Table Of ContentAdiel Teixeira de Almeida
Danielle Costa Morais (Eds.)
Innovation for
Systems Information
5
0
4
P and Decision
I
B
N
L
Second International Meeting, INSID 2020
Recife, Brazil, December 2–4, 2020
Proceedings
123
Lecture Notes
in Business Information Processing 405
Series Editors
Wil van der Aalst
RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
John Mylopoulos
University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Michael Rosemann
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Michael J. Shaw
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Clemens Szyperski
Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7911
Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
(cid:129)
Danielle Costa Morais (Eds.)
Innovation for
Systems Information
and Decision
Second International Meeting, INSID 2020
–
Recife, Brazil, December 2 4, 2020
Proceedings
123
Editors
AdielTeixeira deAlmeida Danielle Costa Morais
Federal Univof Pernambuco Departamento deEngenharia deProducao
Recife, Pernambuco,Brazil Universidade FederaldePernambuco
Recife, Pernambuco,Brazil
ISSN 1865-1348 ISSN 1865-1356 (electronic)
Lecture Notesin Business Information Processing
ISBN 978-3-030-64398-0 ISBN978-3-030-64399-7 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64399-7
©SpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG2020
Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpartofthe
material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information
storageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilarmethodologynow
knownorhereafterdeveloped.
Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthispublication
doesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfromtherelevant
protectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.
Thepublisher,theauthorsandtheeditorsaresafetoassumethattheadviceandinformationinthisbookare
believedtobetrueandaccurateatthedateofpublication.Neitherthepublishernortheauthorsortheeditors
give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or
omissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.Thepublisherremainsneutralwithregardtojurisdictionalclaimsin
publishedmapsandinstitutionalaffiliations.
ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbytheregisteredcompanySpringerNatureSwitzerlandAG
Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland
Preface
The INnovation for Systems Information and Decision meeting (INSID) is an event
(http://insid.events)linkedtotheinternationalnetworkINCT-INSID(http://insid.org.br).
This network involves academics and practitioners from different countries, bringing
together outstanding researchers from around the world in the field of Information
SystemsandDecision.
TheINSIDmeetingshaveprovidedastimulatingenvironmentforthedissemination
of state-of-the-art knowledge about innovation for systems, information, and decision.
This broad theme is transversely related to many areas, particularly to operational
research,managementengineering(orproduction engineering),includingalso,system
engineering (and engineering in general), management science, computer science, and
their interdisciplinary related areas. These meetings have allowed discussions among
participants as well as the exchange of ideas and critical comments for further
improvement since 2008, under the acronym SIDS.
INSID 2020 should have been held at the Federal University of Pernambuco, in
Recife-Pernambuco, Brazil, during December 2–4, 2020. However, due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, it took place virtually. This was the first time that the event
happenedinanonlineformatsince2008.However,thiswasnottheonlyreasonitwas
a historic meeting. This is the first volume of the INSID meeting included in the
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (LNBIP) series.
In total, 84 papers were approved for presentation covering the main topics related
to themes and areas of interest of the meeting as follows: Methodological advances in
decision making and aid; decision models in the environmental context; decision
models in the energy context; decision models in the service systems; and, potential
applications of decision and negotiation models. After a thorough review process, 8
of these papers were selected for inclusion in this volume entitled INnovation for
Systems Information and Decision: Models and Applications.
These selected papers reflect methodological improvements and advances in Mul-
ticriteria Decision-Making/Multicriteria Decision-Aid (MCDM/MCDA) oriented
toward real-world applications, contributing to the understanding of relevant devel-
opments of current research on, and future trends of, innovation for systems, infor-
mation, and decision.
The first paper by Danielson and Ekenberg explores and tests a robust multicriteria
weight generatingmethodunderuncertaintycoveringawidesetofdecisionsituations
and exemplify its application with a problem of selecting strategies for combatting
COVID-19. Then, a paper by von Nitzsch, Tönsfeuerborn, and Siebert introduces the
ENTSCHEIDUNGSNAVI,amulti-criteriadecisionsupportsystem,whichbesidesthe
basic functionalities of a decision support system, provides training to improve the
user’s decision-making skills. The third paper by Angelo and Lins deals with a com-
bination of Soft and Hard Operational Research (OR) presenting a multimethodology
vi Preface
namedComplexHolographicAssessmentofParadoxicalProblems(CHAP2)appliedto
a complex health system.
Zaraté presents the results of multicultural experiments in order to see whether
decision-makers feel comfortable with shared preferences and how the need to use
privatepreferencescouldbeseenusingamulticriteriaGroupDecisionSupportSystem
(GDSS)calledGRUS.EufrazioandCostaproposeasyntheticindexofqualitylifefor
OECD countries called Synthetic Better Life Index (SBLI). It follows a study by Xu,
Liu, Kilgour, and Hipel, which presents a new algebraic definition to facilitate calcu-
lating of Stackelberg stability in a graph model for conflict resolution with two
decision-makers, and a superpower military confrontation is used to illustrate how
Stackelberg stability can be applied to a real-world problem.
Fossile, Costa, and Lima deal with a study on the development of a sustainable
measurementmodelofrenewableenergysources,aimingtoidentifythemostadequate
energysource tobeusedinBrazilianports.Finally,theeighthpaperbyCunha,Mota,
deAlmeida,Frej,andRosellipresentsanapplicationrelatedtosecurityintheBrazilian
Federal Police, applying Value Focused Thinking with the FITradeoff method for the
assignment of priorities regarding special operations.
The preparation of this volume required the efforts and collaboration of many
people. In particular, we would like to thank the Steering Committee and Program
Committee for their contributions to the INSID 2020. Special thanks also go to all
members of the INCT-INSID network. We are also very grateful to the following
reviewers for their timely and informative additional reviews: Marc Kilgour, Liping
Fang, Ana Paula Gusmão, Mischel Carmen Belderrain, Eduarda Frej, Leandro Rego,
Maisa M. Silva, Carolina Lino, Luciana Hazin, and Ana Paula Cabral.
WewouldalsoliketothankRalfGerstner,AlfredHofmann,ChristineReiss,Guido
Zosimo-Landolfo, and Anna Kramer at Springer for the excellent collaboration.
Finally,wehopereaderswillfindthecontentofthisbookusefulandstimulatingfor
further developments and applications of innovation for systems, information, and
decision.
December 2020 Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
Danielle Costa Morais
Organization
Program Chair
Danielle Costa Morais Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Steering Committee
Adiel Teixeira de Almeida Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Keith Hipel University of Waterloo, Canada
Love Ekenberg Stockholm University,Sweden
Marc Kilgour Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada
Pascale Zarate Université Toulouse 1 Capitole, France
Ralph Keeney DukeUniversityandUniversityofSouthernCalifornia,
USA
Roman Slowinski Poznań University of Technology, Poland
Rudolf Vetschera University of Vienna, Austria
Petr Ekel Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Minas Gerais,
Brazil
Marcos Pereira Estellita Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Lins
Helder Gomes Costa Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
Mischel Carmen Neyra Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, Brazil
Belderrain
Danielle Costa Morais Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Program Committee
Alexandre Bevilacquea Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Leoneti
Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Costa
Ana Paula Henriques de Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Brazil
Gusmã
Annibal Parracho Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
Sant’Anna
Carlos Francisco Simões Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
Gomes
Caroline Maria de Miranda Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Mota
Cristiano Alexandre V. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Cavalcante
Cristiano Torezzan Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil
viii Organization
Daniel Aloise Polytechnique Montréal, Canada
Haiyan Xu Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,
China
Hannu Nurmi University of Turku, Finland
JoãoCarlosCorreiaBaptista Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
Soares de Mello
Johannes Siebert MCI Management Center Innsbruck, Austria
José Rui Figueira Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal
Leandro Chaves Rêgo Universidade Federal do Ceará, Brazil
Liping Fang Ryerson University, Canada
Luciana Hazin Alencar Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Luiz Bueno da Silva Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Brazil
Luiz César Ribeiro Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Carpinetti
Maria Teresinha Arns Pontifícia Universidade Católica Paraná, Brazil
Steiner
Mariana Rodrigues de Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
Almeida
Salvatore Greco University of Catania, Italy
Sérgio Eduardo Gouvêa da Pontifícia Universidade Católica Paraná, Brazil
Costa
Vanessa Batista de Sousa Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Brazil
Silva
Contents
Automatic Criteria Weight Generation for Multi-criteria Decision Making
Under Uncertainty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Mats Danielson and Love Ekenberg
Decision Skill Training with the ENTSCHEIDUNGSNAVI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Rüdiger von Nitzsch, Mendy Tönsfeuerborn,
and Johannes Ulrich Siebert
Multimethodology Applied to a Complex Health System. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Simone Aldrey Angelo and Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins
Multi-criteria Group Decision Support System: Multi
Cultural Experiments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Pascale Zaraté
A Proposed Synthetic Index of Quality Life for OECD Countries. . . . . . . . . 62
Edilvando Pereira Eufrazio and Helder Gomes Costa
Stackelberg Stability in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution:
Definition and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Haiyan Xu, Guixian Liu, D. Marc Kilgour, and Keith W. Hipel
Sustainable Measurement Model of Renewable Energy Sources:
An Application in Port Located in the South Region of Brazil . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Dayla Karolina Fossile, Sergio E. Gouvea da Costa,
and Edson Pinheiro de Lima
Applying the FITradeoff Method for Aiding Prioritization of Special
Operations of Brazilian Federal Police. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
Carla Patrícia Cintra Barros da Cunha,
Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,
Eduarda Asfora Frej, and Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127