Table Of ContentGovernment Is Unnatural,
Anarchy Is Natural
A practical analysis therein Naturosophy
1
If you have an open mind that permits you to objectively view
reality, then this book is for you. Ignorance is no excuse.
Copyright 2023 Cory Edmund Endrulat
ISBN 9798375468228
2
Chapters:
1. The Natural
(4)
2. Government
(21)
3. Anarchy
(52)
4. Suasion
(67)
3
Chapter 1:
The Natural
The natural represents that of nature.
The word “nature” comes from Latin natura
"course of things; natural character, constitution,
quality; the universe.” By the mid-14th century, as "the
forces or processes of the material world; that which
produces living things and maintains order." From the
late 14th century as "creation, the universe" or
"heredity, birth, hereditary circumstance; essential
qualities, inherent constitution, innate disposition, initial
character.” Some sources detail how the word comes
from Egyptian “NTR”, meaning "god,” symbolized
hieroglyphically as a simple stylized flag on a pole,
which represented a force that was known to exist
through its observable effects, but difficult or impossible
4
to see with the eye. NTR was actually pronounced
inetfer/ (ne-cher), extremely close to the English
pronunciation of "nature": inextfar/ (nay-cher). Nature
may be wholly defined as “the phenomena of the
physical world collectively, including plants, animals,
the landscape, and other features and products of the
earth, as opposed to humans or human creations.”
From post-romantic philosophy (Rousseau,
Romanticism, Transcendentalism, Muir, Christianity,
Mill etc.) as “the whole of material reality, considered
as independent of human activity and history.” From
Stoicism, Atomism, Epicurism, Taoism, Descartes,
Bacon, Spinoza, Aristotle, Mill, etc. as “the whole
universe, as it is the place, the source and the result of
material phenomena (including man or at least man’s
body).” From Heraclitus, Hegel, Nietzsche, Darwin,
Vitalism, etc. as “The specific force at the core of life
and change.” Also from Aristotle, Mill, etc. as “the
essence, inner quality and character, the whole of
specific physical properties of an object, live or inert.”
Therefore among these definitions, the macro (whole
world) view of nature would be “the all” or “that which
contains all that is natural”, whereas the micro (parts of
the whole world) view of nature would be looking at the
individual natures, that of which is natural within nature.
5
The essential understanding for what is
considered “of nature” based on our definitions, is
viewing nature through the lens of time. While
everything within nature (the micro) is constantly
changing, nature (the macro) stays the same. If nature
is the “constitution”, “birth” or “initial character”, the
“source” or “god” that is “core to change” itself then the
natural must be what has always existed, being that it
is “of nature.” The natural is then an alignment to
nature, the present aligned to the ever-present, the
micro aligned to the macro. This relates to the common
notion of the universal and timeless “natural law” or the
“law of nature” which is seen as the inescapable or
immutable (it cannot be changed), even if attempted or
justified otherwise. For ourselves to understand this
law, we come to follow it, rather than “violate” it in the
attempt to disobey. Nature may be likened to a self-
operating machine, for which we are one of the gears
placed within that may work with the machine. This
worldview upon all things places scrutiny and question
for if they are remaining natural, of nature. For
instance, we may ask ourselves if human beings are
creating things which have not always existed. Even
our own very selves are not permanent or timeless.
When we compare ourselves and our creations (micro)
to our natural world (the creation, macro), we come to
6
understand the man made and unnatural as opposed
to the natural. Change, time and nature itself must too
be evaluated by the natural and unnatural. For
instance, the change that always exists as opposed to
change that humans create, or the time that always
exists as opposed to time that humans create, or the
nature that always exists as opposed to nature that
humans create. Whatever we accept or embrace within
our lives, we assume as natural to exist and therefore
natural to persist. This gives us the simple equation:
what is natural to exist is what is natural to persist.
People may assume everything is natural if it
exists or can exist, however you must merely ask
yourself one question: why does it exist? In the same
ways an individual may attempt to disregard morality, is
the same ways an individual may attempt to disregard
the concept of the natural versus unnatural. Just
because something naturally occurs, does not mean it
is natural to exist, and just because something is
natural to exist, does not mean it is natural to use.
Morality, that concerning what is right and wrong, is the
very distinction between the natural and unnatural. This
distinction must be, since human beings cannot decide
to go against the constitution of life, they cannot
choose to go against nature. Human beings can only
7
attempt to violate nature, but since they did not create
nature itself, they have no power to actually change it.
What humans have power over, are their own creations
and themselves (the micro). Just because human
beings are created within the world, does not make
them unnatural, as for as far as our own
comprehension may seek, the creation of ourselves or
beings as a whole, has always existed. In the same
way, the trees grow and give birth. We cannot change
the fact humans exist, and we have long existed, as
even perhaps in different forms. We cannot speak
wholly of nature, for we are only part. Therefore, we
may not fully comprehend ourselves or our world, but
that does not mean we don’t try and learn our place. It
however means that we recognize a sense of humility
and mystery, as with our need for constant learning.
We are given humanity by nature, the ability to breathe,
to learn, to create and much more. It is our choice of
what to do with what we are given. It is the ability of
choice which makes us free, and it equally makes us
powerful, especially when we know what choices we
make. Time is important because time tells all truth,
and time heals all wounds. Therefore, in case we do
wrong to ourselves or our world, nature helps us learn.
If we are willing to learn or not, nature will teach us one
way or another, this has been said to be karma, natural
8
law, the law of attraction, the golden rule, the moral
law, and many other names through many different
micro cultures and peoples all observing an ever
similar macro nature. When we attain knowledge, we
attain an understanding of nature(s). When we attain
an understanding of nature(s), we may better live with
nature. Every thought is a question, and every person’s
life is at question while nature is the answer.
Of the countless quotes, the following quotes are
from Socrates, a founding father of philosophy, not of
government. This helps encapsulate much of this text:
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one
evil, ignorance.”
“To know, is to know that you know nothing.”
“To find yourself, think for yourself.”
“To know, is to know you know nothing. That is
the meaning of true knowledge.”
“I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only
make them think.”
“Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds
discuss events, weak minds discuss people.”
9
“He who is not contented with what he has,
would not be contented with what he would like to
have.”
“If you don't get what you want, you suffer; if you
get what you don't want, you suffer; even when you get
exactly what you want you still suffer because you can't
hold on to it forever. Your mind is your predicament. It
wants to be free of change. Free of pain, free of the
obligations of life and death. But change is law and no
amount of pretending will alter that reality.”
“Everyone wants to tell you what to do and
what's good for you. They don't want you to find your
own answers, they want you to believe theirs.”
“The easiest and noblest way is not to be
crushing others, but to be improving yourselves.”
"No man is capable of causing great evil, without
thinking he's doing the right thing.”
In understanding morality and the concept of
nature, we must also examine word usage. Every word
we use is representative for an idea, a particular nature
that becomes more definitive, the clearer our definition
is. However, since the word “definition” means to limit
or prescribe, and being that we create words, the
10
