Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis ...

128 Pages·2016·8.02 MB·English

UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff MMoonnttaannaa
SScchhoollaarrWWoorrkkss aatt UUnniivveerrssiittyy ooff MMoonnttaannaa
Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, &
Graduate School
Professional Papers
2001
EEaarrllyy aanndd MMiiddddllee AArrcchhaaiicc pprroojjeeccttiillee ppooiinntt tteecchhnnoollooggiieess iinn tthhee
CClloosseedd BBaassiinn aarreeaa ooff tthhee SSaann LLuuiiss VVaalllleeyy,, CCoolloorraaddoo
Scott A. Des Planques
The University of Montana
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd
Let us know how access to this document benefits you.
RReeccoommmmeennddeedd CCiittaattiioonn
Des Planques, Scott A., "Early and Middle Archaic projectile point technologies in the Closed Basin area of
the San Luis Valley, Colorado" (2001). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers.
2124.
https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2124
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of
Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an
authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
Maureen and Mike
MANSFIELD LIBRARY
The University of
Montana
Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety,
provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in
published works and reports.
**Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature**
Yes, I grant permission
No, I do not grant permission
Author's Signature; ^ P
Date: 5Z£//ol '
Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with
the author's exphcit consent.
MSThcsis\Mansfjeld Library Permission

THE EARLY AND MIDDLE ARCHAIC
PROJECTILE POINT TECHNOLOGIES
IN THE CLOSED BASIN AREA OF THE
SAN LUIS VALLEY, COLORADO
by
Scott A. Des Planques
B.A. University of Wyoming, 1998
B.A. University of Wyoming, 1999
presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
degree of
Master of Arts
The University of Montana
May 2001
Masters Degree Thesis
University of Montana
Spring 2001
Apprqvei
(irperson
Dean, Graduate School
S
'3l-o\
Date
UMI Number: EP36290
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO ALL USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
UMT
Owaartttkm ftMWÉig
UMI EP36290
Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
All rights reserved. This work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 -1346
Des Planques, Scott A., Masters Thesis, May 2001 Anthropology
The Early and Middle Archaic Projectile Point Technologies in the Closed
Basin Area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado
Thesis Committee Chair; John Douglas, Ph D
Early and Middle Archaic projectile point types from the High Plains,
southern Rocky Mountains, Great Basin and Desert Southwestr egions
are outlined in this research in order to establish what lithic technologies
are present in the Closed Basin area of the San Luis Valley, Colorado.
Three-hundred forty-eight projectile points recovered as surface finds in
the Closed Basin area are documented, analyzed (statistically and
morphologically) and, in many cases, illustratedt o provide a
comprehensive guide of the variability present in accepted point type
technologies. The lithic raw material types used int he production of
these various projectile point types from the Closed Basin area are
recorded and compared to known quarries in and adjacent to the San
Luis Valley. Statistical t-tests are computed and utilized to compare
morphological data and lithic technologies fromt he projectile points of the
Closed Basin area with corresponding morphological data and lithic
technologies from adjacent regions, when published data are available.
These comparisons provide quantifiable evidence as to whether the
points from the Closed Basin area are a part of the same projectile point
technologies found in the HighP lains, southern Rocky Mountains, Great
Basin and Desert Southwest regions.
ii
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction and Overview 1
Chapter 2: Diagnostic Archaic Period Projectile Point Types In and Around Colorado... 5
Introduction 5
The AtlatI Weapon System 6
Projectile Point Morphology 7
The Early Archaic Period 9
The Early Archaic Side-Notched 9
Other Plains Archaic Side-Notched 11
The Early Archaic Large Side-Notched Projectile Point Continuum 12
Northern Side-Notched 12
The Sudden Side-Notched 15
The San Rafael Side-Notched 16
The Chiricahua Stage of the Cochise Culture 16
The Albion Boardinghouse Complex 18
Summary of Early Archaic Side-Notched Point Types 19
The Early Archaic Mountain Traditions 20
The Mount Albion Complex 22
Cherry Gulch Types 1 and 2 / Magic Mountain Sequence Type 3 23
The Fourth of July Complex 25
Summary of Early Archaic Mountain Traditions 26
The Early Archaic Oshara Tradition and the Rio Grande Complex 26
The Rio Grande Complex, Quemado Phase 27
The Oshara Tradition (Jay Phase) 28
The Oshara Tradition (Bajada Phase) 30
Summary of the Early Archaic Oshara Tradition and the Rio Grande Complex 31
The Middle Archaic 32
The Pinto Basin Projectile Point Type 32
The Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) 41
Gypsum Cave / Contracting Stem Projectile Point Types 43
The Humboldt Projectile Point Type 47
The McKean Complex 50
Comer-Notched Projectile Points 55
Chapter 3: The San Luis Valley, Colorado 60
Location and Physiographic Setting of the San Luis Valley 60
The History of Archaeological Investigations in the San Luis Valley 64
The Closed Basin Area of the San Luis Valley 65
Early and Middle Archaic in the Closed Basin Area of the San Luis Valley 67
The Study Areas of this Research 68
Methodology..... 68
Chapter 4: San Luis Valley Artifacts and Analysis 74
Early Archaic Point Types Found in the San Luis Valley 74
Oshara Tradition (Jay Phase) Points Found in the Closed Basin 74
Oshara Tradition (Bajada Phase) Points Found in the Closed Basin 77
Northern Side-Notched Points Found in the Closed Basin 81
Sudden Side«Notched Points Found in the Closed Basin 85
Anomalous Side-Notched Points Found in the Closed Basin 86
Early Archaic Mountain Tradition Points Found in the Closed Basin 86
Summary of Early Archaic Point Types Found in the San Luis Valley 87
iii
The Middle Archaic in the Closed Basin 88
Gypsum Cave / Contracting Stem Points Found in the Closed Basin 88
Humboldt / San Luis Lanceolate Points 94
The Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) Projectile Points in the San Luis Valley.. 98
Leaf-Shaped Points Found in the Closed Basin Area 105
Summary of Middle Archaic Point Types Found in the San Luis Valley 107
Chapter 5: Conclusion 109
Bibliography 113
iv
Figures and Tables
The Different Hafting Element Morphologies 7
Diagnostic Morphological Attributes 8
Early Plains Archaic Side-Notched Projectile Point Types 9
Large Archaic Side-Notched Projectile Point Types 14
A Map of Archaic Mountain Tradition Sites 21
Early Archaic Mountain Tradition Projectile Point Types 24
Rio Grande/Jay and Bajada Projectile Point Types 29
A Map of Archaic Sites 33
Pinto Basin Projectile Point Types 36
Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) Projectile Point Types 43
Gypsum Cave/Contracting Stem Projectile Point Types 44
Humboldt Series of Projectile Points 48
McKean Complex Projectile Points 52
Archaic Comer-Notched Projectile Points 55
A Map Showing the Location of the San Luis Valley, Colorado 61
A Map Showing the Location of the Closed Basin Area 66
Morphological Attributes of Points Used in this Study 73
Oshara Tradition (Jay Phase) Projectile Points from the San Luis Valley... 75
Lithic Materials Used During the Eariy Archaic Period 76
Oshara Tradition (Bajada Phase) Projectile Points From the Closed Basin 78
Oshara Tradition (Bajada Phase) Projectile Points From the Closed Basin 79
Oshara Tradition (Bajada Phase) Projectile Points From the Closed Basin 80
Large Side-Notched Points From the Closed Basin 83
Large Side-Notched Points From the Closed Basin 84
Eariy Archaic Mountain Tradition Projectile Points From the Closed Basin. 87
Contracting Stem Projectile Point Types Found In the Closed Basin 89
Contracting Stem Projectile Point Types Found in the Closed Basin 90
Lithic Materials Used During the Middle Archaic Period 91
San Luis Lanceolates Found in the Closed Basin 95
Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) Points from the Closed Basin 99
Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) Points from the Closed Basin 100
Oshara Tradition (San Jose Phase) Points from the Closed Basin 101
Leaf-Shaped Points from the Closed Basin 106
Foraging vs. Collector Technological Correlates 71
Sample Sizes Used in Metric Study 72
Sample Sizes Used in Metric Study 72
Bajada Point Data 81
Northern Side-Notched Data 84
Sudden Side-Notched Data 85
Leaf-Shaped Point Data 106
V
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to thank my wife, Kim Des Planques, for her support,
editing talents and infinite patience with me while I was completing this thesis.
I would like to acknowledge and thank my thesis chair. Dr. John Douglas, as well as my
thesis committee members. Dr. William Prentiss and Dr. John Donahue.
A very special thanks to Drs. Dennis Stanford and Margaret (Pegi) Jodry—your
friendship, encouragement, support and mentoring have meant more than you can know.
Thanks for helping me find my way from "the dark side" of archaeology to becoming a member of
the professional archaeological community I doubt that this study would have ever been
undertaken without you. or that I would be receiving myM asters degree.
Many thanks to the Great Sand Dunes National Monument. Without the gracious offer of
lodging and financial assistance from Barbara Irwin, Fred Bunch and Andrew Valdez of the Park
Service, this study would not have been possible.
My gratitude to The Nature Conservancy for allowing me access to the Medano and
Zapata Ranch properties to obtain GPS location data on several of the sites used in this study,
and to Nancy Walker and Mike Gibson for making the necessary arrangements.
Thanks to Vince Spero and Kenny Fry of the U.S. Forest Service for providing resource
material concerning lithic material sources in the San Luis Valley
My deep and sincere appreciation to the avocational archaeologists who allowed me
access to their collections, especially to Bill and Judy Hamilton of Monte Vista, Colorado; to Ron
Kessler, of Monte Vista, who also facilitated access to other avocational collections used in this
study; and to Colin Bauer of Alamosa.
And last, but not least, I would like to thank my brother, Kevin Des Planques, for
introducing me to the prehistory of the San Luis Valley and for allowing me to obtain
measurements from the projectile points in his collection.
vi