Instrument Performance in Kepler's First Months

1.1 MB·

by  Douglas A. Caldwell

accepted for ApJ Letters, 2009 December 21
PreprinttypesetusingLATEXstyleemulateapjv.11/10/09
INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE IN KEPLER’S FIRST MONTHS
Douglas A. Caldwell1
SETIInstitute/NASAAmesResearchCenter,MS244-30,MoffettField,CA94035
Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak
NASAMarshallSpaceFlightCenter,VP60,Huntsville,AL35812
0
Jeffrey E. Van Cleve, Jon M. Jenkins, Paul R. Gazis
1
SETIInstitute/NASAAmesResearchCenter,MS244-30,MoffettField,CA94035
0
2
Vic S. Argabright, Eric E. Bachtell
n
a BallAerospace&TechnologiesCorp.,1600CommerceStreet,Boulder,CO80301
J

1 Edward W. Dunham

LowellObservatory,1400WestMarsHillRoad,Flagstaff,AZ86001
]
P
E John C. Geary
. SmithsonianAstrophysicalObservatory,60GardenSt.,Cambridge,MA02138
h
p
- Ronald L. Gilliland
o
SpaceTelescopeScienceInstitute,3700SanMartinDrive,Baltimore,MD21218
r
t
s
a Hema Chandrasekaran, Jie Li, Peter Tenenbaum, Hayley Wu
[
SETIInstitute/NASAAmesResearchCenter,MS244-30,MoffettField,CA94035

1
v
William J. Borucki, Stephen T. Bryson, Jessie L. Dotson, Michael R. Haas, David G. Koch
6
NASAAmesResearchCenter,MS244-30,MoffettField,CA94035
1
accepted for ApJ Letters, 2009 December 21
2
0
ABSTRACT
.
1 TheKeplerMissionreliesonprecisedifferentialphotometrytodetectthe80partspermillion(ppm)
0 signal from an Earth–Sun equivalent transit. Such precision requires superb instrument stability on
0
time scales up to 2 days and systematic error removal to better than 20 ppm. To this end, the
1 ∼
spacecraft and photometer underwent 67 days of commissioning, which included several data sets
:
v taken to characterize the photometer performance. Because Kepler has no shutter, we took a series
i of dark images prior to the dust cover ejection, from which we measured the bias levels, dark current,
X
and read noise. These basic detector properties are essentially unchanged from ground-based tests,
r indicating that the photometer is working as expected. Several image artifacts have proven more
a
complexthanwhenobservedduringgroundtesting,asaresultoftheirinteractionswithstarlightand
the greater thermal stability in flight, which causes the temperature-dependent artifact variations to
be on the timescales of transits. Because of Kepler’s unprecedented sensitivity and stability, we have
also seen several unexpected systematics that affect photometric precision. We are using the first 43
daysofsciencedatatocharacterizetheseeffectsandtodevelopdetectionandmitigationmethodsthat
will be implemented in the calibration pipeline. Based on early testing, we expect to attain Kepler’s
planned photometric precision over 80%–90% of the field of view.
Subject headings: instrumentation: photometers — planetary systems — space vehicles: instruments
— techniques: photometric
1. INTRODUCTION itable zones of solar-like stars. The objectives and early
results of the Kepler Mission are reviewed by Borucki,
Kepler was launched on 2009 March 6, beginning a
et al. (2010) and the mission design and overall per-
3 1/2 year mission to detect transiting exoplanets and
formance are reviewed by Koch et al. (2010). Before
determinethefrequencyofEarth-sizeplanetsinthehab-
beginning science operations, Kepler underwent a com-
[email protected] missioning period to ensure it was operating correctly
2 Caldwell et al.
after the rigors of launch, to verify that ground-based be done during commissioning. A significant portion of
characterizations were still valid, and toperformcharac- commissioning was spent with the dust-cover on, in or-
terizations that could only be done in space (Haas et al. dertomeasurecharacteristicsthatwouldlaterbemasked
2010). In this Letter we describe the instrument char- by star light. The latter half of commissioning included
acteristics relevant for understanding Kepler’s raw pixel measurementsofthephotometer’spointspreadfunction,
data. In addition to standard CCD detector properties pixel response, and focal plane geometry parameters, as
( 3.1), we discuss the characterizations and data prod- discussed in Bryson et al. (2010). Commissioning obser-
u§ctsresultingfromKepler’s uniquedesignandoperation vationsresultedinaseriesoffocalplanemodelsthatare
( 3.2). In 4, we describe several image artifacts that usedthroughoutthepipelineprocessingandareavailable
a§re present§in Kepler data and discuss their impact on at the data archive 2.
photometric precision. Detailed descriptions of the pho-
tometer beyond the scope of this Letter can be found in 3.1. Standard Detector Properties
Argabright et al. (2008) and in the “Kepler Instrument
Because of the large number of photons collected from
Handbook” (Van Cleve & Caldwell 2009).
our typical targets, low read noise is not critical and
2. OBSERVATIONMODES the focal plane median value of 95 e− read−1, or ap-
proximately 1 digital number (DN) per read, is suffi-
Kepler science data are available at either short ca-
cient. The focal plane is maintained at 85◦C, reducing
dence ( 1 minute) for 512 targets, or long cadence ( 30 −
∼ ∼ dark current effectively to zero. The CCDs are operated
minutes) for 170,000 targets. All science data are col-
to guarantee that the full-well of 1.1 million electrons
lected with an integration time of 6.02 s. In science col-
is not clipped by the 14-bit analog-to-digital converter
lection mode, the full single integration CCD frames are
(ADC) range, resulting in a median gain of 112 elec-
coadded together, then at the end of the short and long
trons DN−1. The high quantum efficiency (QE) back-
cadenceperiodpre-specifiedpixelsforeachtargetarese-
illuminated CCDs combine with the broad bandpass so
lected from the coadd, processed, and stored on board.
that stars with Kepler magnitude . 11.3 saturate de-
Due to data storage and transmission limitations, only
pending on the field of view (FOV) location. The ob-
about 6% of the 96 million pixels are stored for eventual
servednonlinearityoverthefullrangeofinputuptoand
transmission to the ground.
beyond saturation is on the order of 3% after account-
Thefocal planeconsistsof84separatesciencereadout
±
ing for charge bleeding.
channels (identified as module#.output#) and four fine
Since Kepler’s goal is not absolute photometry, an ac-
guidancesensor(FGS)channelsallofwhicharereadout
curate global flat field image is not required, but we do
synchronously. Each channel has several regions avail-
usealocalflat,orpixelresponsenon-uniformity(PRNU)
abletocollectcalibration,or“collateral”data(Figure1).
mapforcalibration. ThePRNUimagemapseachpixel’s
There are two sets of columns of virtual pixels: (1) 12
relative brightness variation from the local mean, ex-
columnsofbias-onlypixelsresultingfrom12leadingpix-
pressed in percent (Van Cleve & Caldwell 2009). The
els in the serial register (“leading black”), and (2) a 20
median standard deviation of the pixel values in the
column serial over-scan region (“trailing black”). There
PRNU image across the focal plane is 0.96%. A “bad
are also two sets of rows of collateral pixels: (1) the
pixel”map, constructedbythresholdingthePRNUmap
first 20 rows, which are covered by an aluminum mask
to find > 5σ outliers, shows that 0.5% of the FOV is
(“masked smear”), and (2) a 26 row parallel over-scan
≤
affected by pixel or column defects.
region (“virtual smear”). Duringscience datacollection,
Table 1 summarizes the standard CCD detector prop-
a coadded sum of specified columns of the trailing black
erties as measured during ground testing and updated
androwsofboththemaskedandvirtualsmeararestored
during photometer commissioning.
at each cadence for each channel.
Since Kepler has no shutter, we cannot take standard
dark frames. Instead, the CCDs can be reverse-clocked 3.2. Kepler-Specific Instrument Properties
so that none of the signal from the stars and sky reaches Kepler’s design and operation result in several non-
the CCD output, allowing us to measure the bias level standardpropertiesthatinfluencethecontentoftheraw
throughout the image. pixels: readout smear, charge injection, and digital data
Finally, a full frame image (FFI) mode is available, in requantization.
whichallthepixelsinthefocalplanearestored. FFIsare Because there is no shutter, stars shine on the CCDs
invaluable for examining detector properties, verifying during readout, resulting in trails along columns that
pointing, and verifying the target aperture definitions; contain stars. Each pixel in a given column of the im-
however, at 380 megabytes each, only a limited num- age —including the masked and virtual smear rows—
ber can be processed and stored. Reverse-clocked data receives the same smear signal (Figure 1). The column-
and FFIs are taken periodically throughout the mission by-column smear level in each image is measured in the
(Haas et al. 2010). smear regions. Smear signals are typically small, since
each pixel only “sees” a star for the readout time (0.52
3. DETECTORPROPERTIES
s) divided by the total number of rows (1070); there-
EachofKepler’s detectorchannelshasdistinctproper- foresmearisnotasignificantcontributortophotometric
tiesimportantforunderstandingandanalyzingthepixel noise.
data, roughly divided into standard CCD detector char- The science CCDs are operated with an electrical
acteristics and those unique to Kepler’s design. Where charge injection feature that injects charge at the top of
possible instrument characterization was performed on
theground(Argabright et al.2008),thoughsomehadto 2 http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/
INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE IN KEPLER’S FIRST MONTHS 3
each CCD for four consecutive rows at a signal level ap- To this end, a column of pixels is prepended to each tar-
proximately40%offullwell. Thesignalappearsentirely getaperture,andtwotargetswereaddedtoeachchannel
in the virtual smear. Charge injection serves the dual to monitor the undershoot response to both an impulse
purpose of filling radiation induced traps in the CCDs andastepchange. Anundershootcorrectionisincluded
and providing a stable signal for monitoring the readout in the pixel calibration pipeline (Jenkins et al. 2010b).
electronics,or“localdetectorelectronics”(LDE),under-
shoot artifact ( 4.1). 4.2. FGS Clocking Cross Talk
§
In order to store and downlink pixel data for 170,000
Cross talk from the FGS clocks to the science CCD
targets, the CCD output must be compressed from 23
video signals injects a complex pattern into the bias im-
bits pixel−1 to 4–5 bits pixel−1. Because of the Poisson
age of every science channel with an amplitude up to
noise intrinsic in the data, we can afford to requantize 20 DN read−1 (Argabright et al. 2008). Because the
(aftertheinitialanalog-to-digitalconversion)sothatthe
FGSandscienceCCDssharethesamemasterclock, the
effective noise due to quantization is a constant percent-
pattern is spatially fixed; however, the amplitude of the
age of the intrinsic noise for all signal levels. For higher
cross talk is dependent on the temperature of the LDE.
signals with more shot noise, more ADC output values
The cross talk has three distinct components based on
are mapped on to a single requantized value. With ∆
Q the state of the FGS CCDs as the science pixel is read
thestepsizeforasignalwithintrinsicvarianceσm2easured, out (see Figure 1): FGS CCD frame transfer, parallel
the total variance, σ2 , is the quadrature sum of the transfer, and serial transfer (which shows no cross talk).
total
observational noise and the quantization noise: Approximately 20% of targets have at least one of the
parallel or frame-transfer cross talk pixels in their aper-
σ2 =σ2 +∆2/12. (1)
total measured Q ture. Without mitigation, the cross talk introduces a
small time-varying bias into atarget’s flux time series as
(Note that the variance of a uniform random variable of
unit width is 1/12.) Kepler data are requantized such the LDE temperature changes with orbital position.
Inordertomeasurethecrosstalkthermaldependence,
that the quantization noise is at most 1/4 of the intrin-
aseriesofdarkFFIsweretakenatdifferenttemperatures
sic noise, ∆ /√12 σ /4, resulting in a total
Q ≤ measured duringcommissioning. Boththelevelsandtheirthermal
noise increase of 3%. Requantization reduces the num-
dependenceareconsistentwithgroundcharacterizations.
ber of bits pixel−1 from 23 to 16 and greatly improves
The signal in each cross talk pixel type can be modeled
compressibility for subsequent lossless steps in the com-
as an offset from the bias level that is linear in time and
pression process (Haas et al. 2010).
LDE board temperature (Van Cleve & Caldwell 2009).
4. INSTRUMENTARTIFACTS This model removes the cross talk effect to the level of
the read noise for all but a few pixel types on the most
Ground testing uncovered several instrumental arti-
affected channels. The temporal component decreased
facts, each of which was investigated to understand the
significantly during commissioning with a damping time
cause, impact, and cost to fix or mitigate. Based on
ontheorderofaweek,indicativeofatransienteffectsuch
reviews by the Kepler Team and outside experts, the
as out-gassing. With the dust cover on, the focal plane
project dispositioned each of these artifacts. There were
was warmer during the dark data collection than during
several for which the Kepler Team and review boards
science operations, so the model is used to extrapolate
decided that the potential impact to the mission did not
the measured cross talk levels to those we see during
warrant the risk of fixing them. These artifacts were
operations,allowingustogenerateabiasimage,or“two
extensively characterized on the ground and then again
dimensional(2D)black”forcalibrationthatincludesthe
during commissioning. For those with the largest im-
clocking cross talk.
pact, the data processing pipeline either already cor-
rects for them, or corrections are under development
4.3. 2D Black Artifacts
(Jenkins et al.2010b). Table2summarizestheFOVpo-
tentially affected by each artifact. Values for artifact Groundtestsrevealedseveralartifacts associatedwith
levels given below are based on 43 days of science data the 2D structure of the dark images. Their extent on
collection. the focal plane was observed to be small, as was the
likelihood that they would worsen or spread. The dark
4.1. LDE Undershoot images obtained in flight are completely consistent with
ground test results. Nevertheless, the analysis pipeline
Testing of the LDE signal chain on star-like images
does not yet include a means of identifying changes in
revealed a large signal-dependent trailing undershoot in
these features, so time series that are released with the
the video. The primary cause was traced to the use of a
current processing version may contain artifact features
bipolar-inputAD8021operationalamplifierinthecorre-
at signal levels discussed below.
lated double-sample circuit. Corrective action to replace
this amplifier with the junction field effect transistor-
4.3.1. High-frequency Oscillations
input AD8065 in all video channels resulted in greatly
reducing this artifact, from an initial 2% amplitude and A temperature-sensitive amplifier oscillation at
12 pixels duration to a median amplitude of 0.34% and >1 GHz was detected in some CCD video channels
3 pixels duration, as measured in flight data (Figure 2). during the artifact investigation. We suspect that the
The undershoot distortion can be modeled as an invert- origin of this oscillation is from the AD8021 operational
ible, linear, shift-invariant digital filter, meaning we can amplifiers used extensively in the video signal chain,
correct the pixel values provided we have enough pixels which may show subtle layout-dependent instability
upstream(lowercolumnnumbers)ofthepixelofinterest. when used at low gains. The oscillation’s frequency
4 Caldwell et al.
range, rate of change, and pattern among the channels moir´e pattern, approximately 20% of the FOV may be
matchedcloselythosecharacteristicsinthedarkimages, affected by these artifacts above the 0.02 DN read−1
strongly suggesting that the artifact is a moir´e pattern pixel−1 level.
generated by sampling the high-frequency oscillation at A second scene dependent effect is observed on all
the 3MHz serial pixel clocking rate. Since the character- channels. A bright star produces a strong undershoot
istic source frequency drifts with time and temperature signal as discussed above, but the undershoot signal ex-
of the electronic components by as much as 500kHz/◦C, tends for hundreds of pixels at a very low level rather
the signal from a given pixel in a series of dark images than the 20 pixels currently used for the inverse filter.
has a time varying signature. This signature may be This extended undershoot signal varies in proportion to
highly correlated with neighboring pixels and yet poorly variations in the source star’s light curve. We estimate
correlated with slightly more distant pixels. When the that36%ofCCDrowscontainstarsbrightenoughtoin-
oscillation frequency is a harmonic of the serial clocking troduceextendedundershootsignalswhichsuggeststhat
frequency, a DC shift occurs producing a horizontal 20%ofpixelsareatrisktobeaffectedbythisartifact. Of
band offset from the mean bias-level in the image. As these, we conservatively estimate that 50% are actually
the frequency drifts with temperature, the point on the affected above the 0.02 DN read−1 pixel−1 level. This
image where this DC shift occurs moves up or down means 10% of the total FOV is subject to this effect.
from sample-to-sample, producing a rolling band.
Forty-six of the 84 readout channels have never ex- 4.3.3. Start-of-line Ringing
hibited this behavior and an additional 9 channels have
Atransientsignalinitiatedattheonsetofserialclock-
thus far not exhibited this behavior at a detectable level
ingofeachrowiswell-modeledasaseriesof 5superim-
inflight. Typically,intheremaining29channels,20%of ∼
posed, slightly under-damped oscillations which extend
the FOV exhibits the moir´e pattern with peak-to-peak
for roughly 150 pixels. This start-of-line ringing is evi-
amplitudes>0.1DNread−1 pixel−1, whileanother18%
dent on all output channels, but shows much less ther-
exhibits between 0.02 and 0.1 DN read−1 pixel−1. Two
malsensitivitythantheoscillationsdiscussedpreviously.
outputchannels,9.2and17.2,typicallyexhibit>0.1DN Theinitialamplitudeoftheoscillationsis>1DNread−1
read−1 pixel−1 moir´e pattern peak-to-peak amplitudes pixel−1; however, the pattern is static, so the current
over their entire fields-of-view. The resulting total FOV
processing algorithms adequately remove the artifact to
fraction typically affected by moir´e signal at or above a accuracies <0.02 DN read−1 pixel−1. We do not expect
levelof0.1DNread−1 pixel−1 (0.02DNread−1 pixel−1)
this artifact to impact photometric precision.
is 9% (15%). For comparison, 0.1 DN read−1 pixel−1 is
thechangeinsignalperpixelinatypical12th magnitude 5. SUMMARY
star aperture for an Earth-size planet transit. We have
Wehaveusedcommissioningandthefirstmonthofsci-
adopted the conservative threshold of 0.02 DN read−1 enceoperations tocharacterize Kepler’s instrument per-
pixel−1, or roughly 1/4 of the per pixel signal from an
formance. The basic properties of the photometer are
Earth-sizetransit,inordertoputanupperboundonthe
unchangedfromgroundtesting. Imageartifactsarecon-
potential impact from image artifacts. While the moir´e
sistent with ground observations, though star light cre-
amplitude per pixel in these channels is significant, how
ates scene dependence of the moir´e pattern signal, com-
theartifactaffectsourabilitytodetectsmallplanetsde-
plicating mitigation plans. Corrections in the current
pends on its frequency, sum within a target aperture,
analysis pipeline for static FGS clocking cross talk, LDE
and variations over time-scales of interest to transit de-
undershoot,andstart-of-lineringingarefoundtoremove
tection. Basedonthefirst33.5daysofdatafromscience theseartifactstoalevelsufficienttomeetKepler’s preci-
operations, Jenkins et al. (2010a) find the instrument is
sion requirements. We are currently testing mitigations
meeting the 6-hour precision requirement across the fo-
for the thermally varying FGS cross talk, moir´e pat-
cal plane for the quietest 30% of stars. The two worst
tern, and extended undershoot, which will subsequently
moir´e channels, 9.2 and 17.2, exhibit a 20% increase in
be implemented in the analysis pipeline. Results indi-
6-hour noise over the focal plane averag∼e at 12th magni-
cate that we can reduce the levels of these artifacts to
tude, as measured by the standard deviation of 6-hour < 0.02 DN read−1 pixel−1 over 80%–90% of the focal
binned flux time series. Such an increase is small com-
plane, with the remainder flagged for use in subsequent
pared with the factor of 1.5 spread in the distribution
analysis steps (Jenkins et al. 2010b). The photometer is
of dwarf star precision at 12th magnitude (Jenkins et al.
currentlyprovidingmeasurementsofunprecedentedpre-
2010a).
cisionandtime coverage, giving usgreatconfidencethat
the Kepler Mission will meet its science goals and make
4.3.2. Scene-dependent Artifacts
many unexpected discoveries.
As a consequence of the sensitivity of the oscillating
LDE component to temperature, the thermal transient
We gratefully acknowledge the years of work by the
introduced during readout by the signal from a bright
many hundred members of the Kepler Team who con-
starcausesadditionallocalizedchangesinbias-level(Fig-
ceived, designed, built, and now operate this wonderful
ure 1). These scene dependent artifacts persist over
mission. Funding for this Discovery mission is provided
a range of hundreds of pixels in the columns following
by NASA’s Science Mission Directorate.
bright stars. In the 29 output channels exhibiting the
REFERENCES
Argabright,V.S.,etal.2008,Proc.SPIE,7010,70102L Borucki,W.J.,etal.2010,Science,submitted
INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE IN KEPLER’S FIRST MONTHS 5
Bryson,S.T.,etal.2010,ApJ,this issue VanCleve,J.,&Caldwell,D.A.2009,KeplerInstrument
Haas,M.R.,etal.2010,ApJ,this issue Handbook,KSCI19033-001(MoffettField,CA:NASAAmes
Jenkins,J.M.,etal.2010a,ApJ,this issue ResearchCenter),http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/
—.2010b,ApJ,this issue
Koch,D.G.,etal.2010,ApJ,this issue
6 Caldwell et al.
1000
1000
980
900
800 960
700
940
ber 600 ber
m m
nu nu 920
w 500 w
o o
R R
400 900
300
880
200
860
100
840
200 400 600 800 1000 960 980 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120
Column number Column number
Fig. 1.— Raw FFI of channel 17.2 (left) and a zoomed portion of the image (right). The left panel shows the collateral data regions:
leading black columns (left edge), trailing black columns (right edge), masked smear rows (bottom), and virtual smear rows (top). The
fourbrightchargeinjectionrowscanbeseeninthevirtualsmear. Thesmearsignalisvisibleasbrightcolumns. TheFGSframe-transfer
clocking cross talk signals are the five faint horizontal bands near rows 1, 220, 430, 640, and 860. The right panel shows a close-up near
two bright stars. The smear signal, frame-transfer cross talk at row 860, and trailing black beginning at Column 1112 are visible. The
FGSparallel-transfercrosstalksignalsarethe∼16pixelswidesegmentsspacedsevenrowsapartbeginningnearthelowerleftandoffset
towardtheupperright. Scene-dependentmoir´epatternisvisibleinthecolumnsfollowingthetwobrightstarsinrows865and930. This
commissioningFFI(KPLR2009108050033)used270coaddsof2.59sintegrationseach,foratotalexposuretimeof700s. Thedisplayuses
alinearstretchfromthe7th to80th percentile.
580 0.3
0.2
570
0.1
%)
560 ht (
eig 0
ow number550 e to peak h−0.1
R540 elativ−0.2
ux r
Fl
−0.3
530
−0.4
520
−0.5
1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050 1000 1010 1020 1030 1040 1050
Column number Column number
Fig. 2.— Portion of a raw FFI of channel 11.1 near a saturating star that spills charge ±30 rows (left) and the mean of three rows
(521-523) cutting through a saturated column (right), scaled to be relative to the saturation peak height and expressed in percent. The
dottedlinewith‘x’symbolsisfromtherawFFI,andthesolidlineisfromthecalibratedFFI,demonstratingtheefficacyoftheundershoot
correction(Jenkinsetal.2010b). Theundershootlevelis0.4%forthefirstpixeland0.1%forthesecond. ThisFFI(KPLR2009231194831)
used270co-addsof6.02sintegrations,foratotalexposuretimeof1625s. Thedisplayusesalinearstretchfromthe5thto95thpercentile.
Anopticalghostfromthefieldflattenerlensisclearlyvisiblearoundthisbrightstar.
INSTRUMENT PERFORMANCE IN KEPLER’S FIRST MONTHS 7
TABLE 1
Detector Properties Summary
Parameter WhereMeasured Minimum Maximum Median
Readnoise(e− read−1) Flight 81 307[149]a 95
Darkcurrent(e− pix−1 s−1) Flight -8.1[-3.2]a 7.5 0.25
QEat600nm Ground 0.81 0.92 0.87
Gain(e− DN−1) Ground 94 120 112
Saturation(KeplerMag)b Flight 11.6 10.3 11.3
PRNUc (%) Ground 0.82 1.20 0.96
LDEUndershoot(%) Flight 0.08 1.92 0.34
Note. —Minimum,maximum,andmedianaretakenacrossall84channelsofthefocalplane.
a
Flight measurements of read noise and dark current are contaminated by image artifacts for several of the noisiest channels (§ 4). Values for
non-artifactchannelsaregiveninsquarebrackets,wheredifferent.
b
Saturation range is calculated using the measured QE variations, a vignetting model, and the observed central pixel flux fraction range of
0.28–0.64.
c
PRNUisameasureoflocalpixelresponsevariationanddoesnotincludelarge-scaleopticaleffectssuchasvignetting(§3.1).
TABLE 2
Field of View at Risk from Artifacts.
PotentialExtent FOVatRisk
Artifact onFOVa (%) >0.02DN/reada (%)
LDEundershoot 100 0
FGScrosstalk 20 0
Moir´epattern 45 15b
Scenedependentmoir´e 45 7b
Extendedundershoot 100 10b
a
“Potential extent” indicates the fraction of the FOV where the artifact could potentially be seen. “FOV at risk” indicates the fraction where
we could see time varying signals at or above 0.02 DN read−1 after existing and planned mitigations in the analysis pipeline. See the text for
discussion.
b
TheFOVvaluesdonotaddsinceartifactsoverlap. Scenedependentmoir´epatterndriftadds∼4%uniqueFOVandextendedundershootadds
∼8%.