Table Of Contentii 
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL  PHARMACOLOGICAL  MEETING, 
STOCKHOLM,  22-25  AUGUST,  1961 
Vol.  1 Part  1: Plenary  Session 
Part 2: Pharmacological  Control  of Release  of Hormones  Including  Antidiabetic 
Drugs 
Vol.  2 Effects  of  Drugs  on  Synthesis  and  Mobilization  of  Lipids 
Vol.  3 New  Aspects  of  Cardiac  Glycosides 
Vol.  4  Drugs  and  Membranes 
Vol.  5  Methods  for  the  Study  of Pharmacological  Effects  at  Cellular  and  Subcellular 
Levels 
Vol.  6  Metabolic  Factors  Controlling  Duration  of Drug  Action 
Vol.  7  Modern  Concepts  in  the  Relationship  between  Structure  and  Pharmacological 
Activity 
Vol.  8 Pharmacological  Analysis  of  Central  Nervous  Action 
Vol.  9  Part  1: Bradykinin  and  Vaso-dilating  Polypeptides 
Part 2: Pharmacology  of  the  Lung 
Vol.  10  Abstracts 
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL  PHARMACOLOGICAL  MEETING 
PRAGUE,  20-23  AUGUST,  1963 
Vol.  1 Pharmacology  of  Conditioning,  Learning  and  Retention 
Vol.  2  Biochemical  and  Neurophysiological  Correlation  of  Centrally  Acting  Drugs 
Vol.  3 Pharmacology  of  Cholinergic  and  Adrenergic  Transmission 
Vol.  4  Drugs  and  Enzymes 
Vol.  5 Pharmacology  of  Cardiac  Function 
Vol.  6 Pharmacology  of  Smooth  Muscle 
Vol.  7 Pharmacology  of  Oriental  Plants 
Vol.  8 Evaluation  of New  Drugs  in  Man 
Vol.  9  Recent  Advances  in the Pharmacology  of  Toxins 
Vol.  10 Oxytocin,  Vasopressin  and  their  Structural  Analogues 
Vol.  11 Drugs  and  Respiration 
PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD  INTERNATIONAL  PHARMACOLOGICAL  MEETING 
SAO PAULO,  24-30  JULY,  1966 
Vol.  1 Mode  of  Action  of  Anti-Parasitic  Drugs 
Vol.  2 Pharmacology  of  Reproduction 
Vol.  3  Clinical  Pharmacology 
Vol.  4  Mechanisms  of Drug  Toxicity 
Vol.  5  77?^ Control  of  Growth  Processes  by  Chemical  Agents 
Vol.  6 Drugs  in Relation  to Blood  Coagulation,  Haemostasis  and  Thrombosis 
Vol.  7 Physico-Chemical  Aspects  of  Drug  Action 
Vol.  8  Salt  and  Water  Balance 
Vol.  9 Pharmacology  and  Pain 
Vol.  10 Rapporst  Entre  les  Actions  Pharmacologiques  des  LM.A.O.  et  Leurs  Effets 
chez  V  Homme 
Vol.  11  Immunopharmacology
Immunopharmacology 
Edited  by 
H. O.  SCHILD 
University  College 
London 
000  ©©[ROdHSG 
1  — 
5£> 
[Ff}m[^iM®My®©iMi 
<S8> 
TT 'OU-S rACWHDA  R
OINDY U6S1 9T6H
PERGAMON  PRESS 
O X F O RD  L O N D ON  • E D I N B U R G H • N EW  Y O RK 
T O R O N TO  - S Y D N E Y*  P A R I S - B R A U N S C H W E IG
Pergamon  Press Ltd., Headington  Hill Hall,  Oxford 
4  & 5 Fitzroy  Square, London  W.l 
Pergamon  Press (Scotland)  Ltd., 2 & 3 Teviot Place, Edinburgh  1 
Pergamon  Press Inc., 44-01  21st Street, Long Island  City, New  York  11101 
Pergamon  of Canada,  Ltd., 6 Adelaide  Street East, Toronto,  Ontario 
e 
Pergamon  Press (Aust.)  Pty. Ltd.,  Rushcutters  Bay, Sydney, New  South  Wales 
Pergamon  Press S.A.R.L.,  24 rue des Ecoles, Paris  5
Vieweg & Sohn  GmbH,  Burgplatz  1,  Braunschweig 
Copyright  ©  1968 
Pergamon  Press  Ltd. 
First edition  1968 
Library  of Congress  Catalog  Card  No  67-19416 
08 003269 9
LISTOF  AUTHORS 
BENACERRAF,  B.  Department  of  Pathology, 
New  York  University,  School  of  Medicine 
New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A. 
BROCKLEHURST,  W.  E.  Edinburgh  University,  Medical  School, 
Edinburgh,  U.K. 
BRODER,  I.  Department  of  Medicine  and  Pharmacology, 
University  of  Toronto, 
Toronto,  Canada 
COCHRANE,  C.  G.  Scripps  Clinic and  Research  Foundation  Division 
of  Experimental  Pathology, 
La  Jolla,  California,  U.S.A. 
DAVID,  J.  R.  Department  of  Medicine,  New  York  University  School 
of  Medicine, 
New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A. 
FRAY,  ANTOINETTE  Chaire  de  Medecine  Experimentale, 
College  de  France, 
Paris,  France 
GOTH,  A.  Department  of Pharmacology,  The  University  of 
Texas,  Southwestern  Medical  School, 
Dallas,  Texas,  U.S.A. 
GREAVES,  M.  W.  Department  of  Pharmacology,  University  College, 
London,  England 
HALPERN,  B.  Chaire  de  Medecine  Experimentale, 
College  de  France, 
Paris,  France 
HAYASHI,  H.  Department  of Pathology,  Kumamoto  University 
Medical  School, 
Kumamoto,  Japan 
ISHIZAKA,  K.  Children's  Asthma  Research  Institute  and  Hospital, 
Denver,  Colorado,  U.S.A. 
LEVINE,  B.  B.  Department  of  Medicine,  New  York  University  School 
of  Medicine, 
New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A. 
MONGAR,  J.  L.  Department  of  Pharmacology,  University  College, 
London,  England 
M 0 LLER-EBERHARD,  J. Scripps  Clinic  and  Research  Foundation,  Division  of 
Experimental  Pathology, 
La  Jolla,  California,  U.S.A. 
vii
viii  LIST OF  AUTHORS 
OVARY,  Z.  Department  of Pathology,  New  York  University 
School  of  Medicine, 
New  York,  N.Y.,  U.S.A. 
ROTSCHILD, A.  M.  Department  of  Pharmacology, 
Faculty  of  Medicine, 
Ribeirao  Preto,  Brazil 
SCHILD, H.  O.  Department  of  Pharmacology, 
University  College, 
London,  England 
STORB,  URSULA  Chaire  de  Medecine  Experimental, 
College  de  France, 
Paris,  France 
UNGAR,  G.  Baylor  University,  College  of  Medicine, 
Houston,  Texas,  U.S.A. 
UVNAS,  B.  Department  of  Pharmacology, 
Karolinska  Institutet, 
Stockholm,  Sweden 
WARD,  P.  A.  Scripps  Clinic  and  Research  Foundation, 
Division  of  Experimental  Pathology, 
La  Jolla,  California,  U.S.A. 
WlLLOUGHBY, D.  A.  Department  of  Pathology, 
St.  Bartholomew's  Hospital, 
London,  England
PREFACE 
THIS  volume  contains  the  proceedings  of a  symposium  on  Immunophar-
macology  held  at  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil, on  26 July  1966, in conjunction  with 
the  Illrd  International  Pharmacological  Congress. 
The  symposium  expresses  the  close  relations  between  pharmacology 
and  immunology,  relations  which  are likely  to  become  even  closer  as  the 
nature  of the  substances  mediating  hypersensitivity  reactions  gets  further 
elucidated. 
Part I of this volume deals with immunoglobulins  responsible for  hyper-
sensitivity  reactions  and  with  the  mechanisms  of  these  reactions;  part 
II  with  pharmacological  mediators  of immediate  and  delayed  hypersensi-
tivity and Arthus  reactions and  with soluble factors  released  by the  action 
of  antigen  on  sensitized  lymphocytes.  Part  III  contains  a  single  paper 
on  the subject  of penicillin  allergy. 
I have  been entrusted  with  the  organization  of the  symposium  together 
with Dr. Benacerraf and am most grateful to the participants for their  lucid 
contributions  and  for  providing the manuscripts  in good  time. I also  wish 
to  thank  Dr.  Radan  Capek,  Prague, for helping with the editing and  print-
ing of the  volume. 
H.  O.  SCHILD 
ix
PROPERTIES  OF  IMMUNOGLOBULINS 
WHICH  MEDIATE  THE  RELEASE 
OF  VASOACTIVE  AMINES  IN 
EXPERIMENTAL  ANIMALS* 
BARUJ  BENACERRAF 
Department  of  Pathology 
New  York  University  School  of  Medicine 
New  York,  N.Y. 
RECENT  studies  on  the  heterogeneity  of  immunoglobulins  have  revealed 
that  several  mammalian species including man produce a special immuno-
globulin  capable  of  sensitizing host  tissues  for  systemic, local, and  under 
certain  experimental  circumstances,  in  vitro  anaphylactic  reactions.  This 
immunoglobulin  type  will  be  referred  to  as  "anaphylactic  antibody".  Its 
biological  properties  are  a  consequence  of  its  capacity  to  combine  with 
certain target cells (probably  tissue mast  cells) so that  subsequent  contact 
with  a  specific  antigen  initiates  a series  of events  which  cause the  release 
of vasoactive agents. The anaphylactic antibodies  are characteristic  of  the 
species  in  which  they  have  been  produced  since  they  can  only  mediate 
and  transfer  anaphylactic reaction within this  species  or  to  closely  related 
species.  It  is  a  general  observation  that  anaphylactic  antibodies  cannot 
sensitize unrelated  species. However,  mammalian  anaphylactic  antibodies 
can  nevertheless  be  classified  into  main  types  according  to  their  physico-
chemical  properties  and  some  of thei(r  1b)io2logical  pro perti()es.3  T,he 4anaphy-
lactic  antibodies  of  the  guinea  pig '   and  mouse   are  very  similar 
and  have  been  called  y\  immunoglobulin(s. 5)Th,ey6  diff(er) 7app rec)ia(bl8y  from () 9
the  anaphylactic  antibodies  of  the  rat,   rabbit,   dog   and  man
which  will be referred  to  as the  "reaginic type"  of anaphylactic  antibody. 
*  This  work  was  supported  by  United  Public  Health  Service  Grants  AI  2094  and 
AI 04983 and by the Health  Research  Council  of the City of New York  under  contract 
no.  1-138. 
3
4  B.  BENACERRAF 
I.  ANAPHYLACTIC  ANTIBODIES  OF  THE  GUINEA  PIG  AND 
MOUSE,  L  ITMMUNOGLOBULINS 
A.  The  guinea  pig.—Although  the  guinea  pig  has  been  an  animal  of 
choice  for  the  study  of  local  and  systemic  anaphylactic  reactions  ever 
since  the  discovery  of  these  phenomena,  characterization  of  the  specific 
guinea pig immunoglobulin  which  mediates these reactions  has  only  been 
accomplished  in the past few years. This has been achieved  independently 
by two groups of workers in the United States and in England.  Benacerraf, 
Ovary,  and  Bloch  observed  that  antisera  of  guinea  pigs  immunized  with 
hapten-protein  conjugates  contain  two  populations  of  prec1i, pit)at1ing0  anti-
bodies  directed  against  the  same  antigenic  determinant/   These  two 
antibodies  differ  in  their  electrophoretic  mobility  on  agar  gel  and  starch 
block electrophoresis. They were identified  as yi and y 2  antibodies.  White, 
Jenkins  and Wilkinson made  similar  observations  with  antisera  of  g(u)i2nea 
pigs immunized  with  egg albumin  in complete  Freund's  adjuvant.   Both 
groups  reported  that  the  faster  migrating  y x  but  not  y2  antibodies  are 
able  to  sensitize  guinea  pigs  for  passive  cutaneous  anaphylaxis  (PCA) 
and  for  systemic  anaphylaxis.  y 2  antibodies  are  able  to  block  specifically 
PCA  reactions  provoked  by  y±  antibodies  with  the  same  immunological 
specificity provided a sufficient  excess is used. Contrasting with their  ability 
to  mediate  anaphylactic  reactions,  y±  guinea-pig  antibodies  are  not  able 
to fix complement in the presence of antigen, nor to sensitize antigen  coated 
erythrocytes  for  lysis  by  complement.  Complement  fixation  was  shown 
to  be  a  property  of  the  slower  migrating  y 2  immunoglobulins.These 
two  antibo(d)y1  types  were  shown  to  have  approximately  7S  sedimentation 
constants.   Immunological  analysis  of  y x  and  y2  guinea-pig  antibodies 
with  rabbit  antisera  against  these  immunoglobulins  and  their  papain-
fragments  revealed  that  y x  and  y2  antibodies  are  identical  with  respect 
to  their  L  chains  and  their  Fd  fragments,  which  c(on1 st2i tu1t)e 31the4  Fab  frag-
ment  containing  the  antibody  combining  site. ' '   However,  these 
two  immunoglobulins  differ  completely  in  the  portion  of  their  H  chains 
contributing  to the  Fc fragments.  These structural  differences  are not  sur-
prising  and  contribute  to  explain  the  different  biological  properties  of 
these  two  antibody  classes,  since  it  has  been  clearly  demonstrated  that 
the  chemical  structures  respon(1s5ib)le  for  biological  activities  of  antibodies, ( )1  6
such as complement  fixation,   and  passive anaphylactic  sensitization,
are  indeed  located  on  the  Fc  fragment  of  7S  immunoglobulins. 
Although  the level  of yi  immunoglobulins  is usually  much  lower  in  the 
serum  of unimmunized  guinea  pigs than  the level of y 2  immunoglobulins,
PROPERTIES  OF  IMMUNOGLOBULINS  5 
specific  immu(n)liz7ation  will  cause  a  very  high  level  of  y±  antibodies  to  be 
synthesized.   Immunization  with  protein  antigens,  in  complete  adju-
vants  containing  mycobacteria,  st(im 1u)la2tes  the  synthesis  of  comparable 
quantities  of y2  and  y\  antibodies '   although  the  respective  amount  of 
these  two  imm(un)1og8lobulins  formed  differs  somewhat  with  the  type  of 
antigens  used.   Immunization  without  adjuv(a)1nts  stimulates  the  forma-
tion of yi immunoglobulin  almost exclusively.  It can be stated,  therefore, 
that  anaphylactic  antibody  of the guinea pig is one  of its two most  preva-
lent  immunoglobulins  and  for  this  reason  it  has  been  possible  to  obtain 
it in  sufficient  amounts,  relatively  pure,  to  allow  its  characterization  and 
the  study  of  its  physical  properties. 
The  anaphylactic  properties  of  guinea  pig y± antibodies  whether  in  th(e 12)9 0
serum or purified are unaffected by heating to 56°C from 30 min to 4  fir, '
a  treatment  which  is  known  to  (d)e7stroy  the  activity  of  human,  rat  and 
rabbit  anaphylactic  antibodies.   Alkylation  and  reduction  under  con(- )2  1
ditions  known  to  completely  inactivate  human  anaphylactic  antibodies
reduced  the  skin  sensitizing  activity  of  guinea  pig  purified  y±  antihapten 
antibodies  only  slightly.  Because  of their important  differences  in  electric 
charge,  guinea  pig  y±  and  y 2  immunoglobulins  can  be  easily  separated 
either  by  preparat(iv)2e   2zone  electrophoresis^  or  by  chromatography  on 
DEAE  cellulose.
In  order  to  differentiate  guinea  pig  y± immunoglobulins  from  the  IgA ( )2  3
antibodies, which are characterized by a high content of  carbohydrates,
hexose  analysis  of  both  y x  and  y2  (g)u2in2ea  pig  antibodies  were  made  and 
these  were  found  to  be  identical.   Since  the  placental  membranes  of 
some  animals  select  certain  maternal  antibodies  for  transmission  to  the 
fetus  and  exclude  others,  passage  of  y\  and  y 2  immunoglobulins  from 
mother  to  fetus  was  investigated.  Both  immunoglobulin  types  are  trans-
mitted  to  the  young  by  active(ly )2or0 passively immunized  pregnant  moth-
ers  in  comparable  amounts.   Thus the site on the  Fc fragment  of  these 
two  immunoglobulin  types  which  is  involved  in  placental  membrane 
transport  in this  species is present  in both  types  of guinea  pig  antibodies. 
B.  The  mouse.—The  immunoglobulins  of  the  mouse  have  been  well 
investigated  and  the  following  types  have  bee(n )i2de4ntified:  IgM,  IgA,  and 
two  IgG's  also  referred  to  as y 2A  and  y2B.   Besides (th)2ese5  immunoglo-
bulins,  the  mouse  produces  also  a  y±  immunoglobulin   which  appears 
to  b e (2id3 e4n)t2ica5l  in  many  respects  with  the  guinea  pig  y±  immunoglobu-
lin. ' '  The y1  mouse  antibodies  have  a faster  electrophoretic  mobility 
than  mouse  y2  antibodies,  although  this  difference  is not  as marked  as  in 
the  guinea  pig,  which  renders  the  separation  of yi  from  y 2  mouse  immu-
6  B.  BENACERRAF 
noglobulins  more  difficult.  Mouse  y±  antibodies  have  been  shown  to  be 
the  only  immunoglobulin  class  capable  of transferring  passive  cutaneous 
anaphylaxis  in the  mouse  and  can  be consi3d, e)re4d  therefore  to  be the  ana-
phylactic immunoglobulin  of the species/   Mouse y± is also a 7S  immu-
noglobulin.  It  is found  in  the  serum  in  lesser  amounts  than  y 2  immuno-
globulins  but it is synthesized  in large quantities  following  specific  immu-
nization.  Similarly to guinea pig y± immunoglobulins,  mouse  anaphylactic 
antibodies  appea(r) 3not  to  lyse antigen  coated  erythrocytes  in the  presence 
of complement.   Mouse  y x immunoglobulins  are synthesized in  sufficient 
amounts to be characterized and to allow their physicochemical  properties 
to  be  investigated.  The anaphylactic antibody  of  the  mouse  is  somewhat 
more  sensitive  than  that  of  the  guinea  p(ig) 3  to  reduction  and  alkylation 
but  equally  resistant  to  heat  at  56°C.
In  summary  both  mouse  and  guinea  pig  produce  in  large  amounts  a 
7S  immunoglobulin  type  with  somewhat  faster  mobility  than  their  re-
spective 72 antibodies. These y± globulins  possess  distinct  antigenic  deter-
minants  on  the  Fc  fragment  of  their  respective  H  chains.  They  mediate 
anaphylactic  reactions  in  their  respective  species.  They  are  also  similar 
in  some  of their  biological  characteristics.  Both  require  a relatively  short 
latent  period  for  passive  cuta(n)2eo6us  anaphylactic  sensitization(, )2v7arying 
from  one  hour  in the  mouse,   to  3 to  5 hr in the  guinea  pig   and  they 
bind  to  the  skin  for  a  very  short  period  of time.  Greatly  decreased  reac-
tions(  a2 re 6)o2bs7erved  after  24 hr in the  mouse  and  after  48 hr in  the  guinea 
pig. '   These  sensitizing  characteristics  are  quite  different  from  those 
of  the  anaphylactic  antibodies  of  the  rat,  the  rabbit,  the  dog  and  man 
which  bind  much  more  strongly  to  the  skin  of  their  respective  species. 
They  are  the  result  of  a  comparatively  lesser  affinity  of  the  mouse  and 
guinea  pig  71, anaphylactic  antibodies  for  their  respective  target  cells. 
In  spite  of  their  numerous  similarities,  the  y x  immunoglobulins  of  the 
guinea  pig  and  the  mouse  are  characteristic  of  their  respective  species 
as  neither  species  can  be  sensitized  by  the  yi  antibodies  of  the  other 
species. 
II.  ANAPHYLACTIC  ANTIBODIES  OF  THE  RAT,  THE  RABBIT  AND 
THE  DOG,  "REAGENIC  TYPE" 
The  anaphylactic  antibodies  of these  three  species  are  very  similar  and 
resemble  closely  in  their  physicochemical  and  biological  properties  the 
human  reagin.  They  can  be  considered  therefore  to  belong  to  a  distinct 
immunoglobulin  class.