Performance Results of The State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom 2013

90 Pages·11.928 MB·English

Public
Annual
Report
Performance Results of
The State Atomic Energy
Corporation “Rosatom”
First and foremost, we would like to thank sincerely
ROSATOM’s stakeholders. Their requests and
recommendations provided during the dialogues 2013: THE ENVIRONMENTAL
in the course of Report preparation helped to
substantially improve the level of the information
PROTECTION YEAR
disclosure.
We also would like to thank the companies assisted
in producing this Report: DaS-Project LLC and
Souvenir-Design LLC.
Public A nnual
Report-2013
The Environmental
Protection Year
Safety One step ahead Responsibility for One Team Respect Efficiency
the Result
Performance Results of
The State Atomic Energy
Corporation “Rosatom”
88 154
Table of Contents
4 About the Report
Chapter 3. Appendices
6 Address from Boris Gryzlov, Chairman of the Supervisory Board
Capital management
7 Address from Sergey Kirienko, CEO of ROSATOM
efficiency
8 Address from the Representative of the Stakeholders 156 Abbreviations
10 Principal events in 2013 158 Glossary
12 Key results 90 3.1. Capital of the Corporation 162 Appendix 1. Tables of GRI (G4) standard
90 3.2. Management of the financial capital reporting disclosures and RUIE’s key
95 3.3. Management of the production performance indicators
36 capital 166 Appendix 2. Opinion of the Audit
103 3.4. Human capital management Commission on the financial and business
110 3.5. Management of the intellectual capital activities of ROSATOM and its
and information technologies organisations for 2013
114 3.6. Management of social and reputational 167 Appendix 3. Opinion of the auditing
Chapter 2.
capital procedures office of ROSATOM’s Internal
Strategy implementation
126 3.7. Management of natural capital, Control and Audit Department
environmental safety, and environmental 168 Appendix 4. Auditor’s opinion on
38 2.1. ROSATOM’s activity strategy protection ROSATOM’s non-financial reporting
39 2.2. Financial and economic results for 2013
14 43 2.3. Realisation of national priorities when 170 Appendix 5. Process for determining
executing state powers in the designated the relevance of the information disclosed
sphere of activity in the Report
142
49 2.4. Strengthening the innovative potential 172 Feedback form
Chapter 1. of the further development of Russian nuclear 174 Contact details
Information about technologies and the broadening of their
the Corporation application
56 2.5. Efficient supply of nuclear electricity to Chapter 4.
Russia’s economy Stakeholder engagement
16 1.1. General information and description
64 2.6. Strengthening as a global player in the in the Report’s preparation
18 1.2. Markets in which ROSATOM has
world market for nuclear services
a presence
76 2.7. Integrated solution for accumulated
22 1.3. Business model and value-creation 144 4.1. Public reporting system of the
nuclear legacy problems and ensuring nuclear
process Corporation and its organisations
and radiation safety
25 1.4. Sustainable development management 146 4.2. Dialogues with stakeholders
26 1.5. Corporate governance 148 4.3. Taking into account stakeholder
29 1.6. Risk management proposals
33 1.7. Internal control system 151 4.4. Report public assurance statement
35 1.8. Corruption and other legal offences
countering system
2 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 3
About the Report Verification of the reported information The Report utilises several perimeters of consolidation. In
all sections of the Report, the integral performance indica-
The credibility of the reported information is verified by tors, as well as the financial and economic indicator EBIT-
The Public Annual Report of the State Atomic Energy Corpo- Guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI, version statements produced by: DA, are disclosed for the Corporation’s entities as per the
ration Rosatom (hereinafter referred to as “ROSATOM” or “the G4). Substantial topics to be disclosed in the Report have been parameter of budget consolidation as of 31 December 2013,
Corporation”) for 2013 is the fifth report voluntarily published by defined in accordance with these standards’ requirements (see › the Audit Commission of ROSATOM (see Appendix 2), except for those entities for which reporting is classified. In
the Corporation for a broad range of stakeholders. Appendix 5). all sections of the Report, the financial and economic per-
› an independent audit organisation that confirmed the cred- formance indicators are brought in line with the parameters
The Report has been produced in an integrated format; it com- While drafting the Report, the Corporation was also guided by ibility of the annual financial statements, and of the IFRS consolidated financial reporting of ROSATOM.
prehensively describes ROSATOM’s strategy and main finan- the following regulations: The financial and economic performance indicators in the
cial, economic, and production results for 2013 (including KPIs › an independent audit organisation that confirmed the credi- section “Financial and economic results” are brought in
of the top management), as well as results in the field of nuclear › the Public Reporting Policy of the State Atomic Energy bility of the non-financial statements as per the standards GRI line with the parameters of the IFRS consolidated financial
and radiation safety and environmental protection, contribu- Corporation ROSATOM, G4 (“Core”), ISAE 3000 and AA1000AS (see Appendix 4). reporting of JSC Atomenergoprom (the IFRS summarised
tions to the development of host territories, implementation of consolidated financial reporting and statements from inde-
the Corporation’s social policy, and other aspects of sustainable › the ROSATOM Standard of Annual Public Reporting, ROSATOM’s Department for Internal Audit and Control pendent auditors are given in the report of JSC Atomener-
development. conducted an internal audit of the compliance of the pub- goprom).
› standards of the АА1000 series of the Institute of Social and lic reporting processes with ROSATOM’s Public Reporting
The top management and representatives of stakeholders de- Ethical Accountability, and Policy and local regulations regarding public reporting (see Forward-looking statement disclaimer
fined the priority topics of the Report as: “Management of Appendix 3).
ROSATOM’s Natural Capital as a Factor of Sustainable De- › recommendations of the RSPP to be followed in manage- The Report contains information on the mid- and long-
velopment” and “ROSATOM’s Performance Efficiency in the ment practices and corporate non-financial reporting, in- Representatives of key stakeholders conducted a public as- term plans and intentions of the Corporation. The plans
Reporting Period”. Information on the selection of the sub- cluding the calculation methodologies of performance in- surance of the Report as per Standard АА1000SES. This are of a forward-looking nature and their feasibility de-
stantial topics to be disclosed in the Report is given in the dicators. confirmed its substantiality and the completeness of the dis- pends, among other things, on a number of economic, po-
section titled “The Report content definition process”. closed information as well as the Corporation’s response to litical, and legal factors beyond the Corporation’s control
Stakeholder involvement requests from the stakeholders in the course of the Report’s (the global financial, economic, and political situation; the
According to internal regulatory documents, ROSATOM drafting. Please refer to page 151 for the Public Assurance situation in the key markets; changes in taxation, customs,
employs an annual reporting cycle; the previous annual re- The drafting of the Report was carried out with the input of Statement. and environmental laws). Hence, actual performance in-
port was published in 2013. The Report reflects activities of stakeholders as per the International Standard AA1000SES to dicators in the future can differ from the forward-looking
the Corporation in the period from 1 January 2013 to 31 De- enhance the transparency, accountability, and substantiality The Report’s boundaries statements published in the Report.
cember 2013. of the disclosed information. Four dialogues with stakehold-
ers were held to discuss the Report concept. Two featured The Report’s scope encompasses the activities of ROSA-
Standards and regulatory requirements dialogues on the Report’s priority topics, as well as public TOM and its entities in the Russian Federation and other
consultations to discuss the draft Report. The Report takes countries. Information on the current activities of the nu-
The Report was drafted in compliance with the requirements of into account all of the main recommendations given by the clear weapons complex is not fully disclosed because state
the new international reporting standards issued in 2013: the representatives of stakeholders during these dialogues (see secrets and features of ROSATOM’s activities must be kept
International IR Framework and the Sustainability Reporting Chapter 4). secure.
4 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 5
ces. A number of cooperation agreements were signed in the this contract, Russia’s cumulative revenues amounted to US$
framework of fulfilment of the obligations on construction of 17 billion.
nuclear power plants, i.e. a package of agreements on construc-
tion of Hanhikivi NPP (Finland) between ROSATOM and the In 2013, preparations for the first criticality of the BN-800 re-
Finnish company Fennovoima Oy; the technical contract be- actor at Beloyarsk NPP began, design and survey work com-
tween Russia and the People’s Republic of Bangladesh concern- menced on the construction site of Smolensk NPP-2, and the
ing construction of Ruppur NPP. The first power was attained keel of the pilot universal nuclear-powered icebreaker of the
at Unit 1 of Kudankulam NPP (India), Bushehr NPP was hand- new generation was laid at Baltijskiy Zavod.
ed over to Iran for operation. ROSATOM won the tender for
construction of a NPP in Jordan. In June 2013 in St. Petersburg In the reporting year, important corporate reforms were im-
an international conference of the IAEA “Nuclear Power in the plemented. ROSATOM’s uranium mining assets were restruc-
21st Century” and the international forum ATOMEXPO-2013 tured to establish the holding Uranium One Holding N.V.,
were held, which became milestone events for the entire inter- which now consolidates the overseas nuclear fuel cycle front-
national nuclear community. end assets of the Corporation, while JSC Atomredmetzoloto is
now developing all uranium assets within Russia.
Last year Russia was preparing for the Olympics in Sochi and
ROSATOM took part in organization of this most important Environmental protection is one of our priorities. In Russia
event in the country’s life. The special interagency operations and in ROSATOM, 2013 was announced as the Environmental
headquarters, which included representatives of ROSATOM, Protection Year. So more than 1,000 issue-related projects were
was responsible for safety and security of the XXII Winter implemented in the nuclear industry. The Corporation’s total
Olympics and XI Winter Paralympic Games. Nuclear workers environmental protection spending grew by nearly one fourth,
also supported the Olympic Torch Relay, i.e. the nuclear ice- from RUB 15.7 billion in 2012 up to RUB 19.6 billion in 2013.
breaker 50 Let Pobedy delivered the torch to the North Pole.
I would like to thank all employees of ROSATOM for the high
The Corporation will continue strengthening its positions in quality of their work and professionalism, which have helped
the Russian and global markets. Our plans for the coming dec- us achieve such excellent results, and to wish them success in
ade focus on achieving the global technological leadership, the implementation of our common plans for the future.
development of new products and services, raising a share of
foreign assets up to 25 %, bringing a number of power units
being constructed in parallel up to 30, raising proceeds by 3-5
times, and further increasing labour efficiency.
Address from Boris Gryzlov, Address from Sergey
Chairman of the Supervisory Kirienko, CEO of ROSATOM
Board
Dear colleagues and partners,

Dear Colleagues, Last year, we achieved sizeable results in all the Corporation’s
areas of activity. Uranium mining significantly grew compared
Welcome to the Public Report of ROSATOM for 2013. Over to 2012 (from 7,600 up to 8,300 tons), as did the 10-year order
the recent five years the Corporation has voluntarily prepared portfolio (from US$ 66.5 up to US$ 72.7 billion). Consolidated
the annual public reports in the integrated format, which al- labour efficiency in the civil sector of the industry increased by
lows comprehensively describing its activity results and plans increased by 28,5 % as compared to 2011.
for the future.
The restoration of lifetime performance to the RBMK-1000 re-
All main indicators of the Corporation activities established by actor graphite stacks was the most important outcome of 2013.
the Supervisory Board for the reporting period have been suc- The repair was successfully completed at Unit 1 of the Lenin-
cessfully achieved. Many indicators have been exceeded. grad NPP, and now this technology will be copied to repair the
RBMK reactors of other plants, i.e. the Kursk and Smolensk
One of ROSATOM’s activity areas is implementation of the NPPs. This will extend the service lives of uranium-graphite
state functions in the field of the use of atomic energy. So in RBMKs until replacement capacities are in place.
2013 the Corporation 100 % met all targets set y the state. Im-
plementation of the State Programme for Development of the In spite of the objective difficulties caused by the downtime
Nuclear Power and Industry Complex in 2012–2013 contribut- of the RBMK reactors because of the repairs, the Corporation
ed greatly to achievement of the indicators set forth in the De- managed to meet the targets set forth by the FST: In 2013, the
crees of the President of Russia of May 7, 2012. In the reporting amount of generated electricity was 172.2 billion kWh. As in
year, 6,218 new jobs were created in the nuclear industry, up preceding years, there were no operational events rated at Level
8 % from the preceding year. A share of the innovative prod- 2 on the International Scale INES at the Russian NPPs.
ucts and services in the proceeds was 13  %, up 1.3 times from
2012. In 2013, the last stage of the 20-year Russia-U.S. cooperation
Chairman of the Supervisory Board agreement under the HEU-LEU Programme was successfully
In 2013 the Corporation continued expanding its presence of ROSATOM completed. The programme converted Russian weapons-grade CEO of ROSATOM
in the international markets of nuclear technology and servi Boris Gryzlov uranium into fuel for nuclear power plants in the U.S. Under Sergey Kirienko
6 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 7
The way of cooperation our organization – The Centre for An-
ti-Corruption Research and Initiatives of the Transparency
International-Russia  – and ROSATOM have travelled has not
been simple and easy at all. Today, recollecting our first efforts
of independent monitoring of the Corporation’s procurement
system, exercises in formulating the first recommendations on
enhancement of its efficiency and transparency, the first con-
tacts and difficult discussions, it looks that the entire interac-
tion was rather doomed to remain a single-time project with-
out any further practical use and evolution. But going through
meeting after meeting, discussion after discussion, through
trials and errors we have made a long difficult way to learn to
speak the same language and move in the same direction. It
rarely happens, so more valuable this experience is. Especial-
ly, when this experience leads to a substantial saving of funds:
ROSATOM’s procurement system saved over RUB 20 billion
in 2013 only.
In 2013, the Activity Transparency
Enhancement Committee of ROSATOM
worked in the following areas:
›
enhancement of transparency of the
non-related assets restructuring process
(procedures of the “competitive negotia-
tions” and external independent evalua-
tion were developed);
›
development of efficiency improvement
mechanisms of the non-governmental
oversight in the property management
Address from Elena
system (the competition-based procure-
Panfilova, Director of the ment procedures were subjected to con-
trol by the public);
Centre for Anti-Corruption
›
development of the compliance system in
Research and Initiatives
the Corporation (a compliance function
Transparency International-
development schedule has been devel-
Russia. oped and introduced); The Activity Transparency Enhancement Committee of RO- mechanisms in the framework of the contracting, debugging
SATOM reviewed many issues ranging from audits, including to ensure uninterruptible functioning of the system for de-
›
development of a system to control over
that of anti-corruption procedures and practices, through de- claring incomes and property of a substantial number of top
Dear Colleagues, conflicts of interests in procurement velopment of a system to control over conflict of interests of managers and employees of ROSATOM. This process will be
persons engaged in the Corporation’s procurement activities. difficult but, no doubt, interesting and extremely useful not
(mechanisms for declaring and settling
I would like to begin my address from several questions. Why It is one thing if they just spoke and forgot about this mat- only for ROSATOM but also for the entire country. It will be
conflicts of interests in procurement have
does a public corporation need transparency? Why one should ter. But in our case, nearly all proposals of the Commission as important as the experience of all pioneers and innovators.
care about information disclosure? Why one should pay at- been developed and introduced); members, innovative tools and methods (e.g., for enhance-
tention to the public opinion at all? These appear to be simple ment of transparency of non-related assets restructuring or This Report describes exactly such experience.
›
pilot trials of procurement tools with the
questions, but, regretfully, the answer to them is not always for non-governmental oversight in the property management
apparent to very many people in this country. Moreover, it application of mechanisms and tools of system, for building a sound and capable compliance system)
seems to many citizens that the activities of the government and on many other issues have been reflected, in this or other
Contracting (the procurement monitor-
authorities and most of the publicly-owned corporations and way but nearly always, in the daily activities of ROSATOM
ing and assessment of efficiency improve-
companies have nothing to do with them in principle, because and its structural divisions.
they do not affect their everyday life. A significant number of ment when applying the Contracting was
bureaucrats and persons who manage public resources in turn Does this mean that everything has succeeded and we can
carried out, with recommendations on
believe that the transparency enhancement means additional rest on our laurels? Certainly, it does not. The transparen-
modification and revision of legislation
troubles and senseless fuss. cy, accountability and involvement of the public are not sin-
produced). gle-time actions but a complex and integrated process where
ROSATOM’s Report demonstrates that it is not quite so. Rath- perfection cannot be achieved. The agenda includes com- Director of the Centre for Anti-corruption Research
er, far otherwise. plicated issues such as introduction of the control tools to and Initiative Transparency International-Russia
prevent affiliation, adaptation and use of new procurement Elena Panfilova
8 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 9
Principal events in 2013 › Launch of the third overseas Atomic Energy Information
Centre (Dhaka, Bangladesh)
November

International
› ROSATOM won the tender for building an NPP in Jordan
Production
› Restart of Leningrad-1 after completed restoration of life-
time performance of RBMK-1000 reactor
› The keel of the pilot universal nuclear-powered icebreaker
of the new generation laid at Baltijskiy Zavod
December

International
› ROSATOM won the tender for building an NPP in Jordan Alexander Lokshin
February August First Deputy CEO for Operations Management
› Completion of the multi-year cooperation under the Rus- I consider the main achievement of 2013 to be the successful
Production Production sia-U.S. HEU Programme that reprocessed Russian weap- completion of the recovery of the lifetime performance of the
ons-grade uranium into fuel for U.S. NPPs RBMK reactor at Leningrad NPP Unit 1. The nuclear workers
› Setting up the Lifecycle Back-end Management Division › Beginning of project surveys for construction of Smolensk were faced with a task of unprecedented complexity; it was not
Phase II › Signing of an agreement package by ROSATOM and the only successfully solved but also done within the predetermined
Finnish Company Fennovoima to build Hanhikivi NPP deadlines. The technology and necessary tooling were developed
March from scratch, and the best nuclear scientists and specialists were
September Production engaged in the problem-solving process. As a result of the con-
Sustainability certed efforts of JSC Rosenergoatom Concern, various research
International › Preparation for the first criticality of BN-800 reactor at Be- institutes, and sectoral enterprises, we have obtained the efficient
› All-Russia educational forum “New Generation – Resource loyarsk NPP technology of retaining generation capacities on the sites of NPPs
of the Future” within the project “ROSATOM’s School” › Handover of Bushehr NPP to Iran for operation with RBMK reactors, which ensures the required safety and re-
liability parameters. This helped to avoid huge losses in terms of
› First power generation at Kudankulam-1 (Republic of India) electricity generation, and thus saved the proceeds of JSC Rosen-
June ergoatom Concern in the period up to 2030.
Production
International
› Completion of modernisation of the process complex for
› Establishment of Uranium One Holding N.V., which consoli- the fabrication of fuel, fuel rods, and fuel assemblies with
dates the overseas uranium mining assets of ROSATOM MOX-fuel for BN-600 and BN-800 reactors at SRC NIIAR
› The IAEA International Ministerial Conference “Nucle- Sustainability
ar Power in the 21st Century” and the International Forum
ATOMEXPO-2013 in St. Petersburg › The first contest “Ecology Entity Par Excellence of the Nu-
clear Sector” (the winner: Kursk NPP)
Sustainability
› The operation to rescue Russian polar explorers from the October
drifting research station North Pole-40 in the Arctic Ocean
International
July › Initial concrete laid at Tianwan-4 in the People’s Republic
of China
Sustainability
Sustainability
› The first night of the musical “We” within the project NucK-
ids 2013 in Kesthele, Hungary › Delivery of the Olympic torch to the North Pole by the 50
Let Pobedy nuclear-powered icebreaker
10 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 11
81.2 80.9 77.9 Percentage of specialists
Key results
2011 2012 2013 under 35, %
Main indicators of ROSATOM’s operation, as set forth
28.5
by the Supervisory Board 2011
Electricity generation at NPPs 10-year overseas order Uranium production 29.2
2012
(billion kWh) portfolio (exclusive of (thousand t**)
the HEU Contract)
Capacity factor of NPPs 96.3 % 29.7
(US$ bln)
97.1 % as a percentage 2013
109.2 %
66.5 2013/2012
2013/2012* 50.9 2012
2013/2012* 101.7 %
2011
Net assets, as per IFRS Intangible assets, as per IFRS
(billion RUB) (billion RUB) 2013/2012
7.1 7.6 8.3
2011 2012 2013
1,391.4 1,458.2 1,550.1 34.4 44.8 48.3
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 Uranium feedstock (Russian assets)
72.7 (thousand t***)
2013
636.7 550.5 541.9
109.3 % +155.0 +229.45
2011 2012 2013
172.7 177.3
2011 2012 2013/2012 106.3 % 107.8 %
172.2
2013
JSC Rosenergoatom Concern’s Percent increment of 2013/2012 2013/2012
Governmental order performance investment programme consolidated labour efficiency
index as a percentage performance index as a percentage (in current prices)
Taxes paid by ROSATOM EBITDA
compared to 2011 level
Total spending and
and its entities to budgets (billion RUB)**** 110.2 %
(excludes NWC)
100 % 2013 103 % investments in
of different tiers
2012 105 % (billion RUB) 2013/2012 environmental protection
2013 2011 96 % 100.0 117.7 128.5 (billion RUB)
2011 2012 2013
64.4 82.4 110.7 159.9 140.8 155.2
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 124.8 %
Number of events rated Percent cost reduction
above Level 2 on the in procurement of products
INES scale (works, services) 2013/2012
2013 0 2013 11.3 % 10.7 15.7 19.6
2011 2012 2013
2012 0 2012 12.2 %
2011 0 2011 – 134.3 % Proceeds, 111.7 %
as per IFRS
(billion RUB)
2013/2012
2013/2012
Main production and financial results and sustainability
performance outcomes Average salary of nuclear
464.2 473.7 529.2
sector employees
2011 2012 2013
Number of reactors under construction Number of reactors under construction (thousand RUB/month)
in Russia abroad Percentage energy saving
44.6 50.0 55.3
in comparable conditions,
9 9 9 12 12 11 2011 2012 2013
in monetary terms
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013
to reference 2009
100 % 91.7 %
2013/2012 2013/2012 Governmental defence
2013 22.2 %
order performance 100 %
* Indicators in the column “2013/2012 (%)” were calculated with the 2012 data taken to equal 100%. 110.6 % 2012 17.6 %
(NWC)
** The indicator was calculated with information taken from the off-take contract data.
*** In the lower line, the figures with a “+”show the uranium feedstock of Uranium One Inc. Due to the change in calculation methodology in 2012, the data are given separately for the 2013 2011 12.3 %
Russian assets and Uranium One Inc.’s feedstock. The 2011 data are presented for the Russian assets only. 2013/2012
**** The data are consolidated as per Russian Accounting Standards (RAS).
12 About the Report Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 13
One step ahead
We strive to be the leader in the global market. We are always one step ahead
in technology, knowledge and the professional strength of our employees.
We foresee what will be tomorrow and are ready to be it today. We continuously
advance and learn. Every day we try to work better than yesterday.
Chapter 1.
I n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t
t h e C o r p o r a t i o n
16 1.1. General information and description of company
18 1.2. Markets in which ROSATOM has a presence
22 1.3. Business model and value-creation process
25 1.4. Sustainable development management
26 1.5. Corporate governance
29 1.6. Risk management
33 1.7. Internal control system
35 1.8. Corruption and other legal offences countering system
Information about the Corporation
Information about the Corporation
1.1. General information Innovations Management Fundamental and applied research
Management company: Scientific and engineering support for the nuclear power and
industry development programme
and description of company JSC Science and Innovations
Innovative developments, including in other industries

Advanced Materials Development of innovative projects in the field production of
ROSATOM is one of the largest utilities in Russia and one of chemical fibres and carbon-based composite materials
Management company:
the leading companies in the global nuclear technology mar-
JSC SPC Khimpromengineering
ket. It is first in the world in terms of the number of NPPs be-
ing built concurrently across the world; second in the world in * Since 2013 JSC Atomredmetzoloto has been the management company of the Russian uranium mining assets of the Corporation, while Uranium One Holding has managed the
terms of uranium reserves; third in terms of uranium mining; overseas ones.
and second in terms of installed capacity among nuclear utili-
ties, providing about one third of the uranium enrichment re- The State Atomic Energy Corporation Rosatom was established The full name of the Corporation in Russian is
quirements of Western-design reactors and meeting 17 % of the on 18 December 2007. ROSATOM’s status, establishment, ac-
demands of the nuclear fuel market. tivity goals, functions, and authority are stipulated in Federal Государственная корпорация по атомной энергии
Law No. 317-FZ of 1 December 2007 “On the State Atomic En- «Росатом».
ergy Corporation Rosatom”.
The short name in Russian is
Table. Organisational structure and key activity areas of ROSATOM The Corporation is authorised on behalf of the Russian Feder-
ation to fulfil the international obligations of Russia in the field Госкорпорация «Росатом».
Support of Russia’s nuclear deterrence policy and strategic pres-
Nuclear Weapons Complex of peaceful uses of atomic energy and the observance of nuclear
ence in the Arctic
Nuclear Weapons Complex Directorate weapons a non-proliferation regime. ROSATOM is responsible The full name of the Corporation in English is
Performance of the government defence order
for the implementation of national policy in the use of atomic
Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet Navigation via the Northern Sea Route in Arctic energy and is a global company that owns assets in all stages of State Atomic Energy Corporation «Rosatom».
FSUE Atomflot Emergency rescue operations on the ice the nuclear power and industry production chain, including:
uranium exploration and production, the generation of heat The short name in English is
Nuclear Power Complex Mining Division Uranium exploration, mining, and processing and electricity, uranium conversion and enrichment, the fabri-
Management company: cation of nuclear fuel through the decommissioning of nuclear ROSATOM.
JSC Atomredmetzoloto facilities, and the management of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and
Business segment: radioactive waste (RAW). The Corporation’s headquarters is:
Uranium One Holding*
Fuel Division Uranium conversion and enrichment As of 31 December 2013, ROSATOM has incorporated more 24 Bolshaya Ordynka St., Moscow, Russian
Management company: Fabrication and sale of nuclear fuel and its components for power than 360 different corporate entities. A list of the organisations Federation.
JSC TVEL and research reactors in Russia and abroad and enterprises is given on the Corporation’s website.
The auditor of the consolidated financial reports of the Corpo-
Sales and Trading Division Export of uranium enrichment services and enriched uranium
products to the Western-design reactor market ration for 2013 is
Management company:
JSC Techsnabexport
Nexia Pacioli LLC.
Machine Engineering Division Manufacture of equipment for building NPPs and other facilities,
including for allied industries
Management company:
The auditor of the sustainability information disclosed on the
JSC Atomenergomash
Corporation’s 2013 Report is
Power Generation Division Power generation at NPPs
Management company: PricewaterhouseCoopers.
JSC Rosenergoatom Concern
Overseas Construction Construction of NPPs abroad
Management company:
JSC NIAEP
Construction in Russia - Engi- Design and management of construction of NPPs and other
neering facilities
Management company:
JSC Atomenergoproekt
Lifecycle Back-end Division Safe operation of nuclear power facilities and other facilities that
potentially pose nuclear and radiation hazards
Implementation of national policy in the field of RAW, SNF, and
nuclear decommissioning
Doing away with “nuclear legacy” problems from the past eco-
nomic and defence activities of the nuclear industry
Management of radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel and
decommissioning of nuclear- and radiation-hazardous facilities
Corporate Development and International Business (including Promotion of Russian nuclear technology in global markets
radiation technology development)
Management company:
JSC Rusatom Overseas
16 Information about the Corporation Public Annual Report-2013 | The State Atomic Energy Corporation “Rosatom” 17