High Strangeness - Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abduction

434 Pages·2008·6.72 MB·English

by  Laura Knight-Jadczyk

The
High Strangeness
of
Dimensions, Densities,
and the
Process of Alien Abduction
OTHER BOOKS BY LAURA KNIGHT JADCZYK

The Secret History of the World and How to Get Out Alive

The Wave Series – 5 Volumes

Amazing Grace – An Autobiography of the Soul

9/11: The Ultimate Truth
The
High Strangeness
of
Dimensions, Densities,
and the
Process of Alien Abduction

Laura Knight-Jadczyk

with
Henri Sy

Red Pill Press
2005
First published 2004
! Copyright 1994-2005 Laura Knight-Jadczyk
http://www.cassiopaea.org/
All Rights Reserved
ISBN 0-9764064-6-2

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, other than for “fair
use”, without the written consent of the author.

Some material in this book appeared in a slightly different form in the book The Secret
History of the World.

Printed in Canada
Table of Contents

Foreword 7
Author’s Letter to the Reader 18
PART ONE
Chapter One 35
Chapter Two 43
Chapter Three 47
Chapter Four 67
Chapter Five 77
Chapter Six 88
Chapter Seven 117
Chapter Eight 141
PART TWO
Chapter One 160
Chapter Two 174
Chapter Three 185
PART THREE
Chapter One 193
Chapter Two 212
Chapter Three 222
Chapter Four 228
Chapter Five 235
Chapter Six 240
Chapter Seven 249
Chapter Eight 269
Chapter Nine 275
Chapter Ten 292
Chapter Eleven 307
Chapter Twelve 325
Chapter Thirteen 378
PART FOUR
Chapter One 385
Chapter Two 393
Chapter Three 419
Epilogue 431
Foreword
The term “Cassiopaeans” appears in many places in this book. The
name Cassiopaea was given by a source identifying itself by saying
“we are you in the future” which LKJ contacted via an experiment in
superluminal communication in 1994.
“We are you in the future”
This is what “they” declare : that “they” - The Cassiopaeans - 6th
density Unified Thought Form Beings - are Us in the future. What a
bizarre concept. Or is it?
Is that possible? Can such a statement find a place in accepted
theories? Or it is in an evident contradiction with everything that we -
that is, physicists - know about Nature and its laws?
Putting aside for the moment the issue of whether existence in a pure
state of consciousness is possible, is traveling in time possible, even if
only in theory? Is sending and receiving information from the future or
sending information into the past allowed by our present theories of
relativity and quantum mechanics? If information can be sent, does this
also imply that physical matter can be “sent”, via some sort of
TransDimensional Remolecularization? And if so what are the laws,
what are the restrictions? What are the means?
Well, frankly speaking, we do not know, but we may have a clue.
Kurt Gödel, after he became famous for his work on foundations of
mathematics, went on to study the Einstein general theory of relativity
and made an important contribution to physics: he discovered a class of
otherwise reasonable cosmological solutions of Einstein equations -
except for one point: they contained causal loops!
At first these Causal Loops were dismissed by relativists as being
“too crazy”. The arguments against these model universes even became
rather personal, commenting upon the state of mind of the inventor! (A
not terribly unusual phenomenon in the heated debates within so-called
“ivory towers” of academia.)
A “Causal Loop” means the same thing as “Time Loop”. It can be
described as going into the future and ending up where you started at
the original time and place. It is called “Causal” because, in Einstein’s
Theory of Relativity, Time is a relative concept and different observers
can experience Time differently, so the term “causal” is used to avoid
using the term “time.”
Foreword
But, little by little, it was realized that causal - or Time - loops can
appear in other solutions of Einstein equations as well - usually they
correspond to some kind of “rotation” of the universe.
Causal loops make time travel not only possible, but probable. But
then, causal loops lead to unacceptable logical paradoxes, and physics
does not like such paradoxes at all - they are a serious problem!
But, the subject of communicating with the past or receiving
information from the future IS being discussed in physics even in terms
of the flat, not-curved-at-all space-time of Lorentz and Minkowski.
Hypothetical faster-than-light particles - tachyons - can serve as the
communication means. They make an “anti-telephone” - a telephone
into the past - possible.
But do tachyons exist? Or can they exist?
Well, that is still a question that has not been answered definitively
for some.
And, the truth is that paradoxes must never be ignored. They always
indicate that some important lesson is to be learned; that some essential
improvement or change is necessary. The same holds true for the
paradoxes involved in the idea of receiving information from the future.
We cannot simply go back into Saturday and tell ourselves the winning
lottery numbers of Sunday. If this were possible, then it should also be
possible for some future, future self to tell a future self not to tell! Thus
we have a paradox: we, in the future, have intervened into the past
making our communication from the future impossible!
A paradox: if we communicated, we have not communicated, and if
we do not communicate, then we have communicated! Impossible in a
linear, non-branching universe!
Is there a possible escape from the paradox, an escape that leaves a
door open, even if only a little - for our anti-telephone?
Indeed, there is, and not just one, but several ways out.
First of all - the evident paradox disappears if we admit the possibility
that the communication channels are inherently noisy; that is a normal
situation when we deal with quantum phenomena. So, if the
communication into the past is a quantum effect - we are saved from
evident paradoxes. Quantum Theory can be useful!
Sending a signal into the past, we are never 100% sure if the message
will be delivered without distortion. And conversely, receiving info
from the future we are never 100% sure if this comes from an authentic
broadcast or is a spontaneous and random creation of the receiving end.
If this is the case, and if certain quantitative, information - that is,
High Strangeness
theoretic relations between receiving and transmitting ends are secured
to hold - then there are no more paradoxes even with reasonably
efficient information channels.
In other words: there can be broadcasts from the future to the past,
but there will be few “receivers”, and of those few, even fewer that are
properly tuned. And even those that are properly tuned may be subject
to “static”. Even if there is no static, those receivers that can receive
pure information will experience the static of “non-belief” and
distortion after the fact from society.
There is also another aspect of such an information transfer which is
that the probabilities involved are connected with a choice event; with
the choosing of one among many possible futures.
It may happen that branching of the universe corresponds to each
such event. Branching of the universe into an infinite tree of decisions
has been discussed within quantum measurement theory - it even has
the name of “Many Worlds interpretation of quantum theory”.
Two of the well-known physicists who consider the many worlds
interpretation more than just an exercise in theorizing are John
Archibald Wheeler and David Deutsch.
The Many Worlds Interpretation has one serious weakness: it has no
built in algorithm for providing the timing of the branchings. Thus it is
a certain framework rather than a complete theory.
There is, however, a theory that fills in this gap in the Many Worlds
Interpretation - and this theory I know quite well, and in fact I know it
better than most others for the simple reason that I developed it in
collaboration with Philippe Blanchard (University of Bielefeld ) in
1988 as an integral part of the Quantum Future Project. It is called
Event Enhanced Quantum Theory (EEQT for short notation). (A
complete list of references and much more info on this subject can be
found on my “Quantum Future “ project page1 on the World Wide
Web).
The fact that our generally accepted theories of the present do not
prevent us from thinking that time travel is, perhaps, possible, does not
necessarily imply that we know how to build the time machine!
On the other hand, it is perhaps possible that the time machine
already exists and is in use, even if we do not understand the principle
of its work, because it goes much too far beyond our present theoretical
and conceptual framework. It is also possible that some of the machines

1 http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/
9
Foreword
we think are serving a totally different purpose do, in fact, act as time
machines. Many things are possible...
Now, back to superluminal communication, or “channeling” in
general and the Cassiopaeans in particular: the fact that sending
information into the past is possible does not necessarily imply that any
information that pretends to be sent from the future is such indeed! But,
if we generally accept that extraterrestrial life is possible, and we use
all of our knowledge and resources to search for life beyond our Earth,
then we also need to include the understanding that receiving
information from the future is equally possible. With this perspective,
science should search for any traces of such information.
What kind of information channels are to be monitored in search of
such broadcasts? What kind of antenna arrays do we need? How must
we direct them into a particular “future time”? Say, into the year 3000?
Or 30,000? Or 300,001?
My answer is: nothing like that is necessary. All that we need we
already have, namely our minds.
And indeed, assuming that the knowledge and technology of the
future is (or can be) much more advanced than ours, then it is only
natural that any broadcast from the future will be addressed directly
into the mind.
Even today there are techniques of acting directly on our minds. They
are not always used for our benefit; nevertheless they do exist. But if
communications from the future are possible, why don’t we receive
these broadcasts on a daily basis? If our minds can serve as receivers,
then why aren’t we all aware of the transmissions?
I think that the answer has to do with multiple realities and branching
universes, and perhaps any civilization which would receive messages
from the future on a daily basis has ceased to exist because
communication through time is a very dangerous game. You produce
paradoxes, and these paradoxes remove the paradoxical universes from
the repository of possible universes; if you create a universe with
paradoxes, it destroys itself either completely or partially. Perhaps just
intelligence is removed from this universe because it is intelligence that
creates paradox. Perhaps we are very fortunate that even if we can
receive some of these messages from the future, we still continue to
exist.
Suppose our civilization were to advance to the point where everyone
can communicate with themselves in the past; they have a computer
with a special program and peripheral device that does this. It becomes
the latest fad: everyone is communicating with themselves in the past to