Table Of ContentOUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
Effective Altruism
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
ENGAGING PHILOSOPHY
This series is a new forum for collective philosophical engagement with controversial
issues in contemporary society.
Disability in Practice
Attitudes, Policies, and Relationships
Edited by Adam Cureton and Thomas E. Hill, Jr.
Taxation
Philosophical Perspectives
Edited by Martin O’Neill and Shepley Orr
Bad Words
Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs
Edited by David Sosa
Academic Freedom
Edited by Jennifer Lackey
Lying
Language, Knowledge, Ethics, and Politics
Edited by Eliot Michaelson and Andreas Stokke
Treatment for Crime
Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice
Edited by David Birks and Thomas Douglas
Games, Sports, and Play
Philosophical Essays
Edited by Thomas Hurka
Effective Altruism
Philosophical Issues
Edited by Hilary Greaves and Theron Pummer
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
Effective Altruism
Philosophical Issues
Edited by
HILARY GREAVES AND THERON PUMMER
1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
1
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© the several contributors 2019
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2019
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019947210
ISBN 978–0–19–884136–4
Printed and bound in Great Britain by
Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
Foreword
Peter Singer
The emergence of effective altruism caught me by surprise. Thirty years earlier
I had argued, in “Famine, Affluence and Morality,”1 that it is wrong to spend
money on things we do not need when elsewhere people cannot get enough to
eat, and we could use the money we are spending to help them meet their basic
needs. The article was discussed in philosophy journals, reprinted in ethics
anthologies, and assigned to thousands of students to read and discuss; but most
of the professors assigning it presented it as an intellectual challenge, rather than
an ethical one. “Here is an argument that proceeds from plausible premises,” they
would say, “and seems to use sound reasoning. Yet it concludes that we are all
doing something seriously wrong, like failing to rescue a drowning child from a
shallow pond. That conclusion can’t be right, so where does the mistake lie?”
Many professors told me that they enjoyed teaching the article because it always
provoked a lively discussion, but very few students did anything to help people in
extreme poverty.
I became accustomed to that disappointing response. During the first decade
of the new millennium, however, there was a perceptible uptick in concern about
global poverty. The Millennium Development Goals contributed to that, as did
the example set by Bill and Melinda Gates putting most of their wealth into a
foundation focused on eliminating the preventable diseases like malaria and diar-
rhea that claim the lives of so many people in extreme poverty.
So when Professor Julian Savulescu invited to give the Uehiro Lectures in
Practical Ethics at Oxford University in 2007, I decided to revisit the theme of
global poverty and what we ought to do about it. As I was preparing the lectures,
Julian emailed me about an Oxford graduate student in philosophy named Toby
Ord who wanted to meet me. Toby said that my argument for individual action
on poverty had struck a chord with him, and he had founded an organization
called Giving What We Can. The email quoted him as saying that Giving What
We Can “aims to help people give more effectively and share ideas about making
donation a central part of their lives.” Toby (who explains more of his thinking in
his essay in this book) asked if I would be able to take part in a discussion with
students while I was in Oxford. I replied that I would be happy to do so. That was
the first inkling I had of the movement that was to become effective altruism.
1 Philosophy & Public Affairs 1 (1972), 229–43.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
vi Foreword
Since 2007 effective altruism has grown in many different ways including the
number of people involved, the research done into the most effective ways to give,
and the amount of money that has gone to those charities that the research has
suggested will do the most good with every dollar they receive. (Will MacAskill
gives some relevant figures in his contribution to this book, so I won’t repeat them
here.) Effective altruism has spread around the world, facilitated by the internet,
and generated an immense amount of discussion on web forums and blogs. The
scope of the movement has also broadened. It can no longer be assumed that
effective altruists focus solely or even primarily on helping people in extreme
poverty, because there are rival contenders for how we can do the most good.
(Although I continue to think that helping people in extreme poverty compares
well with the other contenders.)
With so much online discussion about effective altruism and the issues it
raises, it was difficult to get an overall sense of the field, or its key issues. Nor was
it easy to separate the contributions that were well argued and worth reading
from more casual comments that did not stand up to scrutiny. That is why I wel-
come this volume. Its carefully selected set of essays will serve for a long time as a
high-quality introduction to the philosophical and ethical issues raised by eff ect-
ive altruism.
There is often a danger that getting to know all the different views about a
complex question can, by undermining our confidence that we know what we
ought to do, lead to a kind of paralysis. I will therefore close this foreword with
a reminder: even if there is disagreement among thoughtful effective altruists
about what is the best thing to do, there is a consensus that several actions open to
us—including helping people in extreme poverty and reducing the suffering of
animals on factory farms—are far better than doing nothing at all.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
Contents
List of Contributors ix
Introduction 1
Hilary Greaves and Theron Pummer
1. The Definition of Effective Altruism 10
William MacAskill
2. The Moral Imperative Toward Cost-Effectiveness
in Global Health 29
Toby Ord
3. Evidence Neutrality and the Moral Value of Information 37
Amanda Askell
4. Effective Altruism and Transformative Experience 53
Jeff Sebo and Laurie Paul
5. Should We Give to More Than One Charity? 69
James Snowden
6. A Brief Argument for the Overwhelming Importance
of Shaping the Far Future 80
Nick Beckstead
7. Effective Altruism, Global Poverty, and Systemic Change 99
Iason Gabriel and Brian McElwee
8. Benevolent Giving and the Problem of Paternalism 115
Emma Saunders-Hastings
9. Demanding the Demanding 137
Ben Sachs
10. On Satisfying Duties to Assist 150
Christian Barry and Holly Lawford-Smith
11. Effective Altruism’s Underspecification Problem 166
Travis Timmerman
12. The Hidden Zero Problem: Effective Altruism and
Barriers to Marginal Impact 184
Mark Budolfson and Dean Spears
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
viii Contents
13. Beyond Individualism 202
Stephanie Collins
14. Overriding Virtue 218
Richard Yetter Chappell
15. The Callousness Objection 227
Andreas Mogensen
Index 245
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 19/08/19, SPi
List of Contributors
Amanda Askell, New York University
Christian Barry, Australian National University
Nick Beckstead, Open Philanthropy Project
Mark Budolfson, University of Vermont
Stephanie Collins, Australian Catholic University
Iason Gabriel, University of Oxford
Hilary Greaves, University of Oxford
Holly Lawford-Smith, University of Melbourne
William MacAskill, University of Oxford
Brian McElwee, University of Southampton
Andreas Mogensen, University of Oxford
Toby Ord, University of Oxford
Laurie Paul, Yale University
Theron Pummer, St Andrews University
Ben Sachs, St Andrews University
Emma Saunders-Hastings, Ohio State University
Jeff Sebo, New York University
Peter Singer, Princeton University and University of Melbourne
James Snowden, GiveWell
Dean Spears, University of Texas at Austin
Travis Timmerman, Seton Hall University
Richard Yetter Chappell, University of Miami
