Fundamentals and Principles of Artifacts Science: 3M&I-Body System

81 Pages·2016·3.25 MB·English

by  Masayuki Matsui (auth.)

SPRINGER BRIEFS IN BUSINESS
Masayuki Matsui
Fundamentals
and Principles of
Artifacts Science
3M&I-Body
System
123
SpringerBriefs in Business
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8860
Masayuki Matsui
Fundamentals and Principles
of Artifacts Science
3M&I-Body System
123
Masayuki Matsui
TheUniversity of Electro-Communications
Chofu, Tokyo
Japan
and
Faculty of Engineering, Department
ofIndustrial Engineering
andManagement
Kanagawa University
Yokohama,Kanagawa
Japan
ISSN 2191-5482 ISSN 2191-5490 (electronic)
SpringerBriefs inBusiness
ISBN978-981-10-0472-8 ISBN978-981-10-0473-5 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0473-5
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2016930055
©TheAuthor(s)2016
Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
dissimilarmethodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt
fromtherelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained
hereinorforanyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.
Printedonacid-freepaper
ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbySpringerNature
TheregisteredcompanyisSpringerScience+BusinessMediaSingaporePteLtd.
Preface
The first ever trial on a simple body was performed by Archimedes. For complex
bodies,it has beenoverhundred years, since any study was conducted onartifacts
such as the 3M&I-body system in IE/OR (industrial engineering/operations
research). Generally, “3M” means to human, material/machine, money, and “I”
means the information/method in nature versus artifacts-based views.
The complex subject of 3M&I variety was first introduced and discussed in the
book,“Manufacturingandserviceenterprisewithrisks,”bySpringer(2008,2014),
andIE/ORisregardedanddevelopedasanart(knowledgeand“waza”/skill)ofthe
3M&I-bodysysteminthebook.F.W.Taylorintroducedanddevelopedthemotion
andtimemethodandlabor-relatedscienceinIE/OR,andthemethod(information)
was further developed by N. Wiener.
For economic artifacts, “3M” represents human (labor), material/machine
(manufacturingprocess),money(capital),and“I”representsinformation(wisdoms)
on methods (combinatorics). This combination alone is not sufficient to delivers
value(weight/profit),anditisbornoutofthechangingstateofactivityandflowin
the field (market/society), in contrast with nature.
This is the first book covering original knowledge on the mathematical science
of the 3M&I-body system, and presents axioms and two major propositions on
issues surrounding nature versus artifacts, and not on animal versus machine. This
book is the product of industrial engineering as contrasted with Wiener’s cyber-
netics challenges for over a half-century.
For the 3M&I-body, there are two approaches to systemization and control:
AI (artificial intelligence)/IoT (Internet of Things) and Matsui’s matrix/3D. The
formeristheanalogicalandvisualapproachtoarealentity.Thelatteristhedigital
and logical approach to system decision, and is applied to the robotics of bodies.
The mathematical science of a body is constructed more effectively using
algebra, geometry, analysis, and control, as in Matsui’s equation, toward the
sandwich and balancing principles of bodies. The sandwich issues propose
the squeeze or pinching theorem in mathematics for the 3M&I-body system, and
v
vi Preface
the balancing issues propose the principle of balancing and invisible collaboration
of bodies, beginning from the work of Archimedes.
The book can contribute to the integration of knowledge and intelligence in
natureversusartifactsscience,andfacilitatetherealizationofthecyber/realworld,
such as an enterprise robot, cloud-coordinated SCM (supply chain management)
andsmartcitesinthenearfuture.Inaddition,thebook,togetherwiththeAppendix,
willbeusefultograduatestudentsandresearchersdealingwithproblemsrelatedto
objects that occur in nature (Newton’s) and to artifacts (Matsui’s).
In conclusion, the author would like to acknowledge the helpful and valuable
advicegivenbyDr.KiyomasaNarita,ProfessorEmeritusofKanagawaUniversity,
and thank Dr. Midori Mori, Associate Professor, and Yusuke Sakai, a member on
the technical staff, for editing this book. Further, the author wishes to thank the
faculty of Kanagawa University, for their support toward this study.
Finally, the author appreciates his dear wife, Kazuko, and family members for
their help and support in his academic life.
Tokyo, Japan Masayuki Matsui
2015
Contents
1 Introductory 3M&I-Body Problem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Versus
Wiener’s Cybernetics View. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1.2 Outline of the 3M&I-Body System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1.3 Cybernetics Versus 3M&I Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1.4 Value Concept in the 3M&I-Body System . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2 New Challenge: Nature Versus Artifacts Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.1 Creative Challenge and Finite Mathematics. . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2.2 Outline of Sandwich Theory (Proposition) . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.2.3 Outline of Balancing Theory (Proposition) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.2.4 Toward Post-ERP/SCM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2 Fundamentals of 3M&I-Body System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 Algebra: Pair Matrix Body and Line Versus OE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1.2 Pair Matrix: Definition and Axiom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.1.3 Vector Case and Matsui’s ME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1.4 Pair Body: Line Versus OE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1.5 Duality of Series Versus OE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.2 Analytics: Sandwich Theory and Matsui’s Equation. . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2.1 Outline of the Sandwich Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.2.2 Sandwich Proposition: Enterprise Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.3 Type of Enterprise-Motor Body. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.4 Type of Particle Physics Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
vii
viii Contents
2.3 Control: Progressive Method and 3D-Geometry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.1 3D-Control Problem of 3M&I-Body . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3.2 Progressive and Matsui’s Logic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.3.3 Medium Estimation of State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.3.4 3D Cell and Graphics Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.5 Two Types of 3D Dynamism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3 Science/Balancing of Multibody Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.1 Dual Job Shop Versus Line System and Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.1.1 Introduction to 3M&I Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.1.2 Job Shop and Flow Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.1.3 Flow Time Formula and Example . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.1.4 Duality Relation Using a Flow Approach. . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.2 Bowl Balancing and Arrangement of Bodies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.2.1 Limited-Cycle Problem with Multiperiod . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.2.2 Multi Limited-Cycle Modeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.2.3 Formulation and Theorem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.2.4 Numerical Example for Assignment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
4 Economics of Invisible Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.1 Medium/Invisible Collaboration of Bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.1.1 Introduction to Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.1.2 Body-Balancing System and Medium Approach . . . . . . . . 50
4.1.3 Balancing Principles and Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
4.1.4 d-Balancing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
4.2 Ellipse Map and SCM/GDP Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.2.1 Ellipse Map and Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.2.2 Ellipse Theory and Medium Balancing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.2.3 Parallel SCM Balancing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.2.4 Balancing of Parallel Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Chapter 1
Introductory 3M&I-Body Problem
Abstract Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (IEOR) could be regar-
dedastheartof3M&I-bodysystems,inwhich3Misthehuman,material/machine,
andmoneyandIistheinformation.ThischapterreviewstheIEORversusWiener’s
cybernetics issues, and relates sandwich and balancing propositions to the nature
versusartifactsbodyofresearch.Theformer(sandwich)wouldprobablybecaused
bythedualism(doubleproperty)ofMatsui’s,Newton’s,andJewell’sequations,and
the latter (balancing) originates in the invisible body-balancing principle and eco-
nomics shown by the medium criteria in supply chain management (SCM)/Smart
city.Therearealsotwoapproachesofartificialintelligence(AI)/InternetofThings
(IoT)andMatsui’smatrix/3D,butonlythelatterwillbefocusedonanddevelopedin
this book. Finally, a review of the tendency toward post-ERP/SCM is given for
higher management. For example, the enterprise resource planning (ERP) may be
partiallyreplacedbyCEOorenterpriserobots,andSCMwillprobablybereplaced
by cloud balancing inthe near future.
Keywords 3M&I(cid:1)Cybernetics(cid:1)Natureversusartifacts(cid:1)Sandwich(cid:1)Balancing(cid:1)
IEOR
1.1 Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
Versus Wiener’s Cybernetics View
1.1.1 Introduction
The subject of 3M&I variety has been recently introduced and systematically dis-
cussedbyMatsui[1].Generally,IEORcouldberegardedastheartof3M&I-body
systems, while Wiener’s cybernetics [2] would be the discussion of animal and
machine in 1948. These analogies and similarities have motivated the academic
studyoftheartofnature(animal)andartifacts(machine)inthe3M&I-bodysystem
ever since Simon’s work on artificial facts [3].
The scientific study of body (object) would probably go back to Archimedes’
(B.C.287–212)studiesofthebalancingandareamethodongeometricconfigurations
©TheAuthor(s)2016 1
M.Matsui,FundamentalsandPrinciplesofArtifactsScience,
SpringerBriefsinBusiness,DOI10.1007/978-981-10-0473-5_1