Table Of ContentMechanical Behaviour of Materials
SOLID MECHANICS ANDITS APPLICATIONS
Volume191
SeriesEditors: G.M.L.GLADWELL
DepartmentofCivilEngineering
UniversityofWaterloo
Waterloo,Ontario,CanadaN2L3GI
AimsandScopeoftheSeries
The fundamental questions arising in mechanics are: Why?, How?, and How
much? The aim of this series is to providelucid accountswritten by authoritative
researchersgivingvisionandinsightinansweringthesequestionsonthesubjectof
mechanicsasitrelatestosolids.
The scope of the series covers the entire spectrum of solid mechanics. Thus it
includes the foundation of mechanics; variational formulations; computational
mechanics;statics,kinematicsanddynamicsofrigidandelasticbodies:vibrations
of solids and structures; dynamical systems and chaos; the theories of elasticity,
plasticity and viscoelasticity; composite materials; rods, beams, shells and
membranes;structuralcontrolandstability;soils,rocksandgeomechanics;fracture;
tribology;experimentalmechanics;biomechanicsandmachinedesign.
The median level of presentation is the first year graduate student. Some texts
aremonographsdefiningthecurrentstateofthefield;othersareaccessibletofinal
yearundergraduates;butessentiallytheemphasisisonreadabilityandclarity.
Forfurthervolumes:
http://www.springer.com/series/6557
Dominique Franc¸ois • Andre´ Pineau • Andre´ Zaoui
Mechanical Behaviour
of Materials
Volume II: Fracture Mechanics and Damage
123
Prof.Dr.DominiqueFranc¸ois Andre´Pineau
E´coleCentraledeParis E´coledesMinesdeParis
Paris ParisTech
France CentredesMate´riauxUMRCNRS
E´vryCedex
Prof.Andre´Zaoui France
FrenchAcade´miedesSciences AcademyofEngineering
Paris Paris
France France
AcademyofEngineering
Paris
France
ISSN0925-0042
ISBN978-94-007-4929-0 ISBN978-94-007-4930-6(eBook)
DOI10.1007/978-94-007-4930-6
SpringerDordrechtHeidelbergNewYorkLondon
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2011944979
©SpringerScience+BusinessMediaDordrecht2013
Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpartof
thematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseofillustrations,recitation,
broadcasting,reproductiononmicrofilmsorinanyotherphysicalway,andtransmissionorinformation
storageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilarmethodology
nowknownorhereafterdeveloped.Exemptedfromthislegalreservationarebriefexcerptsinconnection
with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered
and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of
this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the
Publisher’slocation,initscurrentversion,andpermissionforusemustalwaysbeobtainedfromSpringer.
PermissionsforusemaybeobtainedthroughRightsLinkattheCopyrightClearanceCenter.Violations
areliabletoprosecutionundertherespectiveCopyrightLaw.
Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthispublication
doesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfromtherelevant
protectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.
While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of
publication,neithertheauthorsnortheeditorsnorthepublishercanacceptanylegalresponsibilityfor
anyerrorsoromissionsthatmaybemade.Thepublishermakesnowarranty,expressorimplied,with
respecttothematerialcontainedherein.
Printedonacid-freepaper
SpringerispartofSpringerScience+BusinessMedia(www.springer.com)
Foreword
Without repeating all the considerations included in the foreword of Volume I
of Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, we simply want to stress, in view of the
problemsstill present in the design of componentsand structures, the importance
of a good link between material science and mechanics, more precisely between
deformation mechanisms and constitutive equations. We insisted on the need to
teach these aspects to graduate students, possibly even to undergraduates and to
makeengineersawareofthissubject.Itiswiththesameobjectiveinmindthatwe
haveundertakenwritingthepresentvolume.
VolumeIofMechanicalBehaviourofMaterialshasgiventhetoolstocalculate
the stress and strain fields in loaded bodies with different constitutive behaviours
and to understand the physical mechanisms at work in each case. This should
helpstudentsandengineersto reachsoundresultsandto findwaysforimproving
materials.WithVolumeIIwenowwishtodothesamefortheavoidanceoffailures.
We think that this requires a thoroughunderstandingof damage mechanisms. We
thustackleinsixchaptersbrittleandductilefractureandthetransitionbetweenthe
two,fatigueandcreepdamages,environmentalassistedcracking.Asthisismostly
rootedinthecaseofmetallicmaterials,weincludeaseventhchaptertotreatcasesof
non-metallicmaterials:ceramics, glasses, concrete,polymers,woods,composites.
A complete outline on fracture mechanics precedesthese seven chapters, because
thisconstitutesanunavoidabletooltostudydamagesandalsotopredictthelifeof
componentsandstructures.Thisisthendevelopedforthevariouskindsoffailuresin
thecorrespondingchapters.Aspecialcaseofdamageisthatduetofrictionandwear.
Wefeltthatwecouldnotavoiddealingwiththeseverydetrimentalphenomena.A
ratherdifferentkindofpresentationisadoptedinthechapterdealingwiththem,as
it was needed first to give results of contact mechanics and we could not expand
too much on the mechanisms. The extent of the various chapters is not the same
according to the subjects. For instance, in the case of fatigue, object of so many
researchesandbooks,we sticktotheessential. Thechaptersonbrittleandductile
fractureandoncreeparemoreelaborate,asupdatingknowledgeisrequired.
As forVolume I, this re-editionis rootedonthe Klu¨weredition of Mechanical
Behaviour of Materials, which owes much to the translation of “Comportement
v
vi Foreword
me´canique des mate´riaux” by Jack Howlett whose work was essential. We have
now added a great deal of up-to-date material and we hope that our six-hand
playing,notwithstandingourinabilitytoplaythepiano(therearesix-handscores),
haselectronicallyproduced(amanuscriptwouldhaverequiredthreehandsonly)a
readableandoriginalcompendiumofmaterialsscienceandmechanics.Hopefully,
let students, professors and engineers enjoy it. This volume could not have been
completed without the help and precious contributions of Jacques Verdu, Lucien
Laiarinandrasana,MichelBoussuge,MarcBle´tryandHenryProudhon.Wewishto
thank them very warmly. We are also very grateful to Eva He´ripre´ and to Rene´
Billardon for beautiful pictures. Contributions received over the years from our
colleagues and from students have helped us greatly and gave us the incentive to
carrythroughourproject.WearegratefultoProf.GrahamGladwellfromUniversity
ofWaterloo,Canada,forincludingthisvolumeasthelastoneintheseriesofwhich
heisresponsible.
We tried to illustrate the book with enough figures. Many are adapted from
publications and the authors are acknowledged. We hope nobody was forgotten;
ifnotso,wewouldwelcomeanyrequest.
In the previous edition of Mechanical Behaviour of Materials (Klu¨wer 1998)
exercises were included. They have disappeared in this revised version, which
has expanded.We advise disappointedreaders that we are now writing a volume,
which will be entirely devoted to exercises. They will illustrate all chapters of
bothvolumes.Furthermore,wewouldliketoproduceanotherbookincludingcase
studies and what we called long exercises, that is elaborate studies of various
problems. We dream to initiate some interactive production. Thus, we would
encourageandwelcomecontributionsofanykind.
Publishing a book like this one requires a lot of careful and tedious auxiliary
work.We pay tribute in this respectto Joe¨lle Pineau and to Odile Adam. We also
liketothankthestaffofSpringerwhotookgoodcareofourworkandansweredour
questions,especiallyNathalieJacobsandAnnekePot.Readerswillappreciatethe
layoutandwearethankfultooforthescrupulousworkoftheeditor.
Acknowledgements
Illustrations in this book are for the most part originals or adapted from various
sources. Many figures were provided by courtesy of authors and publishers. Let
themallbethanked.
Permissions for reproduction were solicited for the reproduction of original
figures and photographs.Would publishersand authorswho would not have been
identified signal it to Springer so acknowledgements could be given in future
editions.
The authors would like to acknowledge the following publishers for their
permissiontouseanumberoffiguresincludedinthetext:
Elsevier
TheocarisPS,PapadopoulosGA(1980)Elastodynamicformsofcausticsforrunningcracksunder
constantvelocity.EngFractMech13:683–698–(Figure15)forFig.2.10
SherryAH,WilkesMA,BeardmoreDW,LidburyDFG(2005)Materialconstraintparametersfor
theassessmentofshallowdefectsinstructuralcomponents.PartI:Parameterssolutions.Eng
FractMech72:2373–2395–(Figure8)forFig.2.45
RuggieriC,GaoX,DoddsRH(2000)Transferabilityofelastic-plasticfracturetoughnessusingthe
Weibullstressapproach:significanceofparametercalibration.EngFractMech67:101–117–
(Figure6)forFig.3.9
Martin-Meizoso A, Ocana-Arizcorreta I, Gil-Sevillano J, Fuentes-Perez M (1994) Modeling
cleavagefractureofbainiticsteels.ActaMetallMater42:2057–2068–(Figures1and2)for
Fig.3.11and3.12
KroonM,FaleskogJ(2005)Micromechanismsofcleavagefractureinitiationinferriticsteelsby
carbidecracking.JMechPhysSolids53:171–196–(Figure16a)forFig.3.14
Heerens J, Hellmann D (2002) Development of the Euro fracture toughness dataset. Eng Fract
Mech69:421–449–(Figures7a,7c,7g)forFig.3.17
Gas P, Guttmann M, Bernardini J (1982) Interactive co-segregation of Sb and Ni at the grain
boundaries of ultra-high purity Fe-based alloys. ActaMetall30:1309–1316 –(Figure 1)for
Fig.3.42
vii
viii Acknowledgements
SeahMP(1977) Grainboundary segregationandtheT-tdependence oftemperbrittlenessActa
Metall25:345–357–(Figure2)forFig.3.44
NaudinC,FrundJ-M,PineauA(1999)Intergranularfracturestressandphosphorusgrainboundary
segregationofaMn-Ni-Mosteel.ScriptaMater40:1013–1019–(Figure5)forFig.3.48
TanguyB,BouchetC,BugatS,BessonJ(2006)Localapproachtofracturebasedpredictionofthe
T56JandTKIC100shiftsduetoirradiationforanA508pressurevesselsteel.EngFractMech
73:191–206–(Figure7)forFig.3.56
BaboutL,Bre´chet Y,MaireE,Fouge`resR(2004)Onthecompetitionbetweenparticlefracture
andparticledecohesioninmetalmatrixcomposites.ActaMater52:4517–4525–(Figure1)for
Fig.4.2
Devillers-Guerville L, Besson J, Pineau A (1997) Notch fracture toughness of a cast duplex
stainlesssteel:modellingofexperimentalscatterandsizeeffects.NuclEngDes168:211–225–
(Figure3)forFig.4.3b
Lee BJ, Mear ME (1999) Stress concentration induced by an elastic spheroidal particle in a
plasticallydeformingsolid.JMechPhysSolids47:1301–1336–(Figures3and5)forFig.4.4b
and4.6
Bao Y, Wierzbicki T (2005) On the cut-off value of negative triaxiality for fracture. Eng Fract
Mech72:1049–1069–(Figure11)forFig.4.10
MaireE,BordreuilC,BaboutL,BoyerJ-C(2005)Damageinitiationandgrowthinmetals.Com-
parisonbetweenmodelingandtomographyexperiments.JMechPhysSolids53:2411–2434–
(Figure2)forFig.4.11
WorswickM,PickR(1990)Voidgrowthandconstitutivesofteninginaperiodicallyvoidedsolid.
JMechPhysSolids38:601–625–(Figure18)forFig.4.12
PardoenT,HutchinsonJW(2000)Anextendedmodelforvoidgrowthandcoalescence. JMech
PhysSolids48:2467–2512–(Figures4,3a,b,cand9a)forFig.4.15,4.16a,b,cand4.24
Weck A, Wilkinson DS (2008) Experimental investigation of void coalescence in metallic
sheets containing laser drilled holes. Acta Mater 56:1774–1784 – (Figures 3d, h, o, l) for
Fig.4.22,b,c,d
Fabre`gueD,PardoenT(2008)Aconstitutivemodelforelastoplasticsolidscontainingprimaryand
secondaryvoids.JMechPhysSolids56:719–741–(Figure3)forFig.4.25
Faleskog J, Shih C (1997) Micromechanics of coalescence. I: Synergistic effects of elasticity,
plasticyieldingandmulti-size-scalevoids.JMechPhysSolids45:21–45–(Figures14a,b,c)
forFig.4.26a,b,c
LautridouJ-C,PineauA(1981)CrackinitiationandstablecrackgrowthresistanceinA508steels
inrelationtoinclusiondistribution.EngFractMech15:55–71–(Figures5a,b,9aand9)for
Fig.4.38,4.45and4.53
McMeekingRM(1977)Finitedeformationanalysisofcrack-tipopeninginelastic-plasticmate-
rialsandimplicationforfracture. JMechPhysSolids25:357–381–(Figures10and11)for
Fig.4.43
Gullerud AS, Gao X, Dodds RH, Haj-Ali R (2000) Simulation of ductile crack growth using
computational cells: numerical aspects. Eng Fract Mech 66:65–92 – (Figures 1a and 9b, c)
forFig.4.46aand4.47
RivalinF,BessonJ,DiFantM,PineauA(2001)Ductiletearingofpipeline-steelwideplates:I.
Dynamicandquasistaticexperiments.EngFractMech68:329–345–(Figure7b)forFig.4.51
GriffithsJR,OwenDRJ(1971)Anelastic-plasticstressanalysisforanotchedbarinplanestrain
bending.JMechPhysSolids19:419–431–(Figure10)forFig.5.4
Tanguy B, Besson J, Piques R, Pineau A (2005a) Ductile-to-brittle transition of a 508 steel
characterizedbyCharpyimpacttest.PartI:Experimentalresults.EngFractMech72:49–72–
(Figure5)forFig.5.8a,b
Heerens J,HellmannD(2002) Development oftheEurofracture toughness dataset.EngFract
Mech69:421–449-694–(Figure10b)forFig.5.28
Acknowledgements ix
XiaL,ShihCF(1996) Ductilecrack growth–III. Transitiontocleavagefracture incorporating
statistics.JMechPhysSolids44:603–639–(Figures9a,b)forFig.5.31a,b
PlumtreeA,AbdelRaoufHA(2001)Cyclicstressstrainresponseandsubstructure.IntJfatigue
23:799–805–(Figure5)forFig.6.10
TetelmanAS,RobertsonWD(1963)Directobservationandanalysisofcrackpropagationiniron-
3.5%siliconsinglecrystal.ActaMetall11:415–426–(Figure1)forFig.7.7
XieJH,AlpasAT,NorthwoodDO(2002)Amechanismforthecrackinitiationofcorrosionfatigue
ofType 316Lstainless steelinHank’s solution.MaterCharact 48:271–277 –(Figure 3)for
Fig.7.22
FournierB,SauzayM,CaesC,Noblecourt M,MottotM,BougaultA,RabeauV,ManJ,Gillia
O,LemoineP,PineauA(2008)Creep-fatigue-oxidationinteractionsina9Cr-1Momartensitic
steel.PartIII:Lifetimeprediction.IntJFatigue30:1797–1812–(Figure1)forFig.8.26
Lerch BA, Jayaraman N, Antolovich SD (1984) A study of fatigue damage mechanisms in
Waspaloyfrom25to800ıC.MaterSciEng66:151–166–(Figure15c)forFig.8.39
Pe´dronJ-P, PineauA(1982) Theeffect ofmicrostructure andenvironment onthecrackgrowth
behaviourofInconel718alloyat650ıCunderfatigue,creepandcombinedloading.MaterSci
Eng56:143–156–(Figures2a,b,c)forFig.8.41a,b
TaylorMP,EvansHE,BussoEP,QianZQ(2006)CreeppropertiesofaPt-aluminidecoating.Acta
Mater54:3241–3252–(Figure1)forFig.8.49
DangVanK,MaitournamMH(2002)Onsomerecenttrendsinmodellingofcontactfatigueand
wearinrail.Wear253:219–227–(Figure5)forFig.9.29
LimSC,AshbyMF(1987)Wear-mechanismmaps.ActaMetall35:1–24–(Figure27)forFig.9.44
ClarkeDR,FaberKT(1987)Fractureofceramicsandglasses.JPhysChemSolids48:1115–
1157–(Figure29)forFig.10.4
CelarieF,PradesS,BonamyD,DickeleA,BouchaudE,GuillotC,MarliereC(2003)Surfacefrac-
tureofglassymaterialasdetectedbyrealtimeatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM)experiments.
ApplSurfSci212–213:92–96–(Figure4)forFig.10.12
LuJ,RavichandranG,JohnsonWL(2003)DeformationbehaviouroftheZr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5
Ni10Be22.5bulkmetallicglassoverawiderangeofstrain-ratesandtemperatures.ActaMater
51:3429–3443–(Figure8)forFig.10.17a
BuschR,BakkeE,JohnsonWL(1998)Viscosityofthesupercooledliquidandrelaxationatthe
glasstransitionoftheZr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5N10Be22.5bulkmetallicglassformingalloy.Acta
Mater46:4725–4732–(Figure6)for10.17b
HeQ,ChengYQ,MaE,XuJ(2011)Locatingbulkmetallicglasseswithhighfracturetoughness:
chemical effects and composition optimisation. Acta Mater 59:202–215 – (Figure 4c) for
Fig.10.19
vanMierJGM,vanVlietMRA(2003)Influenceofmicrostructureofconcreteonsize/scaleeffect
intensilefracture.EngFractMech70:2281–2306–(Figures8a,b,c,d,e)forFig.10.31
Qing H, Mishnaevski L Jr (2009) 3D hierarchical computational model of wood as a cellular
material with fibril reinforced heterogeneous multiple layers. Mech Mater 41:1034–1049 –
(Figure3a)forFig.10.57
SpringerNetherlands
Lambert-PerladeA,GourguesA-F,BessonJ,SturelT,PineauA(2004)Mechanismsandmodeling
ofcleavagefractureinsimulatedheat-affectedzonemicrostructureofahigh-strengthlowalloy
steel.MetallMaterTransA35A:1039–1053–(Figures5and6)forFig.3.32and3.33
Hofmann S, Lejcek P (1996) Solute segregation at grain boundaries, Interface science,
3:241–2677–(Figure5)forFig.3.37
x Acknowledgements
CoxTB,LowJR(1974)AninvestigationoftheplasticfractureofAISI4340and18nickel-200
grademaragingsteels.MetallTransA5:1457–1470–(Figure16a)for4.21b
HahnGT,RosenfieldAR(1975)Metallurgicalfactorsaffectingfracturetoughnessofaluminum
alloys.MetallTrans6A:653–668–(Figures7and11b)forFig.4.37and4.52
Pineau A (2008) Modelingductile-to-brittle fracture transition insteels– micromechanical and
physicalchallenges.IntJFract150:129–156–(Figures12,13and15)forFig.5.33,5.34and
5.35
Antolovich SD, Liu S, Baur R (1981) Low cycle fatigue behaviour of Rene 80 at elevated
temperature. Metall Trans 12A:473–481 – (Figures 1, 13d, 9 and 10) for Fig. 8.36, 8.37b,
8.38a,b
Wiley&Sons
BordetSR,TanguyB,BessonJ,BugatS,MoinereauD,PineauA(2006)CleavagefractureofRPV
steelfollowingwarmpre-stressing:micromechanicalanalysisandinterpretationthroughanew
model.FatigueFractEngMaterStruct29:1–18–(Figure2)forFig.3.26
Gao X, Faleskog J, Shih CF (1999) Analysis of ductile to cleavage transition in part-through
crackusingacellmodelincorporatingstatistics.FatigueFractEngMaterStruct22:239–250–
(Figure2a)forFig.4.49
Bathias C (2010) Gigacycle fatigue. In: Bathias C, Pineau A (eds) Fatigue of materials and
structures;fundamentals.Wiley,Hoboken,pp179–226–(Figure5.43)forFig.6.17
HalesR(1980)Aquantitativemetallographicalassessmentofstructuraldegradationoftype316
stainlesssteelduringcreep-fatigue.FatigueEngMaterStruct3:339–356–(Figures9and10)
forFig.8.20a,b
Antolovich SD, Pineau A (2010) High temperature fatigue. In: Bathias C, Pineau A (eds)
Fatigueofmaterialsandstructures–applicationtodamageanddesign.ISTE-Wiley,Hoboken,
pp1–130–(Figure1.91)forFig.8.47
Laiarinandrasana L,Morgeneyer TF,Proudhon H,RegrainC(2010)Damageofsemicrystalline
polyamide6assessedby3-DX-raytomography:frommicrostructuralevolutiontoconstitutive
modelling.JPolymSci:PartB:48:1516–1528–(Figure8)forFig.10.41
Lavoisier
Fraczkiewicz A, Wolski K, Delafosse D (2011) Se´gre´gation intergranulaire et rupture des
mate´riaux cristallins. In: Priester L (ed) Joints de grains et plasticite´ cristalline. Herme`s-
Lavoisier,Paris,pp289–332–(Figure6.6)forFig.3.40
Bathias C, Pineau A, (2008) Fatigue des Mate´riaux et des Structures I, Lavoisier, chap. 1,
pp17–38–(Figure1.9)forFig.6.15
GuillotY,Be´rangerG(2009)Fissurationfavoriseparl’environnement.In:ClavelM,BompardPh
(eds)Endommagementetrupturedesmate´riaux.Lavoisier,Paris,pp207–266–(Figures5.4
and5.5)forFig.7.12dand7.13
