Laura Knight-Jadczyk

418 Pages·2008·2.63 MB·English

The Wave
Book One
OTHERBOOKSBY LAURA KNIGHT-JADCZYK
Amazing Grace – An Autobiography of the Soul
The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive
9/11: The Ultimate Truth
The High Strangeness of Dimensions, Densities, and the Process
of Alien Abduction
The Wave
Book One
Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Red Pill Press
2005
(cid:1)Copyright1994-2005LauraKnight-Jadczyk
http://www.cassiopaea.org/
AllRights Reserved
ISBN0-9764064-7-0
Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedinaretrievalsystem,or
transmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical,orotherwise,other
thanfor“fairuse”,withoutthewrittenconsentoftheauthor.
SomematerialinthisbookappearedinaslightlydifferentforminthebooksThe
SecretHistoryoftheWorld,AmazingGrace,andTheHighStrangenessofDimensions,
DensitiesandtheProcessofAlienAbduction.
Table of Contents
Foreword 7
Author’s Letter to the Reader 19
Note to the Reader on the Subject of Aliens and UFOs 36
Autobiographical Background of the Author
Necessary to the Context of The Wave 79
Chapter 1
Riding the Wave 211
Chapter 2
Multi-Dimensional Soul Essences 232
Chapter 3
Dorothy and The Frog Prince Meet Flight 19 in Oz or,
“I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore!” 252
Chapter 4
The Cassiopaeans Get Taken Out of the Closet
and Go for a “Test Drive” 296
Chapter 5
Perpendicular Realities, Tesseracts,
and Other Odd Phenomena... 329
Chapter 6
Animal Psychology or That which was A, will be A.
That which was not-A, will be not-A. Everything was
and will be either A or not-A. 362
Chapter 7
Balloons, Anti-balloons and Fireworks
Or Laura Falls Into the Pit and Ark Comes to the Rescue 396
The End of Volume 1 of The Wave 413

Foreword
Speculations on Time Travel and Superluminal
Communication
by a Theoretical Physicist/Mathematician
The term “Cassiopaeans” appears in many places in this book. The
name Cassiopaea was given by a source identifying itself by saying
“we are you in the future” which Laura Knight-Jadczyk contacted via
an experiment in superluminal communication in 1994.
“We are you in the future”
This is what “they” declare: that “they” - The Cassiopaeans - 6th
density Unified Thought Form Beings - are Us in the future. What a
bizarre concept. Or is it?
Is that possible? Can such a statement find a place in accepted
theories? Or it is in an evident contradiction with everything that we -
that is, physicists - know about Nature and its laws?
Putting aside for the moment the issue of whether existence in a
pure state of consciousness is possible, is traveling in time possible,
even if only in theory? Is sending and receiving information from the
future or sending information into the past allowed by our present
theories of relativity and quantum mechanics? If information can be
sent, does this also imply that physical matter can be “sent”, via some
sort of TransDimensional Remolecularization? And if so what are the
laws, what are the restrictions? What are the means?
Well, frankly speaking, we do not know, but we may have a clue.
Kurt Gödel, after he became famous for his work on foundations of
mathematics, went on to study the Einstein general theory of
relativity and made an important contribution to physics: he
discovered a class of otherwise reasonable cosmological solutions of
Einstein equations - except for one point: they contained causal
loops!
At first these Causal Loops were dismissed by relativists as being
“too crazy”. The arguments against these model universes even
became rather personal, commenting upon the state of mind of the
inventor! (A not terribly unusual phenomenon in the heated debates
within so-called “ivory towers” of academia.)
8 Foreword
A “Causal Loop” means the same thing as “Time Loop”. It can be
described as going into the future and ending up where you started at
the original time and place. It is called “Causal” because, in
Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, Time is a relative concept and
different observers can experience Time differently, so the term
“causal” is used to avoid using the term “time.”
But, little by little, it was realized that causal - or Time - loops can
appear in other solutions of Einstein equations as well - usually they
correspond to some kind of “rotation” of the universe.
Causal loops make time travel not only possible, but probable. But
then, causal loops lead to unacceptable logical paradoxes, and physics
does not like such paradoxes at all - they are a serious problem!
But, the subject of communicating with the past or receiving
information from the future IS being discussed in physics even in
terms of the flat, not-curved-at-all space-time of Lorentz and
Minkowski. Hypothetical faster-than-light particles - tachyons - can
serve as the communication means. They make an “anti-telephone” -
a telephone into the past - possible.
But do tachyons exist? Or can they exist?
Well, that is still a question that has not been answered definitively
for some.
And, the truth is that paradoxes must never be ignored. They
always indicate that some important lesson is to be learned; that some
essential improvement or change is necessary. The same holds true
for the paradoxes involved in the idea of receiving information from
the future. We cannot simply go back into Saturday and tell ourselves
the winning lottery numbers of Sunday. If this were possible, then it
should also be possible for some future, future self to tell a future self
not to tell! Thus we have a paradox: we, in the future, have intervened
into the past making our communication from the future impossible!
A paradox: if we communicated, we have not communicated, and
if we do not communicate, then we have communicated! Impossible
in a linear, non-branching universe!
Is there a possible escape from the paradox, an escape that leaves a
door open, even if only a little - for our anti-telephone?
Indeed, there is, and not just one, but several ways out.
First of all - the evident paradox disappears if we admit the
possibility that the communication channels are inherently noisy; that
is a normal situation when we deal with quantum phenomena. So, if
The Wave -Book1 9
the communication into the past is a quantum effect - we are saved
from evident paradoxes. Quantum Theory can be useful!
Sending a signal into the past, we are never 100% sure if the
message will be delivered without distortion. And conversely,
receiving info from the future we are never 100% sure if this comes
from an authentic broadcast or is a spontaneous and random creation
of the receiving end. If this is the case, and if certain quantitative,
information - that is, theoretic relations between receiving and
transmitting ends are secured to hold - then there are no more
paradoxes even with reasonably efficient information channels.
In other words: there can be broadcasts from the future to the past,
but there will be few “receivers”, and of those few, even fewer that
are properly tuned. And even those that are properly tuned may be
subject to “static”. Even if there is no static, those receivers that can
receive pure information will experience the static of “non-belief”
and distortion after the fact from society.
There is also another aspect of such an information transfer which
is that the probabilities involved are connected with a choice event;
with the choosing of one among many possible futures.
It may happen that branching of the universe corresponds to each
such event. Branching of the universe into an infinite tree of decisions
has been discussed within quantum measurement theory - it even has
the name of “Many Worlds interpretation of quantum theory”.
Two of the well-known physicists who consider the many worlds
interpretation more than just an exercise in theorizing are John
Archibald Wheeler and David Deutsch.
The Many Worlds Interpretation has one serious weakness: it has
no built in algorithm for providing the timing of the branchings. Thus
it is a certain framework rather than a complete theory.
There is, however, a theory that fills in this gap in the Many
Worlds Interpretation - and this theory I know quite well, and in fact I
know it better than most others for the simple reason that I developed
it in collaboration with Philippe Blanchard (University of Bielefeld)
in 1988 as an integral part of the Quantum Future Project. It is called
Event Enhanced Quantum Theory (EEQT for short notation). (A
complete list of references and much more info on this subject can be
found on my “Quantum Future “ project page1 on the World Wide
Web).
1http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/