Table Of ContentWestern Kentucky University
TopSCHOLAR®
Government theses Government
12-1977
The Masterless Society: Observations on American
Democracy by Alexis de Tocqueville
James Tyrie Jr.
Follow this and additional works at:http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/gov_theses
Part of theAmerican Politics Commons,American Studies Commons,Political History
Commons, and theUnited States History Commons
Recommended Citation
Tyrie, James Jr., "The Masterless Society: Observations on American Democracy by Alexis de Tocqueville" (1977).Government theses.
Paper 1.
http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/gov_theses/1
This Other is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government theses by an authorized
administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected].
• 
THE  I~~TERLEJS SOCIETYI  OB~ERVATIONJ O~ 
AMERICA:1  O:.\t.:OCRACY  OY  ALEXr,; DE  ?OCQ'E'l ILL~ 
A Thesis 
Pronented to 
the  Faculty of the Department of Government 
~1cst~rn i<ent'lcky Ilniversity 
BOlv1 ing  Green.  Kent'lcky 
• 
In Partial  Fulfillment 
of the  Reqll irem'lots  for  the Degreo 
r:aster  of Arts 
by 
Jane:::  S.  Tyrie,  Jr. 
•  December  1977
• 
AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF THESIS 
Permis.ion 15 hereby 
~ranted 
to the Western Kentucky University Library to 
make, or allow to be made photocopies.  microfilm or other 
copies of this the.iII (or appropriate research or scholarly 
purp.lsell. 
O reserved to the author for the making of any copies of this 
•  thesis except (or brief acctions for research or Icholarly 
purpOICs • 
Signed 
Date 
Please pl03ce a.n "X;"  in the appropriate box. 
Thill (orm will be filed with the original of the thcal.s and will control 
future lIle of the thesili • 
•
• 
•  cCOMMtmd<'d  \ - ? 3 - t"\ B 
(::In to) 
t;:::ir 
f  o~c~c!f:-, 
b:; t 
,eo l-' c/ ( 
ApprOVerl'~_-~} __- L7TI-T~7~J~ _________  
- (Uate) 
//.,-, 
, 
'Jean of t.he  College 
• 
ii
• 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 
The writer wisheo  to acknowledgo hts  indebtedness to 
several  individuals who  sacrificed their time  in making  this 
paper possible.  Sincere appreciation 1s expressed to Dr.  Edward 
N.  Kearny.  who  suggested  the topic of the thesis.  His  valuable 
comments,  insight. and  guidance were of great benefit. 
Appreciation is alao expressed to Dr.  John D.  Parker and 
Dr.  ?aye Carroll for their help and  guldRnce. 
A special appreciation is  given to my  wife.  Betsy,  for 
•  her expertise and  perseverance  in the many  hours  of typing 
the rr.anuscr ipt • 
• 
Hi
• 
TABLE  OF  CONTE~ITS 
.... .... . .. . ... . .. . . 
ACKNO'IILEDGM=:NTS 
iii 
Chapter 
1.  INTJ.:OD 'c'r ION 
II.  FOUNDATIONS  OF FREEDOM 
9 
Ill.  EQllALlTY OF  CONDITIONS  20 
1'1.  THE t<:ASTERLES$ SOCIETY 
35 
V.  ECONvrlIC f.lAfERIALISi,:, 
!MSTERLESS soc IETY  50 
V I.  SAFEG'!AROS  AGAINST  TilE  .. NE·. ..  DESPOT ISN"  .  62 
•  . .... .... . . 
'Ill.  COHCLI'SION!:)  •  •  •  •  .  •  •  •  72 
!UBLIOGP.APHY •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  .  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  •  76
• 
THE  MASTERLESS  SOCIETY, 
OBSERVATIONS ON  AMERICAN  DEr.OCRACY 
BY  ALEXIS  DE  TOCQUEVILLE 
James S.  Tyrie.  Jr.  December 1977  84 pages 
Directed by,  Edward  N.  Kearny,  John D.  Parker. and Faye Carroll 
Department of Government  ~estern Kentucky University 
Prench political  theorist Alexis de Tocqueville's  views 
cor.earning American democracy were examined  in order to discern 
key aspects of democratic thought and  practice in America. 
Tocqueville found  certain fundament8 1 pr~mises such as  Ind i 
vidual  freedom and "equality of conditions"  at the  base of 
•  democracy  in America.  Prom  these basic premises come  several 
paradoxical  results,  namely the rnssterlesu society. economic 
materialism.  and "tyranny of the majority."  The$e  paradoxec 
are controlled  by safeguardS  of aSAociations,  ttle  preBs,  and 
the  judiciary within the system.  It was  found  that Tocqueville's 
detachment and  foresight give his thought greater meaning than 
that of many  contemporary social and  political thinkers such as 
Jean-Jacques Revel and others.  This high degree of foresight and 
detachment make  it possible fo. students  to discover an~ 
rediscover basic facets  of American society today. 
•
• 
I'I':'RO~" CT 10:1 
~learl II one  h!l:"ldred and  ft f:..y  j'e'!.r:: 3"'0.  n  va mf' i"rench 
oolitlcal  !lcicntiGt named  ALexis de Tocq'lev1l1e, atone with 
hll1  etol'te  fric:"!d CUg  ave de ~eall:nont.. cane  to Anerica  under  the 
prctllnse of st.mbl.nl7 the  A,'erican pennl  sy:.;te"l h'a  l~ft.  with 
who.  for GaMe  i:3  the  true moaninf'  of "mel'lear.  dcI'lOc!'ocv. 
'!'!lh: visit took  pIneo  in  1811 and  tantod  nearl"  one  ,,{'ar. 
rn  this relativelY :::hort stay,  ':'ocq'JCvitle,  thro'li'h 1''.1.G 
• 
persist.ent.  qucGtloning and  intcrviewinp,  discerned ko')  n3pects 
of democratic thoupht. and  practice  in America  Which ~,3d been 
overlooked  l'Jy  nany  contcnpornry  :.;t'ldents of Anericnn  rlenocracy. 
roth =.:uropcnn and  Ame!"ican.  :-:ven  today.  Tocquevilte's  two 
1101'11:10  work  entitled Democracv  in flnerica  rennins a  classic 
""I\rely  match d  in  its  provoc&.t\ve  pro..,in"  of A:r.erican nociet~. 
:"':0  major  factors contrih:Jtc to  the IIniqur.nc:;s  of 'l'oco"cville's 
political  t.hour,ht. 
;-'irst.  '!'ocqueville'g  detachr.tent  from America kept  his 
findinP-G unfettered.  H~ was  k  traveler in a  stranrc  land  and 
as  s'lch was able  to tnke a  removed  viewpoint of the AMeriean 
scene.  As  a  sophisticated ~uropenn traveler  in a  stran~e 
land,  Tocqueville  was  in a  better position to  perceive  Anerica 
• 
from a  broad  cosmopolitan perspective  rather than from  a  narrow 
phrochial  viewpoint,
•  ? 
Tocquevllle's  independence ~M nn obBe~Ver WOJ  enhnnced 
by  the  fact that  he was  not  only  physically rletachod  from 
America via Prance but  alco  Ideologicully  douchod and  free  from 
preferences  which would tend  to cloud  hlG  thought.  Unlike 
many who  came  to Americ&  with  preset  ldeologicnl  notiono of 
democracy,  Tocquevllie  was able  to  hold  his  preconccptlontJ  at. 
a diotance while Observing.  This  e~~bled him  to give a 
somewhat  more accurate Rccount of the political  and  social 
ins-::itutions he observed  in the United States.  If one compared 
the writings of  Tocqueville with.  for example.  those of 
Thomas Paine.  one  might discover he ...  an nbnence  of bllndinR 
ideological  preferences  in Tocquev1l1e's  case  adds  to hill 
•  uniqueness as an observer  of American  institutions . 
Thomas  Paine was one of  the greatoot  propagnndluta nnd 
polit ical pamphleteerti who  ever lived.  But  he wa~ not nn 
astute observer.  He  came  to America  from England w 1t .h 
preconceived notions  of government  and  the  ~ommon man. 
A long history of  early hardships  had  instilled  in him n 
hatred  of  government and aristocracy,  together  with an 
unblemished  regard  for the common  man.  Common Sense was  n 
brilliant  reflection of what  tho common man  in America was 
feeling in 1775.  But  it will never rank high  as nn explanation 
of American character or institutions. 
In contrast  to Paine, Tocqueville 8eems  to have  the 
uncanny ability to shed preconceived notions and  impressions 
• 
of  hio aristocratic past enabling him  to give an accurate and 
...."rc9ptive Ilcc\'Iunt  of  demucntic mores  in the United States.
•  ) 
It  is this ahillty of Tocquev!.l1e  to  oh~d hill .. ristocratlc 
~roundinpo that adds  to  the uniqlencsG and  detachmen~ of his 
writinp'~. 
Toeq'lovillc,  more  than r'lost poUtical \. . riters anr:! 
trlnkcrn of the cirhtccnth  and  nineteenth centuries,  ·.. . as ahle 
to pive an  ex~rnordinnrily objective aeco lnt of 1CMocratic 
in!:: t i tilt iono  in Ar.H~r ien.  As  Den,tnM in r'.  ','ir i"'h t  po in ts o'll, 
"'!'ocq'lcvlltc  saw with  8r:'!a7.inp clarity,  where othero !law  h'lt 
ha7ilv  if  at  all.  thnt danoerney was on  the 'NI\\',  that the 
hroadeninp:  0  power and  privitera \'o'ns  nn  incvitat>le  stare  of 
IVlI'Ian  evolution."l  For a  f.uropean aristocrat to  make  this 
forecRot  required  a  large mcasun~  of  detact,Ment. 
•  A l':ccond  factor charflct.crit;tic  of  ':'ocq IcvillC't; 
thOtlJ"ht Wft~  hiG  dep'ree  of  foreGi.ht,  7oc~',If'ville !lce~ed to 
hnve  a  ,'onarkahle  a"lility  to anticipate ;'meriean t.rends and 
iRS'les.  I'nnv of  the  o'loerva t i ... n~  thn t are "'ounti  in h h: wr i t inr'fl 
3re  :"e le ... an t  in  todav' S  GOC ie ty UG  ev iJc:~=&d  in  the  fo 110v.' in!" 
quotel 
There nrc.  at the  present  til1e.  two  ~reat nntions 
1n  the world  which see:n  to  tend  tovlards  the same end, 
nlthouph  they started  f:-on different points:  I  all'lde 
to  the  !lussians and  the Americam;.  ":loth of  them have 
grO',vn up 'lnnoticed:  snd whilst the attention of 
l'I1ankind  \'taG  di:-ected elgewhere,  they  r.ave  (lllddenly 
assumed a  mOGt  prominent  place  amongst  the  nations: 
and  the world  learned  ~heir existence nnd  their 
prentness at  al"oat the same  time. 
All other  nations  seem  to have  ~early renched  thcir 
on turnl  lini ts.  and on ly  to he  char~ed with  the 
113cn,lnmin P.  "lright.  "American Government and  Politics 
• 
of Democracy  in America,N American Politi~al Science  kevicw 
40  (Fe\"ruary  191.6) I  57 •
Description:Prench political theorist Alexis de Tocqueville's views cor.earning American democracy were examined in order to discern key aspects of democratic thought and practice in America. Tocqueville found certain fundament8 1 pr~mises such as Ind i- vidual freedom and "equality of conditions" at the base