Table Of ContentWORKERS OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE! 
 
 
 
 
ENVER HOXHA 
 
 
 
 
ON LITERATURE AND ART  
 
 
(1949-1980)
ISBN: 978-1-4583-0578-7 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE NOVEMBER 8TH PUBLISHING HOUSE 
TORONTO 2022
ENVER HOXHA
CONTENTS 
OUR  LITERATURE  SHOULD  FOLLOW  THE 
ROAD OF SOCIALIST REALISM — Discussion 
at the meeting of the Political Bureau of the CC of the 
PLA (June 7, 1949)  ..................................................... 1 
ADVICE FOR NEW WRITERS (June 23, 1949) ............. 8 
OUR  INTELLIGENTSIA  IS  RAISED  AND 
DEVELOPED  IN  THE  BOSOM  OF  THE 
PEOPLE — From the speech at the meeting with the 
representatives  of  the  intelligentsia  of  the  capital 
(October 25, 1962) ..................................................... 12 
LITERATURE AND THE ARTS SHOULD SERVE 
TO  TEMPER  PEOPLE  WITH  CLASS 
CONSCIOUSNESS  FOR  THE 
CONSTRUCTION  OF  SOCIALISM  —  The 
closing speech delivered at the 15th Plenum of the CC 
of the PLA (October 26, 1965)  ................................... 23 
FROM THE REPORT TO THE 5TH CONGRESS 
OF THE PLA «ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE 
CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE PARTY OF 
LABOUR OF ALBANIA» (November 1, 1966) ......... 50 
TOWARDS  FURTHER  REVOLUTIONIZING 
OUR SCHOOLS — From a speech at a meeting of 
the Politburo of the PLA Central Committee (March 
7, 1967) ..................................................................... 57 
CARRY  OUT  THE  TASKS  OF 
REVOLUTIONIZING OUR PARTY AND THE 
LIFE  OF  OUR  COUNTRY  WITH
PERSISTENCE AND IN A CREATIVE WAY — 
From a speech at the 17th Party Conference of the city 
of Tirana (December 21, 1968) ................................... 66 
LETTER  TO  SCULPTORS  KRISTAQ  RAMA, 
MUNTAZ DHRAMI AND SHABAN HADËRI 
(June 26, 1969) .......................................................... 78 
FROM THE REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF 
THE  CENTRAL  COMMITTEE  OF  THE 
PARTY OF LABOUR OF ALBANIA — Presented 
to the 6th Congress of the PLA (November 1, 1971) ...... 82 
INSENTIFY  THE  IDEOLOGICAL  STRUGGLE 
AGAINST  ALIEN  PHENOMENA  AND 
LIBERAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS THEM — 
From  a  report  to  the  4th  Plenum  of  the  Central 
Committee of the PLA (June 26, 1973) ........................ 85 
WRITERS AND ARTISTS ARE ASSISTANTS OF 
THE  PARTY  FOR  THE  COMMUNIST 
EDUCATION  OF  OUR  PEOPLE  —  Speech 
delivered at the meeting of the Secretariat of the CC of 
the PLA concerning the implementation to date of the 
tasks in literature and art set by the 4th Plenum of the 
CC of the PLA (December 20, 1974) ......................... 128 
FROM THE REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF 
THE  CENTRAL  COMMITTEE  OF  THE 
PARTY OF LABOUR OF ALBANIA — Presented 
to the 7th Congress of the PLA (November 1, 1976) .... 161 
PROUDHON’S  SUCCESSORS  IN  FRANCE 
(Excerpts) .................................................................. 214
OUR LITERATURE SHOULD FOLLOW 
THE ROAD OF SOCIALIST REALISM 
Discussion at the meeting of the Political Bureau of the CC of 
the PLA1 
June 7, 1949 
In his address to the comrades of the League of Writers in-
vited at the meeting of the Political Bureau, Comrade Enver 
Hoxha said: 
We would like to know your opinion on the way the 3rd 
Conference of the League of Writers is going to proceed so 
that we can help you with our advice. In your material, in 
which you have jotted down the principal ideas of the report, 
a great deal is said about the prewar writers, and very little 
about the writers of the years of the National Liberation War 
and the postwar period. Thus the old writers eclipse the new 
ones. We want you to tell us how you came to this conclusion, 
so that afterwards, as I said above, we can give you our help. 
At the conclusion of discussion Comrade Enver Hoxha said: 
The conference of writers is of great importance. Of 
course, both you as writers and we are concerned to see it 
properly prepared so that it will proceed successfully. But it 
must be said that this problem has not been properly tackled 
 
1 The Politburo of the Central Committee of the PLA heard a report 
from some of the leaders of the Writers’ Union at this meeting on the 
issues they intended to raise at the 3rd Conference of the Writers’ Union. 
 
1
as a whole and in proportion to its importance. The main 
attention should not be centred chiefly on six or seven well-
known writers who have distinguished themselves with their 
writings, but on the major problem of building our new pro-
gressive literature as well as of encouraging our new talents. 
We would be making a mistake if we were to demand perfec-
tion in the work of new writers at this stage. This will come 
gradually. We would also be making a mistake if we were to 
be content with just those few affirmed writers. It is my opin-
ion that the writers’ conference should have as its main objec-
tive the encouragement of the new talents, greater encourage-
ment for them from the Party, the special assistance that 
should be given them for their ideological education. 
The cultural level of our cadres is still low, but this does 
not imply that they should hesitate to air their views freely on 
problems of literature. This, however, is not attained without 
exertion. We must understand this properly. If it is thought 
that in order to create writers should be taken off work, all 
that will come out will be cliches. We are told that in the So-
viet Union there are writers who have been taken off any 
other activity in order to engage in literary creation, but we 
should bear in mind that in the beginning they worked any-
where they were needed, some of them even worked in facto-
ries and continued their writing at the same time. Even now 
they address conferences, engage in other activities and con-
tinue their writing. With this I mean that our writers should 
work somewhere, but at the same time they must also write. 
I agree that the writers must be eased of some of the burden 
that hinders them in their literary activity, but this does not 
mean that they should pass the time strolling round the town. 
 
2
Life and the everyday struggle together with the working 
masses will assist our writers in their creative work. If you go 
to the railway construction site, for instance, and live and 
work among the youth, there is no doubt that you will find 
inspiration there, while, if you divorce yourself from the 
masses, you cannot find inspiration. 
In some of the contributions we heard here from the com-
rades of the League I noticed a certain dose of pessimism. 
More is demanded from the material we have in our country 
today. However, in my opinion, Fishta with his satires can’t 
bear comparison with the «Epic of the Balli Kombëtar» by 
Shefqet Musaraj. The works of our comrades who write about 
the war, the life and work of our people, stand higher and are 
of a sound content. At the moment there may be some short-
comings in regard to form, but we can be confident that with 
the passage of time their works will improve in this aspect, 
too. 
Despite this, the study presented by Comrade Dhimitër 
Shuteriqi is good. Therefore, we should work in this direction 
in order to assist the development of our new socialist litera-
ture. We must encourage our new writers, have more frequent 
contact with them, help them study and raise themselves ide-
ologically, culturally, and professionally, so that they can pro-
duce more and better works. Your writings must be brought 
more to the fore, because they are not being publicized as they 
should. This is not because this person or another does not 
want to, but merely because of underestimation and because 
the idea has been created that in order to write one should be 
a specialist. We must combat this opinion. The press should 
play a positive role in this direction. You too must make your 
 
3
contribution to the press in order to improve it, because to 
us, it has become like a gramophone record which is played 
over and over again with the same boring phraseology, the 
same words and expressions, without spirit and life, with a 
few monotonous reports. We must see to it that our press 
publishes better quality reviews and evaluations of the work 
of our new writers; this is what we must emphasize. Of course, 
this must not become an obstacle to analysing the works of 
the past, to evaluating their positive aspects and rejecting 
those which are harmful. It would be a great thing, for exam-
ple, if a good study were made of the work of Naim Frashëri, 
because in this manner we shall teach our people not only 
how to make an assessment of Naim, but also how to get the 
correct bearings in assessing the others, and not make mis-
takes. But the problems of the present must be in the centre 
of our attention. We should not become involved in empty 
discussions of reactionary authors like Fishta, Koliqi, etc., but 
we should bring out the values of those who write for the peo-
ple. In the field of literature, as everywhere else, we should 
take our stand on the position of the Party. 
During this period our literature has grown stronger, has 
made headway, and new talents are continually making their 
debut. It must be developed along the road of socialist real-
ism, relying firmly on the national terrain and on the Marxist-
Leninist ideology. We must go more deeply into the work for 
the development of our literature. This requires that our 
writer comrades themselves, among other things, must read 
more and never say, «We haven’t the time to read». We are 
busy, too, but we try to find the time, and in fact we do read. 
A writer who does not make efforts, first of all, to raise his 
 
4