Table Of ContentPraise for 
For Slavery and Union 
“Well-researched, well-argued, and well-written, For Slavery and Union is an 
exemplary study. Benjamin Buckner of Kentucky personifies the dilemma of the 
Upper South proslavery unionist, both during and after the Civil War. Patrick A. 
Lewis ably portrays the trials, contradictions, and struggles of those who favored the 
Union, but also saw it as capable of protecting slavery. Once the conflict became one 
to end slavery, Buckner zealously joined blue and gray allies in protecting whiteness. 
By placing Buckner fully in the context of his time, Lewis reveals that the old unionist 
did not change, but rather the circumstances in the world around him did. To 
Benjamin Buckner, the best way to protect slavery was to keep the Union together. He 
joined the Union cause as the Civil War began, but his opposition to emancipation 
brought about his resignation from the army. Soon he joined his former enemies in 
trying to shape a postwar world that would replicate the prewar racial one. All of 
this is well told in Lewis’s wonderful case study.”—James C. Klotter, state historian of 
Kentucky and professor of history at Georgetown College
“Patrick A. Lewis’s splendid For Slavery and Union is a most welcome contribution to 
Civil War, Kentucky, and border-state historical scholarship. Deeply researched and 
gracefully crafted, Lewis’s book provides the best insights available into the conflicted 
ideological and social worlds of Benjamin Forsythe Buckner and like-minded 
proslavery unionists during the Civil War era. Better than any previous scholar, Lewis 
untangles the conundrum conservative and upwardly mobile white southerners 
confronted as the nation dissolved. They believed not only that unionism and slavery 
went hand in hand, but envisioned that secession signaled the death knell not only 
of the ‘peculiar institution’ but also of white southerners’ much-boasted-about way 
of life, a weltanschauung predicated on white supremacy. Lewis’s mature, richly 
interpretive study places Buckner’s postwar life in the whirligig world of Jim Crow/
New South Kentucky, a world he quietly embraced.”—John David Smith, author of 
Lincoln and the U.S. Colored Troops
“Benjamin Forsythe Buckner was a conservative proslavery unionist who was for 
the Union because he thought slavery would be safest in the Union, and who never 
accepted emancipation as a Union war aim. This insightful book positions Patrick 
A. Lewis among the cutting-edge scholars who have punctured the mythology about 
Kentucky’s benign slave system, harmonious social order, and enlightened political 
leadership.”—Daniel W. Crofts, author of Reluctant Confederates: Upper South 
Unionists in the Secession Crisis
“Patrick A. Lewis paints a splendid picture of proslavery unionism in the form of 
Major Benjamin Buckner. His portrayal of the Kentucky planter gives texture, depth, 
and nuance to an ideological position that has confounded historians for many years.
This may be the first biography we have seen that captures the cultural and political 
center of Civil War–era Kentucky, including the state’s embrace of a conservative 
Union in 1861 and its rejection of a transformed Union in 1865.”—Aaron Astor, 
author of Rebels on the Border: Civil War, Emancipation, and the Reconstruction of 
Kentucky and Missouri
“As part of a recent book project, I researched the letters Benjamin Forsythe Buckner 
wrote to his fiancée. This revealing collection of Civil War documents offers the 
perspective of a Kentucky Union officer who resigned his military commission in 
1863 specifically to protest the Emancipation Proclamation, long before his home 
state saw its slaves freed by wartime realities. Patrick A. Lewis has turned this small 
set of letters into a larger, more troubling story—the postwar transformation of the 
formerly loyal Bluegrass State into an unreconstructed southern state, accomplished 
by the defiant politics of racial hatred, war allegiance, and fictive memory.”—
Christopher Phillips, author of The Civil War in the Border South
“Patrick A. Lewis has written an engaging and insightful portrait of a man who 
embodied the struggle many loyal whites in the Upper South endured during 
the Civil War era. His nuanced examination of Benjamin Buckner’s outlook and 
choices elucidate the phenomenon of proslavery unionism shared by many white 
southerners. This is a biography that deepens our understanding of an important but 
understudied wartime faction.”—Anne Marshall, Mississippi State University
“Deeply researched and narrated with elegance and verve, For Slavery and Union is 
the story of a fascinating Kentuckian whose life mirrored the larger ordeal of the state 
in the era of the Civil War and Reconstruction. In Lewis’s skillful hands, Benjamin 
F. Buckner’s life becomes an account of loyalties divided but never fully reconciled, 
and of a proslavery unionism that foundered in the face of emancipation. The result 
is essential reading for anyone wanting to understand why Kentucky sided with the 
Union in the Civil War—and then turned south to align with the former Confederate 
states in the decades beyond. A sobering but thoroughly enjoyable read.”—Amy 
Murrell Taylor, University of Kentucky
“White unionists in Kentucky, argues Lewis, fought with the Union for the benefit of 
slavery, not despite slavery. This insight is the basis of a gracefully written, beautifully 
argued reinterpretation of Kentucky’s experience in the Civil War era that also speaks 
to American political culture more generally. Even as the Civil War divided the 
nation, support for slavery and racial inequality flourished in both the Union and 
the Confederacy, suggesting how difficult it would be to resolve the conflicts that led 
the nation to war.”—Laura F. Edwards, author of A Legal History of the Civil War and 
Reconstruction: A Nation of Rights
For Slavery and Union
For
 
Slavery
 
and
UNION
Benjamin Buckner 
and Kentucky Loyalties 
in the Civil War
PATRICK A. LEWIS
Due to variations in the technical specifications of different electronic 
reading devices, some elements of this ebook may not appear as they 
do in the print edition. Readers are encouraged to experiment 
with user settings for optimum results.
Copyright © 2015 by The University Press of Kentucky
Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth,
serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern 
Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College,
Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, 
Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, 
University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University.
All rights reserved.
Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky
663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008
www.kentuckypress.com
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Lewis, Patrick A., 1984–
  For slavery and union : Benjamin Buckner and Kentucky loyalties in the Civil War / 
Patrick A. Lewis.
       pages cm
  Includes bibliographical references and index.
  ISBN 978-0-8131-6079-5 (hardcover : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-0-8131-6081-8 (pdf) —   
 ISBN 978-0-8131-6080-1 (epub)   
 1. Buckner, Benjamin  Forsythe, 1836–1901.  2. Unionists (United States Civil War)—
Kentucky—Biography.  3. Kentucky—History—Civil War, 1861–1865—Biography.  
4. United States—History—Civil War, 1861–1865—Biography.  5. United States. Army. 
Kentucky Infantry Regiment, 20th (1862–1865)  6. Slavery—Kentucky—History—19th 
century.  I. Title. 
  F455.B83L48 2015
  973.7'469092—dc23
  [B]               2014039418
          
This book is printed on acid-free paper meeting the requirements of the American 
National Standard for Permanence in Paper for Printed Library Materials.
Manufactured in the United States of America.
Member of the Association of 
American University Presses
Contents
Introduction: Relationships, Interests, and Identities  1
1. The World Is a Cruel and Cold Place  15
2. Firstborn of the Union  43
3. Brave Hearts and Stout Hands  67
4. I Feel Impelled to Pause  89
5. Privileges and Elections  119
6. Democratic Partisan Militia  157
Epilogue: Glen Avon  187
Acknowledgments   201
Notes  205
Bibliography  241
Index  259
Introduction
Relationships, Interests, 
and Identities
For Benjamin Forsythe Buckner, the major of the Union army’s Twentieth Kentucky 
Volunteer Infantry Regiment, a dissonant note of defeat accompanied the repulse of 
the Confederate invasion of his home state in the fall of 1862. Despite the military 
victory, Buckner was left gutted by the news of President Lincoln’s preliminary 
Emancipation Proclamation. Halted during the pursuit of the Confederate army 
back into Tennessee, Buckner vented his conservative proslavery unionist outrage at 
the president’s new war measure in a letter to his secessionist fiancée, Helen Martin.1 
“The Union Kentuckians are not shamefully heated,” Buckner wrote, “and by reason 
of the presidents want of good faith, which is only equaled by his lack of sense, we 
find ourselves in arms to maintain doctrines which if announced 12 months ago, 
would have driven us all, notwithstanding our loyalty to the Constitution & the 
Union into the ranks of the Southern Army.”2 Furious as he was, though, Buckner 
never seriously considered turning rebel. “The people of the South have brought 
all this upon us and are not worthy of our support,” he continued. “Nor can they 
give us any guarantee of protection or assistance.” Buckner was trapped between the 
government he loved and the section of the country (and its institution) with which 
he identified—which, indeed, shaped his identity as a white man. “We joined the 
people of the North (a people whom we did not love) to fight the South (a people 
with whom we were connected by ties of relationship, interest, the identity of our 
hearts and institutions) merely upon principle and to preserve that Constitutional 
form of government which was the wonder and admiration of the world. But the 
president has by the shake of the pen taken away all that.” Stunned, he could only 
ask, “But what are we to do[?] Where can we go[?]”3
1