Report of the International Advisory Panel on its review of the Maidan Investigations

118 Pages·2016·2.92 MB·English

THE PANEL’S ASSESSMENT
–
THE PANEL’S EVALUATION OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATIONS
 
THE PANEL’S CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARY OF THE PANEL’S CONCLUSIONS
THE PANEL’S CONCLUDING REMARKS
 
’ ’
Prosecutor General’s Office
 

The International Advisory Panel (“the IAP” or “the Panel”) was established by the
an Rights (“the
Convention”) and the caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights (“the European
Court”).
receive regular reports from the Prosecutor General’s Office (“the PGO”) on the progress of
provided that at the end of the Panel’s mission, a final report should be prepared by the Chair
The scope of the Panel’s review
appointed and the Panel was thereby constituted. In the same month, the Panel’s Mandate
underlining that the main focus of the Panel’s wor
investigations, the letter went on to confirm the Ukrainian Government’s acceptance that the
 
Panel’s Mandate. The letter concluded
s 2 and 3 of the Convention, and the relevant European Court’s caselaw, of the
authorities, namely the PGO, the Ministry of the Interior (“the MoI”) and the State Security
Service (“the SSU”), all of which were char
The Panel’s working methods
 
review both from the authorities, especially the Prosecutor General’s Office, and from the
The Panel’s Report
“Draconian laws”. The Panel has not taken ac
 