Table Of ContentPlotinus’ Cosmology
A Study of Ennead ii.1 (40)
Text, Translation, and Commentary
JAMES WILBERDING
3
PLOTINUS’ COSMOLOGY
A STUDY OF ENNEAD II.1 (40)
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide in
Oxford New York
Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto
With oYces in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan South Korea Poland Portugal
Singapore Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Published in the United States
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York
© James Wilberding, 2006
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
Database right Oxford University Press (maker)
First published 2006
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate
reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Data available
ISBN 0–19–927726–5 978-0-19-927726-1
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
Typeset by Regent Typesetting, London
Printed in Great Britain
on acid-free paper by
Biddles Ltd, Norfolk
Acknowledgements
This book is a revised version of a University of Chicago doctoral dis-
sertation submitted in 2002. I came to the topic through a reading group
led by Ian Mueller which began as a reading group on Plato’s Timaeus
but then developed into a reading group on Aristotle’s De caelo before
we finally turned our sights on Simplicius’ commentary on the De caelo.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, I decided that I would understand Simplicius
better by simultaneously studying what Plotinus had to say about cos-
mology, and although this started as a short excursion on a topic of inter-
est, it quickly grew into a full-scale dissertation project. When I began
this project there was no commentary devoted entirely to Ennead ii.1, but
that changed with the appearance of R. Durfour’s French commentary in
2003. Yet, since the penultimate version of this study was complete by the
time Dufour’s book was available, it was only in the final revisions that I
was able to take his work into account. (For a brief discussion of the dif-
ferences between our approaches to Ennead ii.1, see my review in Archiv
für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004), 322–9.)
While writing this book I accumulated a number of academic debts
which I would like to acknowledge here. Liz Asmis, Rachel Barney,
Christoph Horn, David Rehm, and Richard Sorabji all read the type-
script either in part or in whole and provided valuable comments, advice,
and support. I also profited from several conversations I had with Stephen
Menn over the years. Wayne Hammond helped me find the images for the
cover, and Jay PasachoV kindly gave me permission to use those images.
Special thanks should go, of course, to Ian Mueller whose reading group
led me to this project and who oversaw it from its inception.
Contents
Abbreviations ix
Deviations from H–S xii
Introduction 1
Context of the Treatise 1
Plotinus’ Background in Cosmology 4
Plato’s Cosmological Theory 6
Aristotle’s Cosmological Theory 21
Stoic Cosmological Theory 34
Plotinus’ Cosmology: An Overview of ii.1 41
Sigla 71
Codices 72
TEXT AND TRANSLATION 73
Commentary 94
Bibliography 235
Index of Names and Subjects 245
Index Locorum 262
Abbreviations
AA Philoponus, Against Aristotle On the Everlastingness of the
World
Acad. Cicero, Academica
Ad Gaurum Porphyry, Ad Gaurum quomodo animetur fetus
Aet. mundi Philo, On the Imperishability of the World
Against Phys. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Physicists
Against Log. Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians
Alm. Ptolemy, Almagest
AP Philoponus, Against Proclus on the Everlastingness of the
World
APo Aristotle, Posterior Analytics
AN Porphyry, De antro nympharum
Cat. Aristotle, Categories
Caus. plant. Theophrastus, De causis plantarum
Chald. Orac. Chaldean Oracles
Comm. math. Iamblichus, De communi mathematica scientia
Crat. Plato, Cratylus
DA (Arist.) Aristotle, De anima
DA ([Alex.]) [Alexander], De anima
DC Aristotle, De caelo
De fat. Alexander, De fato
De Mel. [Aristotle], On Melissus, Xenophanes, and Gorgias
De mix. Alexander, De mixtione
De myst. Iamblichus, De mysteriis
De Plat. Apuleius, De dogmate Platonis
DI Theophrastus, De igne
Didask. Alcinous, Didaskalikos
DK Herman Diels and Walther Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vor-
sokratiker
DM [Aristotle], De mundo
DP Aristotle, De philosophia
DS (Arist.) Aristotle, De sensu
DS (Theoph.) Theophrastus, De sensu
Elem. Euclid, Elements
E–K Edelstein and Kidd, Poseidonius
Epin. [Plato], Epinomis
GA Aristotle, De generatione animalium
GC Aristotle, De generatione et corruptione
x Abbreviations
Gorg. Plato, Gorgias
H–S P. Henry and H.-R. Schwyzer’s editions of Plotinus
Hist. plant. Theophrastus, Historia plantarum
Hyp. astr. Proclus, Hypothesis astronomicarum positionum
IA Aristotle, De incessu animalium
In Alc. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Alcibiades
In Cat. (Phil.) Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories
In Cat. (Porph.) Porphyry, Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories
In Cat. (Simp.) Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories
In Crat. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Cratylus
In DA (Alex.) Alexander, Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima
In DA (Phil.) Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima
In DC Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle’s De caelo
In DS Alexander, Commentary on Aristotle’s De sensu
In GA Michael of Ephesus, Commentary on Aristotle’s De genera-
tione animalium
In GC Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle’s De generatione et
corruptione
In Gorg. Olympiodorus, Commentary on Plato’s Gorgias
In Meta. (Alex.) Alexander, Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics
In Meta. (Syr.) Syrianus, Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics
In Meteo. (Alex.) Alexander, Commentary on Aristotle’s Meteorology
In Meteo. (Olym.) Olympiodorus, Commentary on Aristotle’s Meteorology
In Meteo. (Phil.) Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle’s Meteorology
In Parm. (Dam.) Damascius, Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides
In Phaed. Damascius, Commentary on Plato’s Phaedo
In Phaedr. Hermias, Commentary on Plato’s Phaedrus
In Phys. (Phil.) Philoponus, Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics
In Phys. (Simp.) Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics
In Remp. Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Republic
In Tim. (Chalc.) Chalcidius, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus
In Tim. (Porph.) Porphyry, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus
In Tim. (Proc.) Proclus, Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus
In Top. Alexander, Commentary on Aristotle’s Topics
Incor. qual. Galen, Quod qualitates incorporeae sint
K-G Raphael Kühner and Berhard Gerth, Ausführliche Gram-
matik der griechischen Sprache
LSJ H. G. Liddell, R. Scott, and H. Stuart Jones, Greek–English
Lexicon
MA Aristotle, De motu animalium
Mant. [Alexander], De anima libri mantissa (= De anima liber al-
ter)
Mem. Xenophon, Memorabilia
Description:In Ennead II.1 (40) Plotinus is primarily concerned to argue for the everlastingness of the universe, the heavens, and the heavenly bodies as individual substances. Here he must grapple both with the philosophical issue of personal identity through time and with the rich tradition of cosmology which