en en amendments

159 Pages·2017·1.15 MB·English

European Parliament
2014-2019
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
2016/0357A(COD)
4.10.2017
AMENDMENTS
767 - 1090
Draft report
Kinga Gál
(PE605.985v02-00)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
establishing a European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS)
and amending Regulations (EU) No 515/2014, (EU) 2016/399 and (EU)
2016/1624
Proposal for a regulation
(COM(2016)0731 – C8-0466/2016 – 2016/0357A(COD))
AM\1135937EN.docx PE609.323v02-00
EN EN
United in diversity
AM_Com_LegReport
PE609.323v02-00 2/156 AM\1135937EN.docx
EN
Amendment 767
Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 6 – title
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
Issuing, refusal, annulment or revocation of Issuing, refusal, update, annulment or
a travel authorisation revocation of a travel authorisation
Or. en
Amendment 768
Marie-Christine Vergiat
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there is no evidenceto conclude that
reasonable grounds to conclude that the the presence of the person on the territory
presence of the person on the territory of of the Member States poses a security risk,
the Member States poses an irregular a travel authorisation shall be issued by the
migration, securityor public healthrisk, a ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS
travel authorisation shall be issued by the National Unit of the responsible Member
ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS State.
National Unit of the responsible Member
State.
Or. fr
Amendment 769
Angelika Mlinar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
AM\1135937EN.docx 3/156 PE609.323v02-00
EN
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there are no factual indications or
reasonable grounds to conclude that the reasonable grounds to conclude that the
presence of the person on the territory of presence of the person on the territory of
the Member States poses an irregular the Member States poses a risk, a travel
migration, security or public healthrisk, a authorisation shall be issued by the ETIAS
travel authorisation shall be issued by the Central System or the ETIAS National
ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS Unit of the responsible Member State.
National Unit of the responsible Member
State.
Or. en
Amendment 770
Artis Pabriks
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there are no factual indications or
reasonable grounds to conclude that the reasonable grounds to conclude that the
presence of the person on the territory of presence of the person on the territory of
the Member States poses an irregular the Member States poses an illegal
migration, security or public health risk, a migration, security or public health risk, a
travel authorisation shall be issued by the travel authorisation shall be issued by the
ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS
National Unit of the responsible Member National Unit of the responsible Member
State. State.
Or. en
Amendment 771
Jan Philipp Albrecht
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
PE609.323v02-00 4/156 AM\1135937EN.docx
EN
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there are no reasonable grounds based
reasonable grounds to conclude that the on factual indicationsto conclude that the
presence of the person on the territory of presence of the person on the territory of
the Member States poses an irregular the Member States poses a threat to
migration, security or public health risk, a security, a travel authorisation shall be
travel authorisation shall be issued by the issued by the ETIAS Central System or the
ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS ETIAS National Unit of the responsible
National Unit of the responsible Member Member State.
State.
Or. en
Justification
“Reasonable grounds” that do not rely on factual indications are just guesses.
Amendment 772
Sergei Stanishev
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there are no factual indications or
reasonable grounds to conclude that the reasonable grounds to conclude that the
presence of the person on the territory of presence of the person on the territory of
the Member States poses an irregular the Member States poses a security or
migration, security or public health risk, a public health risk, a travel authorisation
travel authorisation shall be issued by the shall be issued by the ETIAS Central
ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS System or the ETIAS National Unit of the
National Unit of the responsible Member responsible Member State.
State.
Or. en
Justification
In line with previous amendments to remove prevention of irregular migration as one of the
main objectives of this Regulation.
AM\1135937EN.docx 5/156 PE609.323v02-00
EN
Amendment 773
Sylvie Guillaume, Christine Revault D'Allonnes Bonnefoy, Tanja Fajon, Birgit Sippel,
Péter Niedermüller
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1. Where the examination of an 1. Where the examination of an
application pursuant to the procedures laid application pursuant to the procedures laid
down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates down in Chapters III, IV and V indicates
that there are no factual indications or that there are no factual indications or
reasonable grounds to conclude that the reasonable grounds to conclude that the
presence of the person on the territory of presence of the person on the territory of
the Member States poses an irregular the Member States poses an irregular
migration, security or public health risk, a migration or security risk, a travel
travel authorisation shall be issued by the authorisation shall be issued by the ETIAS
ETIAS Central Systemor the ETIAS Central System or the ETIAS National
National Unit of the responsible Member Unit of the responsible Member State.
State.
Or. en
Amendment 774
Artis Pabriks
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1a. The ETIAS National Unit of the
responsible Member State may attach a
flag to the travel authorisation it issues,
recommending further checks at the
border crossing point. This flag shall only
be visible to the border guards, it shall
indicate the reason for such flag and it
shall be removed automatically once the
check has been carried out.
Or. en
PE609.323v02-00 6/156 AM\1135937EN.docx
EN
Amendment 775
Carlos Coelho, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
1a. The ETIAS National Unit of the
responsible Member State may request, in
accordance with the [SIS directive], that
an alert for specific, [inquiry] or discreet
check is created in SIS. Such alert may
also be created upon the request of a
consulted Member State.
Or. en
Justification
If doubts subsist or the person is of interest, even after the issuance of a Travel authorization,
Member States should use the means already in place to request action at the Union External
Borders. This will allow for an efficient use of existing systems, but also guarantees
procedural safeguards are taken into account.
Amendment 776
Monika Hohlmeier
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
2. A travel authorisation shall be valid 2. A travel authorisation shall be valid
for five years or until the end of validity of for multiple trips over the period of three
the travel document registered during years or until the end of validity of the
application, whichever comes first, and travel document registered during
shall be valid for the territory of the application, whichever comes first, and
Member States. shall be valid for the territory of the
Member States.
The validity of the travel authorisation is
contingent on the validity of the data
provided in the application at the time of
entry in the territory of the Member
States.
Or. en
AM\1135937EN.docx 7/156 PE609.323v02-00
EN
Amendment 777
Petri Sarvamaa
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
2. A travel authorisation shall be valid 2. A travel authorisation shall be valid
for five years or until the end of validity of for three years or until the end of validity
the travel document registered during of the travel document registered during
application, whichever comes first, and application, whichever comes first, and
shall be valid for the territory of the shall be valid for the territory of the
Member States. Member States. However, for categories of
applicants exempt from paying the fee in
accordance with Article 16(2), the travel
authorisation shall be valid for a single
entry.
Or. en
Amendment 778
Gérard Deprez, Louis Michel
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
2. A travel authorisation shall be valid 2. A travel authorisation shall be valid
for five years or until the end of validity of for 3 years or until the end of the activity
the travel document registered during that gave rise to the authorisation fee
application, whichever comes first, and being waived pursuant to Article 16(2)(c)
shall be valid for the territory of the to (e) or until the end of validity of the
Member States. travel document registered during
application, whichever comes first. Itshall
be valid for the territory of the Member
States.
Or. fr
Amendment 779
Helga Stevens
PE609.323v02-00 8/156 AM\1135937EN.docx
EN
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
2. A travel authorisation shall be valid 2. A travel authorisation shall be valid
for five years or until the end of validity of for three years or until the end of validity
the travel document registered during of the travel document registered during
application, whichever comes first, and application, whichever comes first, and
shall be valid for the territory of the shall be valid for the territory of the
Member States. Member States.
Or. nl
Amendment 780
Brice Hortefeux, Rachida Dati
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
2. A travel authorisation shall be valid 2. A travel authorisation shall be valid
for five years or until the end of validity of for two years or until the end of validity of
the travel document registered during the travel document registered during
application, whichever comes first, and application, whichever comes first, and
shall be valid for the territory of the shall be valid for the territory of the
Member States. Member States.
Or. fr
Amendment 781
Jan Philipp Albrecht
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
3. A travel authorisation shall not deleted
confer an automatic right of entry.
Or. en
AM\1135937EN.docx 9/156 PE609.323v02-00
EN
Amendment 782
Brice Hortefeux, Rachida Dati
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
3. A travel authorisation shall not 3. A travel authorisation shall not
confer an automatic right of entry. confer an automatic right of entryor right
to stay.
Or. fr
Amendment 783
Carlos Coelho, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
3a. A travel authorization shall not
preclude any actions regarding an alert
on the SIS.
Or. en
Amendment 784
Angelika Mlinar
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 a (new)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendment
Article 30 a
Issuing of a travel authorization at the
external borders
1. In exceptional cases, the travel
authorizationmay be issued at border
PE609.323v02-00 10/156 AM\1135937EN.docx
EN