Table Of ContentMESSAGING ORGANIC:
A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR GENESIS ORGANIC JUICE
by
AINSLEY BLANDFORD
A THESIS
Presented to the Department of Public Relations
and the Robert D. Clark Honors College
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Bachelor of Arts
June 2017
An Abstract of the Thesis of
Ainsley Blandford for the degree of Bachelor of Arts
in the Department of Public Relations to be taken June 2017
Title: Messaging Organic: A Strategic Plan for Genesis Organic Juice
Approved: _______________________________________
Patricia Curtin
Organic food sales in the United States have grown exponentially for the last 20
years, surpassing the growth rate for the overall food and beverage market.Despite this
growth, a lot of uncertainty remains among consumers about what goes into organic.
Although the national standards and certification requirements have long been set, many
consumers are still wary and unsure of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s “Certified
Organic” label. The majority of consumers buy organic because of perceived health
benefits and cleaner ingredient lists.However, the organic label does guarantee a
healthy product. Additionally, conventional food and beverage giants are creeping into
the clean ingredient conversation. Organic food and beverage brands now have to find
another message to differentiate themselves from the noise. Organic companies have the
opportunity to add value to their brands by messaging the benefits of organic beyond
what is not included and returning to the heart of the organic movement, environmental
preservation. This opportunity is addressed in a strategic communications plan for a
Eugene-based organic company, Genesis Organic Juice. The strategic plan aims to
educate Genesis consumers about the environmental benefits of organic and position
Genesis as a leader in its Pacific Northwest market.
ii
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Professor Pat Curtin for helping me fully examine organic
messaging and consider the various perspectives related to the public relations field. I
would also like to thank the members of my thesis committee, Instructor Lance
Robertson and Professor Timothy Williams, for generously offering their time and
advice on this honors requirement. This project would not have been possible without
the incredible instruction and knowledge provided by experts housed in the University
of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication.
Additionally, I want to express my gratitude to Whitney Hoshaw from Genesis
Organic Juice, for providing invaluable information and an instrumental perspective to
guide me on this plan. Furthermore, I would like to thank the marketing
communications team at Annie’s Homegrown, for inspiring this project and cultivating
my excitement and passion for the natural and organic food and beverage industry.
Lastly, I am forever indebted to Lisa Blandford for taking my frantic phone
calls, laughing with me in my pain, financing my education, and constantly inspiring me
to push myself these last four years.
iii
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
The Organic Standard 4
Literature Review 9
Strategic Plan 17
Market Research 13
Situation Analysis 17
Political, Economic, Social, and Technological (PEST) Analysis 20
SWOT Analysis 24
Communications Audit 25
Key Publics 27
Opportunity Statement 34
Goal Statement 34
Objectives 34
Strategies & Tactics 35
Evaluation Criteria & Tools 41
Conclusion 42
Budget 45
Timeline 46
Appendix A: SWOT Analysis 47
Appendix B: Blog/Newsletter Content 48
Appendix C: Social Media Content 49
Appendix D: Potential Influencer 50
Appendix E: Media List 51
Bibliography 53
Appendix F: Email Pitches 52
iv
List of Figures
Figure 1: Genesis Organic Juice’s Instagram post on September 13, 2016 19
Figure 2: Genesis Organic Juice Facebook post on February 16, 2017 20
Figure 3: Example Blog/Newsletter Content 48
Figure 4: Instagram Example Post 49
Figure 5: Facebook Example Post 49
Figure 6: Example Email Pitches 52
v
List of Tables
Table 1: Overview of Organic Foods Production Act 6
Table 2: Advertising Claims Considered in 2012 Guion and Stanton Study 11
Table 3: Budget 45
Table 4: Timeline 46
Table 5: SWOT Analysis 47
Table 6: Influencer List 50
Table 7: Media List 51
vi
Introduction
Every week, the average grocery shopper wanders the aisles, choosing what to
put in his or her cart from cluttered shelves and numerous product statements. In 2015,
the average grocery store carried more than 39,000 items, each product advertising
different benefits.1 The organic shopper bypasses the endless options and goes directly
for the U.S. Department of Agriculture label, wanting the healthy choice, free of
preservatives and pesticides. When they grab that organic mac and cheese, they feel
better about their decision. It is better for them than the other conventional big name
brands, they think. However, there is a problem with their health-conscious choice. The
organic label on the box is not a health endorsement. Organic is better for them, just not
for the reasons they may believe.
The organic food movement developed alongside the environmental movement
in the 1960s and 1970s. The primary goal of organic agriculture is to “feed the soil” by
replenishing the earth with nutrients, rather than degrading and polluting the
environment with conventional farming methods. The USDA’s national organic
standard was established on these ideals in 2002, to regulate the organic food industry
and set clear expectations for farmers and consumers alike.2 More than 10 years later,
the founding notion of organic, sustainable agriculture, has been lost on store shelves.
Currently, there is a disconnect between consumers’ perceptions of organic and the
organic standard, due in large part to the marketing strategies employed by larger,
traditional and non-organic food and beverage companies.
1 "Supermarket Facts." The Voice of Food Retail. Food Marketing Institute, 2016. Web. 28 Apr. 2017.
2 G u i o n , D e i r d r e T . , a n d J u l i e V . S t a nton. "Advertising the U.S. National Organic Standard: A Well-
Intentioned Cue Lost in the Shuffle?" Journal of Promotion Management 18.4 (2012): 514-35. Web. 2
Oct. 2016.
In 2015, the Organic Trade Association acknowledged the shortcomings of the
organic industry by submitting a proposal to the USDA that called for $30 million a
year to be spent on research, accelerated adoption processes, consumer education, and
organic branding. The proposal, Generic Research and Promotion Order for Organic, or
GRO Organic, is the OTA’s response to inadequate funding and consumer confusion
that threatens the sector. Currently, the USDA is in the process of reviewing public
comments and drafting the final proposal. According to the president of the OTA’s
Board of Directors and the Director of Government Affairs for Organic Valley, Melissa
Hughes, “It’s time for organic stakeholders to invest back in our movement — to fund
research to help organic farmers, to create and initiate projects to nurture new organic
farmers. An organic check-off will allow us to speak to the American consumer in a
strong and unified voice.”3
Although health is a primary motivation behind consumers’ organic food
purchasing decisions, organic certification requirements have much larger implications.
A driving force of the organic movement is the desire for more sustainable food
practices. Authorized soil management practices help increase soil biodiversity, curtail
soil erosion, and limit nutrient loss. In addition to enhancing soil quality, the prohibited
use of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers reduce groundwater pollution. Organic
agriculture also helps mitigate climate change through the soil’s increased ability to
retain carbon.4 Additionally, the livestock requirements ensure better animal welfare
3 Organic Trade Association. "Agriculture Department seeks comments on national organic check-
o f f . " P R N e w s w i r e : p r e s s r e l e a s e d i s tribution, targeting, monitoring and marketing. PR Newswire, 17
Jan. 2017. Web. 19 Feb. 2017.
4 "Organic Agriculture." Organic Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
2016. Web. 11 Nov. 2016.
2
with mandated access to the outdoors and pasture.5 The environmental benefits,
arguably the primary purpose of organic agriculture, offer food and beverage companies
a competitive advantage as “clean” food items increasingly crowd store shelves.6
Not only are consumers confused by the different claims and associated benefits,
likely due to the marketing strategies employed by organic brands, but larger food and
beverage giants are starting to use similar claims that highlight the absence of
ingredients. Organic brands need to shift their marketing focus away from the absence
of “bad” ingredients in organic food and capitalize on the beneficial impact on the
environment of choosing organic to ward off traditional food and beverage competitors
and dispel consumer confusion.
This strategic plan studies the organic industry, implications of current organic
marketing practices, consumers’ perceptions of organic, and ways to better educate
them. This research acts as a foundation for a strategic communications plan that
addresses the misconceptions about organic and adds value to a local organic brand,
Genesis Organic Juice.
5 Heckman, J. “A History of Organic Farming: Transitions from Sir Albert Howard’s War in the Soil to
U S D A N a t i o n a l O r g a n i c P r o g r a m . ” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21.3 (2006): 143–150.
6 Watrous, Monica. "Trend of the Year: Clean Label." Food Business News, 2015.Web. 16 Nov. 2016.
3
The Organic Standard
Organic farming was born out of a soil management strategy, humus farming,
which relied on farming methods that conserved and regenerated the soil. The driving
belief of humus farming was to “feed the soil” using soluble fertilizers from organic
matter such as crop residue, manure, and natural fertilizers rather than synthetic
fertilizers.7 The term “organic” first emerged in the 1940s. In 1942, one of the founders
of organic agriculture, J. I. Rodale, published Organic Farming and Gardening,
popularizing organic farming in the United States.8 In the 1960s, Rachel Carson
published Silent Spring in response to the dangers of synthetic pesticide use. Carson’s
work encouraged people to look for alternative agricultural practices, coupling organic
agriculture with the larger environmental movement.9
Although the foundation of the organic movement developed throughout the
1960s and 1970s, the actual practices of organic agriculture varied from producers who
used limited synthetic chemicals to those who absolutely prohibited them. The need for
third-party certification grew as demand for organic food increased. In 1973, the
California Certified Organic Farmers (CCOF) created the first organic certification
program.10 By the end of the 1980s, an excess of large and small agencies offered
7 Kuepper, George. A Brief Overview of the History and Philosophy of Organic Agriculture. Rep. Kerr
C e n t e r f o r S u s t a i n a b l e A g r i c u l t u r e , 1 5 Aug. 2014. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.
8 Francis, Charles. "A Review of 'Organic Struggle: The Movement for Sustainable Agriculture in the
United States'" Organic Farming 2.1 (2016): n.21 Web. 10 Oct. 2016.
9 Kuepper, George. A Brief Overview of the History and Philosophy of Organic Agriculture. Rep. Kerr
Center for Sustainable Agriculture, 15 Aug. 2014. Web. 20 Oct. 2016.
10 Ibid., 10.
4
Description:heavy resistance from the organic community. The first round of bacteria will be avoided when manure used. Table 1: the umbrella of “no,” specifically no hormones, no antibiotics, and no additives. In a .. Adweek, 22 Jan. 2014.