Table Of ContentIN PURSUIT OF HERDS OR LAND? NOMADS, PEASANTS 
AND PASTORAL ECONOMIES IN ANATOLIA FROM A 
REGIONAL PERSPECTIVE 
           1600-1645 
 
   by 
 
          ONUR USTA 
 
     A thesis submitted to 
     The University of Birmingham 
         for the degree of 
     DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 
 
  
                           
 
 
 
 
                  
 
Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman  
and Modern Greek Studies  
School of History and Cultures  
University of Birmingham 
November 2016
University of Birmingham Research Archive 
 
e-theses repository 
 
 
This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third 
parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect 
of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or 
as modified by any successor legislation.   
 
Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in 
accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged.  Further 
distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission 
of the copyright holder.
Abstract 
The documentary evidence used in this dissertation has been drawn from the Ottoman court 
records and it is complemented by the data derıved from the fiscal registers. This dissertation 
adopted a case-study approach to allow a deeper insight into the complexities of the rural history of 
Ottoman Anatolia in the first half of the seventeenth century. These complexities are more related to 
the methodological approaches which are based on the adaptation of the purported theories about 
‘the general crisis of the seventeenth century’ to Ottoman history. Such misinterpretations put the 
contention that a set of social, economic and ecological challenges associated with the Little Ice 
Age put a lot of serious strains on the Ottoman state and society during the seventeenth century. By 
adopting a critical approach to the arguments of such crisis-based theories that revolve around the 
Celali rebellions and the phenomenon of the Little Ice Age, this dissertation aims to show through 
the cases of Aintab, Urfa and Ankara that the countryside of Anatolia was more resilient to the so-
called challenges than it seems. 
This dissertation examines the economic, demographic and ecological dynamics in rural 
Anatolia in the period following the Celali rebellions from a regional perspective that takes into 
consideration the local geographic and climatic characteristics. It focuses on a wide range of topics 
that include types of farming, rural settlement patterns, change in rural settlements, and agrarian and 
pastoral trends in the land use forms. It explores the pastoral and agricultural  activities of the 
nomadic people with the aim of highlighting their constructive in the rural economies of Anatolia.  
 
 
 
 
  ii
To Aslı with love and eternal gratitude 
 for making it possible 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  iii
Acknowledgements 
Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to my thesis supervisor Dr. Rhoads Murphey, 
for his continuous support and patience for the entire process of my PhD journey. His excellent 
guidance helped me explore various aspects of Ottoman history and broaden my horizons about the 
nomads in Ottoman Empire. I would also like to thank Dr. Ruth Macrides, for her motivation and 
encouragement, Dr. Archie Dunn for his valuable recommendations for further readings on nomads 
and pastoralism, Dr. Warren Eastwood for his helpful guidance about environmental and climate 
history, Dr. Oktay Özel, from the Department of History at İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University in 
Ankara, for his inspiration to introduce me to the nomadic world of Ottoman Anatolia, and also Dr. 
Fikret Yılmaz, from Istanbul Bahҫeşehir University, for his helpful guidance and expert advise 
about the use of Ottoman fiscal registers. Besides, I would also like to thank my thesis examiners: 
Dr. Marios Hadjianastasis, and Dr. James Baldwin, for their insightful comments and suggestions 
on the use of court records as historical evidence and encouragements for further studies on rural 
history of Ottoman Anatolia.  
I am very grateful to Ҫanakkale Onsekiz Mart University and Turkish Higher Education 
Council  for  providing  me  a  unique  opportunity  to  earn  a  PhD  degree  from  University  of 
Birmingham by awarding me scholarships and bursaries. 
Needless to say, I am intebted to many people for all their support and encouragement 
during my PhD period. First of all, I have a lot to be thankful to my wife, Aslı Eldeş Usta, and my 
parents for her endless patience and unconditional love. I owe a debt of gratitude to Doğuş and 
Hillary Usta for their warm affection that I have received in every time I visit them in Manchester. 
Besides, I would like to thank my friends and colleagues at Birmingham, specially Seyit Özkutlu 
for making me familiar with Cyprus and the medieval history of the East Mediterranean, the coin-
man Ali Mıynat for leading me think over medieval Anatolia, Alessandro Paolini for his loyal 
company and positive energy whenever I need, Ilaria Bernardi for her supportive motivation by 
saying continuously ‘you almost there’, Francisco Lopez-Santos Kornberger for making me smile 
always ‘ceddin deden, neslin baban’, Giulia Covarino for her kind friendship in Wesmere House. I 
would also like to thank Alper Kumcu, Chiara Morbi, Cosmin Minea, Dimitris Lamprakis, Erdem 
Ҫolak, Esen Hanaҫ, Gemma Mason, Georgia Michael,  Maria D. Petropoulou, Onur Acaroğlu, 
Özcan Gazioğlu, Rohit Talwar, and Selim Çakır for their lovely companion. I need to apologize in 
advance to all others I forgot to mention, but you know you were with me.  
  iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 
FROM ‘CATASTROPHE’ TO ‘CRISIS’ ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 
THE NOMADIC TURKMENS IN MEDIEVAL ANATOLIA, DECLINE OR RECOVERY ? ....................................................................... 6 
THE PARADOX OF THE ‘CRISIS’, FROM REBELS TO NOMADS ....................................................................................................... 28 
THE LITTLE ICE AGE PARADIGM ......................................................................................................................................................... 38 
THE UTILIZATION OF ARCHIVAL RECORDS FOR STUDY OF THE RURAL LANDSCAPE IN OTTOMAN ANATOLIA ............... 46 
COURT RECORDS AND NOMADS ......................................................................................................................................................... 52 
METHODOLOGY AND SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 58 
CHAPTER 1 AINTAB..............................................................................................................................65 
LAND, GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE..................................................................................................................................................... 65 
PRODUCTION AND POPULATION IN COUNTRYSIDE ....................................................................................................................... 70 
NOMADS AND PASTORALISM .............................................................................................................................................................. 97 
NOMADS AND AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................................... 125 
REGIONAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................................... 130 
CHAPTER 2 URFA ................................................................................................................................ 132 
LAND, GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE.................................................................................................................................................. 132 
PRODUCTION AND POPULATION..................................................................................................................................................... 140 
NOMADS AND PASTORALISM ........................................................................................................................................................... 161 
NOMADS AND AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................................... 178 
REGIONAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................................... 185 
CHAPTER 3 ANKARA .......................................................................................................................... 188 
LAND, GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE.................................................................................................................................................. 188 
PRODUCTION AND POPULATION..................................................................................................................................................... 195 
NOMADS AND PASTORALISM ........................................................................................................................................................... 219 
NOMADS AND AGRICULTURE ........................................................................................................................................................... 251 
REGIONAL OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................................... 262 
CONCLUSION FROM ‘CRISIS’ TO RESILIENCE ........................................................................... 265 
APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................ 277 
APPENDIX 1- MAP OF ANATOLIA .................................................................................................................................................... 278 
APPENDIX 2- MAP OF SOUTHEASTERN ANATOLIA ..................................................................................................................... 279 
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................... 280 
UNPUBLISHED PRIMARY SOURCES................................................................................................................................................. 281 
PUBLISHED PRIMARY SOURCES AND CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTS ........................................................................................ 282 
SECONDARY SOURCES ....................................................................................................................................................................... 299 
INTERNET SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................................................... 299 
 
 
 
 
  v
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES 
 
FIGURE 1    THE PROPORTIONS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN AINTAB IN THE 1570S ............................................ 75 
TABLE   1   THE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE TAX REVENUES OF THE SETTLEMENTS IN AINTAB IN THE 1600S AND 1610S 
CONCERNING THE CANBOLADOĞLU REBELLION ........................................................................................................................... 82 
TABLE   2   THE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE TAX REVENUES OF THE SETTLEMENTS IN AINTAB IN THE 1600S AND 1610S 
CONCERNING THE LOCUST INVASION ............................................................................................................................................... 88 
TABLE   3   THE LIVESTOCK PRICES IN THE ESTATE INVENTORY OF DERBEDEROĞLU ...................................................... 178 
TABLE   4   THE ESTATE INVENTORY OF YUSUF…………………………………………………………………………………….239 
TABLE   5   THE ESTATE INVENTORY OF MUSTAFA BIN ABDI .................................................................................................. 240 
TABLE   6   THE ESTATE INVENTORY OF MUSTAFA BIN HIMMET ............................................................................................ 241 
TABLE   7   THE OFFICIAL PRICES OF CEREAL PRODUCTS IN ANKARA IN 1619 .................................................................. 259 
TABLE 8 THE YIELDS OF EDIBLE WHEAT AND BULGUR PER DÖNÜM AND THEIR PRICES IN ANKARA IN 1619 ................... 
 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... .260 
TABLE    9  THE INVENTORY LIST OF MUSTAFA FROM HAYMANA RECORDED IN 1624 ................................................... 261 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  vi
Abbreviations    
 
EI      Encyclopaedia of Islam first edition 
EI2                  Encyclopaedia of Islam second edition 
EI3                  Encyclopaedia of Islam third edition 
İA                    İslam Ansiklopedisi 
JESHO            Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 
KK                  Kamil Kepeci Tasnifi 
MAD              Maliyeden Müdevver Defterleri 
TDVİA           Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  vii
Note on Transliteration 
 
In this dissertation, I have used modern Turkish ortography for personal names in the court entries 
and for administrative terms used in an Ottoman context (e.g., İbrahim, kadı, sancak).  However, I 
have used English to refer to some certain Ottoman words, which have a known English form, like 
janissary, pasha and agha. Besides, I have preferred to use the English translation of the technical 
terms peculiar to the Ottoman court registers (e.g., petition as in arzuhal, takrir as in statement, and 
öşür as in tithe). For the transliteration of Ottoman documents given in footnotes, I have used the 
system of the İslam Ansiklopedisi. 
 
 
Pronunciation of Modern Turkish Letters 
 c    j, as in jar 
 ç    ch, as in church or chimney  
 ş    sh, as in ship or short 
 ğ    unvocalized, lengthens preceding vowels 
 ı    io, as in motion 
 ö    u, as in furnish 
 ü    u, as in  amuse                           
  viii
Glossary 
 
Ağa                  an honorary title for military officers and Muslim notables    
Akçe                                      a small silver Ottoman coin 
Avarız-ı divaniye 
ve tekalif-i örfiyye                             extraordinary taxes and customary levies 
Beşe                                                      honorary title for men who served in the army 
Bennak                                                 peasants who had no land or small area of land less than   
                                                             a half çift land 
Çavuş                                                   sergeant 
Çift                                                       a full-sized area of land whose size regionally changed    
                                                             from 5.5 to 11 hectares on average  
Dönüm                                                 an Ottoman unit of area that was equivalent to 918.4 m2 
Eyalet                                                   province, a primary administrative division  
Has                                                       largest revenue grant under the timar system, belonging  
                                                             to the ruler and his household or the provincial governors 
Havass-ı Hümayun                             imperial domains, or crown lands  
Kadı                                                     judge 
Mezraa                                                 a large field with no permanent settlement 
Miri           belonging to the state 
Müteferrika                                          a member of an elite guard unit of palace cavalry 
Mücerred                                              bachelor, unmarried and landless peasant 
Nahiye                                                 an administrative subdivision that was subject to sancak 
Narh                                                     price list on necessities, established by the kadı  
Pare                                                      a monetary unit used in the Levant 
Timar                                                    smallest revenue grant belonging to the military officers 
Sancak                                                  an administrative subdivision that was subject to eyalet 
Sipahi                                                   a member of the cavalry forces in the provinces who held   
             timar as revenue  
Șahi                                                  a monetary unit used in the Levant 
Vakıf                                                 pious foundation whose revenue supports a religious and    
             charitable purpose 
Zaim                                                    a holder of a large timar 
 
 
                                                        
 
  ix
Description:guidance helped me explore various aspects of Ottoman history and broaden my horizons about the  107 Halil İnalcık and Donald Quataert, An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire,  because they did not feel obliged to pay the tax for their agro-pastoral activities in the mezraas.