Table Of ContentRESEARCHARTICLE
Modeling the Mechanisms by Which HIV-
Associated Immunosuppression Influences
HPV Persistence at the Oral Mucosa
MeghnaVerma1☯,SamanthaErwin2☯,VidaAbedi1,RaquelHontecillas1,StefanHoops1,
AndrewLeber1,JosepBassaganya-Riera1*,StancaM.Ciupe2*
1 NutritionalImmunologyandMolecularMedicineLaboratory,BiocomplexityInstituteofVirginiaTech,
Blacksburg,VA,UnitedStatesofAmerica,2 DepartmentofMathematics,VirginiaTech,Blacksburg,VA,
UnitedStatesofAmerica
a1111111111
a1111111111 ☯Theseauthorscontributedequallytothiswork.
a1111111111 *[email protected](JBR);[email protected](SC)
a1111111111
a1111111111
Abstract
Humanimmunodeficiencyvirus(HIV)-infectedpatientsareatanincreasedriskofco-infec-
tionwithhumanpapillomavirus(HPV),andsubsequentmalignanciessuchasoralcancer.
OPENACCESS
TodeterminetheroleofHIV-associatedimmunesuppressiononHPVpersistenceandpath-
Citation:VermaM,ErwinS,AbediV,HontecillasR, ogenesis,andtoinvestigatethemechanismsunderlyingthemodulationofHPVinfection
HoopsS,LeberA,etal.(2017)Modelingthe
andoralcancerbyHIV,wedevelopedamathematicalmodelofHIV/HPVco-infection.Our
MechanismsbyWhichHIV-Associated
modelcapturesknownimmunologicalandmolecularfeaturessuchasimpairedHPV-spe-
ImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
attheOralMucosa.PLoSONE12(1):e0168133. cificeffectorThelper1(Th1)cellresponses,andenhancedHPVinfectionduetoHIV.We
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 usedthemodeltodetermineHPVprognosisinthepresenceofHIVinfection,andidentified
Editor:GuidoPoli,UniversitaVitaSaluteSan conditionsunderwhichHIVinfectionaltersHPVpersistenceintheoralmucosasystem.
Raffaele,ITALY ThemodelpredictsthatconditionsleadingtoHPVpersistenceduringHIV/HPVco-infection
Received:May3,2016 arethepermissiveimmuneenvironmentcreatedbyHIVandmolecularinteractionsbetween
thetwoviruses.ThemodelalsodetermineswhenHPVinfectioncontinuestopersistinthe
Accepted:November24,2016
shortruninaco-infectedpatientundergoingantiretroviraltherapy.Lastly,themodelpre-
Published:January6,2017
dictsthat,underefficaciousantiretroviraltreatment,HPVinfectionswilldecreaseinthelong
Copyright:©2017Vermaetal.Thisisanopen
runduetotherestorationofCD4+Tcellnumbersandprotectiveimmuneresponses.
accessarticledistributedunderthetermsofthe
CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,which
permitsunrestricteduse,distribution,and
reproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginal
authorandsourcearecredited.
DataAvailabilityStatement:ThecompleteSBML
compliantmodelwasdepositedinwww. Introduction
biomodels.netandassignedtheidentifierMODEL
1605030001.Alltheotherrelevantdataarewithin Infectionwiththehumanimmunodeficiencyvirus(HIV)afflictsover35millionpeopleworld-
thepaperanditsSupportingInformationfiles. wideandresultsinimpairedimmuneresponseswhichmayaffectdefensesagainstother
pathogens.Intheabsenceofprotectivevaccines,currentmanagementofHIVconsistsof
Funding:Thestudywassupportedbythefunds
fromtheNutritionalImmunologyandMolecular administrationofcombinationantiretroviraltherapy(cART)—whichsuppressesviralreplica-
MedicineLaboratory(www.nimml.org). tionand,consequently,drasticallyreducesmorbidityandmortality[1,2].cARTsare99%
effective;however,antiviraldrugresistance(mainlycausedbynon-compliance)againstsome
CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclared
thatnocompetinginterestsexist. oftheanti-HIVdrugshasbeenreportedinupto60%ofthepatients[3].Moreover,acurefor
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 1/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
HIVischallengingduetothestrictneedforlifelongtreatmenttoavoidvirusreboundfrom
activationoflatentreservoirs.
Apartfromtheacquiredimmunodeficiencysyndrome(AIDS),HIVincreasestheriskof
developingopportunisticinfectionsbyotherinfectiousagents,includingviruses:papillomavi-
rus,herpesviruses,flaviviruses;andbacteria:Helicobacterpylori,Salmonellatyphimurium,
Chlamydophilapneumonia[4].EpidemiologicaldatasuggeststhatHIVpatientshavean
increasedriskfordevelopinghumanpapillomavirus(HPV)-inducedcancerssuchasoropha-
ryngealcancer,cervicalcancer,anogenitalcancerandanalcancers[5–10].However,thecellu-
larandmolecularmechanismsexplainingthecorrelationbetweenincreasedsusceptibilityof
HPV-associateddiseasesandHIV-inducedimmunesuppressionremainlargelyunknown.
Theoropharyngealcancersareasubsetofheadandneckcancers(HNCs)whichaccount
forapproximately4%ofallthecancersintheUnitedStates.Theincidenceofdiseasewas
twiceashighinmenthaninwomenin2015[11].Theoropharyngealcancers,intheirclini-
callydistinctformofsquamouscellcarcinoma,arecommonlydetectedinHIVpatientswitha
highernumberoflifetimeoralsexualpartners,immunosuppression,smoking,andcurrent
tobaccouse.ThecausalroleoforalHPVinfectionissupportedbysubstantialmolecularand
cellularevidence[5–7,12].
RecentstudiessuggestedthattheinteractionbetweenHIVandHPVmightberesponsible
fortheincreasedriskofcervicalcancers[13,14].Similaritiesinriskfactorsfortheacquisition
ofHIVandHPVinfections,suchashigh-risksexualbehavior,multiplesexualpartners,and
disease-relatedimmunosuppressionmakesthedemarcationbetweentheHPVandHIV-asso-
ciatedmalignancieschallenging.IthasbeenhypothesizedthatHIVpatientswhohavebeen
infectedforalongperiodoftimehaveahigherprevalenceoforalHPVinfectionandsubse-
quentlyareatahigherriskforHPV-associatedHNCs[15].HIV-inducedimmunosuppression
alsoincreasestheriskofHPV-associatedcancer.Otherfactorsthatcanincreasetheriskof
severeHPVinfectionsinHIVpatientsincludeimmunesenescence,aging,impairedimmune
responsetoHPV,anddirectinteractionbetweenthetwoviruses[13,14,16].Theimmunolog-
icalchangescausedbyHIVcreateapermissiveimmuneenvironment,therebydecreasingthe
overallimmuneresponsesagainstHPV.However,themechanismsbywhichHIV-induced
reductioninCD4+TcelllevelsimpairstheimmuneresponseagainstHPVorotherpathogens
remainlargelyunknown.
Besidesimmunologicalfactors,interactionsatthemolecularlevelbetweenHIVgenestat,
revandvprandHPVhavealsobeenreported.Multiplestudiesindicateanup-regulationof
HPVoncogenicgenes(E6andE7)expressionbytat[14,17,18].Tat increasesHPVshedding
whichsuggeststhatHIVinfectionmaycontributetothepathogenesisofHPV-associateddis-
easebymolecularinteractionsthroughtat[16].
Currently,therearetwocommerciallyavailableHPVpreventivevaccines,thequadrivalent
humanpapillomavirusvaccine(QHPV)(Gardasil;Merck)againstHPVtypes6,11,16and18
andabivalentvaccine(Cervarix,Glaxosmithkline)againstHPVtypes16and18.Bothvaccines
areknowntobe98–100%effectiveagainstHPVtypes16and18[19].Recentstudiesdemon-
stratedtheefficacyoftheanti-HPVvaccineCervarixinHIV-infected-oral-HPV-negative
patientswheremorethan90%ofpatientsproducedhighantibodytitersagainstHPV[20].
However,moredataisneededtoaddresscross-reactivitybetweentheinducedantibodyand
otherHPVstrains[21].Moreover,additionalefficacytrialsofQHPVinHIVinfectedindivid-
ualsareneededtoproperlydeterminethecorrelationbetweenvaccinesdose,timingandpro-
tectionagainstallHPVgenotypesinimmunocompromisedHIVpatients.Themechanistic
investigationofco-infectionscenarioisexperimentallychallenging.Thedisadvantagesof
interruptedtreatmentofHIVandlimitedefficacyfortheHPVvaccineagainstalltheHPV
strainsfurtheraddstothecomplexity.Thelimitedclinicalinformationabouttreatmentand
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 2/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
preventionoptionsagainstHPVinanHIV/HPVco-infectionhasleadustoanalternative
modeofinvestigation.
TogainnewinsightsintotheunderlyingmechanisticinteractionsbetweenHIVandHPV,
inanHIV/HPVco-infectionwedevelopedamathematicalmodelofHIVandHPVinterac-
tions.BuildingonpreviousmodelsofHIV[22]andHPV[23]singleinfections,thisnovel
modelcapturesthemolecularinteractionsbetweenHIVandHPVduetotatandtheeffectof
progressivedepletionofCD4+TcellduetoHIVinfection.Usingthemodel,weaimtoinvesti-
gatewhytheprevalenceoforalHPVinfectionisincreasedinHIV-infectedindividuals.We
demonstratehowthedynamicsofHPVchangesinanHIV/HPVco-infectionwhenthepatient
undergoescombinedantiretroviraltherapy.Thefindingscanbeusedtofurtheradvanceour
understandingofthemechanismsunderlyingoralimmuneplasticity.Lastly,modelingcan
helpproposenewhypothesesforreversingresidualinflammationinindividualsfollowingthe
startofcARTandguideclinicalpractice.
Methods
MathematicalmodelofHIVinfection
WemodeltheinteractionbetweenHIVandCD4+Tcellsasin[22,24].Briefly,weconsider
theinteractionbetweenthreepopulations:i)targetCD4+Tcells(T),ii)productivelyinfected
CD4+Tcells(I),andiii)HIV(V).Targetcellsareproducedatrates,dieatrated,andbecome
productivelyinfectedatrateβproportionaltotheinteractionbetweentargetcellsandthe
virus.InfectedcellsproduceN virionsthroughouttheirlifetime,whicharereleasedthrough
1
bursting,anddieatrateδ.Thevirusisclearedataratec perday.Thefollowingsystemof
1
ordinarydifferentialequations(ODE)representsthesedynamics:
dT
¼s(cid:0) dT(cid:0) bTV;
dt
dI
¼bTV(cid:0) dI; ð1Þ
dt
dV
¼N dI(cid:0) c V;
dt 1 1
withinitialconditionsT(0)=T I(0)=I andV(0)=V
0, 0, 0.
TheeffectofcARThasbeenmodeledasareductionofthevirusinfectivityinthepresence
ofreversetranscriptaseinhibitorstoβ(1-ε )andareductionintheproductionofinfectious
RT
virionsinthepresenceofproteaseinhibitorstoN (1-ε ).Here0(cid:20)ε ,ε (cid:20)1arethedrug
1 PI RT PI
efficacies[24,25].
ThemodelinthepresenceofcARTbecomes:
dT
¼s(cid:0) dT(cid:0) ð1(cid:0) ε ÞbTV;
dt RT
dI
¼ð1(cid:0) ε ÞbTV(cid:0) dI; ð2Þ
dt RT
dV
¼ð1(cid:0) ε ÞN dI(cid:0) c V;
dt PI 1 1
withinitialconditionsT(0)=T I(0)=I andV(0)=V .Notethatmodels(1)and(2)donot
1, 1, 1
takeintoaccounttheHIVlatentreservoirsintheformofrestinglong-livedmemoryCD4+T
cellswithintegratedHIVintheirgenome[26].
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 3/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
MathematicalmodelofHPVinfection
WemodelHPVin-hostdynamicsasin[23].Weconsidertheinteractionbetweenfourpopula-
tions:i)HPVinfectedbasalepithelialcells(Y ),ii)theHPVinfectedtransit-amplifyingcells,
1
inthesuprabasalepitheliallayer(Y ),iii)HPV(W)andiv)HPV-specificcytotoxicTlympho-
2
cytes(CTL)(E).WeassumethatN isthetotalconcentrationofepithelialcellsatthebeginning
2
ofHPVinfectionandthebasallayerisformedofuninfectedbasalepithelialcells,targetedby
HPV.UponHPVinfection,thebasalepithelialcellsbecomeinfectedY whenHPVinteracts
1
withuninfectedcellsatrateψ.WedenotethedifferenceN -Y astheconcentrationofunin-
2 1
fectedepithelialcells.Thebasalinfectedcells,Y traverseupthroughtheepithelialcolumnand
1
transformintoY cells,whichmovefurtherintothesuprabasalepitheliallayer[27][28].The
2
Y cellsbecometransit-amplifyingcellswhichstartassemblingvirionstobereleasedatthesur-
2
face[29,30].Therefore,bothY andY cellsareHPVinfectedcellsbutdifferentiallylocatedin
1 2
theepithelialcelllayer,whereinY cellsareassumedtohavehigherexpressionoftheonco-
2
genesE6andE7comparedtoY [23].Forsimplification,weassumethattheuninfectedcells
1
andinfectedcellshaveanequalprobabilityofinteractionwiththeHPVvirionsirrespectiveof
thespatialarchitectureofthetissue.Amoregeneralizedmodelwhichtakesintoaccountthe
infectivityandlayertransitionterms,oronewhichwouldconsiderspatialstructuresforepi-
thelialcellsindifferentlayersrequiresextensiveknowledgeofnumerousparameters,which
arecurrentlyunknown.Weassumethattheinfectionisdensitydependentwithφrepresenting
theuninfectedcellconcentrationwheretheinfectionishalf-maximal.Weassumethatinfected
cellpopulationsY andY differintermsoftheoncogeneexpressionsuchthattheY (locatedin
1 2 2
thesuprabasalepitheliallayer)havehigheroncogeneexpressioncomparedtoY cells(locatedin
1
thebasalepitheliallayer)[31].TherateofoncogeneexpressionoftheHPVtypepresentinan
infectedcell,givenbyεcontrolstheconversionofY ,intothetransit-amplifyinginfectedcells,
1
Y Cells,Y ,growatraterε,proportionaltotheirowndensityanddieatrateμ.Duetohigher
2. 2
expressionofoncogenes,thetransit-amplifyingcells,Y dividemorebeforedeath,comparedto
2
thebasalinfectedcellsY .Since,bothinfectedcellpopulationhaveanexpressionofoncogene,
1
asin[23],bothtypesofinfectedcellsproducefreevirions(W),atproductionratesk andk that
1 2,
arereleasedthroughbursting.Forsimplicity,weconsideranequalvirionproductionrateofk =
1
k =k.TheHPVvirionsareclearedatratec [23].Thec clearanceratecapturestheantibody
2 2 2
clearancerateimplicitly.
TheclearanceofHPVintheinfectedcells,isassociatedwithasuccessfulimmuneresponse
thatincludesthetriggerofinnateimmuneresponsestargetedagainstthevirionsreleasedfrom
thesurfaceaswellasinfectedcells[30].Inadditiontotheinnateimmuneresponses,theHPV-
specificCTLsrecruitedduringtheadaptiveimmuneresponseaidintheeliminationofthe
infectedbasalcells[32].Here,weassumethat,afterencounteringtransit-amplifyinginfected
cellsY ,effectorcellsspecifictoHPV,E,expandwithamaximumpercapitarateωandcarry-
2
ingcapacityK.Thiscarryingcapacityisanadditiontotheoriginalwork[23].Inthecurrent
model,theCTLresponseEisinitiatedonlybyY cellswhichhavehigheroncogeneE6expres-
2
sion[33][34]comparedtoY .
1
WedisregardthedifferentialCTLresponseagainsttheinfectedcellpopulationsandcon-
siderthatHPV-specificCTLpopulationEkillsbothclassesofinfectedcellsatthesameratea,
sincebothinfectedcellspopulationsexpressoncogenesE6andE7[30][32].Additionally,the
modeldoesnottakeintoaccountthevirusspecificgeneexpressionatanyparticularepithelial
site.Finally,thefunctionaldifferencesinE6andE7,whicharemajordeterminantsofHPV
pathogenicitybetweenHPVtypes[35],arealsoneglected.
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 4/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
Thefollowingsystemofdifferentialequationsrepresentsthesedynamics:
dY N (cid:0) Y
1 ¼cW 2 1 (cid:0) εY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E;
dt φþN (cid:0) Y1 1 1 1
2
dY
2 ¼εY þrεY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E;
dt 1 2 2 2
ð3Þ
dW
¼mkðY þY Þ(cid:0) c W;
dt 1 2 2
(cid:18) (cid:19)
dE E
¼oY E 1(cid:0) ;
dt 2 K
withinitialconditionsY (0)=Y Y (0)=Y W(0)=W andE(0)=E
1 10, 2 20, 0 0.
Co-infectionModel
Theeffectoftatprotein. HIV-proteintat,secretedfromHIV-infectedintraepithelial
immunecells,isknowntoplayanimportantroleinthedisruptionofepithelialtightjunctions,
therebyfacilitatingtheentryofHPVintothemucosalepithelium[36].Wemodelthetat-
inducedincreasedlikelihoodofHPVinfectionthroughincreasingthetotalavailableepithelial
cellsfromN toN (1+pV),where(p)istheeffectoftatproteinsecretedbyanHIVvirion(V),
2 2
giveninEq(4).Theterm(1+pV)incorporatestheHIV-associatedepithelialdisruptionasone
ofthemajorunderlyingmechanismsthatincreasesthesusceptibilityofepithelialcellstothe
HIV/HPVco-infection[36].
dY ð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y
1 ¼cW 2 1 (cid:0) εY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E: ð4Þ
dt φþð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y1 1 1 1
2
Theeffectofimmunosuppression. InHIV-infectedindividuals,thelossofCD4+Tcells
leadstoconsecutivelossofCD4+Tcell-mediatedimmuneresponsesagainstotherpathogens
suchasHPV.NaïveCD4+TcellsaredepletedinmucosaltissuesinallthestagesofHIVinfec-
tion[26,37],andprogressivedeclineofCD4+Tcellsaffectsthedifferentiationprocessof
naïveCD4+Tcellsintothedifferentsubsets.Suchasubset,Th1,isknowntoplayamajorrole
inimmuneresponsesagainstHPV[34]throughinductionofcell-mediatedimmunityinthe
presenceofIL-2,IL-12andIFN-γcytokines[38].
TomodelthedecreaseintheavailabilityofCD4+TcellpopulationduetoHIV;andthe
subsequenteffectofsuchlossonHPV-specificCTL(E)responses,weassumethatthecarrying
capacityoftheEpopulationdecreasesinanimmunosuppressedpatient.Inparticular,werep-
resentKasthecarryingcapacityofCTLsandthusthemaximumEpopulation.WemakeKa
functionofCD4+Tcellpopulation,suchthatKisgivenby,K=K(T)=bT,whereTarethe
uninfectedCD4+Tcellsinthemodel(1).WhenTdecreasesduringtheprogressivelossof
CD4+Tcells,T,K(T),themaximumcarryingcapacitydecreasesatalinearrate.Weassume
thattheCTLcarryingcapacityisdirectlyproportionaltotheamountofCD4+Tcells.Other
modelingoptions,suchasaTdependentsourcewithadeathtermwereexplored,howeverthe
maximumproliferationtermK(T)bestexplainedthehomeostaticmechanisticbehaviorofthe
CTLs.
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 5/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
Fig1.HIVHPVDiagram.Adiagramfortheco-infectionmodel(5).TheleftsideofthefigurerepresentstheHIVdynamicswhereintheinteractionbetween
targetCD4+Tcells(T),productivelyinfectedCD4+Tcells(I)andHIV(V)areshown.Thefigurealsoincludestheeffectofreversetranscriptase(RT)and
proteininhibitor(PI)(shownbyredline—inhibition).TherightsideofthefigurerepresentstheHPVdynamicswhereintheinteractionbetweeninfectedbasal
cells(Y ),suprabasaltransit-amplifyingcells(Y ),HPVspecific(E)cellsandHPV(W)areshown.Thesystemsbiologymarkuplanguage(SBML)compliant
1 2
networkofinteractionsbetweenHIV(V)andHPV(W)iscreatedusingCellDesigner[40](S1Fig).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133.g001
Theco-infectionmodelbecomes(seeFig1):
dT
¼s(cid:0) dT(cid:0) ð1(cid:0) ε ÞbTV;
dt RT
dI
¼ð1(cid:0) ε ÞbTV(cid:0) dI;
dt RT
dV
¼ð1(cid:0) ε ÞN dI(cid:0) c V;
dt PI 1 1
dY ð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y
1 ¼cW 2 1 (cid:0) εY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E; ð5Þ
dt φþð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y1 1 1 1
2
dY
2 ¼εY þrεY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E
dt 1 2 2 2
dW
¼mkðY þY Þ(cid:0) c W;
dt 1 2 2
(cid:18) (cid:19)
dE E
¼oY E 1(cid:0) ;
dt 2 KðTÞ
withinitialconditionsT(0)>0,I(0)>0,V(0)>0,Y (0)=Y Y (0)=Y W(0)=W andE
1 10, 2 20, 0
(0)=E wheret=0isthetimeofco-infection.
0
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 6/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
ThecompleteSBMLcompliantmodelwasdepositedinBioModels[39]andassignedthe
identifierMODEL1605030001.
Results
Analyticalresults
Analytically,wecanfindanecessaryconditionfortheHPVinfectiontobecleared(datainS1
File).WeassumethatwehaveachronicallyinfectedHIVsubjectwhoreachedsteadystateval-
ues(T,I,V).Undertheseconditions,thecarryingcapacityforpopulationEbecomesK¼bT.
System(5)reducesto:
dY ð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y
1 ¼cW 2 1 (cid:0) εY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E;
dt φþð1þpVÞN (cid:0) Y1 1 1 1
2
dY
2 ¼εY þrεY (cid:0) mY (cid:0) aY E;
dt 1 2 2 2
ð6Þ
dW
¼mkðY þY Þ(cid:0) c W;
dt 1 2 2
(cid:18) (cid:19)
dE E
¼oY E 1(cid:0) :
dt 2 K
Then,HPVwillclearwhen:
ckmð1þpVÞN ðεþmþaEÞð(cid:0) εrþaEþmÞ
2 < ; ð7Þ
c ðφþð1þpVÞN Þ ðεþmþaE(cid:0) rεÞ
2 2
whereEisanyCTLlevel(datainS1File).Biologically,thismeansthatwhentheproduct
betweenHPVinfectionrateandtheHPVproductionrate(inthepresenceofHIV)islessthan
thecombinedeffectofeffectorcellsandnaturaldeathrateofHPV,clearanceofHPVwillbe
observed.
Numericalresults
Usingtheco-infectionmodel(5),wenumericallysimulateddiseasescenariosinordertounder-
standthedynamicsofHPVinfectioninaco-infectedindividual.Arecentclinicaltrialhasinvesti-
gatedtheeffectofHIVinHPVinfectioninthepresenceandabsenceofcombinationantiretro-
viraltherapy[41].ThelevelsoforalHPVDNAintheco-infectedpatients,whichwasmonitored
for24weeksafterthestartofcART,remainedelevatedthroughouttherapy.Todeterminethepos-
siblemechanismsofHPVpersistence,weinvestigatemodels(5)and(6)fortherelativecontribu-
tionsofco-infectionfactors:tat,asgivenbypV,andimmunosuppressionasgivenbyK(T).
Parametervalues. Parametervaluesfrompreviouslypublishedstudiesareutilizedhere,
asfollows.EquilibriumvaluesforHIVRNApermlandHIV-specificuninfectedCD4+Tcells
permlwerereportedinanHIV/HPVco-infectionstudytobeV =4.8x104virionspermland
T=3.3x105cellsperml[41].SincethepatientisinachronicHIVsteadystate,wederiveI,β
andsfromsteadystateconditionsI¼cN11Vd,b¼ c1 ands¼dT þTV,tobeI =2.4x103cells
N1T
perml,β=1.5x10-7mlpercellsperdayands=5.6x103cellspermlperday.Theremaining
parametersaresummarizedinTable1.
Weassumethatthetat-effect,givenbypV,rangesbetweenzeroand20,toaccountforuptoa
20-foldincreaseinthetargetepithelialcellpopulationduetoco-infection.Theimmunosuppres-
sionfactor,givenbyKðTÞ¼bTrangesbetweenKðTÞ=35cellsandKðTÞ=1celltoaccount
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 7/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
Table1. Parameters.
Parameter Value Description Reference
s 5.6x103cellsml-1day-1 CD4+Tcellrecruitmentrate Seetext
β 1.5x10−7mlvirions-1day-1 HIVinfectionrate Seetext
d 0.01day-1 UninfectedCD4+Tcelldeathrate [42]
δ 1day-1 InfectedCD4+Tcellsdeathrate [43,44]
N 467virionscells-1 HIVburstsize [45]
1
c 23day-1 HIVclearancerate [46]
1
ε varied Reversetranscriptaseefficacy Seetext
RT
ε varied Proteaseinhibitorefficacy Seetext
PI
T 3.2x105cellsml-1 UninfectedCD4+Tcellsatequilibrium [41]
I 2.4x103cellsml-1 InfectedCD4+Tcellsatequilibrium Seetext
V 4.8x104virionsml-1 HIVatequilibrium [41]
N 104cells Totalconcentrationofepithelialcells [23]
2
φ 106cells Epithelialcellconcentrationforwhichinfectionishalfmaximal [23]
Ψ 0.0067cellsvirions-1day-1 HPVinfectionrate [23]
μ 0.048day-1 Epithelialcelldeathrate [23]
r 0.1 Transit-amplifyingcellsrecruitmentrate [23]
ε varied Oncogenicexpression Seetext
ω 10−3cell-1day-1 CTLexpansionrate [23]
K varied CTLcarryingcapacity Seetext
a 0.01day-1cells-1 CTLkillingrate [23]
k 1000virionscells-1 HPVburstsize [23]
c 0.05day-1 HPVclearancerate [23]
2
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133.t001
forchangesinavailableCTLconcentrationsbetweenanHPVinfectionandHIV/HPVco-infec-
tion.Lastly,theoncogeneexpressionεrangesfromzerotoone.
TheviraldynamicsofHPVinfectedindividuals. WefirststudythedynamicsofHPV
infectionintheabsenceofHIV,asgivenbymodel(6)withI=V =0cellsperml,andT=106
cellsperml.Weletε=0.5perday,KðTÞ=35cells,b=3.5x10-5andtheotherparametersare
listedinTable1.Undertheseassumptions,model(6)predictsHPVandCTLlevelssimilarto
thosein[23].Inparticular,HPVreachesamaximumof1.4x105copiesatday174andeventual
clearance(seeFig2,panelb,greensolidline).TheCTLexpansionisdelayedby80days,and
reachesanequilibriumvalueof27cellsbyday240(seeFig2,panelb,purpledashedline).
Transit-amplifyingcells,Y withhighoncogenicgeneexpression,are12-timeshigherthan
2
cellswithlowoncogenicexpression,Y (seeFig2,panela).Thisresultisdependentonthe
1
oncogeneexpressionrateε(notshown).
TheviraldynamicsofHIV/HPVco-infectedindividuals. Westartbyassumingthatthe
tateffectleadstothedoublingofavailabletargetepithelialcells,i.e.N ð1þpVÞ¼2N .We
2 2
thenaccountforHIVinducedimmunosuppressioninanHIV/HPVco-infectedindividual,by
changingKðTÞasfollows.WehaveshownintheprevioussectionthatanHIV-naïveindivid-
ualhasaCTLcarryingcapacityKðTÞ=35cells,whereT=106CD4+Tcellspermland
b=3.5x10−5.Wekeeptheb=3.5x10-5anddecreasetheTnumbertoi)T=5x105cellsperml,
correspondingtoaveragechronicHIVCD4+Tcellnumbers[47];ii)T=3.3x105cellsperml
asintheHIV/HPVco-infectionstudy[41];andiii)T=2x105cellsperml,correspondingto
AIDS.
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 8/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
Fig2.HPVinfection.(a)InfectedbasalcellsY (bluesolidline)andsuprabasal,transit-amplifyingcells,Y (reddashedline);(b)HPVW(greensolid
1 2
line)andCTLE(purpledashedline)forε=0.5perdayandKðTÞ=35cells.AlltheotherparametersarelistedinTable1.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133.g002
UndertheseassumptionsandparametersinTable1,model(6)predictsHPVclearancein
cases(i)andHPVpersistenceincases(ii)and(iii).Incase(i),HPVlevelsreachesamaximum
of2.4x105copiesatday128andclearsbyday1050.Incases(ii)and(iii),HPVreachessteady
statevaluesof3.5x106and6.7x107DNAcellsafter20and2.1years,respectively(seeFig3,
panela).CTLlevelsdecreaseto17.5,11.5and7cellspermlforcases(i),(ii)and(iii),respec-
tively(seeFig3,panelb).
Todeterminetherelativecontributionsofthetat-effectandimmunosuppressioninthe
transitionbetweenHPVclearanceandHPVpersistence,wederivedabifurcationdiagram
showingtheasymptomaticdynamicofHPVasgivenbymodel(6)whenbothpV andKðTÞ
arevaried.Asexpected,anincreaseintheavailableepithelialcellsrequiresalargerCTLpopu-
lationfortheclearancetooccur(seeFig4,reddashedlines).Inparticular,ifthetateffectis
increasedto100%suchthatð1þpVÞ=2,thentheCTLcarryingcapacityhastobeK>11.9
cellsforclearancetooccur.Moreover,acarryingcapacityaslowasKðTÞ=7cellsisenoughto
ensureHPVclearanceintheHIV-naïvecase(80%lowerthantheconsideredbasevalueof
KðTÞ=35cells).
Changingoncogeneexpressionrates. Wehaveconsideredthattheoncogenicexpression
isε=0.5.InanHIV-naïvehost,thiscorrespondstotransit-amplifyingcells,Y exceedingthe
2
infectedbasalcells,Y by12-times(seeFig2,panela).Inthemathematicalmodelfrom[23],
1
theauthorsshowedthatinanHIV-naïve,HPV-unvaccinatedindividual,adecreaseinthe
oncogenicexpressionεleadstoaslowergrowthofY ,Y andW,adelayedandweakCTL
1 2
responseEand,consequently,adelayedHPVclearance.Todeterminewhetherthiseffectis
carriedoverinanHIV/HPVco-infectedindividual,wecomparedclearanceregionsforε=0.1
perday,ε=0.5perdayandε=0.9perdayforvaryingpV andKðTÞvalues(seeFig4,panel
a).Wefindthattheclearanceregions(definedastheareaunderthecurve)arehigherforlow
εvalues,similartotheresultsfromanHIV-naïvepatient[23].
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 9/20
ModelingMechanismsbyWhichHIV-AssociatedImmunosuppressionInfluencesHPVPersistence
Fig3.HIV/HPVco-infection.(a)HPVWand(b)CTLEasgivenbymodel(6)forε=0.5perday,parametersarelistedinTable1,andT=106cells
perml(bluesolidlines);T=5x105cellsperml(reddashedlines);T=3.3x105cellsperml(greendottedlines);andT=2x105cellsperml(purple
dashed-dottedlines).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133.g003
Fig4.Varyingoncogeneexpressionrates.(a)BifurcationdiagramshowingclearedW(areabelowthecurve)versuschronicW(areaabovethe
curve)asthetateffectpVandCTLcarryingcapacityKðTÞvary.Here,thecriterionforHPVclearanceisgivenbyEq(7);(b)HPVW;and(c)CTLEas
givenbymodel(6)forparameterslistedinTable1andε=0.1(bluesolidlines),ε=0.5(reddashedlines),andε=0.9(greendottedlines).
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133.g004
PLOSONE|DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168133 January6,2017 10/20
Description:and oral cancer by HIV, we developed a mathematical model of HIV/HPV co-infection. conditions under which HIV infection alters HPV persistence in the oral mucosa Fontes A, Andreoli MA, Villa LL, Assone T, Gaester K, et al Perreau M, Savoye AL, De Crignis E, Corpataux JM, Cubas R, et al.