Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology

223 Pages·2007·2.21 MB·English

Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page iii
Gramsci, Culture
and Anthropology
Kate Crehan
P
Pluto Press
LONDON • STERLING, VIRGINIA
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page iv
First published 2002 by Pluto Press
345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA
www.plutobooks.com
Copyright © Kate Crehan 2002
The right of Kate Crehan to be identified as the author of this work has
been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 0 7453 1678 6 hardback
ISBN 0 7453 1677 8 paperback
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Designed and produced for Pluto Press by
Chase Publishing Services, Fortescue, Sidmouth EX10 9QG
Typeset from disk by Stanford DTP Services, Towcester
Printed in Canada by Transcontinental Printing
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page v
Contents
Reading Gramsci
Joseph A. Buttigieg vii
Abbreviations x
1. Introduction 1
Why Should an Anthropologist Read Gramsci? 3
Organization of the Book 8
PART I CONTEXTS
2. Gramsci’s Life and Work 13
‘Times of Iron and Fire’ 13
‘History in All its Infinite Variety and Multiplicity’ 19
‘... Something “Für Ewig”’ 29
3. Anthropology and Culture: Some Assumptions 36
Preliminaries 36
A Complicated Word 38
‘... The Informal Logic of Actual Life’ 42
Cultures as Bounded Entities 45
Culture and the Notion of Tradition 52
Of Hybrids and Hybridity 58
PART II GRAMSCI ON CULTURE
4. Culture and History 71
Culture in the Pre-Prison Writings 72
Gramsci and Teleology 76
Culture and Cultural Revolution in the Prison Notebooks 80
‘The UltimatelyDetermining Factor in History’ 88
Structure and Superstructure 91
5. Subaltern Culture 98
Hegemony 99
Folklore 105
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page vi
vi Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
Common Sense and Good Sense 110
Explicit and Implicit Conceptions of the World 115
Davide Lazzaretti 120
Colonialism and Subalternity 123
6. Intellectuals and the Production of Culture 128
What Defines the Intellectual? 131
Organic and Traditional Intellectuals 137
Intellectuals and the Political Party 145
Creating a National-Popular Collective Will 152
Creating Culture, Creating Intellectuals 156
PART III GRAMSCI AND ANTHROPOLOGY
7. Gramsci Now 165
Raymond Williams’ Gramsci 166
‘Hegemony Lite’ 172
Eric Wolf and the Anthropological Project 177
Culture and Class in the Later Wolf 181
Two Concepts of Class 188
Class and Gender 193
Tradition, Modernity and Mexican Machismo 196
‘Hegemony Lite’ and Gramsci’s Hegemony 199
Escaping Subalternity 205
A Concluding Note 207
Bibliography 211
Index 215
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page vii
Reading Gramsci
General Editor: Joseph A. Buttigieg
Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937), little known outside communist
circles at the time of his death, is now one of the most frequently
cited and widely translated political theorists and cultural critics of
the twentieth century. The first wave of interest in Gramsci was
triggered by the publication, in Italy, of his prison writings, starting
with the letters, which appeared in 1947, and continuing with the
six volumes of the thematic edition of the notebooks, the last of
which was brought out in 1951. Within the space of a few years,
hundreds of articles and books were written explicating, analysing
and debating Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, his revisionist views
on the history of Italy’s unification, his anti-economistic and anti-
dogmatic version of Marxist philosophy, his theory of the state and
civil society, his anti-Crocean literary criticism, his novel approach
to the study of popular culture, his extensive observations on the
role of intellectuals in society, along with other aspects of his
thought. Although long dead, Gramsci became more than an object
of dispassionate study; the intensity of the discussions surrounding
his work and the often heated struggle over his legacy had, and
continue to have, a profound effect on the political culture and
cultural politics of postwar Italy.
During the late 1960s and the 1970s Gramsci’s name and ideas
started circulating with increasing frequency throughout Europe,
Latin America, and North America (and, to a lesser extent, elsewhere
too). The various currents associated with Eurocommunism and the
‘New Left’ that accompanied the swell of interest in what came to be
known as ‘western Marxism’ contributed immensely to Gramsci’s
rise to prominence during this period. In the anglophone world, the
publication, in 1971, of Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith’s
superbly edited Selections from the Prison Notebooksmade it possible
for scholars to move from vague and general allusions to Gramsci to
serious study and analysis of his work. Gramscian studies were
further bolstered by various editions in diverse languages of the pre-
prison writings – which, among other things, drew attention to the
valuable essay on the Southern Question – and by the publication,
vii
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page viii
viii Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology
in Italy, of Valentino Gerratana’s complete critical edition of the
Quaderni del carcere(1975).
Gramsci’s influence became even more pronounced in the 1980s
with the spread of cultural studies, the growing fascination with the
question of ‘power’, and the greater attention that scholars from
different disciplines were devoting to the relations among culture,
society, and politics. The rapid decline of interest in Marxist thought
following the events of 1989 had no effect on Gramsci’s ‘fortunes’.
By that time, as Stuart Hall was among the first to point out, Gramsci
had already ‘radically displaced some of the inheritances of Marxism
in cultural studies’. Indeed, Gramsci’s ideas have come to occupy a
very special position in the best known of post-Marxist theories and
strategies by the political left. Furthermore, the ubiquitous concern
with the concept of civil society during the past 15 years has
rekindled interest in Gramsci’s reflections on the subject. Likewise,
many of the issues and topics that currently preoccupy a broad
spectrum of academic intellectuals – subaltern studies, post-
colonialism and North–South relations, modernity and
postmodernity, the relation between theory and praxis, the
genealogy of Fascism, the socio-political dimensions of popular
culture, hegemony and the manufacturing of consent, etc. – have
motivated many a reading and rereading of Gramsci’s texts.
In the 50 years since Gramsci first became an ‘object’ of study, his
theories and concepts have left their mark on virtually every field in
the humanities and the social sciences. His writings have been inter-
preted, appropriated, and even instrumentalized in many different
and often conflicting ways. The amount of published material that
now surrounds his work – John Cammett’s updated Bibliografia
gramscianacomprises over 10,000 items in 30 languages – threatens
to overwhelm even the trained scholar and to paralyse or utterly
confuse the uninitiated reader. Yet the sheer size of the Gramscian
bibliography is also an important indication of the richness of
Gramsci’s legacy, the continuing relevance of his ideas, and the
immensity of his contribution to contemporary thought. In many
respects, Gramsci has become a ‘classic’ that demands to be read.
Reading Gramsci, however, is not quite an easy undertaking; his
most important writings are open-ended, fragmented, multidirec-
tional explorations, reflections, and sketches. His prison notebooks
have the character of a cluttered, seemingly disorganized intellec-
tual laboratory. The well-trained scholar, no less than the first-time
reader, would welcome an expert guide who could point to the
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page ix
Reading Gramsci ix
salient features of Gramsci’s work and bring into relief the basic
designs underlying the surface complexity of different parts of his
massive oeuvre. Similarly, a critical exposition of the most important
existing treatments of Gramsci’s works, together with a discussion
of the potential usefulness of his insights to certain current lines of
inquiry in the humanities and social sciences, would enable readers
of Gramsci to appreciate better why (and in what ways) his ideas
have a bearing on discussions about some of the most pressing social,
cultural, and political issues of our time.
The multifaceted character of Gramsci’s writing and the rich
diversity of critical and theoretical work it has inspired cannot be
treated effectively in a single, comprehensive study. A series of
monographs, each dealing with a specific aspect of his work (but also
cognizant of the many threads that link its various parts), would be
a much more useful companion to the reader who is seeking to
become better acquainted with Gramsci’s legacy. Each volume in the
‘Reading Gramsci’ series is devoted to a theme that is especially
prominent in Gramsci’s work or to a field of study that has been
strongly influenced by his ideas.
Crehan 00 prelims 19/11/03 10:21 Page x
Abbreviations
Selections From the Prison Notebooks SPN
Antonio Gramsci: Selections From Political Writings 1910–1920 SPWI
Antonio Gramsci: Selections From Political Writings 1921–1926 SPWII
Antonio Gramsci: Selections From Cultural Writings SCW
Antonio Gramsci: Prison Notebooks(vol. I) PNI
Antonio Gramsci: Prison Notebooks, (vol. II) PNII
Letters from Prison(vol. I) PLI
Letters from Prison(vol. II) PLII
x
Crehan 01 chaps 19/11/03 10:25 Page 1
1 INTRODUCTION
If one wants to study a conception of the world that has never
been systematically expounded by its author-thinker, detailed
work is required, and it has to be conducted with the most
scrupulous accuracy and scientific honesty ... The search for the
leitmotiv, the rhythm of the thought, more important than single,
isolated quotations.
(PNII: 137)
This book is about the concept of culture in the writings of Antonio
Gramsci and the potential relevance of Gramsci’s approach to culture
for contemporary anthropologists. The basic question it addresses
is: what might anthropologists, and others interested in issues of
culture, have to gain from reading this early twentieth-century
Italian Marxist? Its aim is not so much to answer this question as to
provide readers with the information they need to decide for
themselves.
In the 30 years since the publication of the first major English
edition of Gramsci’s prison notebooks, Gramsci has become a name
much cited by anthropologists. However, as Michel Foucault noted
in a 1984 letter to the Gramsci scholar Joseph Buttigieg, Gramsci
remains an author who is cited more often than he is genuinely
known.1 Most anthropologists it would seem get their Gramsci
second-hand. A key interpreter of Gramsci for anthropologists is
Raymond Williams; the section on hegemony in Williams’ Marxism
and Literature is probably the gloss on this much-argued-over
Gramscian term most commonly cited by anthropologists. A reliance
on interpreters and secondary sources is understandable given the
nature of Gramsci’s major work, the prison notebooks. For while
these notebooks are without doubt one of the masterpieces of
twentieth-century Marxism and have given rise to a vast literature,
1. ‘Unauteurplussouventcitéqueréellmentconnu’,seePNI:xix(thefirst
volumeofButtigieg’sEnglishtranslationofthecompleteprisonnotebooks,
ofwhichtwovolumeshavesofarbeenpublished;alistoftheabbrevia-
tionsIhaveusedtorefertothedifferenteditionsofGramsciisgivenon
p. x).
1