Table Of Content
WEST’S	LAW	SCHOOL
ADVISORY	BOARD
_________
JESSE	H.	CHOPER
Professor	of	Law,
University	of	California,	Berkeley	DAVID	P.	CURRIE
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	Chicago	YALE	KAMISAR
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	Michigan
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	San	Diego	MARY	KAY	KANE
Chancellor,	Dean	and	Distinguished	Professor	of	Law,
University	of	California,
Hastings	College	of	the	Law	WAYNE	R.	LaFAVE
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	Illinois	ARTHUR	R.	MILLER
Professor	of	Law,	Harvard	University	GRANT	S.	NELSON
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	California,	Los	Angeles	JAMES	J.	WHITE
Professor	of	Law,	University	of	Michigan
i
INTELLECTUAL	PROPERTY	THE	LAW	OF
COPYRIGHTS,	PATENTS	AND	TRADEMARKS
By
Roger	E.	Schechter
Professor	of	Law,
George	Washington	University
John	R.	Thomas
Professor	of	Law,
Georgetown	University
HORNBOOK	SERIES®
Mat	#11575277
ii	West	Group	has	created	this	publication	to	provide	you	with	accurate	and
authoritative	information	concerning	the	subject	matter	covered.	However,	this
publication	was	not	necessarily	prepared	by	persons	licensed	to	practice	law	in	a
particular	jurisdiction.	West	Group	is	not	engaged	in	rendering	legal	or	other
professional	advice,	and	this	publication	is	not	a	substitute	for	the	advice	of	an
attorney.	If	you	require	legal	or	other	expert	advice,	you	should	seek	the	services
of	a	competent	attorney	or	other	professional.
Hornbook	Series,	WESTLAW	and	West	Group	are	registered	trademarks
used	herein	under	license.
COPYRIGHT	©	2003	By	WEST	GROUP
610	Opperman	Drive
P.O.	Box	64526
St.	Paul,	MN	55164–0526
1–800–328–9352
All	rights	reserved
Printed	in	the	United	States	of	America	ISBN	0–314–06599–7
iii
For	Craig
–	R.E.S.
For	Sayuri
–	J.R.T.
*
v
Acknowledgments
_________
Only	other	authors	of	similar	books	really	understand	the	large	number	of
people	 who	 make	 a	 work	 like	 this	 possible.	 I	 am	 deeply	 grateful	 to	 several
remarkable	law	students	at	George	Washington	University	who	helped	in	the
research	for	this	work,	including	Michael	Alter,	John	Donboli,	James	Gallagher,
Mark	Glaze,	John	Moran,	Douglas	Rettew	and	Wayne	Stacy.	Thanks	are	also
due	to	David	Colletti	and	Paul	M.	Levine	for	meticulous	help	in	proof-reading
under	great	time	pressure.
Leonard	Klein,	a	research	librarian	at	the	Jacob	Burns	Law	Library	was,	as
always,	masterful,	in	finding	just	the	right	resource	at	just	the	right	moment.	My
colleague	Robert	Brauneis	offered	many	useful	observations	on	several	chapters,
rescuing	the	reader	from	much	ambiguity.
There	are	many	others	whose	contributions	were	one	step	removed	from	the
preparation	of	this	book,	but	who	laid	the	foundation	that	made	it	possible.	I	am
greatly	 indebted	 to	 Professor	 J.	 Thomas	 McCarthy	 of	 the	 University	 of	 San
Francisco,	not	only	for	his	extraordinary	contribution	to	trademark	law	through
his	definitive	treatise,	but	for	his	many	thoughtful	observations	and	kindnesses
over	the	years.	He	is	one	of	the	true	gentlemen	and	scholars	in	our	business.	I
would	not	be	in	law	teaching	if	not	for	the	confidence	and	support	of	Professor
Glen	E.	Weston,	my	emeritus	colleague	at	George	Washington,	who	illustrated
for	me	what	a	teaching	book	should	look	like.	I	am	grateful	as	well	to	Jerome	A.
Barron,	the	Dean	who	hired	me,	and	to	Michael	K.	Young,	my	current	Dean,	for
doing	 so	 well	 the	 hardest	 thing	 a	 Dean	 can	 do—namely	 to	 leave	 a	 faculty
member	unmolested	to	pursue	a	large	project.	The	forbearance,	patience,	and
grace	of	several	at	West	Group,	notably	Tom	Berreman,	Doug	Powell,	Pam
Siege,	Heidi	Hellekson	and	Roxy	Birkel,	has	been	remarkable.
This	volume	would	have	been	simply	impossible	without	the	collaboration
and	 encouragement	 of	 my	 co-author	 Jay	 Thomas,	 whose	 enthusiasm	 and
amazing	hard	work	kept	me	moving	through	many	hard	patches.	Finally,	there
are	no	sufficient	words	of	thanks	for	my	students.	So	many	teacher-authors	have
said	it	before	that	it	may	take	on	the	trappings	of	a	cliche,	but	the	intellectual
curiosity,	probing	questions,	good	humor,	excitement	and	energy	of	two	decades
worth	of	G.W.	law	students	have	been,	more	than	anything,	what	got	me	out	of
bed	each	morning	and	what	made	this	book	possible.
ROGER	E.	SCHECHTER
_________
My	participation	in	this	project	would	not	have	been	possible	without	the
efforts	of	many	mentors	and	colleagues.	The	late	Chief	Judge	Helen
vi
W.	Nies	gifted	me	with	two	unforgettable	years	of	training	in	the	work	of	the
remarkable	 court	 on	 which	 she	 served.	 I	 miss	 her	 dearly.	 I	 shall	 always	 be
grateful	to	Professors	Martin	Adelman	and	Rebecca	Eisenberg	for	igniting	my
interest	in	intellectual	property,	Harold	Wegner	for	first	placing	me	in	front	of	a
law	 school	 classroom	 and	 Professor	 Hugh	 Hansen	 for	 proposing	 a	 full-time
career	in	law	teaching.	I	also	acknowledge	Professors	Rochelle	Dreyfuss,	Jerome
Reichman	 and	 Pamela	 Samuelson,	 distinguished	 senior	 colleagues	 who	 have
inspired	 a	 new	 generation	 of	 intellectual	 property	 scholars.	 The	 thoughful
commentary	of	Professor	Douglas	Lichtman	improved	the	patent	portions	of	this
text	and	was	of	immeasurable	help.	My	thanks	also	to	Peter	Corcoran,	Jyotsna
Gautam	and	Brian	McMahon	for	their	invaluable	research	assistance.
I	was	pleased	to	attend	Roger	Schechter’s	classes	as	a	student	and	delighted
to	enter	academia	as	his	colleague;	now	I	am	honored	to	serve	as	his	co-author.
Roger’s	insight	and	eloquence	of	expression	is	apparent	from	the	pages	of	this
text,	 but	 I	 also	 admire	 his	 collegiality	 and	 extraordinary	 commitment	 to	 his
students.	The	original	vision	of	this	treatise	was	his,	and	I	am	grateful	to	have
shared	in	the	work	of	fulfilling	it.
JOHN	R.	THOMAS
vii
Preface
_________
Writing	a	book	about	intellectual	property	at	the	dawn	of	the	twenty-first
century	 is	 like	 trying	 to	 hit	 a	 moving	 target	 while	 riding	 in	 the	 bow	 of	 a
speedboat.	Dizzying	political,	economic	and	technologic	changes	have	prompted
the	 Congress	 to	 undertake	 massive	 revisions	 to	 all	 three	 major	 branches	 of
intellectual	property	law	over	and	over	again	in	the	past	few	years.	Those	new
enactments,	 along	 with	 problems	 not	 addressed	 by	 legislation,	 have	 led	 to	 a
cascade	of	decisional	law	on	a	stunning	range	of	highly	complicated	issues.	That
in	turn	leads	to	circuit	splits,	law	review	articles,	more	legislation,	and	still	more
cases.	Anything	that	one	endeavors	to	say	on	the	subject	runs	the	risk	of	being
obsolete	before	the	ink	has	dried	or	the	toner	has	cooled	on	the	page.
We	have	done	our	best	in	this	legal	typhoon,	to	offer	up	a	coherent	survey	of
both	basic	principles	and	emerging	issues.	Our	goal	is	to	provide,	in	a	single
volume,	a	reasonably	thorough	introduction	to	the	field	that	will	be	helpful	to
students,	practitioners	and	judges	alike.	We	have	tried	to	summarize	what	is
clear,	identify	what	is	unsettled,	and	sometimes	to	offer	brief	thoughts	as	to	how
some	sticky	issues	might	be	resolved	or	why	some	existing	rules	seem	poorly
though	 through.	 We	 have	 attempted,	 above	 all,	 to	 make	 the	 text	 lively	 and
readable	and	to	leaven	it	with	numerous	examples	and	occasional	humor.	As
always,	our	readers	will	determine	if	we	have	succeeded.
While	there	are	many	common	themes	that	pervade	the	different	branches	of
intellectual	property	law,	the	law	of	copyrights,	patents,	and	trademarks	still
remain	fairly	discrete	fields.	Each	is	governed	by	its	own	separate,	and	fairly
elaborate	federal	statute,	and	the	cases	dealing	with	problems	in	one	of	the	areas
rarely	 cite	 cases	 from	 the	 others.	 Our	 organizational	 scheme	 reflects	 this
segregation	 of	 topics.	 After	 an	 introductory	 chapter	 exploring	 some	 of	 the
unifying	themes	in	all	intellectual	property	disputes,	we	have	divided	this	work
into	three	principal	parts	dealing	respectively	with	the	three	branches	of	the	law.
We	have	tried,	however,	through	cross-references	in	both	text	and	notes,	to	alert
the	 reader	 to	 overlap	 or	 even	 conflict	 between	 the	 various	 branches	 of
intellectual	property	law.
We	have	sought	to	steer	a	middle	ground	with	the	citation	of	authority.	In
order	to	keep	the	book	to	a	manageable	size,	we	did	not	attempt	to	follow	the
law	review	practice	of	supporting	every	statement	with	a	citation,	nor	did	we
attempt	to	gather	complete	lists	of	authorities	for	various	propositions.	That	such
a	 task	 would	 have	 been	 impossible	 in	 a	 single	 volume	 is	 evidenced	 by	 the
existence	 of	 huge	 multi-volume	 works	 in	 all	 three	 branches	 of	 intellectual
property	law.	On	the	other	hand,	we	have	tried	to	provide	at	least	some	support
for	most	major	points,	and	sufficient
viii
information	to	allow	the	curious	reader	to	get	a	head	start	on	further	research.
Intellectual	 property	 issues	 are	 unusually	 engaging	 and	 stimulating.	 The
excitement	 of	 this	 area	 of	 the	 law	 reflects	 the	 excitement	 of	 living	 in	 a
technologically	 advanced,	 culturally	 diverse,	 economically	 robust	 time	 and
place.	 As	 more	 and	 more	 authors	 develop	 more	 and	 more	 ways	 to	 express
themselves	 and	 to	 disseminate	 their	 work;	 as	 more	 and	 more	 technologists
conjure	more	and	more	ways	to	make	our	lives	longer,	healthier,	easier	and	more
fun;	and	as	more	and	more	merchants	conjure	more	and	more	varieties	of	goods
and	services	to	cater	to	our	needs	and	wants	along	with	appealing	symbols	to
identify	them;	the	law	has	been	in	a	mad	scramble	to	keep	up.	The	Internet	and
globalization	have	thrown	down	extraordinary	challenges	to	the	legal	system.
For	the	student	of	intellectual	property,	there	is	never	a	dull	moment.
Even	more	significantly,	we	believe	that	thoughtful	legal	rules	in	these	areas
can	facilitate	amazing	progress	and	much	good	for	the	citizens	of	the	United
States	and	the	world,	while	rules	crafted	to	advance	special	interests	hold	the
potential	of	doing	great	harm	to	large	numbers	of	people.	Our	hope	is	that	this
book	will	help	a	wide	variety	of	actors	in	the	legal	system	to	gain	the	kind	of
introduction	to	copyright,	patent	and	trademark	issues	that	will	enable	them	both
to	 distinguish	 between	 sound	 and	 unsound	 legal	 regimes	 and	 to	 become
champions	of	the	former.	A	teaching	book	can	aspire	to	no	more	and	should
aspire	to	no	less.
ROGER	E.	SCHECHTER
JOHN	R.	THOMAS
Washington,	D.C.
March,	2003