Table Of ContentEternal victory
Triumphal rulership in late antiquity ,
Byz antium, and the early medieval W est
MICHAEL McC O RMI C K
.
....- _.
.. _, .... ... ..
.,,.~,.- ~" '--
_,,-,
- .
...-..."..."..'....."..".. ...
... -,-
~
CII M DR IDGE UNIV ERSIT Y PRESS
c. ...
,.qt
N.", Y.,k Po" Ch,jI" Mrlb<>u,", Sydnry
EDITIO NS DE LA MAISON DES SCIENCES DE
L'H OMM E
1'1""
PuhUwd hy ,be Syndla.« of d", Univ<r~'y of C.mhridg"
Th Pi" Building, Trumping'''''' Sit..", C.mhridge el' ,"
.0 W"" >OIh S'r«", N"w York, NY ,'''',,, USA
10 St.lmford Rwd, O.1t.Icigh, Mdbourn< J 166, Au",oli •
• nd Edi';"'" de l.. M,oon de. Sci<n<co d.< I'Hornm"
J. Bottiov"d R"p.iI. J7'70 P.n. C«Ie, 0<1
1'1""
C M,i"", dco Scirnc<. de I'Homrn, ,nd C.mhtklgt Uni .... ,.,.;'y
19M
Fin, p"bli,h,J 1916
Rop,;n",d 19!7
Fi .., p'p<,b,ck «Ii,ion "'''''
0.,.
Britls/! Uo,"y e",.I",","t I. ""hl;"",'""
M<C<>rmkk, Mid",,1
E«",.I vic'ory' ttiumpholl'lll"r<hip in),«
W""
Ant'qu",y, By",ntium, .n<! ,10< "'Iy m«li"v.1
,.n.!
n,
(P .. pr ... public>ci"",)
" Triumph. (C ....m oni<>)--Europ<-Hilt""y
L Tid" II. 5<";'"
J9.· .• ·09. eTj")"
" U " '61!0 S h.rdb.ck
j>1
InN 0 J1I )36j9 . P'P",b.iclt
"ON 1 7) S' 003.7 h.rdb,clt (Fn.« only)
""N' 7J j r O)H I P'p<,bacit (Fn.« only)
To
P~111l,
I" loving memory;
f'" "f
And 5te /la.barn and Ih~ Ac~ Acts
'"
Contents
Fortword Pagt xi
NOIr ro th. paperM,k ,ditioM xu,
Abbreviation< xvn
INTRODUCTION: IMPEUAL TRIUMPH AS A ,
HISTORICAL PR08LEM
J INVINCIBLE [ ""PIRE: Tr-H ,nF.OLOGY Of VICTORY
UNDER TilE PRINCIPATE "
2 OUT Of TilE STREETS AND INTO THE CIRCUS:
TilE DEVElOPMENT OF IMHRIAL VICTORY CELE_
!IllATIONS IN THE LATER ROMAN EMPIRE 3S
From I to Theodo,ius I 36
I. Con5t~ntine
2. From the Theodosian succe'lion [0 47
An~,(;IsiU5
J. From to iconocbsm 64
Justini~n
Conclusion 18
3 IMPERIAL VICTORY CELEBRATIONS AND TilE
PUBliC LIFE OF TilE LATER ROMAN STATE 80
I. Usurpers and
barb~ri~ns ~O
2. victory rituals; evidence from R.ome 84
Impcri~l
J. Imperial victory rituall: non-R.oman evidence 91
4. The of imperial victory celebrations 100
christi~niz~tion
S. The divilion of the "npire and the collegiality of
victory I I I
6. Victory ,debrat;"", the throne 20
~"d J
4 THE nEVHOPMFNT OF lM"EMI"L VICTORY
TN E" R1Y MEDI£Y"l BYZ"NTIUM IJI
CHII'R~TIONS
, . Triumphs of Con'tantine V 1 J4
2, An 315" of g~nnJk victory cckbutiOlu in the I,tc
tighth Cl'ntury 137
J. Amuti~n triumph, IH
4, Th~ kgitimation of lh,il I I S2
S, High tide of triumph, 95('- 72 159
6. The celebration of victory under the l"st
M,c~donj.n' 17~
Conc\mion ,84
5
K,(Z" NTINF TR I UMPH
O ~ GAN'71NG"
6 "nl~T"Nl >C HO: VICTORY CELEBRATIONS IN THE
PROV IN<.; •. S '"
I.'-1PE~I"l
,. Ti<:s that bind '"
God and col,mry '"
2,
J, Liule C.",a" 2S2
Condmion 's"
7 '.PH£M£R"" £MPIREI: TRltJMPIi Al RUlERSHIP IN
HA~HA~ I AN AHICA, ~ tJ RGU N [}Y AND ITALY 260
The king .. triumphal majt·,ty in V. ndal Africa
!. ~6r
Victory cmtom, in {he kingdom of the Burgundi,m z66
2 .
J. Triumph~l ideology in Ostrogothic 1t"ly Z67
4, Lomb"rd king'hip and vinory ~84
~ THF KING" VICTORY IN V!Srr;{)THIC n" rS 297
I, Roy.1 n 'n'mony . nd Visigothk kingship 29~
2 , Roy.l victory cdcbr.tiom 302
3, The social corHext ofVi,igothic victory cclcbr~tion\ J I S
4, The rhetoric of victory 32J
HOM l"TE AS'rIQUE 'r o fEUDAL SDClf.T Y;
~ EA~lY
f MANK1SII VICTORY C1LE6~AT!ONS }28
Mcrovingian vinory celebr.tiom 115
j,
2, The liturgy of v;elmy in Fr"nci~ J4J
C""hnl'!i;", ... JUn ,Hc-,w_",i,,1 ,,"d Ill<' king" vinury
j , J(>l
C""<"I""",, JH4
,-""()I."" jHM
,:f
/!,N" 'W"I'!')' !"i,,,,,,), _"""" " wed j'n
I'rr'i"fwl)' "'cd _,((""da'y "''''''"' ~ I ~
"'"'1'''
IJt", li.<1 '1Ji,~'''C5 ~ ,6
t!ld. . x ~ ''.i
l'il
Thi, ,u"ty lx'gan '" lkigilllll. II ,,,,. .. nch topic in the l.te Nicol.,
I-luygheh.nt'< Church Hi,to,y S"mi,,,, at the fr.ncophone
U" iV"«it), of LOllv ,in f!"'w into J doctor,,1 di,,"'t.tion. 'VklOty
"",I
01' ""kbrati"" in thr llyzantin ... empirc' ,nd the llnbHi."
w.,
K ;ngti"rn,. A .D . ~ 7(>-Il)(X) di,,·ctnl by my mentur, Leopold
Gen;e",. Jnd ,kfc',,,kd at the Un;vc,,;ty', In.<till" d'Ctudc'
m'·diev.k,. in r>.-hy 1')7'). It bo.·,,,,ti'cd f,olll th~ comment< .nd
,ugg"'lio", "I" tfa- '· ... n';n;n!'! «""",ille," Me"" Rober! Buicol.
j''''I''''' U(Jj>"ld G<'U;C(Jl, Nicol., Huygheb,,'n.ju'lin
h""ai,,~,
M"s;.y ."d Guy M"rJilk.
w.,
J" lhe U nitni Statc->. ;1 ,"h".n ti.lly ,"xp~nd"d ,!ld ,cv;sed.
Th,' (hronolo!,!;(.lli"';l' \lTre CXlcn,kd .• nd iu 'cope cvolved in
rt"<P()"'~ to ,he' "in"""> I'"",id<'d by till' (WO ,·)(t,aordinny
h.,,'"
i"";,,nio"~ I bo." '" pri"il"l,,,d (" ....· . .· c. At TI,.. Dl""barto"
Q,b emlcr ror ilyza"!i,,," Swdic, (W ..h ington. I).C _). whcr~:I
nlln,bo.'T of d>"p!n, """'n' lir" pn·_",,,ted a, 'In(orm.1 T.lks", my
,,,,1
fri"n,b colle.gl1e, p"",,,kd 111l1(h insight. ",pport, and wi",
m,nm·1. iu Ih,' rolleg;.1 and <'nloghtmed '!mmphnc fostered by
,he l)i,,·<"I"'. Gile, Con<ublc_ My colle.gues and Ic .. hing dutie'S
in ,I,,· I kp'" "'e'" of I Io''''t)· of The johns Hopkin' Uni",",,;ty.
""d
p'rl><"ubrly ,I,,' Eu",pe." Se''';''.t. ull"r<',\ a (ur<h<'t ol'por
to",;,y to pJn;,-ip."" i" ,plend;d oJi""";o,, "I" cun",,1 hi,tor;cal
em,ccn';"g , bro,d r. "ge u( "'pics ,nd problem"
rc'~>rd,
Any malI' of fhis kiml ""T' " dn'p debt libr. . ie, . nd
10
lib"r;.",. In Iklgi"",. rOlhn 1-1_ lh>(o." .nd ,he libr,ry
of lh~
AhbJ),," d" Mon,·e';,,,r. Ih,' S",-i'·I'· ,k, 1l"1I,,,d;,fes .nd Ihe
Bibliot!OC-<;k v, ,, ,k F. ruh,·;t ,In C;udgdcndhcid (K.U.
Lcuv~n)
,,,k.
plJynl <I"6,i "c In A Illerica. til<" innm,par.bk f.cilit;es ,,,,d
J
"
"alfo f I)urn h.""n 0 .1...1 kft their on ncorly evny p.ge. The
rn'r~
'Ill'"
""d", know. howe"",. ,h., though ,hi, study bern
h~,
co"dltc,cd ,,,,dt'r privilq;ed bibliographic~1 conditio",. I decided
'0 '0
limi, (i",;o", of ,.:condory Ii't'ra'ltn' thosc ,i,k, which
r
"-TlllCd, in j"dgc-tnm'. indi'pc",,,bk, I" my foo"'o'e •• ,h" i., I
111
havc' bem forccd to OI11i, many "ltdic" which I co",,,I"'d on
varlou, topte"
I" 0"" ''''Y
"r ,,,,o,hn, l11~ny fri""d, .nd colic.gm·, h.vl·
,It"
""''',ihul<'<1 '" Ih;, h""k over y,'~r<. C"tlvcn,iun u'ges nte to
"'0"
thatlk thoSt' intimat,",y associ3,ed wi,h it. Space (orces nit'
tu
'0
i'ti""ice. I am deeply gra,dul Genicn" for ,ht' role h"
L~()pold
",,1
h" played in my studie, for directing ,he di"",,,tion out of
which thi, book ha, grown. J" hn Baldwin. John C,Il,h,n, Gilt"
Co"'tJblt-, Nicobs l'luy!:heb~e", and H"be,rt Silvc"'c luvc
contributed mort' than they know through their conversation"
coltnsel, . nd frimdship. I "we a hst;ng debt to S,ephcn HJdrovic,
fur !:"iding li"t, haitin): " t'P' in hi,toric,1 ""die" Must "f
111)'
the,"" ch.ptn, r,,,vc ,'nj"y",r Ih,' d""iicd critici'm ."d imight "f
Alcxantkr K07.hdCln and Nicolas OixonOll1idl'S. Othe .. who hnT
rCJd ,,·ctiom and ",ode hl'ipf,,) ' ''ggl,sti,m, incl"de Robe'"
Benson, AVl'ril C.rrwcon, Ev,ngdo, Chrys.o, ."d M"" in Hcin_
,d"U"'L Fiually. l owe ;nc.rcul.ble ,It-h, ,he cttduring
,III to
erlco""gemcltt ."d "'pp"n of my r,,,,ily, hoth iIrln'cdi~'e ."d
cXle",kJ,
r ,
T,'"awa!l</a, N,
TI,allbxi,'i".~, 198}
X"
Note to the paperback edition
The following noles off~, .ddition.l pri"l> ry SO" rce I~Sfi mony th.1
[hH'c cnC<J"nter~d which n,.y be h.!pf,,1 10 "s~rs oflhi. book, A
few ",. . te,;. . 1 error~ - for know[~dg~ of which J . m indcbt~d to
reviewers' cue - h,ve bo:cn corrected silently in Ih~ book. I
:.: Ihe """ of Ibe bishops wh" wrote to were in the
M.u,ic~
Lorn b>rd tcrrilory of A'luiici., H. Berg, •B i"hofc u"d Bi.chof,
,il2c im 0'''[1'''0_ und Don.","um vun 4. bi, zUln 8. J.hr
hllndcrt', a.'Y"" u"d NMhb."" r, ed. H. Wolfrom .nd
Di~ il1T~
A, Schwarcz (Vicnn., 1985), PI'· lil-r08, here h - 4.
41, n. n: Evangdo. Chrysos has sugge<!cd ro me th. t Con't.ntiu,
[I', triumph.nt return to Mil." in ljj mighl he .ddcd to thi.li,t:
Am",i.nu. M>rcel1inu .• , RF' g.'SlM '5, 4. ' l. cd. W, S~yfuth
dd/,. I (Lcip"ig, ",>78), H·U- 3·
60: Th""dcric S" .h,,', .«ide"ul dellh in 48 1 ,ee"" to h.ve
rcsulted in 1 <I",e holid.y: Jord."~,, Ro,,", 436. Momm.en
H·2~---<),
10. with n. Il): p, Conte h .. pre,ented cOllvincing reUonS for
identifying Ihe ;,bnd ofK.[onymo, with Prot., in the h[.nd, of
,he ['rince, (Turkish Ken. li.d.): A'~lI,,", 52 (1988). J66,
74-8: for (he [iturgic,[ "'entiOIl of, victor), cd~br>lion ovcr the
,,,<",ion,
A, ,hi. ,h, followhlg ''''k''', hi'" (0"" my R. eollim.
"',,,i,,~, (D
f;"t';.~ H;"o<i,,1 N'"~, "'. (19~1, <In, p, Co"'" II,.,,", )' (,.""), )~>--9; A.
Cud«. C/,,,i,,1" W". ,".,I J1. '1h ""(1.,9,," », "J-~' M. H,,,\l<lm.on, F""",,, I! (,.37), I .06-
" P. Hoc«y, .«li,"''''1"'' I, (• • 01), ."_,, P. Lem." •. R,."
iI;"""f'''6' 9'7-9" ,(1 ?18), lil-<i; T. C l""ngh;" C,~~"., ,;v;/"";', ",WTiv,,."J.. , l'
(1<ilI.). • (j, T>b"w. ~o.Ji ""J;",.Ji, ... " J, '0 (19'1), . ' .-<i, U, Il.~.
)0 (.<ilIO), .,.,..S" R. V." ll.",. lI_i". Hi" ..... ) R,,~. OJ ('<ilII), 10'3-<,0;
H. Wnlf"",, ,\I/(X;, 11'1 " ."), '"J-<.
XIU
Description:As the Roman empire declined and 'fell', contemporary glorification of the emperor's triumphal rulership reached new heights, strewing traces of the empire's perennial victory across the physical and mental landscape of late antiquity. In this, the first comprehensive study of how a great imperial c