Table Of ContentWirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt
Berta van Schoor
Fighting Corruption
Collectively
How Successful are Sector-Specific
Coordinated Governance Initiatives
in Curbing Corruption?
Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt
Herausgegeben von
Ch. Lütge, München, Deutschland
Die Ordnungsethik analysiert die normativen Grundlagen moderner Gesellschaften ein-
schließlich ihrer ökonomischen Aspekte und macht sie für die praktische Gestaltung
zugänglich. Dies umfasst sowohl systematische als auch historische Perspektiven der
Wirtschaftsethik sowie verwandter Gebiete der Philosophie, Ökonomik, Geistes- und
Sozialwissenschaften.
Herausgegeben von
Prof. Dr. Christoph Lütge
Technische Universität München
Deutschland
Weitere Bände in dieser Reihe http://www.springer.com/series/13464
Berta van Schoor
Fighting Corruption
Collectively
How Successful are Sector-Specific
Coordinated Governance Initiatives
in Curbing Corruption?
Berta van Schoor
München, Germany
Dissertation an der TU München
Wirtschaftsethik in der globalisierten Welt
ISBN 978-3-658-17837-6 ISBN 978-3-658-17838-3 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-17838-3
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017939930
Springer VS
© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the
material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation,
broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage
and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or
hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does
not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective
laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are
believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors
give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions
that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps
and institutional affiliations.
Lektorat: Frank Schindler
Printed on acid-free paper
This Springer VS imprint is published by Springer Nature
The registered company is Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
The registered company address is: Abraham-Lincoln-Str. 46, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
Table of contents
List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX
List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XI
List of Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XIII
Danksagung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XV
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XVII
1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
SELF-INTEREST AS A MEANS OF PREVENTING CORRUPTION
2.1 Corruption as a Societal Challenge in the 21st Century . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1.1 Delimiting Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1.2 Defi ning Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.1.3 Categorizing Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.1.4 Conceptualizing Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.1.5 Assessing Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2.2 Coordinated Governance Initiatives as a New Approach
for Curbing Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.2.1 International Anti-Corruption Efforts in Historical Perspective . . . 36
2.2.2 Overcoming the Governance Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
2.2.3 Governance Structure and Overview of Coordinated Governance
Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
V
VI Table of contents
2.2.4 Potential Success Factors of Coordinated Governance Initiatives . . 64
2.2.5 Empirical Basis for the Assessment of Anti-Corruption Initiatives 70
2.3 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
3 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
3.1 Problem Statement and Research Aims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
3.2 Research Paradigm and Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
3.3 Research Design: Multiple-Case Study Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3.4 Purposive Sampling: Case Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
3.5 Data Collection: Interviews and Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
3.6 Data Analysis: Template Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.7 Limitations of the Multiple-Case Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
4 MULTIPLE-CASE STUDY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
4.1 EMB Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
4.1.1 Profi le, Origin, and Sector Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
4.1.2 Organizational Set-up and Operational Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
4.1.3 Success Factors – General View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
4.1.4 Embeddedness in an Established Institutional Framework . . . . . . . 110
4.1.5 Highly Committed Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
4.1.6 Lean Governance Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
4.1.7 Repeated External Audits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114
4.1.8 Competitive Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
4.2 EITI Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
4.2.1 Profi le, Origin, and Sector Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
4.2.2 Organizational Set-up and Operational Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
4.2.3 Success Factors – General View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
4.2.4 Supportive Institutional Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
4.2.5 Representation of Diverse Interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
4.2.6 Narrow Scope of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
4.2.7 Flexible Governance Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
4.2.8 Ability to Enforce Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
4.2.9 Country-Ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
4.3 MACN Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
4.3.1 Profi le, Origin, and Sector Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
4.3.2 Organizational Set-up and Operational Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
4.3.3 Success Factors – General View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
4.3.4 Awareness-Raising within the Maritime Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
4.3.5 Knowledge and Experience Sharing Among Participants . . . . . . . . 148
4.3.6 Self-Assessment and Reporting Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
4.3.7 Creation of Tangible Benefi ts through Local Collective Actions. . . 151
4.3.8 Visibility towards and Recognition by External Stakeholders . . . . . 152
Table of contents VII
5 CROSS-CASE ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
5.1 Initiatives’ Company Composition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
5.2 Situations of Crisis and External Threats as Initiating Factors . . . . . . . . . 160
5.3 Existence of a Supportive Institutional Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
5.4 Continuing Commitment of Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
5.5 Complexity-Dependent Governance Structures and Procedures . . . . . . . 170
5.6 Enforcement Mechanisms for Reputation Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177
BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
Appendix 1: Interview Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
Appendix 2: List of Documents Analyzed – EMB Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Appendix 3: List of Documents Analyzed – EITI Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
Appendix 4: List of Documents Analyzed – MACN Case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
List of Tables
Table 1 Selection of Scientifi c Defi nitions of Corruption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2 Frequently Made Distinctions of Corruption. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Table 3 Synoptic View of Anti-Corruption Conventions and Treaties . . . . . . 40
Table 4 Overview of Selected Anti-Corruption Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Table 5 Operationalization of Different Levels of Institutionalization . . . . . . 52
Table 6 Operationalization of Different Levels of Enforceability . . . . . . . . . . 53
Table 7 Overview of Selected Coordinated Governance Initiatives . . . . . . . . 61
Table 8 Success Factors Found in Literature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Table 9 Corruption Assessment: Overview of Different Sources
of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Table 10 The Constructivist/Interpretivist Research Paradigm . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Table 11 Maximum Variation Sampling Dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Table 12 Selected Cases for the Empirical Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Table 13 Sampling Profi les of the Three Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Table 14 Distribution of Interviewees across the Three Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Table 15 Profi le EMB Initiative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Table 16 A Priori Themes for the Template Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Table 17 Final Coding Template EMB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
Table 18 Effects of EMB Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Table 19 Profi le EITI Initiative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121
Table 20 Final Coding Template EITI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
Table 21 Profi le MACN Initiative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Table 22 Final Coding Template MACN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Table 23 Clearly Identifi able Type of Corruption and Specifi c Goals in CGIs . 168
IX
List of Figures
Figure 1 Overview Chapters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 2 Classifi cation Scheme for Coordinated Governance Initiatives . . . . . 51
Figure 3 WBI Classifi cation of Initiatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Figure 4 Classifi cation of Selected Coordinated Governance Initiatives . . . . . . 64
Figure 5 Cause-Effect Relation Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Figure 6 Funnel Model of the Research Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Figure 7 Contingency Model of Methodological Fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Figure 8 EMB Governance Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Figure 9 EMB Process of Commitment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Figure 10 EMB: From A Priori Themes to Final Coding Themes . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Figure 11 EITI Governance Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
Figure 12 EITI Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
Figure 13 EITI Requirements along the Extractive Industries Value Chain . . . . 127
Figure 14 EITI: From A Priori Themes to Final Coding Themes . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
Figure 15 MACN Governance Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Figure 16 Seven MACN Anti-Corruption Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Figure 17 MACN: From A Priori Themes to Final Coding Themes . . . . . . . . . . 146
Figure 18 Prototypical Mining Value Chain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
Figure 19 Principal Vessel Types World Merchant Fleet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
Figure 20 Different Levels to which Success Factors Are Related . . . . . . . . . . . 181
XI