Series approximation methods in statistics

228 Pages·2006·1.07 MB·English

by  Kolassa J.E.

Lecture Notes in Statistics 88
Edited by P.Bickel,P.Diggle,S.Fienberg,U.Gather,
I.Olkin,S.Zeger
John E. Kolassa
Series Approximation Methods in Statistics
Third Edition
John E.Kolassa
Department of Statistics
Rutgers University
Piscataway,NJ 08854
[e-mail]
Library ofCongress Control Number:2005939010
ISBN-10:0-387-31409-1 e-ISBN 0-387-32227-2
ISBN-13:978-0387-31409-9
Printed on acid-free paper.
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media,Inc.
All rights reserved.This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the writ-
ten permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media,Inc.,233 Spring Street,New
York,NY 10013,USA),except for briefexcerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis.
Use in connection with any form ofinformation storage and retrieval,electronic adaptation,com-
puter software,or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is for-
bidden.
The use in this publication oftrade names,trademarks,service marks,and similar terms,even if
they are not identified as such,is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or
not they are subject to proprietary rights.
Printed in the United States ofAmerica. (SBA)
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
springer.com
Preface
This book was originally compiled for a course I taught at the University of
Rochester in the fall of 1991, and is intended to give advanced graduate students
in statistics an introduction to Edgeworth and saddlepoint approximations, and
related techniques. Many other authors have also written monographs on this sub-
ject, and so this work is narrowly focused on two areas not recently discussed in
theoreticaltextbooks. Theseareasare,first,arigorousconsiderationofEdgeworth
and saddlepoint expansion limit theorems, and second, a survey of themore recent
developments in the field.
In presenting expansion limit theorems I have drawn heavily on notation of
McCullagh (1987) and on the theorems presented by Feller (1971) on Edgeworth
expansions. ForsaddlepointnotationandresultsIreliedmostheavilyonthemany
papersofDaniels,andareviewpaperbyReid(1988). ThroughoutthisbookIhave
tried to maintain consistent notation and to present theorems in such a way as to
makeafewtheoreticalresultsusefulinasmanycontextsaspossible. Thiswasnot
only in order to present as many results with as few proofs as possible, but more
importantly to show the interconnections between the various facets of asymptotic
theory.
Special attention is paid to regularity conditions. The reasons they are needed
and the parts they play in the proofs are both highlighted.
Computational tools are presented to help in the derivation and manipulation
of these expansions. The final chapter contains input for calculating many of the
results here in Mathematica (R), a symbolic algebra and calculus program. Math-
ematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research, Inc.
This book is organized as follows. First, the notions of asymptotics and distri-
bution approximations in general are discussed, and the present work is placed in
thiscontext. Next,characteristicfunctions,thebasisofalloftheapproximationsin
thisvolume,arediscussed. TheiruseinthederivationoftheEdgeworthseries,both
heuristically and rigorously, is presented. Saddlepoint approximations for densities
are derived from the associated Edgeworth series, and investigated. Saddlepoint
distribution function approximations are presented. Multivariate and conditional
counterparts of many of these results are presented, accompanied by a discussion
oftheextenttowhichtheseresultsparallelunivariateresultsandthepointswhere
multivariate results differ. Finally, these results are applied to questions of the dis-
tribution of the maximum likelihood estimator, approximate ancillarity, Wald and
likelihood ratio testing, Bayesian methods, and resampling methods.
Much of this volume is devoted to the study of lattice distributions, because
inrepresentingadeparturefromregularityconditionstheyrepresentaninteresting
variation on and completion of the mathematical development of the rest of the
material,becausetheyariseveryfrequentlyingeneralizedlinearmodelsfordiscrete
dataandinnonparametricapplications,andbecausemanyofmyresearchinterests
lie in this direction. In the interest of not unnecessarily burdening those who wish
v
vi Preface
to avoid the additional complication of lattice distributions, I have tried to place
thelatticedistributionmaterialaslateineachchapteraspossible. Thosewhowish
may skip these sections without sacrificing much of the foundation for the rest of
the book, but I recommend this material as both useful and inherently interesting.
Prerequisites and Notation
A knowledge of undergraduate real and complex analysis, on the level of Rudin
(1976), Chapters 1-9, and Bak and Newman (1996), Chapters 1-12, is presupposed
in the text. In particular, an understanding of continuity, differentiation, and inte-
gration in the senses of Riemann and Riemann-Stieltjes, is needed, as is an under-
standing of basic limit theorems for these integrals. An understanding of complex
contour integration is also required. Lebesgue integration and integration of differ-
entialformsarenotrequired. Abackgroundinmatrixalgebraofcomparabledepth
is also presupposed, but will not be required as frequently.
Asfarasispossible,statisticalparameterswillbedenotedbyGreekcharacters.
In general, upper-case Latin characters will in general refer to random variables,
lower-case Latin characters will refer to potential observed values for the corre-
sponding random variables, and bold face will in general denote vector or matrix
quantities. Lower case Gothic characters refer to integer constants, and capital
Gothic characters refer to sets. For example R, C, and Z represent the sets of real
numbers, complex numbers, and integers, respectively.
Ihavebeenunabletofollowtheseconventionsentirelyconsistently;forinstance,
densities and cumulative distribution functions are generally denoted by f and F,
and cumulant generating functions are generally denoted by K. Additionally, esti-
matesofparametervaluesundervariousassumptionsaredenotedbytheparameter
value with a hat or tilde accent, and random estimators are denoted by upper case
counterparts. For instance, ω will represent the signed root of the likelihood ratio,
ωˆ will represent its fitted value, and Ωˆ will represent the random variable of which
w is an observed value.
Unless stated otherwise, all integrals are Riemann-Stieltjes integrals, and the
limitingoperationimpliedbynon-absolutelyintegrableimproperintegralsaregiven
explicitly. The symbols (cid:1) and (cid:2) are functions returning the real and imaginary
parts of complex numbers respectively. The Gamma function is denoted by Γ(x),
and ψ is the di–gamma function (d/dx)log(Γ(x)). All logarithms are with respect
to the natural base.
Acknowledgments
This edition was completed with support from NIH grant CA63050. I would like
to thank Martin Tanner, who suggested and encouraged this project, and whose
NIH grant CA35464 supported me for part of the time while I wrote the first edi-
tion of this book. I also thank Dr. Robert Griggs, on whose NIH training grant
T32NS07338 I began this project. Thanks are also due to David Oakes, Lu Cui,
Preface vii
Guang-qin Ma, Shiti Yu, Debajyoti Sinha, and especially Moonseong Heo, who at-
tendedthelecturesthatthisbookisbasedon,andwhosuggestedimprovements. I
am especially indebted to Peter McCullagh and O.E. Barndorff–Nielsen, who read
andcommentedindetailonanearlydraftofthesenotes,andotherswhoreadand
commented more generally on part or all of this work, including Bradley Efron,
David Cox, Mitchell Gail, Scott Zeger, Nancy Reid, and Michael Wichura. The
efforts of the editor for this series, Martin Gilchrist, and the production staff at
Springer–Verlag, are very much appreciated, as are the comments of three anony-
mousreferees. Iamverygratefulforthesupportoffamilyandfriendswhilewriting
this book.
Thanks are also due to those who helped with the second and third editions,
including students who used and commented on preliminary versions of the sec-
ond and third editions: Chris Roe, Bo Yang, Peng Huang, Raji Natarajan, Aiyi
Liu,KellyZou,LeilaChukhina,RamprasathLakshminarasimhan,LarsNordmann,
Juan Zhang, the editor John Kimmel, Anne Meagher, and anonymous reviewers.
Special thanks are due to Yodit Seifu and Greg Elmer, whose sharp eye caught
many typographical errors. NSF grant DMS 0505499 and the Rutgers University
sabbatical leave program supported preparation of the third edition.
Contents
Page
1 Asymptotics in General....................................................... ..... 1
2 Characteristic Functions and the Berry–Esseen Theorem........ ..... 7
3 Edgeworth Series................................................................ ... 31
4 Saddlepoint Series for Densities............................................ ... 63
5 Saddlepoint Series for Distribution Functions........................ ... 89
6 Multivariate Expansions...................................................... .. 109
7 Conditional Distribution Approximations.............................. .. 139
8 Applications to Wald, Likelihood Ratio, and Maximum
Likelihood Statistics............................................................ .. 165
9 Other Topics...................................................................... .. 189
10 Computational Aids............................................................ .. 199
Bibliography...................................................................... .. 205
Author Index..................................................................... .. 215
Subject Index..................................................................... .. 217
ix
1
Asymptotics in General
Many authors have examined the use of asymptotic methods in statistics. Ser-
fling (1980) investigates applications of probability limit theorems for distributions
of random variables, including theorems concerning convergence almost surely, to
many questions in applied statistics. Le Cam (1969) treats asymptotics from a
decision-theoretic viewpoint. Barndorff–Nielsen and Cox (1989) present many ap-
plications of the density and distribution function approximations to be described
below in a heuristic manner. Hall (1992) investigates Edgeworth series with a par-
ticular view towards applications to the bootstrap. Field and Ronchetti (1990)
treatseriesexpansiontechniquesinamannerthatmostcloselyparallelsthiswork;
I have included more detailed proofs and discussion of regularity conditions, and a
survey of the use of Barndorff–Nielsen’s formula. Their work covers many aspects
of robustness and estimating equations not included here. Skovgaard (1990) ex-
plores characteristics of models making them amenable to asymptotic techniques,
and derives the concept of an analytic statistical model. He also investigates con-
vergencealongseriesindexedbymoregeneralmeasuresofinformationthansample
size. Jensen (1995) presents a range of topics similar to that presented here, but
with a different flavor.
Thequestionofconvergenceofvariousapproximationstodistributionfunctions
anddensitieswillbeconsideredwithasmuchattentiontoregularityconditionsand
rigor as possible. Bhattacharya and Rao (1976) and Bhattacharya and Denker
(1990)rigorouslytreatmultivariateEdgeworthseries;thepresentworkbeginswith
the univariate case as a pedagogical tool. Valuable recent review articles include
those of Reid (1996) and Skovgaard (1989).
1
2 1. Asymptotics in General
1.1. Probabilistic Notions
Serfling(1980)describesvariouskindsofprobabilisticlimitsoftenusedinstatistics.
Probabilistsgenerallymodelrandomvariablesasfunctionsofanunobservedsample
pointωlyinginsomesamplespaceΩ,withameasureP[·]assigningtoeachsetina
certainclassF ofsubsetsofΩaprobabilitybetween0and1. Generally,sequences
of related random variables are modeled as a sequence of functions of ω, and a
large part of asymptotic theory is concerned with describing the behavior of such
sequences.
The strongest types of convergence are convergence almost surely, and conver-
genceinmean. RandomvariablesX aresaidtoconvergealmostsurely,orconverge
n
with probability 1, to Y if P[X (ω)→Y(ω)]=1. This notion of convergence cru-
n
cially involves the sample point ω, and concerns behavior of the functions X at ω
n
for all n, or at least for all n sufficiently large, simultaneously. For instance, the
stronglawoflargenumbersimpliesthatifX isaBinomialrandomvariablerepre-
n
sentingthenumberofsuccessesinnindependenttrials,witheachtrialresultingina
successwithprobabilityπandafailurewithprobability1−π,thenX /nconverges
n
almost surely to π. Using this result, however, requires conceptually constructing
a sample space Ω on which all of these random variables exist simultaneously. The
natural sample space for X is Ω = {0,1}n consisting of sequences of zeros and
n n (cid:1)
ones of length n. In this case X (ω) = ω, and probabilities are defined by as-
n i i
signing each ω ∈ Ω the probability 2−n. The common sample space Ω must be
n
constructedasasortofinfiniteproductoftheΩ ;thisexpandedsamplespacethen
n
bears little relation to the simple Ω describing the specific experiment considered.
n
RandomvariablesX aresaidtoconvergetoY inr-thmean,forsomer∈(0,∞)
n
if E[|X (ω)−Y(ω)|r] → 0. This type of convergence is less concerned with the
n
simultaneousbehavioroftherandomvariablesforeachωandmoreconcernedabout
the overall relationship between X (ω) and Y(ω) globally on Ω for fixed n. The
n
relative values of X and Y for a fixed ω play the central role.
n
A weaker form of convergence is convergence in probability. The variables X
n
converge to Y in probability, if for every (cid:4)>0, then limn→∞P[|Xn−Y|<(cid:4)]=1.
As with convergence in r-th mean, convergence in probability concerns the overall
relationship between X (ω) and Y(ω) globally on Ω for fixed n, but in a weaker
n
sense.
Random variables X are said to converge in distribution to Y, if
n
lim P[X (ω)≤x]=P[Y(ω)≤x]
n→∞ n
for all x continuity points of P[Y(ω)≤x]. Of these various convergence notions
convergence in distribution is the weakest, in the sense that convergence almost
surely and convergence in r-th mean both imply convergence in distribution. It is
also weakest in the sense that it relies the least heavily on the classical measure
theoretic probability notions. In the binomial example above, then, one can show