Table Of Content/1L,U?|| 
ENDANGERED  SPECIES  CONSERVATION  COMMITTEE 
JUNE  2   0   0   2
ISBN  No.  0-7785-2962-2  (Printed  Edition) 
ISBN  No.  0-7785-2963-0  (On-line  Edition) 
Pub  No.  1/139  (Printed,  On-line  Edition) 
For  copies  of  this  report,  contact: 
Information  Centre  -  P ublications 
Alberta  Environment  /  A lberta  Sustainable  Resource  Development 
Main  Floor,  Great  West  Life  Building 
9920  -   1 08  Street 
Edmonton,  Alberta 
Canada 
T5K  2M4 
Telephone:  (780)  422-2079 
OR,  visit  our  website  at 
<http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/riskspecies> 
and  select  button  'Legal  Designation' 
WRITING/EDITING;  Edrea  Daniel,  Robin  Outsell,  Dawn  Birn,  Nyree  Sharp,  Dave  Ealey 
GRAPHIC  DESIGN  &   LAYOUT:  Broken  Arrow  Solutions  Incorporated 
This  publication  may  be  cited  as;  Fish  and  Wildlife  Division  2004.  Report  of  Alberta's  Endangered  Species  Conservation 
Committee:  June  2002.  Alberta  Sustainable  Resource  Development,  Fish  and  Wildlife  Division,  Edmonton,  AB.  40  pp.
Message  from  the  Minister 
The  efforts  and  progress  of  the  As  Alberta  moves  forward  in  its 
Endangered  Species  Conservation  efforts  to  ensure  our  natural 
Committee  (ESCC)  clearly  show  Alberta  resources  can  be  used  and  managed 
is  a   leader  at  working  for  the  future  of 
sustainably,  it's  important  that  we 
its  vulnerable  species.  The  province's  pay  attention  to  our  unique  and 
sensitive  wild  species  in  a   balanced 
"at  risk"  species  face  many  challenges 
-  t he  committee  helps  develop  way.  I   look  forward  to  continuing  to 
meaningful  solutions  with  its  practical  work  with  the  committee  in 
input  and  review.  achieving  that  balance. 
The  people  of  the  ESCC  and  its  Included  in  the  many  successes  of 
Scientific  Subcommittee  are  to  be  the  ESCC,  as  described  in  this  MINISTER  OF  SUSTAINABLE 
commended  for  the  tremendous  RESOURCE  DEVELOPMENT 
progress  report,  are  tremendous 
commitment  they  make.  The  quality  advances  that  have  been  made  in 
and  timeliness  of  their  input  is  recovery  planning.  This  is p articularly 
exceptional.  The  advice  and  so  for  the  creation  of  recovery  plans 
recommendations  that  I   receive  from  for  the  piping  plover  and  the 
the  ESCC  are  well-prepared.  I   see  western  blue  flag  as  the  first 
reflected  in  them  the  broad  diversity  provincial  recovery  plans  to  be  '“aTth  eri s pk'r o vspiencciee'ss  
and  many  values  of  Albertans,  as  reviewed  by  the  ESCC. 
represented  by  various  sectors  on  the 
There  is  a   role  for  all  Albertans  to  face  many 
committee. 
participate  in  the  recovery  of  species 
I  w ish  to  recognize  the  continuing  role  at  risk.  The  stories  in  this  report  challenges  -   the 
that  Ivan  Strang,  MLA  West  show  how  essential  public  cdoevmemliotpt ee  helps 
Yellowhead,  has  played  as  the  ESCC  cooperation  is  to  achieve  success 
chair,  a   position  he  has  held  since  the  with  our  provincial  recovery  efforts. 
creation  of  the  ESCC  in  1998.  With  the  meaningful 
members'  cooperation,  he  blends  the 
contributions  of  scientists  and 
solutions  with  its 
stakeholders  to  achieve  the  best  of 
results.  HON.  MIKE  CARDINAL 
practical  input 
and  review. "
Message  from  the  Chair 
I  f eel  privileged  to  represent  the  value,  not  special  interest.  We  then 
diverse  membership  of  the  submit  our  recommendations  to  the 
Endangered  Species  Conservation  Minister  of  Sustainable  Resource 
Committee  (ESCC)  in  introducing  this  Development. 
progress  report  on  species  at  risk 
In  communicating  with  the 
activities.  This  is  one  way  in  which  we 
Minister,  the  committee  has  been 
can  be  accountable  to  Albertans  for 
our  efforts  on  their  behalf.  impressed  with  his  willingness  to 
listen  to  our  points  and  to  consider 
fully  our  submissions.  I   am  pleased 
It's  very  satisfying  to  help  build 
something  and  watch  it  stand  the  test  to  note  that  well  over  90  per  cent 
MLA  WEST  YELLOWHEAD 
of  the  recommendations  submitted 
of  time.  As  a   result  of  start-up 
funding  for  a   number  of  species  at  by  the  ESCC  have  been  accepted, 
risk  initiatives,  the  department  which  is  a   most  impressive  record. 
established,  over  a   couple  of  years,  a  We  are  ready  to  work  with  the 
strong  framework  for  its  species  at  Minister  and  the  department 
risk  programming.  This  framework  toward  fulfilling  our  mandate  as  we 
"The  Scientific  has  enabled  the  committee  to  make  a  address  further  species. 
Subcommittee  good  number  of  recommendations 
and  make  some  headway  toward  My  thanks  go  to  the  hard-working 
committee  members  and  Scientific 
supports  the  recovery  of  species.  The  proof  is  in  Subcommittee  members.  Your 
the  success  stories  described  herein. 
ESCC  with  commitment  to  this  task  of 
The  Alberta  approach  adapts,  for  use 
bettering  the  condition  of  Alberta's 
independent,  at  a   regional  level,  the  assessment  "at  risk"  species  is  unwavering. 
criteria  that  are  used  at  national  and  Albertans  and  the  species 
scientific  international  (World  Conservation  themselves  are  well  served  by  your 
assessments  of a   Union)  levels.  Based  on  these  criteria,  efforts. 
the  Scientific  Subcommittee  supports 
high  calibre.  the  ESCC  with  independent,  scientific 
assessments  of  a   high  calibre.  Then 
Then  the  ESCC 
the  ESCC,  as  a   stakeholder 
takes  these  committee  unique  in  all  of  Canada, 
takes  these  assessments  and  adds 
IVAN  STRANG 
assessments  and 
adds  value. "
Alberta  has  a   rich  natural  heritage.  The  •   to  facilitate  the  planning  and 
province  has  hundreds  of  species  of  implementation  of  conservation 
vertebrate  animals,  and  thousands  of  programs  and  recovery  plans  for 
species  of  plants  and  invertebrates,  species  at  risk;  and 
whose  populations  are  healthy  and 
•   to  recommend  actions  that  will 
stable.  However,  the  populations  of  some 
prevent  species  from  becoming  at 
wild  species  have  decreased  to  such  an 
risk  in  the  future.  Definitions  Used  by  the 
extent  that  they  can  no  longer  sustain 
Endangered  Species 
themselves.  Other  species  are  in  danger  Appendix  1   provides  the  Policy  Conservation  Committee 
of  reaching  this  point.  Statement  of  the  ESCC. 
Species  at  Risk:  A  s pecies  at 
In  response,  the  Alberta  government  has  The  Scientific  Subcommittee  is  an  risk  of  extinction  or  extirpation 
(endangered  or  threatened), 
developed  a   process  to  prevent  "species  independent  subcommittee  of  the 
or  a   species  that  needs  special 
at  risk"  from  becoming  extinct  or  ESCC.  Its  purpose  is  to  study  the 
extirpated.  The  approach  is  innovative  scientific  information  available  on  management  attention  to 
prevent  it f rom  becoming  at 
and  practical,  and  brings  broad  social  and  species  identified  as  potentially  at  risk  risk. 
economic  values  into  the  process.  It  is  in  Alberta.  The  Scientific  Subcommittee 
Extinct:  A  s pecies  that  no 
also  cooperative  and  collaborative,  with  provides  the  ESCC  with  its  analysis  of 
longer  exists. 
the  solid  backing  of  provincial  legislation  the  biological  status  of  a   wild  species 
Extirpated:  A  s pecies  no 
(the  Wildlife  Act).  The  process  relies  on  and  recommends  an  appropriate  status 
longer  existing  in  the  wild  in 
sound  science  plus  a   realistic  designation.  It  may  also  suggest  Alberta  but  occurring 
understanding  of  land  use  and  land  immediate  actions  that  need  to  be  elsewhere  in  the  wild. 
management,  both  of  which  are  needed  taken  to  protect  the  species.  The  ESCC  Endangered:  A  s pecies  facing 
for  the  effective  management  and  considers  and  includes  the  imminent  extirpation  or 
recovery  of  species  at  risk.  extinction. 
subcommittee's  assessment  when  it 
submits  its  advice  to  the  Minister  of  Threatened:  A  s pecies  likely 
The  Alberta  approach  relies  upon  the 
Sustainable  Resource  Development.  to  become  endangered  if 
activities  of  the  Endangered  Species 
limiting  factors  are  not 
Conservation  Committee  (ESCC)  and  its  The  creation  of  the  ESCC  has  added  a  reversed. 
scientific  arm,  the  Scientific  new  dimension  to  the  ongoing  process 
Species  of  Special  Concern: 
Subcommittee,  both  created  under  the 
of  species  assessment  carried  out  in  A  s pecies  of  special  concern 
auspices  of  the  Wildlife  Act  in  1998.  Alberta.  The  result  has  been  clear  because  of  characteristics  that 
The  main  role  of  the  ESCC  is  to  advise  identification  of  species  at  risk  and  the  mhaukmea n  i t ap catritviitciuelsa r loyr    nsaentsuirtailv e  to 
the  Minister  of  Sustainable  Resource  timely  development  of  recovery  plans  events. 
and  management  programs  for  these 
Development  on  matters  related  to  the  Data  Deficient:  A  s pecies  for 
identification,  conservation  and  recovery  species.  which  there  is  insufficient 
of  species  at  risk  in  Alberta.  Its  specific  scientific  information  to 
functions  are  as  follows;  support  status  designation. 
•   to  recommend  the  necessary  legal 
designation  and  protections  for  These  definitions  are  based  on 
threatened  and  endangered  species  in  those  used  by  The  Committee  on 
Alberta;  the  Status  of  Endangered  Wildlife 
in  Canada  (COSEWIC  -   see  page 
16).  For  more  information  see  the 
COSEWIC  website  <http:// 
www.cosewic.gc.ca>.
Alberta's  Endangered  Species 
Conservation  Committee 
Alberta's  Endangered  Species  Conservation  Committee  (ESCC)  held  its  first  meeting  in 
September  1998.  Meeting  quarterly,  it  makes  decisions  usually  by  consensus  but  can 
resolve  matters  using  a   two-thirds  majority  when  consensus  is  not  possible.  The 
committee's  Chair,  Ivan  Strang,  MLA  for  West  Yellowhead,  was  appointed  in  1998  by  a 
Minister  of  then-Alberta  Environmental  Protection. 
The  Alberta  approach  to  assisting  species  at  risk  involves  using  both  scientific  expertise 
and  the  knowledge  of  those  who  own,  manage  or  use  the  land  on  which  wild  species 
ENDANGERED  STATUS  IN  ALBERTA 
depend.  Therefore,  the  ESCC  includes  members  of  the  scientific/academic  community 
(apart  from  the  Scientific  Subcommittee),  plus  representatives  of  organizations  that  are 
land  use  managers,  resource  users,  conservation  groups  and  government  departments.  By 
including  all  these  stakeholders,  the  committee  is  better  able  to  develop  workable 
For  more  information  conservation  management  programs  and  recovery  plans  for  species  at  risk.  The  ESCC 
about  these  consists  of  the  following  individuals  and  organizations  (member  organizations  are  listed 
in  alphabetical  order): 
organizations,  visit  their 
websites,  which  are 
listed  on  the  inside  back  Chair  Ex-officio  Representatives 
cover.  Ivan  Strang,  MLA  for  West  Yellowhead  Alberta  Agriculture,  Food  and  Rural 
Development 
Members 
Alberta  Conservation  Association 
Alberta  Association  of  Municipal  Districts  Alberta  Energy 
and  Counties 
Alberta  Beef  Producers 
Alberta  Fish  and  Game  Association  The  Chair  and  Ex-officio  Representatives  do 
not  vote.  All  other  members  have  one  vote. 
Alberta  Forest  Products  Association 
(2  MEMBERS) 
Alberta  Irrigation  Projects  Association 
Alberta  Native  Plant  Council 
Alberta  Sustainable  Resource 
Development 
Calgary  Zoo 
Canadian  Association  of  Petroleum 
Producers 
Federation  of  Alberta  Naturalists 
Special  Areas  Board 
The  Wildlife  Society  -  A lberta  Chapter 
Treaty  8   First  Nations  of  Alberta 
University  of  Alberta 
(DEPT.  OF  BIOLOGICAL  SCIENCES) 
University  of  Calgary 
(DEPT  OF  BIOLOGICAL  SCIENCES) 
Western  Stock  Growers'  Association 
1 
4
Achievements  of  Alberta's  Endangered  Future  Activities 
Species  Conservation  Committee  of  Aibertas  Endangered 
Alberta's  Endangered  Species  Conservation  Committee  has  been  meeting  since 
September  1998  and  has  accomplished  a   great  deal  in  its  short  tenure.  Between  June  In  the  next  two  years 
2000  and  June  2002,  it  has  achieved  the  following: 
Alberta's  Endangered  Species 
Conservation  Committee 
fionltleonwdsi n gt:o   accomplish  the 
•   received  21  new  assessments  carried  •   reviewed  and  facilitated  public  input 
out  by  the  Scientific  Subcommittee  into  three  draft  recovery  plans;  •   continue  ongoing 
(30  species  have  been  evaluated  since  assessments  of  species 
1999);  •   discussed  Alberta's  Wildlife  Act  and 
areas  where  regulations  and  potentially  at  risk  in 
Alberta  (optimum  is t hree 
•   passed  recommendations  concerning  legislation  could  be  improved  or 
species  per  meeting)  and 
the  legal  designation,  management  make  its  recommendations 
enhanced  to  improve  Alberta's 
and  recovery  of  all  of  these  species  to  approach  to  efficient  management  about  these  species  to  the 
the  Minister  of  Sustainable  Resource  of  Species  at  Risk;  and  Minister  of  Sustainable 
Resource  Development; 
Development  (the  Minister  has 
responded  and  initiated  action  on  all  •   made  recommendations  regarding  •   continue  to  facilitate  the 
the  standard  actions  to  be  taken 
30  species);  planning,  review  and 
following  status  designation  at  each 
implementation  of 
•   facilitated  the  planning,  review  and  level  (endangered,  threatened,  recovery  plans  for 
implementation  of  recovery  plans  for  species  of  special  concern,  data  endangered  and 
deficient).  threatened  species, 
endangered  and  threatened  species, 
including  assisting 
including  assisting  stakeholders  to 
stakeholders  to  participate 
participate  in  the  process; 
in  the  process;  and 
continue  to  review  and 
facilitate  public  input  into 
draft  recovery  plans. 
SPECIES  ASSESSED  BY  ALBERTA'S  ENDANGERED  SPECIES  CONSERVATION 
COMMITTEE  BETWEEN  SEPTEMBER  1998  AND  JUNE  2002 
ENDANGERED  SPECIES  data  DEFICIENT  SPECIES 
1   1   Sage  grouse  {Centrocercus  urophasianus)  1   I   Prairie  rattlesnake  {Crotalus  viridis) 
2   1   Swift  fox  {Vulpes  velox)  2   1   Wolverine  (Gu/o  gu/o) 
3   I   Piping  plover  (Cfiaradnus  me/odus)  3   I   Pygmy  whitefish  {Prosopium  coulter!) 
4   I   Great  Plains  toad  {Bufo  cognatus) 
4   i   Ord's  kangaroo  rat  {Dipodomys  ordii) 
5   I   Whooping  crane  (Grus  amedcana)  5   I   Canadian  toad  (Bufo  hemiophrys) 
THREATENED  SPECIES  ,   NOT  AT  RISK  SPECIES 
1   I   Peregrine  falcon  (fa/co  peregrinus)  1   I   Red-tailed  chipmunk  (Tam/as  mf/caudus) 
2   I   Burrowing  owl  {Athene  cunicularia) 
IN  PROCESS 
3   i   Woodland  caribou  (/?ang/fer  farandus 
caribou) 
1   I   Western  blue  flag  (/ds  m/ssoudens/s)’ 
4   !   Trumpeter  swan  (Cygnus  ducc/nafor)  2   I   Western  spiderwort  {Tradescantia  occidentalis)' 
3   I   Ferruginous  hawk  {Buteo  regalis)^ 
SPECIES  OF  SPECIAL  CONCERN 
4   I   Grizzly  bear  (L/rsusarcfos) 
5   I   Cape  May  warbler  (Dendro/ca  tigrina) 
1   I   Sprague's  pipit  (Anfdussprague//) 
2   I   Long-toed  salamander  {Ambystoma  6   I   Bay-breasted  warbler  {Dendroica  castanea) 
macrodactylum) 
1   I   Soap  weed  {Yucca  glaucaV 
3   I   Long-billed  curlew  (A/umen/us  a/Dedcanus) 
4   1   Loggerhead  shrike  (Lan/us /udowc/anus)  8   I   Yucca  moth  (Tegedcu/ayuccaseZ/a)' 
5   1   Black-throated  green  warbler  (Dendro/ca 
Virens) 
6   I   Harlequin  duck  (H/stdon/cus  d/sfdon/cus) 
7   I   Bull  trout  {Salvelinus  confluentus) 
5 
'   New  regulations  for  the  protection  of p lant  and  invertebrate  species  are  being  developed  so  that  the  listing  process  can  be  completed 
for  these  species. 
^  C urrently  designated  as  threatened,  re-evaluation  on  hold  pending  collection  of  additional  data  on  population  trends.
The  Scientific  Subcommittee  of  Alberta's 
Endangered  Species  Conservation  Committee 
The  Scientific  Subcommittee  is  made  up  of  When  evaluating  a   species,  the 
independent  scientists  who  review  the  best  Scientific  Subcommittee  considers  a 
scientific  information  available  on  a   species  range  of  information  about  the 
that  may  be  at  risk  in  Alberta  and  assess  species'  status  in  Alberta.  Population 
what  the  biological  status  of  that  species  is  size,  changes  in  population  size,  and 
in  the  province.  The  subcommittee  sends  the  size  of  the  area  in  which  the 
its  assessment  and  related  species  occurs  are  very  significant. 
recommendations  to  the  Endangered  Other  population  characteristics,  such 
Species  Conservation  Committee.  as  fragmentation,  isolation  and  status 
in  adjacent  regions  are  also  considered 
RESEARCHER  ABOUT  TO  The  Scientific  Subcommittee  has  adopted  before  the  subcommittee  recommends 
RELEASE  ORD'S  KANGAROO  RAT  the  species  evaluation  method  used  by  the  a   status. 
lUCN'  (now  the  World  Conservation  Union, 
formerly  the  International  Union  for  the  The  present  Scientific  Subcommittee  is 
Conservation  of  Nature  and  Natural  composed  of  a   small  group  of 
The  Scientific  Resources).  This  method  is  the  same  as  scientists  with  significant  expertise 
Subcommittee  is  that  used  by  the  Committee  on  the  Status  related  to  vertebrate  animals 
of  Endangered  Wildlife  in  Canada  (including  mammals,  amphibians, 
made  up  of  (COSEWIC)  at  the  national  level,  and  using  reptiles,  birds  and  fish),  invertebrates 
it  ensures  that  Alberta's  assessments  can  (including  insects  and  spiders)  and 
independent  be  compared  with  those  done  nationally.  vascular  and  nonvascular  plants,  as 
scientists  who  As  well,  having  an  internationally  well  as  in  the  general  fields  of  biology, 
accepted,  open  and  transparent  process  of  botany,  ecology,  forestry,  population 
review  the  best  evaluation  enhances  the  credibility  of  the  genetics,  wildlife  management  and 
scientific  assessments.  wildlife  conservation. 
scientific 
information  Members  of  the  Scientific  Subcommittee  (i  alphabetical  order)  are  as  follows: 
Dr.  Rene  J.  Belland,  Director  of  Research,  Dr.  John  Spence,  Professor, 
available  on  a 
Devonian  Botanic  Garden,  Edmonton,  Department  of  Biological  Sciences, 
species  that  may  Alberta.  University  of  Alberta,  Edmonton, 
Alberta. 
he  at  risk  in  Cheryl  Bradley,  Professional  Biological 
Consultant,  Lethbridge,  Alberta  was  a  Mark  Steinhilber,  Curator  of 
Alberta.  member  of  the  Scientific  Subcommittee  Ichthyology  and  Herpetology, 
until  October  2002,  when  she  resigned.  Provincial  Museum  of  Alberta, 
Edmonton,  Alberta. 
Dr.  David  Gummer,  Curator  of 
Mammalogy,  Provincial  Museum  of  William  D.  Wishart,  Retired  Section 
Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta.  Head,  Wildlife  Research,  Alberta  Fish 
and  Wildlife;  now  Adjunct  Professor, 
Dr.  Brett  Purdy,  Department  of 
Department  of  Biological  Sciences, 
Renewable  Resources,  University  of 
University  of  Alberta,  and  Research 
Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta. 
Associate,  Provincial  Museum  of 
Dr.  Fiona  Schmiegelow  (Subcommittee  Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta. 
Chair),  Assistant  Professor,  Department 
of  Renewable  Resources,  University  of 
Alberta,  Edmonton,  Alberta. 
'The  World  Conservation  Union  has  kept  its  former  acronym — lUCN. 
6
Achievements  of  the  Scientific  Subcommittee  Future  Activities 
of  the  Scientific 
of  Alberta's  Endangered  Species  Conservation  Committee 
ASlubbecrtoam'msi t Etnedea n gofe r ^e  d  * 
Species  Conservation 
The  Scientific  Subcommittee  has  been  meeting  since  January  1999  and  between  June  Committee 
2000  and  June  2002,  can  be  credited  with  the  following  accomplishments: 
considered  and  accepted  the  revised  developed  a   system  for  setting  Over  the  next  two  years,  the 
2001  lUCN  guidelines  for  assessment  priorities  for  data  collection  and  Scientific  Subcommittee  will 
of  species  at  risk;  detailed  status  report  production  be  completing  the  following 
with  particular  reference  to  activities: 
evaluated  21  new  species  (30  species 
vascular  plant  species  at  risk.  •   continue  to  evaluate 
have  been  evaluated  since  1999)  and 
species  potentially  at  risk  in 
provided  its  recommendations  for  Alberta  and  pass  on  its 
these  species  to  the  Endangered  recommendations  to  the 
Species  Conservation  Committee;  and  Endangered  Species 
Conservation  Committee; 
•   continue  to  refine  the 
priority-setting  system  for 
application  to  other 
taxonomic  groups  such  as 
invertebrates;  and 
•   expand  its  membership  as 
needed.
SPECIES  CURRENTLY  LISTED  UNDER  THE  WILDLIFE  ACT,  AND  NEW  SPECIES 
ASSESSED  BY  THE  ENDANGERED  SPECIES  CONSERVATION  COMMITTEE  SINCE  ITS  INCEPTION 
Recovery 
Recovery/ 
Former  Recommendations  Current  ApRperco. v ePdla n  by  | 
Species  Des(i1g9n9a8t)i on  SSC  ESCC  (DJeusnieg n 2at0i0o2n)   FToerammed   MPalanna g Dermafetnetd   Minister 
ENDANGERED  (2000) 
Sage  grouse  (Centrocercus  urophasianus)  GA  EN  Jun-99  EN  Jul-99  EN  IP 
Swift  fox  (V ulpes  velox)  EN  EN  ([N(tPlr)o2v )  N oJva-n9-7O SP  ([NItPl])   Aug-01  (Ntl)  Sep-01 
EN  Sep-99  EN  Oct-99 
Piping  plover  (Charadrius  melodus)  TH  EN  Dec-99  EN  Jan-00  EN  Jul-01  Feb-02 
WOrhdo'os p iknagn ga crroaon e  r a(tG r (uDsi p aomdeormiycsa n uosr)di i)  NENG   EN  Mar-00  EN  Apr-00  EN  [Apr-03]  [IP] 
Bison  (Bison  bison)'  EN  EN  Sep-01  -E N  Oct-01  EENN   NA  Apr-02 
THREATENED  (2000) 
Peregrine  falcon  (Falco  peregnnus)  TEHN   TH  Jun-99  TH  Jul-99  TH  IP 
WBourordolwainndg    coawrli b (oAut h (eRnaen g icfuenri c utlaarraina)d us  caribou)  TH  TH  Sep-99  TH  Oct-99  TTHH   JMuany--0011   [IIPP ] 
Barren  ground  caribou  (Rangifer  tarandus  TH  TH  Dec-00  T- H  Jan-01  TH  [NOAc t-02] 
groenlandicus)  TH  m 
Trumpeter  swan  (Cygnus  buccinator)  TH 
TH  Apr-01  TH Jun-01 
Ferruginous  hawk  (Buteo  regalis)  TH  [Apr-03] 
Oct-01 
Northern  leopard  frog  (Rana  pipiens)  TH  Sep-01  -  TH  IP 
TH4^ 
OTHER  FORMS  OF  PROTECTION  PROPOSED  (2000-2002) 
NA 
Sprague's  pipit  (Anthus  spragueii)  NG  SC  Jun-99  SC  Jul-99  NG(SC)4 
NG  NA  IP 
Long-toed  salamander  (Ambystoma  macrodactylum)  SC  Dec-99  SC  Jan-00  NG(SC)^ 
NG 
LLoonggg-ebrihleleadd    csuhrrliekwe    ((LNaunmieuns i ulsu do vaimceiraincuasn)u s)  NG  SC  Mar-00  SC  Apr-00  NG(SC)4  NNAA  
NG  SC  Mar-00  SC  Apr-00  NG(SC)^  NA  IP 
(BDleancdk-rtohircoaa t veidr e ngsr)e en  warbler  SC  Jun-00  SC  Oct-00  NG(SC)^ 
Flarlequin  duck  (Histrionicus  histrionicus)  GA  NA 
SC  Sep-01  SC  Oct-01  GA(SC)^ 
Bull  trout  (Salvelinus  confluentus)  GF  NA 
Prairie  rattlesnake  (Crotalus  viridis)  NG  SC  Jan-02  SC  Feb-02  GF(SC)4  NA  IP 
DD  Dec-99  DD  Jan-00  NG(DD)^ 
Wolverine  (Gulo  gulo)  FB 
Pygmy  whitefish  (Prosopium  coulteri)  -  DD  Dec-00  DD  Jan-01  FDBD( DD)4  NNAA  
DD  Sep-00  DD  Oct-00 
Great  plains  toad  (Bufo  cognatus)  NG  NA 
DD  Dec-00  DD  Jan-01  NG(DD)4 
Canadian  toad  (Bufo  hemiophrys)  NNGG   DD  Dec-00  DD  Jan-01  NG(DD)4  NA 
NG  NA  NA 
Red-tailed  chipmunk  (Tamias  ruficaudus)  NR  Jun-00  NR  Oct-00 
IN  PROCESS  (JUNE  2002)  (E.G.,  AWAITING  REGULATION  DEVELOPMENT) 
Western  spiderwort  (T radescantia  occidentalis)  -   E N  A pr-0 1  IIPP  
EN Jun-01  [Oct-03] 
Soapweed  (Y ucca  glauca)  EN  Apr-02  EN  May-02  IP  [Oct-03] 
Yucca  moth  (Tegeticula yuccasella)  EN  Apr-02  EN  May-02  IP  [Oct-03] 
Western  blue  flag  (Iris  missouriensis)  IP 
Grizzly  bear  (Ursus  arctos)  GA  TH  Sep-99  TH  Oct-99  Nov-01  Feb-02 
TH  Jan-02  TH  Feb-02  [Oct-02] 
Cape  May  warbler  (Dendroica  tigrina)  NG  SC Jun-00  SC  Oct-00  IP  [IP]  Apr-02 
NG  IP 
Bay-breasted  warbler  (Dendroica  castanea)  SC  Jun-00  SC  Oct-00 
EN  -  E ndangered;  TH  -  T hreatened;  GA  -  G ame  Animal;  NG  -  N on-game  Animal;  GF  -  G ame  Fish  (under  Federal  Fisheries  Act);  FB  -  F ur-bearing  Animal;  IP  -  I n  Process;  ♦  -   L egal 
designation  is  Non-game  Animal,  Fur-bearing  Animal,  Game  Bird  or  Game  Fish,  species  further  described  as  SC  -  S pecies  of  Special  Concern  or  DD  -  D ata  Deficient;  -  R e-evaluation 
on  hold  pending  analysis  of  additional  data  on  population  trends;  NA  -  n ot  applicable. 
'  O nly  bison  (Bison  bison)  that  are  found,  killed  or  captured  on  the  land  within  the  boundaries  described  in  the  regulation  are  endangered  animals.  The  regulation  has  a  d etailed 
description  of  northwestern  Alberta  around  the  Flay-Zama  lakes,  north  and  west  to  the  N.W.T.  and  B.C.  borders. 
^  P ending  development  of  the  provincial  recovery  plan,  Alberta  has  adopted  the  national  recovery  plan  for  sage  grouse. 
3  [ square  brackets]  indicate  events  current  as  of  the  printing  of  this  report. 
8