Table Of ContentBull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 33(2), pp. 67–83, June 22, 2007
Pamphiliid Sawflies (Insecta, Hymenoptera) from Yamanashi Prefecture,
Central Honshu, Japan
Akihiko Shinohara1, Hirohisa Suda2and Hideo Takahashi3
1Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science,
3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
22–13–8 Sennari, Sakura-shi, Chiba, 285–0034 Japan
3876–1–203 Higashiasakawa-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 193–0834 Japan
Abstract Collection data are given for 36 species of pamphiliid sawflies of the genera Acan-
tholyda, Cephalcia, Onycholyda and Pamphilius from Yamanashi Prefecture, central Honshu. Of
these, one species of Cephalciahas not been determined and two species of Onycholydaand four
species of Pamphilius are newly recorded from Yamanashi Prefecture. Compared with the other
well-investigated areas in Honshu, the pamphiliid fauna of Yamanashi Prefecture is very rich, hav-
ing the largest number of species in total (the same number as that of Tochigi Prefecture) and in
the “northern group” of species.
Key words: Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae, fauna, Yamanashi Prefecture, Honshu, Japan.
are summarized and new collection records are
Introduction
given mainly based on the study of the collection
Yamanashi Prefecture, situated in the middle of the National Museum of Nature and Science,
of Honshu, is not a large prefecture, occupying Tokyo (NSMT), and the private collection of H.
an area of 4,465.37km2, but its natural environ- Suda (HSC). Other depositories of the material
ments are diversified and fairly well preserved. examined are H. Kumamoto collection (HKC),
About 78% of the area, ranging from 70 to 3,776 H. Nagase collection (HNC), and Kobe Universi-
m in altitude, is covered with various kinds ty collection (KU).
of forests, which provide excellent habitats for We wish to thank H. Kumamoto (Hirakata), H.
phytophagous insects. The sawfly fauna of Ya- Nagase (Kamakura), and T. Naito (Kobe Univer-
manashi Prefecture should be very rich, but our sity, Kobe) for the loan of the material.
knowledge on this subject is rather poor and only
scattered collection records published in various
Results and Discussion
taxonomic works are available for the moment.
The first record of the sawfly family Pamphili- We have recognized 36 species of four genera
idae from Yamanashi Prefecture dates back to of Pamphiliidae occurring in Yamanashi Prefec-
Yano’s (1919, 1920) reports on the infestation of ture. They are seven species of Acantholyda,
larch by “Cephaleia kaebelei [sic] Rohwer”. three species of Cephalcia, seven species of
Since then, 28 species of the family were added Onycholyda, and 19 species of Pamphilius
to the Yamanashi fauna by Takeuchi (1938) (see Table 1 and the enumeration below). Of
and Shinohara (1985a, etc.; see under respective these, 29 species are already known to occur
species). in Yamanashi Prefecture, while six species are
The present work is an attempt to get together newly recorded in this work. One remaining
all the information on the family Pamphiliidae in species, a Cephalcia, has not been identified.
Yamanashi Prefecture. All the published records
68 Akihiko Shinohara, Hirohisa Suda and Hideo Takahashi
Pref.m alt.]
ori 25 x xx x x x xxx xx
m6
Ao0–1
[
Pref.m alt.]
gi 8 x xxxxxx x x x xxxx xxxx
hi57
Toc0–2
[
ot included). amiange400m alt.] x xxxxxx x
cies n K[ca.
e
determined sp manashi Pref. –3776m alt.] xx x x xxx xx xxxx xxx
un Ya70
u ( [
x areas in Honsh Ishikawa Pref.[0–2702m alt.] x x x x xxx x x xx xxxx
dae recorded in si Hyogo Pref.[0–1510m alt.] x x x xxxxxxxx
hilii
p
m
Table1.Pa Subfamily CEPHALCIINAEGenus ACANTHOLYDASubgenus AcantholydaA. nipponicaSubgenus ItycorsiaA. albomaculataA. alpinaA. iwatai A. kojimaiA. mizunoiA. posticalis posticalisA. sasakiiA. tsuyukiiA. laricisGenus CEPHALCIAC. lariciphila japonicaC. koebeleiC. variegataSubfamily PAMPHILIINAEGenus NEUROTOMASubgenus NeurotomaN. iridescensSubgenus GongylocorsiaN. atrataN. haraiGenus CHRYSOLYDAC. leucocephalaGenus ONYCHOLYDAO. amplectagroupO. decorataO. esakiiO. lucidaO. minomalisO. moriutiiO. similisO. tenuisO. viriditibialisO. luteicornis groupO. kumamotonis
Pamphiliid Sawflies from Yamanashi Prefecture 69
Aomori Pref.0–1625m alt.] xxxx xxxxxx x xx xx 260.620.56 Shinohara andYamada (2005)
[
Tochigi Pref.[0–2578m alt.] xxx xxxxxx xxxx xx xx350.510.78Nakamura (2003)Shinohara and Yamada (2005)
Kamiangea. 400m alt.] xxxx x xxx xxx190.840 Shinohara(2002)
c
[
e1.(Continued). Ishikawa Pref.Yamanashi Pref. [0–2702m alt.][70–3776m alt.] xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxx32350.590.460.531Togashi (1998)Shinohara and present workYamada (2005)d: Species of the “northern group”
Tabl Hyogo Pref.0–1510m alt.] xxxxx x xxx xx xx 240.750.17 Naito et al.(2004) Lightly shadowe
[
s
u
c
ni
o ”
p p
Genus PAMPHILIUSP. basilaris groupP. basilarisP. alternans groupP. komonensisP. takeuchiiP. sulphureipes groupP. ishikawaiP. zhelochovtsevi nipP. histrio groupP. brevicornis ibukiiP. tricolorP. vafer groupP. confususP. flavipectusP. nakagawaiP. lobatusP. venustusP. kamikochensisP. archiducalisP. naokoaeP. opacusP. hortorumP. itoiP. variusP. togashiiP. sylvaticus groupP. alnicolaP. benesiP. daisenusP. gracilisP. japonicusP. volatilisP. inanitusgroupP. hilarisTotal number of speciesB/T ratio (see text for explanation)N/B ratio (see text for explanation) Main references Heavily shadowed: Species of the “basic grou
70 Akihiko Shinohara, Hirohisa Suda and Hideo Takahashi
Noteworthy species and probable additions in the Table 1 shows the pamphiliid species known to
future occur in five prefectures and one area in Honshu.
The occurrence of three rare species of Pam- Besides the entry of Yamanashi Prefecture, the
philius in Yamanashi Prefecture is noteworthy. table was already published by Shinohara and
Pamphilius naokoae Shinohara, 1999, which is Yamada (2005). These are the best-investigated
endemic to Yamanashi Prefecture, is known only areas in Honshu in terms of pamphiliid fauna.
from the type series collected at Masutomi-kosen The pamphiliid fauna of Yamanashi Prefecture is
in the northern part of the prefecture (for more very rich, comparable only to that of Tochigi Pre-
information, see comments under the species). fecture, according to the present study. In Hon-
Pamphilius brevicornis ibukii Shinohara, 1995, shu, a little more species of the Pamphiliidae
and P. tricolor Benesˇ, 1974, are also very rare may have been recorded or collected in Nagano
species. In Honshu, the former is known only by Prefecture, but the collection data from the pre-
one specimen each from Ishikawa and Yamanashi fecture have not been worked out.
Prefectures and the latter by one specimen each Shinohara and Yamada (2005), based on distri-
from Niigata and Yamanashi Prefectures. bution patterns, roughly classified the pamphiliid
On the other hand, some relatively common or species in Honshu into three categories, the
widespread pamphiliid species have not been “basic group”, the “northern group”, and the
found in Yamanashi Prefecture. Among these are “others”, and proposed to use two different ra-
Cephalcia variegata Takeuchi, 1930, Neurotoma tios, the B/T ratio and the N/B ratio, for compar-
iridescens (André, 1882), Onycholyda kumamo- ing the species compositions of the local pam-
tonis (Matsumura, 1912), Pamphilius zhelochov- philiid faunae in Honshu. The species of the
tsevi nipponicus Shinohara, 1993, P. japonicus “basic group” occur widely in Honshu (ideally in
Shinohara, 1985, P. togashii Benesˇ, 1977, and P. all prefectures), whereas the species of the
varius(Audinet-Serville, 1823). Of these, C. vari- “northern group” occur mainly on mountains of
egata will certainly be found on Pinus pumila central to northern Honshu. The “others” include
stands in the subalpine zones of Yatsugatake or rare species without sufficient information on
Akaishi Mountains, and P. varius on Betula trees distribution; possibly, they may eventually be al-
on the same mountain ranges. Onycholyda ku- located into “basic” or “northern” groups. The
mamotonis will be found on Filipendula in the B/T ratio is the ratio of the species number of the
areas where P. venustus, a species also associated “basic group” to the total number of species oc-
with this plant, has been collected. Neurotoma curring in the area, whereas the N/B ratio is the
iridescens is rather common and widespread in ratio of the number of species of the “northern
central Honshu. Other three species of Pam- group” to that of the “basic group” found in the
philiusare not common but widely distributed in area. The use of these ratios may help to under-
Honshu, including prefectures around Ya- stand the characteristics of the pamphiliid faunae
manashi. Further collectings will certainly reveal at the prefecture or lower levels (see Shinohara
the occurrence of these species in Yamanashi and Yamada, 2005, for more details).
Prefecture. A very rare species, Chrysolyda leu- The number of the species included in the
cocephala (Takeuchi, 1938), has been collected “basic group” is expected to increase as our
at Shiratsuka-rindo on the southwestern slope of knowledge on the pamphiliid fauna of Honshu
Mt Fujisan in Shizuoka Prefecture (1/, 21. V. grows (Shinohara and Yamada, 2005). After the
1978, S. Tsuyuki, NSMT); this species is also data of the Yamanashi Prefecture are added, we
likely to be found in Yamanashi Prefecture. propose to treat 20 species (heavily shadowed in
Table 1) as belonging to the “basic group”. The
Comparison with other prefectures and nature of representatives of the “basic group” in this work
local pamphiliid faunae in Honshu are widespread species recorded in four or more
Pamphiliid Sawflies from Yamanashi Prefecture 71
areas out of the six areas treated and are expected
to be found eventually in all prefectures in Hon-
shu. Pamphilius confusus Shinohara, 2005, P.
nakagawai Takeuchi, 1930, and P. venustus
(Smith, 1874) were recorded from four areas, but
they are not likely to be found in western Honshu
because their known host plants are not distrib-
uted or rarely found there (Shinohara and Morita,
2003; Shinohara, 2005); therefore, these species
are not included in the “basic group”. The
“northern group” (lightly shadowed in Table 1) is
also redefined here to include the species of the
Cephalciinae, the Pamphilius vafer group, and
the Pamphilius histrio group, excluding the
species included in the “basic group”, and
Onycholyda kumamotonis (Matsumura, 1912),
which is very similar to Pamphilius venustus, a
member of the P. vafer group, in biology and Fig. 1. Diagram showing the number of species
distribution. of pamphiliid sawflies, classified into three cat-
egories, for each of Hyogo, Ishikawa, Ya-
Figure 1 shows the number of species, allocat-
manashi, Tochigi, and Aomori Prefectures and
ed into three categories, for each prefecture and
Kamiange area. B (heavily shadowed): The
area, and the B/T and N/B ratios calculated for “basic group”. N (lightly shadowed): The
each prefecture and area are given in Table 1. “northern group”. O (not shadowed): Others.
Among the six areas, Kamiange is exceptional. It T: Total number of species known to occur in
the area. See text for more explanation.
is not a prefecture but a small area about 400m
high in the west of Tokyo (Shinohara, 2002). It
shows the highest B/T ratio of 0.84 and the low- group” may occur in all prefectures in Honshu
est N/B ratio of 0, meaning that its pamphiliid (thus “basic”) and additional occurrence of the
fauna is mostly composed of the species of the “northern group” species in each prefecture will
“basic group” and no species of the “northern determine the total species diversity of the Pam-
group” have been found there (see also Fig. 1). philiidae in the prefecture. Yamanashi Prefecture,
This is probably a typical species composition of having the largest number of the species of the
the Pamphiliidae in the lowlands of central Hon- “northern group” (16), apparently has the most
shu. On the other hand, Yamanashi Prefecture diverse pamphiliid fauna in Honshu.
shows the lowest B/T ratio (0.46) and the highest
N/B ratio (1) among the six areas considered.
List of Pamphiliidae from Yamanashi Prefecture
The low value of the B/T ratio, shared by Tochigi
Prefecture (0.51), simply shows the relatively (The numerals in brackets after the locality
small share of the “basic group” and consequent- names in the collection data refer to
ly high species diversity of the pamphiliid the numerals in the map, Fig. 2)
sawflies in the prefecture. The very high value of
the N/B ratio, also shared by Tochigi Prefecture
Acantholyda albomaculata Shinohara, 1985
(0.78), indicates a very rich representation of the
[Japanese name: Shiromon-matsu-hiratahabachi]
species of the “northern group” in Yamanashi
Prefecture. Distribution. Japan (central to western Hon-
As shown in Fig. 1, the species of the “basic shu, Shikoku).
72 Akihiko Shinohara, Hirohisa Suda and Hideo Takahashi
Fig. 2. Map of Yamanashi Prefecture. Numerals refer to those given in brackets in each collection data and show
approximate locations of the sites.
Material examined. 1? from Hatchodaira from Mt. Kimpu-zan [17], all recorded by Shino-
[15], Mt. Kimpu-zan, 1/ (paratype) from Aoki- hara (2001a).
gahara [48], 1/ from Fuji-rindo recorded by Shi- Host plant. Unknown.
nohara (1985b, 2001a) Remarks. This species is known to occur in
Host plant. Unknown. Honshu (Aomori, Tochigi, Yamanashi, Nagano,
Remarks. This species has been recorded Aichi Prefectures), Shikoku (Tokushima Prefec-
from Honshu (Yamanashi, Nagano, Mie, Nara ture), and Kyushu (Kagoshima Prefecture). It
and Hyogo Prefectures) and Shikoku (Kochi Pre- was first recorded from Yamanashi Prefecture by
fecture) (Shinohara, 2001a). In Yamanashi Pre- Shinohara (2001a).
fecture, three collection records were published
by Shinohara (1985b, 2001a).
Acantholydalaricis(Giraud, 1861)
[Japanese name: Kiberi-hiratahabachi]
Acantholyda iwataiTakeuchi, 1938
Distribution. Europe to Siberia and China.
[Japanese name: Iwata-hiratahabachi]
Japan (central Honshu).
Distribution. Japan (Honshu, Shikoku, Material examined. 1/ from Hoo-goya [8],
Kyushu). Mt. Hoo-zan, recorded by Shinohara (1997).
Material examined. 1/ and 2? from Fuji- Host plants. Larixspp. (Shinohara, 1997).
rindo, 1? from Masutomi-kosen [13], and 1/ Remarks. This larch-feeding species is rare
Pamphiliid Sawflies from Yamanashi Prefecture 73
in Japan, known so far only from five specimens Aokigahara [48] recorded by Takeuchi (1938)
(3/, 2?) from Nagano Prefecture and one and Shinohara (1995b). Additional material.1/,
female from Yamanashi Prefecture, central Mt. Tenjo-yama [46], Kawaguchi-ko, 22. V.
Honshu. 1979, H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Koyodai [49], 3. V.
2002, H. Takahashi (NSMT).
Host plants. Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc.,
AcantholydamizunoiShinohara, 2001
Pinus parviflora var. pentaphylla (Mayr) Henry,
[New Japanese name: O-tsuga-hiratahabachi]
Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc. (see Shinohara,
Distribution. Japan (central Honshu). 2001a).
Material examined. 1? from Masutomi- Remarks. This species is known from
kosen [13] and 1/ from Mt. Misaka-yama [42], Aomori, Yamagata, Miyagi, Fukushima, Tochigi,
both paratypes. Gunma, Ibaraki, Saitama, Tokyo, Kanagawa,
Host plant. Tsuga diversifolia (Maxim.) Yamanashi, Nagano, Ishikawa, and Tottori Pre-
Masters (see Shinohara, 2001a). fectures (Shinohara, 1995b, 2001a). Takeuchi
Remarks. This species was described on the (1938) and Shinohara (1995b) recorded this
basis of seven specimens from central Honshu species from Yamanashi Prefecture.
(Tochigi, Yamanashi and Nagano Prefectures),
including two paratypes from Yamanashi Prefec-
AcantholydatsuyukiiShinohara, 2001
ture (Shinohara, 2001a).
[New Japanese name: Tsuga-hiratahabachi]
Distribution. Japan (central Honshu, Shikoku).
AcantholydanipponicaYano and Sato, 1928
Material examined. 1/ and 1?from Kitaza-
[Japanese name: Nihon-akazu-hiratahabachi]
wa [5], Mt. Kitadake and 1/ and 1? from Mt.
Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, northern to Senjodake [6], South Alps, 1/ from Okanbazawa
central Honshu). [7], 1/ from Gozaishi [9]/Hoo-goya [8], 1/from
Material examined. 1/ from Tokusa-toge Gozaishi-kosen [9], and 2/ from Hatchodaira
[18] recorded by Shinohara (1997). [15], Mt. Kimpu-zan, all paratypes.
Host plants. Larix leptolepis (Sieb. et Zucc.) Host plant. Tsuga diversifolia (Maxim.)
Gord., Pinus strobus L., Pinus pumila (Pallas) Masters (see Shinohara, 2001a).
Regel (see Shinohara, 2001a). Remarks. This species was described on
Remarks. This species is known to occur in the basis of the material from central Honshu
Hokkaido and Aomori, Miyagi, Tochigi, Saita- (Tochigi, Yamanashi, Nagano and Gifu Prefec-
ma, Tokyo, Yamanashi, Nagano, and Ishikawa tures) and Shikoku (Ehime Prefecture) (Shino-
Prefectures (Shinohara, 2001a; Nakamura, 2003). hara, 2001a).
From Yamanashi Prefecture, this species was first
recorded by Shinohara (1997). This is usually an
Cephalciakoebelei(Rohwer, 1910)
uncommon species but it occurred in larch plan-
[Japanese name: Karamatsu-hiratahabachi]
tations of Hokkaido in outbreak proportions in
the last decade. Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu),
Russia (Baikal region).
Material examined. 1/, 14? from Mt. Hoo-
Acantholydasasakii(Yano, 1916)
zan recorded by Shinohara (1997). Additional
[New Japanese name: Haraaka-matsu-hiratahabachi]
material. 1?, Mitsutoge-guchi [43], Kawaguchi-
Distribution. Japan (Honshu). ko Town, 27. VIII. 1986, Y., T. and H. Suda
Material examined. 1/ from Sasago-toge (HSC).
[29], 1/ from Saruhashi [36], and 1/ from Host plant. Larix leptolepis (Sieb. et Zucc.)
74 Akihiko Shinohara, Hirohisa Suda and Hideo Takahashi
Gord. (see Shinohara, 1997). ma Town, 18. VII. 1968, H. Suda (HSC); 1/,
Remarks. Yano (1919, 1920) reported on the Oshino [39], Saruhashi Town, Otsuki City, 10. V.
mass occurrence of “Cephaleia kaebelei [sic] 1977, H. Suda (HSC); 2/, Tateno [40], Yana-
Rohwer” in larch forests in Yamanashi Prefec- gawa Town, Otsuki City, 23. V. 1975, H. Suda
ture. This old record may actually refer to the (HSC); 1/, Koyodai [49], 11. VIII. 1993, H.
foregoing species, C. lariciphila japonica (see Takahashi (NSMT); 1/, Minobu [56], Minobu
Shinohara, 1997). In Honshu, this species has Town, 18. V. 1964, H. Suda (HSC).
been recorded from Niigata, Yamanashi, and Host plant. Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. var.
Nagano Prefectures (Shinohara, 1997). japonica(Miq.) Nakai (see Shinohara, 2006).
Remarks. In Honshu, O. decorata has been
recorded from Miyagi, Fukushima, Tochigi,
Cephalcialariciphila japonica Shinohara, 1997
Saitama, Chiba, Tokyo, Kanagawa, Ishikawa,
[Japanese name: Nihon-karamatsu-hiratahabachi]
Nagano, Osaka, and Hyogo Prefectures (Shino-
Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu). hara, 1985c), and this is the first record from Ya-
Material examined. 2/ and 1? from Mt. manashi Prefecture.
Hoo-zan [8] recorded by Shinohara (1997). Addi-
tional material. 1/, Mt. Mitsutoge-yama [44],
Onycholydaesakii(Takeuchi, 1937)
Kawaguchi-ko Town, 22. V. 1990, H. Suda
[Japanese name: Esaki-hiratahabachi]
(HSC); 1?, Mt. Tenjo-yama [46], Kawaguchi-ko
Town, 10. VI. 1986, H. Suda (HSC); 1/2?, Shi- Distribution. Japan (Honshu, Shikoku,
bokusa–Toriiji Pass [51], 31. V. 1988, H. Suda Kyushu).
(HSC). Material examined. 1/ from Yanagisawa-
Host plant. Larix leptolepis (Sieb. et Zucc.) toge [23] and 1/ from Fuji-rindo recorded by
Gord. (see Shinohara, 1997). Shinohara (1986a). Additional material. 1/,
Remarks. In Honshu, this species is known Koyodai [49]–Sankodai, 3. IX. 1992, H. Taka-
to occur in Tochigi, Yamanashi, and Nagano Pre- hashi (NSMT).
fectures (Shinohara, 1997). In artificial larch Host plant. Unknown.
forests, C. lariciphila japonica and C. koebelei Remarks. In Honshu, this species is known
sometimes occur in great numbers and are re- to occur in Aomori, Iwate, Yamagata, Fukushi-
garded as pests. ma, Tochigi, Tokyo, Kanagawa, Fukui, Ya-
manashi, Nagano, Gifu, Aichi, Nara, Hyogo, and
Hiroshima Prefectures (Shinohara, 1986a; Enoki
Cephalciasp.
and Nakamura, 1993; Nagase, 2004). From Ya-
Material examined. 1/, Kagosaka Pass [55], manashi Prefecture, it was first recorded by Shi-
Yamanaka-ko Village, 25. V. 1972, T. and H. nohara (1986a).
Suda (HSC).
Remarks. Japanese species of the genus
Onycholydalucida(Rohwer, 1910)
Cephalcia are badly in need of revision, and this
[Japanese name: Tsuya-hiratahabachi]
female specimen has not been identified with
certainty. Distribution. Japan (Honshu, Shikoku,
Kyushu).
Material examined. 1? from Masutomi-
OnycholydadecorataShinohara, 1985
kosen [13] recorded by Shinohara (1986b). Addi-
[Japanese name: Wamon-hiratahabachi]
tional material. 6/4?, Utsukushinomori [1],
Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu). 1500–1700m, Yatsugatake Mts., 5–8, VI. 2000,
Specimens examined. 1/, Tokusa Spa, Suta- A. Shinohara (NSMT); 1?, Kiyosato [2], Takane,
Pamphiliid Sawflies from Yamanashi Prefecture 75
Kitakoma, 20. V. 1980, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Ma- in Honshu from Aomori to Hiroshima Prefec-
sutomi [13], 8. V. 1994, H. Hamaji (NSMT); 1/, tures (Shinohara, 1986b; Nakamura and Enoki,
Kanayama-kogen [14], Sutama Town, 28. V. 1997). Shinohara (1986b) was the first to record
1979, H. Suda (HSC); 2/, Tokusa-toge [18], the species from Yamanashi Prefecture.
Kurohira, 19–20. V. 1987, H. Yamazaki (NSMT);
3/, Kitahara [19], Makioka Town, 24. V. 1976,
Onycholydaminomalis(Takeuchi, 1930)
H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Nishizawa-keikoku [21],
[Japanese name: Komon-hiratahabachi]
Mitomi Village, 28. V. 1980, H. Suda (HSC); 1/,
Sakeishi [24], Enzan, 23–24. V. 1987, H. Ya- Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu, Shi-
mazaki (NSMT); 1/, Daibosatsu-toge [25], 19– koku, Kyushu).
22. V. 1961, H. Takenaka (NSMT); 1/, same lo- Specimens examined. 1/1?from Kawaguchi-
cality, 27–28. VII. 1981, T. Niisato (NSMT); 1/, ko [45] recorded by Shinohara (1987). Additional
Daibosatsu road, Enzan City, 18. V. 1966, T. and material. 2?, Kamisasao [3], Kobuchizawa, 19.
H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Hikawa-rindo [26], Dai- V. 1980, H. Suda (HSC); 2?, Kitahara [19],
bosatsu, 9. VI. 1986, Y. Kurosawa (NSMT); 1/, Makioka Town, 24. V. 1976, H. Suda (HSC); 2/,
Hikawa Path [26], Daibosatsu, 14. VI. 1992, S. Nishizawa-keikoku [21], Mitomi Village, 28. V.
Tsuyuki (NSMT); 2/, Hikage [28], Yamato Vil- 1980, H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Kuwasai [32], Otsuki
lage, 16. V. 1978, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Yoshikubo City, 21. V. 1998, H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Koyodai
[30], Sasago Town, Otsuki City, 17. V. 1988, H. [49]–Ashiwada-yama [50], 21. V. 1978, H. Suda
Suda (HSC); 1/, Yunosawa-guchi [31], Otsuki (HSC); 1/, Oshino-mura [52], 6. VI. 1996, H.
City, 21. V. 1998, H. Suda (HSC); 4/, Magi [33], Nagase (HNC); 1/, Kagosaka Pass [55], Ya-
Otsuki Town–Okuyama [35], Nigioka Town, Ot- manaka-ko Village, 25. V. 1972, T. and H. Suda
suki City, 11. V. 1976, H. S Suda (HSC); 2/, (HSC).
same locality, 2. V. 1980, H. Suda (HSC); 3/, Host plant. Rubus parvifolius L. (see Oku-
Ogatayama [34], Tsuru City, 26. IV. 1988, H. tani, 1967).
Suda (HSC); 3?, Ogisan [38], 9. IV. 1990, H. Remarks. In Honshu, this species has been
Takahashi (NSMT); 3/, Torisawa [39], Otsuki recorded from Miyagi, Saitama, Tokyo, Kana-
City, 7. V. 1974, H. Suda (HSC); 2/1?, same lo- gawa, Niigata, Fukui, Ishikawa, Yamanashi,
cality, 23. IV. 1979, H. Suda (HSC); 2/, Oshino Nagano, Gifu, Mie, Kyoto, Osaka, Hyogo, Tottori
[39], Saruhashi Town, Otsuki City, 10. V. 1977, and Hiroshima Prefectures (Shinohara, 1987;
H. Suda (HSC); 4/, Kawai [41], Uenohara, Ki- Taguchi, 1988). It was first recorded from Ya-
tatsuru District, 24. IV. 1990, H. Suda (HSC); manashi Prefecture by Shinohara (1987).
5/, same locality, 16. IV. 1991, H. Suda (HSC);
1/2?, Mt. Mitsutoge [44], Kawaguchi-ko Town,
OnycholydasimilisShinohara, 1987
22. V. 1990, H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Tenjo-san [46],
[Japanese name: O-komon- hiratahabachi]
Kawaguchi-ko, 4. V. 1993, H. Takahashi (NSMT);
1/, same locality, 28. IV. 1987, T. and H. Suda Distribution. Japan (Honshu, Kyushu).
(HSC); 1/, Misaka road, Kawaguchiko Town, Specimens examined. 1/ from Kawaguchi-
22. V. 1990, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Panoramadai ko [45] and 1/ from Yanagawa [40] (both
[47], Kamikuishiki, 22. V. 1978, H. Suda (HSC); paratypes) recorded by Shinohara (1987). Addi-
1/, Koyo-dai [49], Narusawa-mura, 6. V. 1991, tional material. 1?, Yoshikubo [30], Sasago, O-
H. Takahashi (NSMT); 4/5?, Oshino-mura tsuki, 17. V. 1988, H. Suda (HSC); 2/, Yuno-
[52], 1. V. 1990, H. Nagase (HNC). sawa-guchi [31], Otsuki City, 21. V. 1988, H.
Host plants. Rubus spp. (Okutani and Fujita, Suda (HSC); 1?, Kuwasai [32], Otsuki City, 21.
1955). V. 1998, H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Tateno [40], Yana-
Remarks. Onycholyda lucida is widespread gawa Town, Otsuki City, 23. V. 1975, H. Suda
76 Akihiko Shinohara, Hirohisa Suda and Hideo Takahashi
(HSC); 2/3?, Kawai [41], Uenohara Town, 14. kraj).
V. 1991, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Toriiji Pass Material examined. 1/ from Yashajin-toge
[51]–Ohasumi, Fujiyoshida City, 31. V. 1988, H. [10] recorded by Shinohara (1986a). Additional
Suda (HSC); 1/, Kagosaka Pass [55], Yamana- material. 1/, Utsukushinomori [1], 1500–1700
ka-ko Village, 25. V. 1972, T. and H. Suda m, Yatsugatake Mts., 5–8. VI. 2000, A. Shinohara
(HSC). (NSMT); 1?1/, Tokuwa-keikoku [22],
Host plant. Unknown. Mitomi Village, 12. VIII. 1993, H. Suda (HSC);
Remarks. This species was described on the 1/, Hikawa-rindo [26], Daibosatsu, 19. VI. 1982,
basis of the specimens from Akita, Gunma, S. Tsuyuki (NSMT); 1/1?, Yunosawa-guchi
Tokyo, Kanagawa, Niigata, Fukui, Ishikawa, Ya- [31], Otsuki City, 21. V. 1998, H. Suda (HSC);
manashi, Nagano, Gifu, Shizuoka, Shiga, Kyoto, 1?, Saihara [37], Uenohara Town, 11. VI. 1991,
and Hyogo Prefectures (Shinohara, 1987), and H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Kawai [41], Uenohara Town,
was later recorded from Tochigi Prefecture 9. V. 1979, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Kawai [41],
(Nakamura, 2003). Uenohara Town, 14. V. 1991, H. Suda (HSC); 1?,
Panoramadai [47], Kamikuishiki Village, 22. VII.
1975, Y., T. and H. Suda (HSC); 1?, Koyodai
Onycholydatenuis(Takeuchi, 1937)
[49]–Ashiwada-yama [50], 29. VII. 1986, H.
[Japanese name: Hoso-haraaka-hiratahabachi]
Suda (HSC); 1?, Sankodai–Mt. Ashiwada-yama
Distribution. Japan (Honshu). [50], 3. VIII. 1995, H. Takahashi (NSMT); 1/,
Specimens examined. 1?, Sensui-toge [4], Mt. Hirao-yama–Hirano [54], 12. VII. 2002, H.
South Alps, 9. VIII. 1985, A. Shinohara Takahashi (NSMT); 1/, Kagosaka Pass [55]–
(NSMT); 1/, Masutomi-kosen [13], Sutama, 6. Azamidaira, 20. V. 1998, H. Takahashi (NSMT)
VIII. 1986, A. Shinohara (NSMT); 1/, Tokusa Host plant. Rubus crataegifolius Bunge (see
Pass [18], Sutama Town, 18. VII. 1968, H. Suda Okutani and Fujita, 1956).
(HSC); 1/, Marukawa Pass–Sakeishi [24], Remarks. This species occurs widely in Hon-
Enzan, 18. VII. 1978, H. Suda (HSC); 1/, Yuno- shu from Aomori to Hiroshima Prefectures (Shi-
sawa-guchi [31], Otsuki City, 21. V. 1998, H. nohara, 1986a; Nagase, 2004). It was first
Suda (HSC); 1/, Kuwasai [32], Otsuki City, 21. recorded from Yamanashi Prefecture by Shino-
V. 1998, H. Suda (HSC). hara (1986a).
Host plant. Rubus microphyllus L. f. var.
subcrataegifolius (H. Lev. et Vaniot) Ohwi (see
PamphiliusalnicolaErmolenko, 1973
Shinohara, 1987).
[Japanese name: Hannoki-shima-hiratahabachi]
Remarks. This species is known to occur on
higher mountains in Tochigi, Gunma, Saitama, Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, southern
Niigata, Toyama, Ishikawa, Nagano, Gifu, and Kuriles, Honshu), Russia (Primorskij kraj).
Hyogo Prefectures (Shinohara, 1985e). The spec- Material examined. 1/ from Masutomi-
imens listed above represents the first distribution kosen [13] and 1? from Fuji-rindo recorded by
record from Yamanashi Prefecture. The record Shinohara (1985a, 2002).
from Hiroshima Prefecture (Taguchi, 1988) may Host plant. Alnus hirsuta Turcz. (see Shino-
need confirmation. hara and Hara, 1993).
Remarks. This is an uncommon species
recorded in Honshu only from Tokyo, Nagano,
Onycholydaviriditibialis(Takeuchi, 1930)
and Yamanashi Prefectures (Benesˇ, 1977; Shino-
[Japanese name: Aosune-hiratahabachi]
hara, 1985a, 2002).
Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu,
Shikoku, Kyushu), Korea, Russia (Primorskij
