Table Of ContentPerceived Weight, Actual Weight, and Risky Behaviors: 
Racial and Gender Disparities in U.S. Adolescents 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
BY 
RAMONA CAMELIA KRAUSS  
B.S., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2005 
M.A., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2007 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THESIS 
 
Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements 
for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics 
in the Graduate College of the 
University of Illinois at Chicago, 2014 
 
 
Chicago, Illinois 
 
Defense Committee: 
Frank Chaloupka, Chair and Advisor 
Barry Chiswick 
Evelyn Lehrer 
Lisa Powell, School of Public Health 
Houston Stokes 
Roy Wada, Institute for Health Research and Policy
This thesis is dedicated to the most important people in my life: my son Noah, who 
always reminds me that life is beautiful and full of wonders, my husband Stephen, without whom 
this would never have been accomplished, my late father Andrei and my mother Elena who made 
me the person I am today, and my parents in law, Carl and Gladys who always believed in me 
and supported me. 
   
ii
Part of Chapter III was published in the article “Weight Misperceptions and Racial and Ethnic 
Disparities in Adolescent Female Body Mass Index.” in Journal of Obesity, 
doi:10.1155/2012/205393, co-authored with Dr. Lisa Powell and Dr. Roy Wada. I designed, 
analyzed and wrote the study; Dr. Powell and Dr. Wada helped with the design of the study and 
gave important feedback on the manuscript. 
 
 
   
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
CHAPTER                      PAGE 
   I.      INTROUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 
 II.     STUDY ONE: WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS AND ACTUAL WEIGHT — 
A LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 4 
        A.     Literature Review ................................................................................................... 5 
        B.     Research Questions and Hypotheses .................................................................... 11 
        C.     Analytical Framework: Weight Perceptions and Healthy Weight ........................ 12 
        D.     Methods ................................................................................................................ 17 
        E.     Results ................................................................................................................... 23 
        F.     Discussion ............................................................................................................. 41 
III.   STUDY TWO: WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS AND ACTUAL WEIGHT—   
OAXACA DECOMPOSITION ...................................................................................... 47 
        A.     Research Questions and Hypothesis ..................................................................... 48 
        B.     Methods ................................................................................................................ 48 
        C.     Results ................................................................................................................... 52 
        D.     Discussion ............................................................................................................. 61 
IV.  STUDY THREE: WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS AND ACTUAL WEIGHT—
QUANTILE REGRESSIONS ......................................................................................... 65 
        A.     Research Questions and Hypotheses .................................................................... 65 
        B.     Methods ................................................................................................................ 66 
        C.     Results ................................................................................................................... 69 
        D.     Discussion ............................................................................................................. 86 
V.     STUDY FOUR: MEASURES OF BODY WEIGHT AND RISKY SEXUAL 
BEHAVIORS .................................................................................................................. 89 
        A.     Literature Review ................................................................................................. 89 
         B.     Analytical Framework: Measures of Weight and Risky Sexual Behaviors. ......... 95 
        C.     Research Questions and Hypotheses .................................................................... 98 
        D.     Methods ................................................................................................................ 99 
        E.     Results ................................................................................................................. 109 
 
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 
CHAPTER                       PAGE 
        F.     Discussion ........................................................................................................... 164 
         G.     Overall Conclusion ............................................................................................. 171 
         APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 172 
                       Appendix A……………………………………………………………………...171  
                       Appendix B……………………………………………………………………...177 
               Appendix C……………………………………………………………………...184 
          CITED LITERATURE ............................................................................................. 1855 
          VITA ..................................................................................................................... …2022 
 
 
 
 
   
v
LIST OF TABLES 
TABLE                      PAGE 
I.  SUMMARY STATISTICS: MEANS (STANDARD DEVIATIONS) AND 
FREQUENCIES…………………………………………………………….………25 
 
II.  SUMMARY STATISTICS: WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS BY SUBGROUPS - 
MEANS (STANDARD DEVIATIONS) AND FREQUENCIES………………….29 
 
III.  ESTIMATED EFFECTS OF UNDER-PERCEIVED AND OVER-PERCEIVED 
WEIGHT STATUSES ON ADOLESCENT BODY MASS INDEX—MODEL 
SPECIFICATION…………………………………………………………………..32 
 
IV.  INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS TWO LEAST SQUARES……………………...34 
 
V.  INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL FIXED EFFECTS ESTIMATES OF BODY MASS 
INDEX—FULL SAMPLE………………………………………………………….37 
 
VI.  INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL FIXED EFFECTS ESTIMATES OF ADOLESCENT 
FEMALE BODY MASS INDEX: FULL SAMPLE AND BY SUBGROUPS……40 
 
VII.  SUMMARY STATISTICS:  MEANS (STANDARD DEVIATION) AND 
FREQUENCIES…………………………………………………………………….54 
 
VIII.  FREQUENCIES OF CORRECTNESS OF WEIGHT PERCEPTIONS BY 
GENDER, RACE/ETHNICITY, AND BY WEIGHT CATEGORIES…………….58 
 
IX.  PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM DECOMPOSITION MODEL OF 
RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN ADOLESCENT BODY MASS INDEX…..60 
 
X.  QUANTILE REGRESSION OF ADOLESCENT BODY MASS INDEX—MODEL 
SPECIFICATION…...……………………………………………………………...72 
 
XI.  INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSIONS: FEMALE 
ADOLESCENTS SAMPLE………………………………………………………...74 
 
XII.  INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSIONS: MALE 
ADOLESCENTS SAMPLE………………………………………………………...76 
 
 
vi
LIST OF TABLES (continued) 
 
TABLE                        PAGE 
 
XIII.  ASSOCIATION OF WEIGHT UNDER-PERCEPTION WITH FEMALE BODY 
MASS INDEX—INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSION BY 
SUBGROUPS………………………………………………………………………79 
 
XIV.  ASSOCIATION OF WEIGHT UNDER-PERCEPTION WITH MALE BODY 
MASS INDEX—INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSION BY 
SUBGROUPS………………………………………………………………………81 
 
XV.  ASSOCIATION OF WEIGHT OVER-PERCEPTION WITH FEMALE BODY 
MASS INDEX—INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSION BY 
SUBGROUPS………………………………………………………………………83 
 
XVI.  ASSOCIATION OF WEIGHT OVER-PERCEPTION WITH MALE BODY MASS 
INDEX—INDIVIDUAL FIXED EFFECTS QUANTILE REGRESSION BY 
SUBGROUPS………………………………………………………………………85 
 
XVII.  SUMMARY STATISTICS—FEMALE ADOLESCENTS: MEANS (STANDARD 
ERRORS) AND FREQUENCIES………………………………………………...110 
 
XVIII. SUMMARY STATISTICS—MALE ADOLESCENTS: MEANS (STANDARD 
ERRORS) AND FREQUENCIES………………………………………………...114 
 
XIX.  SUMMARY STATISTICS FEMALE ADOLESCENTS-FREQUENCIES AND 
MEANS (STANDARD ERRORS)………………………………………………..117 
 
XX.  SUMMARY STATISTICS MALE ADOLESCENTS-FREQUENCIES AND 
MEANS (STANDARD ERRORS)………………………………………………..119 
 
XXI.  EFFECT OF FEMALE ACTUAL WEIGHT ON EARLY SEXUAL DEBUT: 
PROBIT RESULTS-ODDS RATIOS……………………………………………..123 
 
XXII.  EFFECT OF FEMALE PERCEIVED WEIGHT ON EARLY SEXUAL DEBUT: 
PROBIT RESULTS-ODDS RATIOS……………………………………………..126 
 
XXIII. EFFECT OF FEMALE MISPERCEIVED WEIGHT ON EARLY SEXUAL 
DEBUT: PROBIT RESULTS-ODDS RATIOS…………………………………..128 
 
XXIV. EFFECTS OF MALE ACTUAL WEIGHT ON EARLY SEXUAL DEBUT: 
PROBIT RESULTS-ODDS RATIOS……………………………………………..131 
 
vii
LIST OF TABLES (continued) 
 
TABLE                      PAGE  
 
XXV.  EFFECT OF MALE WEIGHT PERCEPTIONS ON EARLY SEXUAL DEBUT: 
PROBIT RESULTS-ODDS RATIOS………………………………………….134  
 
XXVI.  EFFECT OF MALE WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS ON EARLY SEXUAL 
DEBUT-ODDS RATIOS………………………………………………………137  
 
XXVII.  EFFECT OF ACTUAL WEIGHT ON NUMBER OF SEX PARTNERS FOR 
FEMALES: FE POISSON……………………………………………………...141 
 
XXVIII.  EFFECT OF WEIGHT PERCEPTIONS ON NUMBER OF SEX PARTNERS 
FOR FEMALES: FE POISSON………………………………………………..143 
 
XXIX.  EFFECT OF WEIGHT MISPERCEPTIONS ON NUMBER OF SEX 
PARTNERS FOR FEMALES: FE POISSON…………………………………145 
 
XXX.  EFFECT OF ACTUAL WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES USED FOR 
FEMALES: FE POISSON……………………………………………………...147 
 
XXXI.  EFFECT OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES USED 
FOR FEMALES: FE POISSON………………………………………………..149 
 
XXXII.  EFFECT OF MISPERCEIVED WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES 
USED FOR FEMALES: FE POISSON………………………………………..150 
 
XXXIII.  EFFECT OF ACTUAL WEIGHT ON NUMBER OF SEX PARTNERS FOR 
MALES: FE POISSON…………………………………………….…………..151  
 
XXXIV.  EFFECT OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT ON NUMBER OF SEX PARTNERS FOR 
MALES: FE POISSON…………………………………………………….…..154 
 
XXXV.  EFFECT OF MISPERCEIVED WEIGHT ON NUMBER OF SEX PARTNERS 
FOR MALES: FE POISSON………………………………………………..…156 
 
XXXVI.  EFFECT OF ACTUAL WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES USED FOR 
MALES: FE POISSON………………………………………………………...159 
 
XXXVII. EFFECT OF PERCEIVED WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES USED 
FOR MALES: FE POISSON…………………………………………..………161 
 
viii
LIST OF TABLES (continued) 
 
TABLE                      PAGE 
 
XXXVIII.  EFFECT OF MISPERCEIVED WEIGHT ON TIMES CONTRACEPTIVES 
USED FOR MALES: FE POISSON…………………………………………163 
 
 
   
ix
Summary 
Parallel with the rise in obesity prevalence among adolescents there has been an 
increasing prevalence in weight misperceptions with important differences across gender, 
race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).  This dissertation is the first to investigate the 
relationship between weight misperceptions and adolescent body mass index (BMI), the 
importance of weight misperceptions as determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in BMI, the 
differential effect of weight misperceptions across the adolescent BMI distribution, as well as the 
importance of different measures of weight as determinants of adolescent risky sex, using a 
nationally representative panel of adolescents. The results suggest that weight under-perceptions 
are significantly associated with adolescent BMI even after controlling for time constant 
individual-level unobservables. Results show that cross-sectional ordinary least squares methods 
(OLS) over-estimates the association between weight under-perceptions and BMI. The results 
based on the OLS model reveal that weight under-perception (compared to correct identification 
of one’s weight status) is associated with 1.8 higher BMI units for female, and 2.7 higher BMI 
units for male adolescents, respectively, compared to results based on an individual-fixed effects 
model (FE) of 0.7 and 0.9 higher BMI units for adolescent females and males, respectively.  I 
find an income gradient for males but not for females, with male adolescents from high-income 
households having statistically significant lower magnitudes of association of weight under-
perception and BMI than their low-income counterparts.  In addition, the association between 
weight under-perception and BMI is significantly higher for black compared to white female 
adolescents.  Analyses stratified by gender, race, and SES, reveal complex significant 
associations between weight under-perception and adolescent BMI. Oaxaca-Blinder 
decomposition analysis shows that accounting for weight misperceptions, in addition to 
x
Description:Roy Wada, Institute for Health Research and Policy  analyzed and wrote the study; Dr. Powell and Dr. Wada helped with the design of .. (Gordon-Larsen et al., 2003; Kandula et al., 2004; Popkin & Udry, 1998) (for more details see.