Table Of ContentMATTHEW ARNOLD: THE CRITICAL
HERITAGE
VOLUME 2, THE POETRY
THE CRITICAL HERITAGE SERIES
General Editor: B.C.Southam
The Critical Heritage series collects together a large body of criticism on major
figures in literature. Each volume presents the contemporary responses to a
particular writer, enabling the student to follow the formation of critical attitudes
to the writer’s work and its place within a literary tradition.
The carefully selected sources range from landmark essays in the history of
criticism to fragments of contemporary opinion and little published documentary
material, such as letters and diaries.
Significant pieces of criticism from later periods are also included in order to
demonstrate fluctuations in reputation following the writer’s death.
MATTHEW ARNOLD
VOLUME 2, THE POETRY
THE CRITICAL HERITAGE
Edited by
CARL DAWSON
London and New York
First Published in 1973
This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
“To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s
collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.”
11 New Fetter Lane
London EC4P 4EE
&
29 West 35th Street
NewYork, NY 10001
Compilation, introduction, notes and index © 1973 Carl Dawson
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced
or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means,
now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording,
or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in
writing from the publishers.
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
ISBN 0-203-97708-4 Master e-book ISBN
ISBN 0-415-13473-0 (Print Edition)
For Cecil and Lorna Dawson
General Editor’s Preface
The reception given to a writer by his contemporaries and near-contemporaries is
evidence of considerable value to the student of literature. On one side we learn a
great deal about the state of criticism at large and in particular about the
development of critical attitudes towards a single writer; at the same time,
through private comments in letters, journals or marginalia, we gain an insight
upon the tastes and literary thought of individual readers of the period. Evidence
of this kind helps us to understand the writer’s historical situation, the nature of
his immediate reading-public, and his response to these pressures.
The separate volumes in the Critical Heritage Series present a record of this
early criticism. Clearly, for many of the highly productive and lengthily reviewed
nineteenth- and twentieth-century writers, there exists an enormous body of
material; and in these cases the volume editors have made a selection of the most
important  views,  significant  for  their  intrinsic  critical  worth  or  for  their
representative quality—perhaps even registering incomprehension!
For earlier writers, notably pre-eighteenth century, the materials are much
scarcer and the historical period has been extended, sometimes far beyond the
writer’s lifetime, in order to show the inception and growth of critical views
which were initially slow to appear.
In each volume the documents are headed by an Introduction, discussing the
material assembled and relating the early stages of the author’s reception to what
we have come to identify as the critical tradition. The volumes will make
available much material which would otherwise be difficult of access and it is
hoped that the modern reader will be thereby helped towards an informed
understanding of the ways in which literature has been read and judged.
B.C.S.
Contents
  PREFACE   xi
  INTRODUCTION   1
  NOTE ON THE TEXT   33
  The Strayed Reveller and Other Poems (1849)  
1  CHARLES KINGSLEY, review in Fraser’s Magazine, May 1849   34
2  W.E.AYTOUN, review in Blackwood’s Magazine, September 1849  39
3  W.M.ROSSETTI, review in Germ, February 1850   46
  Empedocles on Etna (1852)  
4  G.D.BOYLE, review in North British Review, May 1853   56
5  A.H.CLOUGH, review in North American Review, July 1853   59
  Poems (1853, 1854, 1855)  
6  G.H.LEWES, review in Leader, November-December 1853   65
7  J.A.FROUDE, review in Westminster Review, January 1854   72
8  J.D.COLERIDGE, review in Christian Remembrancer, April 1854  81
9  COVENTRY PATMORE, review in North British Review, August  95
1854
10  Arnold in response to critics of his preface, 1854   103
11  GEORGE ELIOT, review in Westminster Review, July 1855   106
12  Other comments on the early volumes   108
(a)  Notice in English Review, March 1850   108
(b)  J.C.SHAIRP to Clough, April 1853   109
(c)  Arnold to Clough, November 1853   109
(d)  HARRIET MARTINEAU, review in Daily News, December 1853  110
viii
(e)  W.R.ROSCOE, review in Prospective Review, February 1854   112
(f)  CHARLES KINGSLEY, review in Fraser’s Magazine, February   113
1854
(g)  D.G.ROSSETTI, letter to William Allingham, 1855   114
  Merope (1857, dated 1858)  
13  JOHN CONINGTON, review in Fraser’s Magazine, June 1858   115
14  Other comments on Merope   124
(a)  Notice in Saturday Review, January 1858   124
(b)  GEORGE LEWES, notice in Leader, January 1858   125
(c)  W.R.ROSCOE, notice in National Review, April 1858   126
(d)  JOHN NICHOLS in Undergraduate Papers, 1858   127
  New Poems (1867) and Poems (1869)  
15  LESLIE STEPHEN, review in Saturday Review, September 1867   129
16  A.C.SWINBURNE, review in Fortnightly Review, October 1867   133
17  I.G.ASCHER, review in St. James’s Magazine, February 1868   153
18  H.B.FORMAN, review in Tinsley’s Magazine, September 1868   157
19  ALFRED AUSTIN, review in Temple Bar, August 1869   166
20  Other comments from the 1860s   172
(a)  Notice in Spectator, September 1867   172
(b)  JOHN SKELTON, notice in Fraser’s Magazine, November 1869  173
  The 1870s  
21  R.H.HUTTON, review in British Quarterly Review, April 1872   175
22  H.G.HEWLETT, review in Contemporary Review, September 1874  193
23  Notice in Saturday Review, September 1877   212
24  J.B.BROWN in Ethics and Aesthetics of Modern Poetry, 1878   218
25  More views from the 1870s   220
(a)  WILLIAM LeSUEUR, notice in Canadian Monthly, March 1872  220
(b)  WILLIAM ADAMS, notice in Gentleman’s Magazine, April   221
1875
(c)  EDMUND STEDMAN in Victorian Poets, 1876   221
ix
(d)  Notice in Spectator, July 1877   222
(e)  Notice in Contemporary Review, January 1878   223
(f)  Anonymous essay in Church Quarterly, April 1878   224
(g)  OSCAR WILDE, letter to Helena Sickert, October 1879   224
  The 1880s  
26  WALT WHITMAN, essay in Critic (New York), November 1883   225
27  HENRY JAMES, review in English Illustrated Magazine, January   228
1884
28  W.E.HENLEY, review in Athenaeum, August 1885   237
29  EDWARD CLODD, review in Gentleman’s Magazine, April 1886  240
30  JOSEPH JACOBS, obituary in Athenaeum, April 1888   252
31  FREDERIC MYERS, obituary in Fortnightly Review, May 1888   255
32  H.D.TRAILL, obituary in Contemporary Review, June 1888   260
33  MOWBRAY MORRIS, essay in Quarterly Review, October 1888   268
34  ROWLAND PROTHERO, essay in Edinburgh Review, October   279
1888
35  EDWARD DOWDEN, essay in Atlanta, September 1889   306
36  More comments from the 1880s   313
(a)  C.E.TYRER in Manchester Quarterly, January 1883   313
(b)  Notice in London Quarterly Review, April 1885   314
(c)  Notice in Spectator, July 1885   315
(d)  RICHARD LE GALLIENNE, commemorative poem in   316
Academy, April 1888
(e)  VIDA SCUDDER, Andover Review, September 1888   317
(f)  AUGUSTINE BIRRELL in Scribner’s Magazine, November   318
1888
(g)  CHARLES ELIOT NORTON in Proceedings of the American   318
Academy of Arts and Sciences
  The 1890s  
37  LIONEL JOHNSON, review in Academy, January 1891   319
38  MRS OLIPHANT in The Victorian Age of English Literature, 1892  324
Description:Whereas Robert Browning 'lived to realize the myth of the Inexliaustible Bottle,'. W.E.Henley wrote, 'Matthew Arnold says only what is worth saying' (No. 28). There were many of Arnold's contemporaries who would have vigorously disagreed with Henley, either because they had come to think of