RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN KUWAIT A thesis ...

342 Pages·2017·2 MB·English

RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN
ARBITRAL AWARDS IN KUWAIT

A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

By

Saad Badah

School of Law, Brunel University

August 2016
ABSTRACT
International commercial arbitration is undertaken for the purpose and in the confidence
that an award emanating therefrom is binding, recognizable and enforceable between the
parties. Recognition and enforcement give rise to legal issues because while awards may
be obtained by private parties or companies, recognition and enforcement depend on the
state through its judicial arm, the courts. There might be conflicts between the
successful parties’ aspirations and those of the state or the court that must recognize and
enforce an award. The procedure is therefore key. This thesis seeks to analyse the rules
relevant to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Kuwait and
also to evaluate the effectiveness of Kuwait’s recognition and enforcement framework,
especially against the backdrop of article V (1) and (2) of the New York Convention.
Kuwait derives its laws mainly from Islamic law, Islamic jurisprudence, local customs,
international conventions and international law. Kuwaiti’s statutory laws largely meet
international standards but with some reservations. In particular, the recognition and
enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is largely subjected to Islamic law and principles
as arbitral awards must usually be registered in Kuwaiti courts and be validated by
judges, who are constitutionally bound to adhere to the supremacy of Islamic law and
values. Nevertheless, this study establishes that Kuwaiti laws and practices on
recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards for the most part have applied
the rules and standards stipulated in the New York Convention, albeit restrictively.
However, deviations exist between the Arabic text of the New York Convention and the
actual text of the Convention. These deviations do not necessarily hamper the effective
recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, but in some respects they render
a narrower and more restrictive interpretation and application of the Convention in
Kuwait.
i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank God for his blessing and for giving me the strength to sustain this project. I also
thank my family, in particular, my father, mother and wife for giving me the inspiration
to undertake this work.
My thanks also go to the Kuwaiti Government for supporting me financially, as well as
morally over the last four years, making it possible for me to study for a research degree
in the United Kingdom.
I would like to acknowledge the high quality of supervision that I received from my
supervisor, Professor Peter Jaffey and to thank him for all his help and kindness. I wish
to thank Brunel Law School, Brunel University, London, for the support given during
my time of study. I would also like to thank Dr Mihail Danov, Dr Olufemi Amao, Dr
Muhammed Korotana, Mr Tony Cole, Professor Benedict Abrahamson Chigara,
Professor Javaid Rehman, Professor Manisuli Ssenyonjo, Professor Alexandra Xanthaki,
Dr Ayesha Shahid and the late Professor K Kiakabord for their friendship and moral
support.
Finally, I would like to thank my special friend, Dr Abdullah Alhajeri, for his advice and
support over the last four years.

ii
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the work in this thesis is my own work and all quotations have
been distinguished by quotation marks. This work has not been submitted in substance
for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is it
being submitted in candidature for any degree or other award.

Saad Badah
iii
DEDICATION
This thesis is dedicated to God almighty and all arbitration victims in the Middle East
and around the world.

iv
TABLE OF CASES
2nd Review Committee, Decision No 235/T/2 dated 1415 H (1994)
3rd Review Committee, Decision No 15/T/3 dated 1423 H (2003)
4th Review Committee, Decision No 105/T/4 dated 1413 H (1992)
4th Review Committee, Decision No 155/T/4 dated 1415 H (1994)
4th Review Committee, Decision No 156/T/4 dated 1413 H (1992)
4th Review Committee, Decision No 187/T/4 dated 1413 H (1992)
4th Review Committee, Decision No 22/T/4 dated 1413 H (1992)
9th Administrative Panel, Decision No 32/D/A9 dated 1418 H (1997)
AB Gotaverken v General National Maritime Transport Co (GMTC), Libya (1981) VI
YBCA 237 (Swedish Supreme Court, 13 Aug 1979)
Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Cassation No 245/2000
Actival International SA v Conservas EI Pilar SA (2002) XXVII YBCA 528 (Spain,
Supreme Court 1996)
Al Haddad Bros Enterprises Inc v M/S AGAP 635 F Supp 205 (D Del, 1986), aff’d (3d
Cir, 1987)
American Bureau of Shipping v Tencara SpA (2002) XXVII 509 (Italian Corte di
Cassazion, 26 June 2001)
AMINOIL v Kuwait (1982)
Amoco v Iran (1987)
Anglo-Persian Oil Co v Sheikh of Abu Dhabi (1951)
v
Animalfeeds Intl Corp v SAA Becker & Cie (France Court 1970)
Arabian American Oil Co (ARAMCO) v Saudi Arabia (1963) 27 ILR 117
Aramco Associated Bulk Carriers of Bermuda v Mineral Import Export of Bucharest
(1984) IX YBCA 462 (US District Court 30 January 1980)
Audi-NSU Auto Union AG v SA Adelin Petit & Cie (1980) V YBCA 257 (Belgium,
Supreme Court 1979)
BP v Libya (1973)
Bremen v Zapata Offshore Co 407 US 1; 92 SCt 1907; 32 LED 2d 513 (1972)
Buckeye-Cheke Cashing Inc v Cardegena, 126 Sct 1204 (2006)
Buyer (Austria) v Seller (Serbia and Montenegro) (2005) XXX YBCA 421 (Austria,
Supreme Court, 26 January 2005)
Buyer (PR China) v Seller (Germany) (2008) XXXIII YBCA 495 (Germany, Court of
Appeal 2004)
Buyer v Seller (2007) XXXII YBCA 619 (Switzerland Tribunal Federal Supreme Court,
21 January 2006)
Carters Ltd v Francesco Ferraro (1979) IV YBCA 275 (Italy Court of Appeal 1975)
Case No 1/2009 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 11/2010 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 2/2010 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 2/2011 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 20/2009 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 29/2010 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 4/2009 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
vi
Case No 4/2010 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 5/2009 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Case No 6/2009 (Court of Appeal, Kuwait)
Cassation Court Decision in Domestic Case No 37 dated 3 June 1981 and Decision No
182/86 dated 11 March 1987, No 210/88 dated 15 May 1989 (Kuwait)
Cassation Court Decision No 155/96 dated 7 April 1997 (Kuwait)
Cassation Court Decision No 166 (Commercial)/2, dated 2 March 2005 (Kuwait)
Cassation Court Decision No 221 (Commercial, 15 December 1991)
Cassation Court Decision No 51/1997 (15 March 1998)
Cassation Court Decision No 67/85 (Commercial) 18 December 1985
Cassation Court Decision No 714 (judicial year 47, 26 April 1982)
Cassation Court, Decision No 205/86 (Commercial) 22 April 1987
Ceskoslovensska Obchodhi Banka AS (CSOB) v The Slovak Republic), ICSID Award
No 97/4 decision on objection on jurisdiction (24 May 2006)
Channel Tunnel v Balfour Beat [1993] AC 33
China Agribusiness Development Corp v Balli Trading [1998] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 76 (UK
QBD Com Ct 1997)
China Nanhai Oil Joint Service Corporation Shenzhen Branch v Gee Tai Holdings Co
Ltd (1995) XX YBCA 671 (Hong Kong High Court 1994)
Chromalloy Aeroservices Inc v Arab Republic of Egypt 939 F Supp 907 (US District
Court Colu 1996)
Cia Maritima Zorroza SA v Sesostris SAE [1984] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 652 (UK QBD Com
Ct)
Claude Clair v Louis Beradi (1982) VII YBCA 319 (France Court of Appeal 1980)
vii
Combee v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215
Compagnie de Navigation et Transports SA v MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company
SA (1996) XXI YBCA 690 (Switzerland Supreme Court, 16 January 1995)
Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee v Hammermills Inc 1992 WL 122712 (US District
Court DC 1992)
Compagnie X SA v Féderation Y (2009) XXXIV YBCA 810 (Switzerland, Federal
Supreme Court, 9 December 2008)
Company A v Company B &C 2008) XXXII YBCA 517 (Germany Court of Appeal, 23
February 2007)
Conceria G De Maio & F snc (Italy) v EMAG AG (Switzerland) (1996) XXI YBCA
604-605
Consmaremma-Consorzio v Hermanos Escot Madrid SA (2001) XXVI YBCA 858
(Spain, Supreme Court 2001)
Construction Company (UK) v Painting Contractors (Germany) (2006) XXXI YBCA
722 (Germany, Court of Appeal 2004)
Continaf BV v Polycoton SA (1987) XII YBCA 505 (Switzerland Court of Appeals, 25
April 1985)
Coppe Levalin v Ken Fertilizers and Chemicals [ 1994] 2 Lloyds Rep
Court of Appeals Request for Arbitration No 16/2001 (8 May 2006)
Court of Cassation Decision 5 April 1967, Collection of Cassation Decisions (Civil
Departments) s 18 (1967) 79
Couturier v Hastie (1856) 5 HLC 673
Creighton Ltd v The Government of Qatar (1996) XXI YBCA 751 (US District Court,
District of Columbia, 22 March 1995)
Czechoslovakian Export Organization v Greek Shipping Co (1989) XIV YBCA 636
(Greece, Court of Appeal 1982)
viii
Decision No 1259/49, dated 13 June 1983, Collection of Cassation Decisions vol 34,
1416
Decision No 287/88 (Commercial) 26 March 1989)
Decision No 714/47 k (26 April 1982) Collection of Cassation Decisions vol 32, 422
Decision of the Cassation Court in Egypt No 2660 (year 59 27 March 1996)
Deutsch Schachtbau-und Tiefbohrgesllschaft MBH v Ras Al Hkaimah National Oil Co
[1987] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 246 (UK Court of Appeal)
Dragon, Inc v Gebr Van Weelde Scheepvaartkantoor BV 574 F Supp 367, 372 (SDNY
1983)
DST v Ra’s al-Khaimah (1982)
Dubai Cessation Court, Decisions Nos 48 and 70 (23 May 1992) and No 91/89 (6 March
1999)
Dutch Seller v Swiss Buyer (1979) IV YBCA 309 (Switzerland, Court of Appeal 1971)
Dyncorp (US) v International Industrial Trading and Investment Company
e TermoRio SAESP v Electranta SP 487 F.3d 928 (DC Cir 2007, Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia)
Efxinos Shipping Co Ltd v Rawi Shipping Lines Ltd (1983) VIII YBCA 381 (Italy
Court of Appeal 1980)
Encyclopaedia Universalis SA v Encyclopaedia Britannica 403 F3d 85 (US Court of
Appeals 2nd Cir 2005)
Essex County Council v Premier Recycling Ltd [2006] EWHC 3594
Excelsior Film TV srl v UGC-PH (1999) XXIVa YBCA 643 (France, Supreme Court
1998)
Fertilizer Corp of India v IDI Management Inc (US District Court) 957
ix