International trade regulation : panel decisions and scholarly literature

6 Pages·1997·0.28 MB·English

by  Trebilcock, Michael J., 1941-

INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION
Professors Michael J. Trebilcock and Robert Howse
Panel Decisions and Scholarly Literature
University of Toronto Faculty of Law
1997/1998
Note: The materials are not to be considered published. They are for the sole
educational use of students at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law'.
- /LYX-gS^
M« IASMIN LAS LIMY
SEP 8 1397
mm 6F law
mm
t'MvgsiTY of
LASKIN LAW LIBRARY
BUKA
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
INTERNATIONAL TRADE REGULATION
Professors Michael J. Trebilcock and Robert Howse
Panel Decisions and Scholarly Literature
University of Toronto Faculty of Law
1997/1998
Note: The materials are not to be considered published. They are for the sole
educational use of students at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law.

Table of Contents
Belgian Family Allowances, BISD., 1st Supp. (1953), pp.57-64 .1
Canada, Import, Distribution and Sale of Certain Alcoholic Drinks by Provincial
Marketing Authorities, GATT Doc. Dsl7R, October 16, 1991.4
Final Report of the Panel Convened Pursuant To Chapter 18 of the Canada-United
States Free Trade Agreement in the Matter of Puerto Rico Regulations on the
Import, Distribution and Sale of U.H.T. Milk from Quebec,
USA-93-1870-01.25
Warren F. Schwartz and Alan 0. Sykes, “Toward a Positive Theory of the Most
Favored Nation Obligations and Its Exceptions in the WTO/GATT System”,
(1996) 16 International Review> of Law and Economics 27-51.64
Jon R. Johnson, “What is a North American Good? The NAFTA Rules of Origin,”
40 C.D. Howe Institue Commentary, Feb. 1983.77
Hyundai Dumping Case, (1988) 16 C.E.R. 185 (Canadian Import Tribunal).91
Alan O. Sykes, “The Economics of Injury in Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Cases”, (1996) 16 International Review of Law and Economics
5-26.117
United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review,
U.S.A.-92-1904-01 in the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada, Decision of the Panel, May 6, 1993.129
United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Articlel904 Binational Panel Review,
U.S.A.-92-1904-01 in the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada, Decision of the Panel on Remand, December 17, 1993.153
United States International Trade Commission, “Report to the President on Certain
Motor Vehicles and Certain Chassis and Bodies Therefore,” in John H. Baron
and Bart S. Fisher, International Trade and Investment: Regulating
International Business, (Boston: Little Brown, 1986), pp. 216-232.205
WTO Panel Decision, EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products
(Hormones) Complaint by the United States, Interim Report - Findings
Section.219
NAETA Arbitral Panel Established Pursuant to Article 2008 in the Matter of
Tariffs Applied by Canada to Certain U.S.-Origin Agricultural Products,
Secretariat File No. CDA-95-2008-01, Final Report of the Panel, December 2,
1996 .287
GATT Challenge to U.S.S. 337 of Tariff Act of 1930 (1989), Report of Panel
adopted on November 7, 1989 (L/6439) .325
GATT, Canada - Administration of the Foreign Investment Review Act, Report of
the GATT Panel (1983) .349
United States - Restrictions on Imports of Tuna, Report of the Panel, (1994) ..364
Robert Howse and Michael J. Trebilcock, “The Fair Trade-Free Trade Debate:
Trade, Labor, and the Environment” (1996) 16 International Review of Lcn\>
and Economics 61-79 .398
Anne O. Krueger, “ Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn”,
(1997) 87 The American Economic Review 1-22 .408
WTO, The Report of the Panel on Canada -Certain Measures Concerning
Periodicals, WT/L/160/Rev. 1, 14 March 1997,. 420