Questions of Faith: A Skeptical Affirmation of Christianity

198 Pages·2003·0.5 MB·English

by  Peter L. Berger

Questions of Faith
A Skeptical Affirmation
of Christianity
Peter L. Berger

Questions of Faith
RELIGION IN THE MODERN WORLD
Series Editors: Paul Heelas and Linda Woodhead,Lancaster University
Editorial Advisor: David Martin, Emeritus Professor, London School of
Economics
Founding Editors: John Clayton, University of Boston, and Ninian Smart,
formerly of University of California – Santa Barbara
The Religion in the Modern World series makes accessible to a wide
audience some of the most important work in the study of religion today.
The series invites leading scholars to present clear and non-technical con-
tributions to contemporary thinking about religion in the modern world.
Although the series is geared primarily to the needs of college and uni-
versity students, the volumes in Religion in the Modern World will
prove invaluable to readers with some background in Religious Studies
who wish to keep up with recent thinking in the subject, as well as to
the general reader who is seeking to learn more about the transforma-
tions of religion in our time.
Published:
Don Cupitt – Mysticism After Modernity
Paul Heelas, with the assistance of David Martin and Paul Morris –
Religion, Modernity and Postmodernity
Linda Woodhead and Paul Heelas – Religion in Modern Times
David Martin – Pentecostalism: The World Their Parish
Steve Bruce – God is Dead
David Smith – Hinduism and Modernity
Peter Berger – Questions of Faith
Forthcoming:
Juan Campo – Pilgrimages in Modernity
Bronislaw Szerszynski – The Sacralization of Nature: Nature and the Sacred
in the Global Age
Questions of Faith
A Skeptical Affirmation
of Christianity
Peter L. Berger
© 2004 by Peter L. Berger
350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA
108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK
550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia
The right of Peter L. Berger to be identified as the Author of this Work has
been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act
1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the
UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of
the publisher.
First published 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Berger, Peter L.
Questions of faith : a skeptical affirmation of Christianity / Peter L. Berger.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-4051-0847-9 (alk. paper) – ISBN 1-4051-0848-7 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Apostles’ Creed. 2. Theology, Doctrinal – Popular works. I. Title.
BT993.3.B47 2004
238¢.11 – dc21
2003044373
A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library.
Set in 10 on 12.5pt Meridian
by SNP Best-set Typesetter Ltd., Hong Kong
Printed and bound in the United Kingdom
by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall
For further information on
Blackwell Publishing, visit our website:
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com
Contents
Preface vii
1 “I believe...” 1
2 “...in God” 14
3 “...the Father Almighty” 31
4 “...Creator of heaven and earth” 43
5 “I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord” 53
6 “He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit and
born of the virgin Mary” 69
Excursus: On Prayer in Christ’s Name 81
7 “He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and
was buried” 85
Excursus: On the Empty Tomb and Other Miracles 97
8 “He descended into hell. On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven, and is seated on the right hand
of the Father. He will come again to judge the living and
the dead” 103
9 “I believe in the Holy Spirit” 115
10 “...the holy catholic church, the communion of saints” 130
11 “...the forgiveness of sins” 144
Excursus: On Christian Morality 156
12 “...the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting” 163
Bibliography 177
Index 180

Preface
This book is an exercise in what used to be called “lay theology.” That is,
its author is not a professional theologian, and the intended audience
is assumed to consist, in the main, of similarly unaccredited people. If
some professional theologians should read it, they will undoubtedly
find various errors and misinterpretations in the discussion of religious
thinkers and doctrines. That is a risk that must be taken by a lay person
who ventures into a field in which he is not academically accredited. Evi-
dently, I think that the risk is worth taking. And if I look at the works
that many professional theologians have regaled us with in recent years,
I become even more convinced that a lay intrusion into their precincts is
fully justified.
The structure of the book is very simple. Each chapter (with the excep-
tion of a couple of excursi) is based on a phrase of the Apostles’ Creed.
This document, alas, does not date from the time of the Apostles. It was
composed early on in the history of the western church, probably in
Rome, and was subsequently adopted in the east as well. It is the most
compact statement of Christian faith and, along with the Nicene Creed,
the one that is most often recited in worship. Obviously it does not cover
everything that Christians have believed. But it covers most of it and is
thus a convenient guide for a tour d’horizon of Christian beliefs.
My subtitle combines the words “skeptical” and “affirmation.”
This is not an oxymoron. My argument is skeptical in that it does not
presuppose faith, does not feel bound by any of the traditional
authorities in matters of faith – be it an infallible church, an inerrant
scripture, or an irresistible personal experience, and takes seriously the
historical contingencies that shape all religious traditions. Nevertheless,
my argument eventuates in an affirmation of Christian faith, however
viii Questions of Faith
heterodox. Of course the reader will be free not to follow me to this
conclusion.
In the name of honest advertising, I should state my own location on
the theological map. I feel uncomfortable with all available theological
labels and ecclesial affiliations. My biographical roots are in Lutheranism,
and I would still identify myself as Lutheran, albeit with great reserva-
tions. I attend services in an Episcopal church, not because I am in any
sense on the road to Canterbury, but because the two Lutheran churches
located at convenient distances from my home are impossible for oppo-
site reasons (one belongs to the Missouri Synod, which adheres to a quite
stifling orthodoxy; the other is a parody of “political correctness,” which,
if anything, is even more stifling). I most feel at home in the tradition
of liberal Protestantism, going back (in attitude, not in substance) to
Friedrich Schleiermacher, because this tradition embodies precisely the
balance between skepsis and affirmation that, for me, defines the only
acceptable way of being a Christian without emigrating from modernity.
I should emphasize, however, that I do not consider this book to be a
liberal Protestant manifesto. Readers who do not so locate themselves
may find themselves able to go along with me at least part of the way.
Some of my best conversations in recent years have been with Catholics
– the kind who are prone to say, “I am Catholic, but...”
This “but” is important. Quite a few years ago, in a book by that title,
I used the phrase “the heretical imperative” to describe the situation of
religious believers in the contemporary world. The Greek word hairesis,
from which the English “heresy” derives, means “choice.” That is, a heretic
is one who picks and chooses from the tradition, retaining some parts of
it and giving up other parts. I argued (correctly, I continue to think) that
such exercises of choice are inevitable in a situation in which no religious
tradition is any longer taken for granted. The individual now mustmake
choices. And even if he defines himself as an orthodox adherent of this
or that tradition, that too is the result of a choice. This situation is both
liberating and burdensome. All in all, I think that this is good. I cannot
see how taken-for-granted religion is superior to religion that is
chosen. Kierkegaard, in his passionate attack on the taken-for-granted
Christendom of the Danish established church of his time, urged us to
become “contemporaneous” with Jesus. That is hardly feasible. The
Christendom which he attacked hardly exists anymore (certainly not in
Denmark). Its taken-for-granted status has been exploded by modernity
and pluralism. What this means, however, is that in a strange way we
have become “contemporaneous” with the earliest Christians, who also
existed in the exuberantly pluralistic world of late Graeco-Roman civi-
lization, and for whom Christian faith was possible only as a deliberate
act of choice. I don’t think that we should deplore the fact that our situ-