SD vs Betty D. Wright

0.26 MB·

by  U.S. Department of Justice, FBI and the National Whistleblowers Center

‘Attachment..to Independent Case’ Review Report
For CORD # S71 Case File # Q5-234380.

MateriS1 Examindws Malong (RO!

Remarks:
SNDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT

ingestion, Celt bnyp dA bere

predeotvrpenics Abt Fi bts _
Revie coomoratar PMMA Mrindy, _S.

vce D5 IETSEO
abana tis: LOLOWH SRA

‘Banminers) & Symbols
2G yee Reo Nei
na o 8

ig Reed
| states edu 22
aga ll eet Us

Eavorkary None,

uionaistimbee FOROGALL SRA.

Laban ce:

_ tain oer _—
Waa ny cthec neti resin Yr Re fad

“eyes, plone ier ante eset a mater baer heats “osrtya Sheng
ies dill fog. 2.06 Le tabbed.
base gbba ii bppss' *

Reesnlts of Review
wet QSOEY3D ————- watorpntocasrevions KL, QI
02,03 B4, 0S Ole
Review of Laboratory Reports) and Bench Notes:

"Note Nemered expert aradegueed bao aru
pages Ban "a Asbo tg Deke eons

ta

1) —Didih examinee pion he aproneie te nase womb muy, tao oe weal
tats and an lero eeubl a he bac en org exrnintha()?
ier BN ilhetlet Deen:

2) areficexarnatin ysl far felon og engpid ey docunrotdin be
tearheetat Biot Ne OUnBlo te etn

Review of Teataony.

‘wee: Naniierel annaunte ne rq iva 08
‘ander pepe fr on Noe eto ke ae” Msp

Ske HAMM. te Cone SETS,

2 Toinagemiearaeeomasminest Kt a6 nUatiwnsne

1 Teisiptet i,

£1 Trdneny const lec test hrc ole Cte torwenine
2) Tenn witurtemtsteaminesiapeiet Aes ae “OUatbewDHemne

pene ae a

os
Camunests
Sex font see qt 8 apie
Who" Adivetael Comment, vested)

neapprpraie I am) illo h diftemae

Oth
ti (is cxarunes pespamel qpprpridde ASKS
Md word ess mitoheey Vhs Cand. ARSE
ee

dice ta Yeck meen IABUS,
dieu. Yat anys siewncypae, Slides woe. Amada,
& he. raligeagl widus, Yhistns be if
foe. iy :

ofontinn’s h

sricwemucter itsnmerneg; Sif FF tows
Toneneeacntatingrevew gore nay LEE Aa

rgcraig doin bist ner sed he es ev ee
‘Bojoovaneao en Gaspar eaweystutaa ot af. one

= : ~thsthagest Pomc ill
‘Adtiioral Comateate
Gol iy ion Ei)

ree. BIRO
“O) eta. ches ates

ca "ah