADF)  personnel  and  Veterans.  Slater  and  Gordon  has  assisted  or 
represented numerous individuals and organisations in reviews of military compensation, 
Veterans’  entitlements and  Comcare  schemes,  and  in  Senate  Committee  and  Defence 
inquiries. We have strongly advocated for the improvement of safety, benefits and services 
to injured Veterans and other defence personnel.  
Our success in Federal Court and High Court appeals is a testament to our commitment to 
achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients. We are able to offer legal services to 
Registered Members in relation to Australian Military Compensation Claims.  
In my official role as National Military Compensation Expert and Practice Group Leader at 
Slater and Gordon, I also have a variety of connections with the wider defence community 
and am a close associate of many RSL Advocates and members of a variety of Ex-Service 
  1
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Organisations. I also have close ties with other stakeholders who share an interest in the 
welfare of our defence personnel.  
In making this submission to the current inquiry, I intend to draw on and refer to some of our 
previous work in this area, including recent submissions to the Inquiry into Mental Health of 
Australian Defence Force Members and Veterans (Mental Health Inquiry), the Veterans’ 
Affairs Legislation Amendment Bill and the Review of Military Compensation Arrangements 
conducted in 2009. Due to our strong history of advocacy in this area, some of the following 
submissions may strike the Committee as familiar; the fact is that many of the concerns we 
have previously raised over a number of years remain issues today.  
We  are  fortunate  that  the  size  of  Slater  and  Gordon  enables  us  to  provide  specialist 
expertise in this area and provide legal services for vulnerable members of the community 
who  might  not  have  otherwise  had  access  to  justice.  My  team  represents  Veterans, 
members, ex-members and their families on a daily basis. We are at the coal face and have 
witnessed the devastation of those left behind when our military personnel take their own 
lives.  
Many of our clients spend significant amounts of their time having to negotiate the minefield 
of the various pieces of legislation and how each affects their claims. My team members are 
also seriously affected when a client takes their own life. Given that there are no official 
publicly available statistics, I cannot give exact numbers of how many Veterans and ex-
service personnel commit suicide each year – however  even one life lost is one too many. 
Many of our clients are simply worn down by the system.  
One of the concerns we have had for a long time is that the process is overly complex and a 
bureaucratic  nightmare  that  results  in  huge  delays.  For  legislation  that  is  supposedly 
beneficial, it, in my opinion, actually compounds the issues experienced by my clients who 
suffer  from  serious  mental  health  problems.  Unfortunately,  the  whole  process  and  the 
system itself too frequently lead to suicides, marital and family breakdowns and self-harm. 
My team must frequently deal with clients who are extremely psychologically disturbed and 
crying out for assistance. Many feel guilty about simply making a claim or being a burden on 
the country they have served.  
It is well-known that there is a mentality in the military that you serve your country, you fight 
for your mates and you do your utmost as a soldier without wanting to be seen as a whinger 
or a malingerer. As a result, many injuries, conditions and diseases are not reported and 
nothing appears in the military records. The reluctance of the Department of Veterans’ 
Affairs (DVA) to accept claims in the absence of contemporaneous records is of serious 
concern.  
For those of the Committee who are not familiar with the plight of our Veterans and ex-
service  personnel,  this  submission  will  attempt  to  cast  light  on  why  our  Veterans  are 
committing suicide at such high rates.    
  2
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Table of Contents 
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 
Relevant Legal Background ............................................................................................... 1 
Military Compensation Matters .......................................................................................... 1 
Our Submissions ................................................................................................................... 6 
(a) The reasons why Australian Veterans are committing suicide at such high rates ......... 6 
Extent of the problem ..................................................................................................... 6 
Causes .......................................................................................................................... 8 
Problems with DVA Processing ...................................................................................... 9 
The “Transition and Wellbeing Research Programme” ................................................. 10 
Annual Screening ......................................................................................................... 11 
Mental Health Evaluation and Counselling Services available ...................................... 12 
Case studies from PTSD Inquiry .................................................................................. 12 
USA and the UK........................................................................................................... 13 
Australia ....................................................................................................................... 15 
The adequacy of mental health and support services provided by DVA ....................... 16 
Chaotic claims management by DVA ........................................................................... 17 
The approach in the UK ............................................................................................... 19 
Identification and disclosure policies of the ADF in relation to mental ill-health matters 20 
The view of a Veteran .................................................................................................. 20 
Encouraging reporting of mental health problems ........................................................ 20 
(b) Previous reviews of military compensation arrangements and their failings ................ 21 
Recommendation 8 ...................................................................................................... 21 
Recommendation 9 ...................................................................................................... 21 
Recommendation 10 .................................................................................................... 22 
The 2003 Inquiry .......................................................................................................... 22 
The 2013 APSC Capability Review .............................................................................. 23 
(c) The Repatriation Medical Authority’s Statements of Principles, claims administration 
time limits, claims for detriment caused by defective administration, authorised medical 
treatment, level of compensation payments, including defence abuse, as contained in all 
military compensation arrangements ............................................................................... 23 
1. RMA’s Statement of Principles ................................................................................. 23 
2. Claims Administration Time limits ............................................................................. 25 
3. Examples of unreasonable delays and their consequences ..................................... 26 
4. Claims for detriment caused by defective administration .......................................... 27 
5. Authorised medical treatment ................................................................................... 27 
  3
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
6. Level of compensation payments in all military compensation arrangements (including 
defence abuse) ............................................................................................................ 27 
(d) To investigate the progress of reforms within DVA ..................................................... 27 
DVA Capability Review ................................................................................................ 28 
Duplication of Services ................................................................................................. 29 
DVA Client Survey 2014 .............................................................................................. 29 
(e)  The  administration  of  claims  by  DVA  and  the  legislative  or  other  constraints  on 
effective rehabilitation and compensation for Veterans .................................................... 30 
Administration of claims by DVA .................................................................................. 30 
Delays in DVA decisions, compounding disadvantage for the injured Veteran ............. 31 
Substance Abuse ......................................................................................................... 31 
Inaccurate claim files and mismanagement of claims ................................................... 31 
Examples ..................................................................................................................... 31 
Complaint by Rod Thompson (Level Four Advocate) AAPVA ...................................... 32 
Case of Sergeant Michael Lyddiard ............................................................................. 33 
Other client experiences .............................................................................................. 33 
Legislative constraints .................................................................................................. 34 
(f) Any other related matters ............................................................................................ 39 
Homelessness ............................................................................................................. 39 
Support Available to Veterans ...................................................................................... 39 
The role of Compensation Lawyers .............................................................................. 41 
Summary of recommendations ........................................................................................... 42 
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 43 
Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 44 
Glossary.............................................................................................................................. 45 
References ......................................................................................................................... 46 
References from this submission ..................................................................................... 46 
Section A ..................................................................................................................... 46 
Section B ..................................................................................................................... 47 
Section C ..................................................................................................................... 47 
Section D ..................................................................................................................... 48 
Section E ..................................................................................................................... 48 
Section F...................................................................................................................... 49 
References from previous submission into Inquiry into Mental Health of ADF Members and 
Veterans .......................................................................................................................... 50 
Material on Treatment and Prevalence of Mental Illness in the UK Military .................. 50 
  4
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Material on Treatment and Prevalence of Mental Illness in the US Military .................. 51 
Material on Treatment and Prevalence of Mental Illness in the Australian Military ........ 51 
Other Research and Reports: ...................................................................................... 53 
Recent media sample ...................................................................................................... 56 
 
 
   
  5
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Our Submissions 
I make the following submissions in response to the Committee’s terms of reference. Please 
find attached our submissions responding to the terms of reference (a) through (f). Annexed 
to this Submission are a variety of media articles concerning issues surrounding the suicide 
of Veterans and ex-service personnel. 
(a) The reasons why Australian Veterans are committing suicide at such high rates 
Suicide among our Australian Veterans seems to be increasing at an alarming rate. Current 
press outlets are focussed on its apparent unabated rise. Despite the growth in programs, it 
would appear that the assistance being publicised and offered is not being accepted. My 
team and I have witnessed the devastation that is caused by military personnel taking their 
own lives. Senator Jacqui Lambie reports that as at 15 September 2016, 48 Veterans and 
military personnel have taken their lives this year alone. This is greater than the number of 
ADF personnel killed over 13 years of engagement in Afghanistan. We cannot abide a 
situation in which returning home proves more dangerous than deployment. 
Extent of the problem  
The prevalence and significance of mental health problems and PTSD among returned 
service personnel cannot be denied. As a general estimate I would say that at least 10 per 
cent of my current clients would be diagnosed as suffering from PTSD. I also have many 
other clients suffering from other mental health problems, such as depression (ranging from 
minor to severe), and anxiety or personality disorders that can be directly connected to their 
military service. 
Figures from the Military Compensation Group at Slater and Gordon Lawyers corroborate a 
steady increase in the number of Veterans suffering from mental health issues over the past 
five years. I expect this trend to continue into the future unless numbers of service personnel 
on combat related deployments decrease. From past press reports I have observed that 8 
per cent of the Defence personnel who had been on any deployment reported significant 
PTSD symptoms. The rate of Navy personnel was 7.7 per cent. 
The ADF and the DVA should be in a position to provide exact or at least adequate statistics. 
However, one may dispute whether these statistics can be considered accurate as many 
service  personnel  when  discharged  do  not  come  under  the  auspices  of  the  DVA  and 
therefore would fall ‘between the cracks’ of official reports. Instances of this occurring are 
common knowledge amongst the Defence community. 
Previous inquiries and studies by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), in a year-long 
survey, found that 20 per cent (or 1 in 5) of personnel within the ADF population had 
experienced mental health issues which was a similar figure to the rate of community sample 
matched for age, gender and deployment. Of major concern is that the same studies found 
that half of ADF personnel had experienced anxiety, affective (or mood) disorder or alcohol 
disorder  at  some  stage  in  their  life,  which  was  significantly  higher  than  the  matched 
community rate. 
 
  6
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
Although these numbers are shocking and have served as a call to action for many in the 
Veteran support community, they may not reflect the true depths of the problem. I have 
previously advocated, as have many others, for the introduction of a publicly maintained 
register of suicide amongst ex-military personnel. Indeed, this was a central feature of a 
number of submissions to last year’s Mental Health Inquiry. I was shocked to find that that 
the Mental Health Inquiry Committee drew the conclusion that it was satisfied with the 
measures currently in place and not in favour of the introduction of such a register. I cannot 
fathom why the DVA does not at least want to know the extent of the problem. 
Current  pathways  for  scrutinising  the  death  of  ADF  members,  and  (through  civilian 
pathways) Veterans, were considered to be adequate. The Committee noted that Defence 
currently records the death of members during their service, including those suspected or 
confirmed to have died as a result of suicide, but that “it is much more difficult, however, to 
determine the number of Veterans who have died as a result of suicide”. It is staggering to 
read that the Committee has placed an important measure for addressing the extent of such 
a significant problem into the “too-hard basket”. 
The underlying assumption of the difficulty of this task is also questionable. It is remarkable 
that there is no such public record when it is widely known that the equivalent United States 
Department  can  record  the  service  history  upon  discharge  of  millions  of  ex-military 
personnel.  I  query  why  DVA  cannot  keep  track  of  the  post-discharge  health  of  mere 
thousands of Australian Veterans. It appears that the problem in Australia is not a lack of 
ability, but a lack of will.  Australia expects more, and Veterans deserve more than this. It is 
time that the necessary resources are dedicated to making this register a reality. With 
accurate tracking of the prevalence of suicide among Veterans, DVA, the Department of 
Defence (DoD) and the Australian Government (the Government) more broadly will be in a 
far better position to understand this issue and use the insights gained to inform their 
response to this crisis. 
In the absence of official statistics, anecdotal reports are relied on to get a picture of the 
problem.  Media  outlets  have  been  performing  a  valuable  public  service  in  publishing 
available figures and raising awareness of the issue, including thorough investigations such 
as that carried out by the Herald Sun. The efforts of Veteran Aaron Gray in creating and 
maintaining the Australian Veterans’ Suicide Register is another source of this incredibly 
important information that is to be commended.   
I note that DVA has commissioned the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) to 
carry out a data matching exercise between military superannuants from ComSuper and the 
National Death Index for reported incidents of suicide from 2001 onwards. DVA initially 
advised the Mental Health Committee that results from this exercise were expected in late 
2015,  but  later  revised  that  commitment  to  late  2016.  This  is  indeed  a  promising 
development and will hopefully provide much needed clarity and lead to better mental health 
diagnosis,  treatment  and  support  options.  Although  this  is  a  positive  development  for 
Veterans, the urgent need for consistent record keeping going forward remains.  
The current process whereby DVA becomes aware of Veteran suicides when a dependant 
lodges a claim is insensitive and manifestly inadequate of a Government organisation. This 
process cannot continue in its current state. The type of data that the AIHW hopes to collect 
  7
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
needs to be gathered on a regular basis and made publicly available in a de-identifiable 
format. This is the only way that the extent of the issue can be properly quantified and 
understood, and then steps toward a meaningful solution strategy taken.  
Causes  
While the lack of an official register means that we cannot be sure of the exact number of 
Veteran suicides, any number is too high, and it is vital that we seek to understand and 
combat the causes. The 2010 ADF Mental Health Prevalence and Wellbeing Study (the 
2010  study)  found  that,  in  comparison  with  the  general  Australian  community,  ADF 
personnel reported a significantly higher prevalence of suicide ideation and plans. This is 
more than double that of the general population. 
The reasons for Veterans’ suicide have been found to be multidimensional. A review of 
research and literature undertaken by the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and 
Prevention this year concluded that the studies suggest that these reasons include a range 
of Veteran-specific risk factors such as: 
  difficulty returning to civilian life; 
  relationship problems; 
  mental illness; 
  alcohol and drug misuse; 
  employment problems; 
  bereavement; 
  loss of the routine and structure that accompany military life; and 
  veterans’ reluctance to seek help for their problems.  
Many of these risk factors were identified as problems experienced by Veterans in last year’s 
Mental Health Inquiry, and I would refer the current Committee to the statistics published in 
Chapter two of that report where the extent and significance of mental health disorders in the 
defence  community  is  outlined  in  detail.  My  submissions  to  that  inquiry  gave  graphic 
examples of the experiences suffered by many Veterans on deployment and how those 
traumatic events subsequently impacted upon their lives on returning to Australia and, if 
medically discharged, to a civilian life. 
It is clear that the issues in relation to mental health identified in that inquiry are contributing 
to the incidence of Veteran suicide and that further action to address mental health concerns 
will likewise assist in preventing further Veteran suicide. The worrying trend across all these 
studies is that information about the prevalence of mental health is not being translated into 
action being taken by the responsible Government departments.  
Another important risk factor as outlined above is the reluctance of Veterans to seek help for 
their problems. The root cause of this would appear to be a systemic problem within the 
culture of the ADF where those who ask for help are seen as weak. The stigma associated 
with a mental health condition and the fear of losing out on future deployment or career 
progression  opportunities  underscore  the  reluctance  of  ADF  members  to  report  their 
problems.  
  8
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
I acknowledge the military’s acceptance of problems in this area and commend all efforts 
towards remedying this, through both awareness-raising and initiatives to remove stigma. 
Problems with DVA Processing 
I refer to recent media from the Sydney Morning Herald and broadcaster Michael Smith 
below. 
Private Matthew Tonkin 
Private Matthew Tonkin was diagnosed with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder 
(PTSD) after returning from Afghanistan where he served with his best friend Robert Poate. 
Poate was killed in action on 29 August 2012. Tonkin was said to have abused prescription 
drugs since that night in order to cope with the loss. The reporter observes that “Poate died 
in an instant whereas Tonkin died slowly on home soil, but both sacrificed their lives for their 
country”. Poate’s father Hugh is frustrated that the DVA or DoD fail to publish the statistics 
on suicide by Veterans returning to Australia. Mr Poate sees the DVA as an “obstructionist 
institution with an insurance-industry mentality”. Tonkin’s father David says that his son’s 
case worker from the DVA was “on holidays” three times in six months prior to his son 
committing suicide; “They didn’t return calls. They wouldn’t put things in writing.” David 
suggests that the DVA’s approach to processing his son’s claims greatly exaggerated his 
son’s PTSD which led to his suicide. Ironically enough, DVA processed Tonkin’s claim 2 
weeks after he committed suicide.  
Rear Admiral Robyn Walker 
Conversely, Rear Admiral Robyn Walker, Commander Joint Health and Surgeon General of 
the ADF has said that PTSD (a condition that is believed to affect around 30 per cent of 
military personnel worldwide), usually occurs after a ‘lifetime exposure to traumatic events’. 
In light of the anecdotal reports that suggest a suicide rate three times higher than combat 
mortality rates it is unfathomable for Walker to say that that there is “no link between 
operational deployment and suicide”. Brisbane psychiatrist and clinical director at Brisbane’s 
Toowong Private Hospital Dr Andrew Khoo says Walker’s comments are misleading: “If you 
purely look at the diagnostic criteria ... you only need a one-off event,” says Dr Khoo. “I’ve 
got innumerable patients who’ve just had a one-off, terrible trauma and they’ve got PTSD.”  
Of the 85 claims DVA determined relating to death by suicide over 10 years up until 31 
December 2014, 47 claims were accepted as service related.  
Generally, DVA only becomes aware of the death of a Veteran by suicide through the 
dependant lodging a compensation claim in respect of the death of that Veteran. To add 
further to their grief, the cause of death must be investigated by the DVA in order to establish 
a link to service.  
A number of previous submissions to the Mental Health Inquiry highlighted the difficulty of 
accurately estimating suicidality of Veterans and expressed concern about the lack of data 
regarding  this.  When  death  from  self-harm  in  association  with  existing  mental  health 
difficulties occurs, the cause of death is often left open by the coroner unless it is very clear, 
e.g.  self-inflicted  injury  or  overdose. This  action  produces  inaccurately  low  figures  with 
regard to suicide, particularly when substance abuse, motor vehicle accidents and cliff falls 
  9
Suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel
Submission 160
Suicide by Veterans and ex-service personnel 
 
are involved. In addition there may be no mention of a mental health history on the death 
certificate at all. 
Researcher Brian O’Toole identified in 2015 that Veterans were at far higher risk of the 
effects of mental health issues. The research provided that Veterans are 7.9 times more 
likely to have suicidal ideations, 9.7 times more likely to plan a suicide and 13.8 times more 
likely  to  make  attempts  on  their  own  life  when  compared  with  the  general  Australian 
population.   
Dr Kieran Tranter, in Griffith University’s submission to the Mental Health inquiry, stated that 
PTSD, depression, alcohol disorders, phobia and agoraphobia were prominent predictors or 
indicia of ideation, planning and attempts among Veterans. The Griffith University research 
provides  that  according  to  the  Veteran’s  Line  Statistics,  52  call-backs  were  made  to 
Veterans who presented as a risk in the year 2012-2013 compared with only 21 in 2011-
2012. In 2013/14, that number rose to more than double (122). See Figure 1.  
Veterans' Calls 
150
122 
100
50 52 
21 
0
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Veterans' Calls
 
Figure 1 – Graph of Veteran’s Line Call backs 2011 – 2014. 
The “Transition and Wellbeing Research Programme” 
We  welcome  the  “Transition  and  Wellbeing  Research  Programme”  survey  previously 
announced  by  Senator  Michael  Ronaldson.  However,  I  would  question  why  such  a 
comprehensive study has taken so long when the precedent had already been set by the 
2010 study. The DVA seems to be continually reacting to pressures from the public and the 
Defence community rather than being proactive in addressing the serious problems that face 
the defence community. The equivalent UK and US Departments are much further advanced 
in their response to these problems compared to Australia, despite having been involved in 
many of the same conflicts as Australia over the past several decades. 
I support the call from the Australian Defence Association for a Commonwealth funded 
compulsory  medical  examination  for  Veterans.  However,  I  anticipate  that  making  the 
examination compulsory will be met with resistance. After discharge, many of my clients only 
wish to distance themselves from the bureaucracy of the ADF, the DoD and the DVA. 
Forcing them to attend appointments may not be the right solution to plug the current gap in 
reporting and is unlikely to improve their mental wellbeing.  
What is obvious from the findings of the US experience is that any assessment of the 
societal impact of a disorder must begin with a consideration of prevalence. Sadly Australia 
seems to be playing catch up with the recording of mental disorders, PTSD and suicide in 
  10
Description:The Military Compensation Group at Slater and Gordon Lawyers (Slater and Gordon)  I note that Mr Michael Burge OAM, Director of the Australian.