Foundations of Canadian law (ITLP101) : casebook

2014·0.25 MB·English

by  Geisler, Brigitte, compiler

Y
R
A
R INTERNATIONALLY
BmmZ UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
LI TRAINED LAWYERS
W ==% FACULTY LAW
A of PROGRAM
KIN L—~icon
S
A
L
A
R
O
B
Foundations of Canadian Law (ITLP101)
CASEBOOK - Volume 3
Instructor: Brigitte Geisler
2014-15
Funded by:

Vol. 3
NCA Foundations of Canadian Law Casebook 2014 -2015
Table of Contents
No. Item Page
i|''?ft; %11:' fte M.E'T:<ctTTTj5| HSUS
- NCA Syllabus (Revised February, 2014) 1 - 7
i Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, [ 1995] 2 S.C.R. 1 1 30 8 - 61
The Charter of Whiteness: Twenty-Five Years of Maintaining Racial Injustice in the Canadian Criminal
Justice System (2008), 40 S.C.L.R. (2d) 655-686
2 62 - 93
http:llcronus.uwindsor.ca/users/tltanovich/bio.nsf/9d019077a3c4f6768525698a00593654/cbb2df71007aadcb85
25 7230006 7cb 7a/$FILE/TheCharterofWhiteness.pdf.
Elaine Craig, “Converging Queer and Feminist Legal Theories: Family Feuds and Family Ties (2010)
3 94 - 116
http:/lworks.bepress.com/cgilviewcontent.cgi?artide= 1011 &content=elaine craig
Andrei Marmor, “The Nature of Law” (201 1)
4 1 17 - 128
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-nature/
Debra Parkes, “Precedent Unbound? Contemporary Approaches to Precedent in Canada” (2007)
5 129 - 156
http://robsonhall.ca/mlj/sites/default/files/articleslparkes-precedent%20unbound.pdf
6 Roger Shiner, “Precendent” http://ivr-enc.info/index.php?title+Precedent 157 - 161
Leonard Rotman, “The Fusion of Law and Equity: A Canadian Perspective” (201 1)
7 162 - 186
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractJd= 1846694
“Bijuralism and Harmonization: Genesis” available on the Department of Justice
8 187 - 237
website: http://canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/dept-min/pub/hfJ-hlf/b 1 -fl /bfl g.html
9 St-Hilaire v. Canada (Attorney General), 2001 FCA 63, [2001] 4 F.C. 289 238 - 286
John Borrows, “Indigenous Legal Traditions” (2005) 19: 167 Journal of Law and Policy
10 287 - 343
http://law.wustl.edu/journal/19/p 16 7Borrows.pdf
Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [ 1999] 2 S.C.R. 81 7 (skim headnote for factual
1 1 344 - 375
context, read paragraphs 69-71, 78-81)
12 De Guzman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FCA 436. 376 - 401
Manirabona and Crepeau, “Enhancing the Implementation of Human Rights Treaties in Canadian Law”
13 (2012) http://cjhr.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Manirabona-and-Crepeau-Enhancing-lmplementation-with- 402 - 436
Human-Rights-Treaties.pdf
mmm
14 Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217, paras. 35-48 & 49-82; 1 - 46
15 Singh v. Canada (Attorney General), 2000 CanLII 17100 (F.C.A.), paras. 13-44; 47 - 70
Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Prov. Court of P.E.I.; Ref re Independence and Impartiality of
16 71 - 194
Judges of the Prov. Court of P.E.I., 1997 CanLII 3 17 (S.C.C.):
Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada Attorney General 201 1 S.C.C. 53, (201 1) 3
17 195 - 217
S.C.R. 471.
Vo!.
No. Item Page ^
mmm
i VOLUME 3*- Aboriginal Peoples ' £ $&'
Mary C. Hurley, "The Crown's Fiduciary Relationship with Aboriginal Peoples", Library of Parliament, 1 ■ 8J
18
Revised 2002 at: http://www.parl.gc.ca/information/library/prbpubs/prb0009-e.htm
"Highlights from the Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: People to People, Nation to
19 9 - 85fl
Nation" (1996) at: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/aplpubs/rpt/rpt-eng.asp
_M
M
20 R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1075 CO o 1 S
“
21 R. v. Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507; 115 - 20*1
22 R. v. Sappier ;R v Gray, 2006 SCC 54, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 686; 210 - 23?
i\
23 R. v. Powley, 2003 SCC 43; 236 - 25^|
Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, [2010] 2 S.C.R. 650 http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-
24 254 - 27^
csc/scc-csclscc<sclen/item/7885Hndex.do
Cl
25 Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010; 280 - 35*1
■
William v. British Columbia, 2012 BCCA 285, Leave to Appeal to SCC granted, 2013 CC 34986 ll
26 353 - 423^
http: 1/canlit.calenlbclbcca/doc/201212012bcca285/2012bcca285.html
“Why Treaties?” [re: modern day treaties], BC Treaty Commission: i
27 424 - 439
http://www.bctreaty.net/files/pdf documents/why treaties.pdf
<
28 R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220 ^o
r 1