Table Of Contents
o
r Keeping head above water: social
r
a
B
e
d
o presence in the transitions of Brazilian
b
m
o
P
women to motherhood
F.
a
n
i
l
o
r
a Comparing experiences in Brazil, France, Portugal and Sweden
C
Carolina F. Pombo de Barros
n
a Tese apresentada à Universidade de Évora
azili para obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Dinâmicas da Saúde e da Proteção Social:
Br n
s of wede uma abordagem das Ciências Sociais
sition and S ORIENTADORES: Profa. DPraro. fF. eDlirs.m Minaar cM Beensdseins
an al
r g
e t tu
e in th hood ce, Por ÉVORA, MAIO DE 2017
cial presenc en to mother n Brazil, Fran
er: so wom nces i
wat erie
e xp
v e
d abo aring
a p
e m
h
g Co
Contactos: n
pi
Universidade de Évora e
e
Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada - IIFA K
Palácio do Vimioso | Largo Marquês de Marialva, Apart. 94
7002-554 Évora | Portugal
Tel: (+351) 266 706 581
Fax: (+351) 266 744 677 INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGAÇÃO E FORMAÇÃO AVANÇADA
email: [email protected]
I dedicate this thesis to the memory of Odete Fernandes de Souza, my adoptive grandmother who I did
not have the opportunity to meet but who keeps feeding my myth of origin.
iv
―And that, you see, is my dilemma this afternoon. Both reason and seven decades of life-
experience tell me that reason is neither the being of the universe nor the being of God. On the
contrary, reason looks to me suspiciously like the being of human thought; worse than that, like the
being of one tendency in human thought. Reason is the being of a certain spectrum of human
thinking. And if this is so, if that is what I believe, then why should I bow to reason this afternoon
and content myself with embroidering on the discourse of the old philosophers?‖
(Elizabeth Costello‘s quote in J.M. Coetzee‘s essay ―The Lives of Animals‖)
v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The first persons I have to acknowledge as fundamental supporters are: Marcelo and Laura, my beloved
husband and daughter who stood by my side during this entire process, facing the difficulties and joys
of being Latin American immigrants in Europe. I should say that this thesis is also a result of a success-
ful family project constructed with you guys – and yes, we finally did it!
I must thank all the academic support from Professors Felismina Mendes and Marc Bessin, who had a
great part in this work, taking me to new directions whereas also believing in my foremost insights. To
Professor Laurinda Abreu and all the staff of Phoenix Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctoral Program Dynam-
ics of Health and Welfare, who helped me a great deal in academic and administrative issues. Also I
thank to the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency from European Commission for the
financial support, which was fundamental to this whole enterprise.
Finally, I could not mention all the names of the Brazilian friends and family relatives who accompanied
me during these last four years and helped me in many ways, visiting us in our home in Portugal and
France and welcoming us back in Brazil, comprehending my absences and being present the way they
could. To all of them I want to say: thank you very much. Besides, I would like to especially mention my
young sister Julia Pombo, with whom I was able to have very exciting discussions on Feminism, Philos-
ophy, Social Sciences and the most trivial and important themes of life as love and family bonds. Thank
you very much my dear sister and friend.
vii
Contents
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ vii
Table and figure Index ................................................................................................................... 13
List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... 14
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ 15
Sumário ....................................................................................................................................... 16
Introduction: Transience by and despite motherhood ..................................................................... 17
The thesis‘ structure ............................................................................................................. 23
Part one: Setting the framework ........................................................................................................ 27
I.1 Research pathway: Public Health as a situation charnière ......................................................... 28
I.1.a The problem of the maternalist rhetoric of Brazilian social policies ..................................... 28
I.1.b The research questions and their context: choosing ―social presence‖ ............................... 36
From demographic crisis to care ethics at the transnational context ....................................... 36
I.2 Nature is not binary: epistemology for studying corporeity in motherhood .................................. 44
I.2.a Biology, gender and sex: new considerations to old issues in Motherhood Studies .............. 47
The complexity of reproductive development .......................................................................... 47
Sexual reproduction and the process of hierarchizing human experiences .............................. 49
Gender politics, science and the production of bodily experiences .......................................... 54
Experience and agency in the transition to motherhood .......................................................... 57
I.2.b Temporality and gender in situated experiences ................................................................. 62
Women‘s situation and social presence ................................................................................. 62
Temporality as social structure of gendered situations ............................................................ 64
I.3 The phenomenological method: inquiring experience(s) of presence(s)...................................... 68
I.3.a The fieldwork: methodological steps of an implicated subject ............................................. 68
Computer- Mediated Communication for a transnational research .......................................... 73
The recruitment and selection of participants ......................................................................... 75
ix
The participants‘ profiles ....................................................................................................... 77
I.3.b The documentary research ................................................................................................ 84
I.3.c The interviews and daily diaries ......................................................................................... 90
I.3.d The material analysis ........................................................................................................ 92
Part two: Desire, presence and the choice of motherhood ................................................................. 94
II.1 Desiring presence and (not) choosing motherhood .................................................................. 94
II.1.a Chosen motherhood as mark of social class ..................................................................... 97
II.1.b The complexity within choice, planning and desire of motherhood ................................... 102
II.2 Searching for inteligibility in therapeutic motherhood ............................................................. 109
II.2.a From scientific to therapeutic motherhood ...................................................................... 111
II.2.b Ethic of desire as a mark of social class .......................................................................... 116
Part Three: Searching for humanization of childbirth ........................................................................ 129
III.1 Facing the perinatal paradox ................................................................................................ 130
III.1.a The complexity of Brazilian perinatal paradox ................................................................. 134
III.1.b The paradox of politicisation of birth in Brazil ................................................................. 136
III.2 Experiencing birth in European systems ............................................................................... 151
III.2.a Giving birth in France: childbirth as a social matter ........................................................ 154
III.2.b Negotiating delivery in Portugal: between rights and informality ...................................... 164
III.2.c Having midwifery philosophy and rhetoric of decision in Sweden .................................... 171
Part Four: Hesitation and ethical responsivity in early childrearing ................................................... 183
IV.1 Learning to give time ............................................................................................................ 184
IV.1.a Reproducing Inequality and fragmentation of family policies in Brazil .............................. 189
IV.1.b (Not) searching for responsive presences and becoming alone ....................................... 196
IV.1.c Trying to be a good mother through the ideal time balance............................................. 211
IV.2 Having responsive presences for generating hesitations ........................................................ 219
IV.2.a Sharing childcare through associative participation ........................................................ 222
IV.2.a Having the paradoxical presence of grandmothers ......................................................... 226
x
IV.2.b Being racialized and deconstructing the ―good mother‖ ideal ......................................... 232
Final considerations: improving social presence for promoting care ethics ....................................... 240
The main conclusions ............................................................................................................. 240
Considerations about care ethics in the transition(s) of motherhood ......................................... 243
References ..................................................................................................................................... 247
Annex ............................................................................................................................................. 271
Participants‘ quotes in Portuguese language ................................................................................ 271
xi
Description:pressure to fulfil the ―good family‖ ideology from Brazil's chauvinist Figaro: http://madame.lefigaro.fr/societe/marlene-schiappa-140915-98208.