Table Of ContentA254  813
AD- 
ii131333111
DTIC
ELECTE
LEGAL ASPECTS OF  SEP  2 11992~
C
SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION 
BY
LISA 1 FREELAND
A REPORT PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COMMITTEE
OF TLE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IN
PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITY  OF FLORIDA
SUMMER 1992
' 29e 2 -2 44   8 2
_  _  _  _  _  _ 
92i  49.02  1b5
Acknowldgment
I would like to sincerely thank Mr. Gene Taylor, Director of the Safety
Department,  Navy  Public  Works  Center  (NPWC),  Pensacola,  Florida.  He
generously provided encouragement, many hours of helpful discussion, and access
to the extensive safety library maintained at the NPWC.  The Safety Department
staff members were aso helpful and supportive in every way.
A genuine interest in spreading the word about safety was evident in word
and action.
_A.eta  torn  For
Distr  4  e  islov
Av~tliqlity  Cores
I is  1 ,S   a io  ...
Forward
Safety is a general subject area that has never particularly interested me.
Attendance  at  safety  meetings  was considered  boring and  time  consuming.  An
impromptu  appearance  of the  Safety  manager  at my  office  door was  met with
silent/private  aroans.  I will not incriminate  myself further with  any  of the other
stupid thoughts I have had on the subject.  Suffice it to say that I chose the topic of
"Legal Aspects  of Safety in Construction"  in recognition  of my  own dangerous
attitudes and a desire to change them.
My own life experience has included relatively few accidents of any kind
and  those  that I have  experienced  were  relatively  minor  and  inconsequential  in
nature...  until recently.  During the  time frame in which I was performing  the
research for this report, I also had a very serious  car accident  which but for the
grace  of God could  have  resulted  in  serious  injury  or death to  my  two young
children and me.
A permanent impression waq made on my mind as I surveyed the total
wreckage of our car, personal belongings strewn for 200 feet. and frightened crying
children.  There  was perfect  irony in realizing  that thousands  of pages of safety
reference books and research notes wcrc  among the debris.
ii
This accident got my attention.  It was Preventable.  There was a caus...
and the accident was the effect.  Experience is the best teacher but clearly there are
some  exerinces  ,such  as  this  one,  that  do  not  lend themselves  to  firsthand
knowledge.  The risk is too geat and the experience is of no value if one does not
live to benefit from it.
Safety Engineering  Education, and Enforcement are intended to prevent
accidents.  I hope the current high level of interest that I have in safety will never be
replaced by the old lackadaisical attitudes.
oI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter One -Introduction. ........................................................................ 1
1.1  Background and History ..................................................................... 1
1.2  Topic Overview ................................................................................. 5
Chapter Two - The Occupational Safety and Health Act ........................  8
2.1  Administration ...............................................................................  8
2.1.1 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ............  8
2.1.2  Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ......9 
2.1.3  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health ......1 0
2.1.4  Bureau of Labor Statistics .................................................  10
2.2  Applicability ................................................................................... 10
2.2.1  Modified Requirements ...................................................  11
2.2.2  Exclusions ......................................................................  11
2.3  Employer and Employee Duties and Rights ...................................... 12
2.3.1  Specific Employer Duties .................................................  13
2.3.2  Employee Duties ..............................................................  18
2.3.3  Employer Rights ..............................................................  18
2.3.4  Employee Rights ..............................................................  21
2.4  Occupational Safety and Health Standards ......................................  23
2.4.1  Variances from the Standards ...........................................  25
Chapter Three - OSHACT Enforcement ...............................................  27
3.1  Compliance Inspections .....................................2 7
iV
3.2  Violations, Citations, and Penalties ......................................................  29
3.2.1  Violations .........................................................................  30
3.2.2  Citations ...........................................................................  32
3.2.3  Penalties ...........................................................................  33
Chapter Four - OSHA Standards for Construction ..................................  36
4.1  Overview ........................................................................................  36
4.2  Training Requirements ..................................................................  40
4.3  Construction Compliance Inspections .............................................  41
Chapter Five - Legal Concepts ..............................................................  43
5.1  OSHA Actions Affirmed. ................................................................  43
5.2  OSHA Actions Vacated ................................................................  46
Chapter Six - Conclusion .......................................................................  49
Appendix A - Accident Investigation Form .............................................  52
Appendix B - Chart of Scheduled Charges (Injuries) ...............................  54
Appendix C - OSHA Form 101 ..............................................................  55
Appendix D - OSHA Poster ..................................................................  57
Appendix E - List of Employee Rights ...................................................  58
Appendix F - Standard Setting Organizations .........................................  59
Appendix G - Variance  Application Information ....................................  60
Appendix H - OSHA Inspection Subjects ...............................................  61
Appendix I - Construction Safety Rules .................................................  62
Referen  es ............................................................................................  63
Supplementary Bibliography ..................................................................  64
V
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1  Backrud and Istory
Individual and societal attitudes concerning saety are continually evolving.
The book, Work is Dangerous to Your Health,  describes safety as "a vast problem.
Among the 80 million workers in the United States, more than 14,000 deaths on
the job are recorded annually, and about 2.2 million disabling injuries.  Those are
probably minimal figures, for every worker knows the devices by which industry
pads  its  safety  records  (5-ii)."  These  figures  reflet pre-1973  statistics.  The
National Safety Council still repors that there  are more than 11,000 work related
deaths per year and about 2 million injuries.  Changes in society and technology are
reflected in the evolution of safety legislation and case law over the past century.
The history of occupational safety and health was greatly affected by the
industrial revolution.  "Chnges in production methods with their concomitant need
for masses of workers brought with them hazards never before encountered...
DIeads and injuries were accepted as being part of "industrial progress' (8-3)."
Three doctrincs of common law which were prevalent at the time were
* the Fellow Servant rule which held that the employer was not liable for
injury to an employee that resulted from negligence of a fellow employee,
I
* ContributoryN  egligence which supported the employer as not liable if
the employee was injured due to his own ngligence, and
* Assumption ofRisk which protected the employer from liability because
the employee took the job with full knowledge of the risks and hazards involved.
It was the early 1900's before any significant legislative action took place
concerning safety.  Many federal and state worke's compensation laws were passed
during the first two decades of the 20th century.  This was one way to enlighten
management to accept responsibility for prevention of accidents.  This new line of
thinking held the employer responsible for a share of the economic loss suffered by
the employee who was involved in an accident  The National Council for Industrial
Safety (now the National Safety Council) was established in 1913.
The mission of the National Safety Council is to educate
and influence society to adopt safety and health policies, practices,
and procedures that prevent and mitigate  human and economic
losses  arising  from  accidental  causes  and  adverse  occupational
and  environmental  exposures.  (Adopted  by  the  Board  of
Directors, 1983).
A prnmary objective which took shape over time was the development of
safety standards.  During the 1920's the American Standards Association came into
being  (under  a  different  name)  and  has  been  an  important  partner  in  standard
setting for the safety movement.  Standards provide an important tool for the courts
2
to ascertains uch things as state-of-the-ar  safety tectnology and accepted standards
of the industry.
The Walsh-Healy Act of 1936 directed some attention to occupational
safety  and  health.  The  importance  of safety  in  the  work  place  was  further
highlighted  by  labor  shortages  experienced  duuing  World  War  II.  Increased
emphasis  on safety was well established and did not diminish with the end of the
war.  In 1948 Admiral Ben Moreel wrote
Although safe and healthful working conditions can be
justified on a cold dollars-and-cents basis, I prefer to justify them
on the basic principle that it is the right thing to do.  In discussing
safety in  ndustrial operations, I have often heard that the cost of
adequate health and safety measures would be prohibitive and that
"we can't afford if.  My  answer to that is quite simple and quite
direct.  It is this:  If we can't afford safety, we can't afford to be in
business. (8-6)
This noble sentiment was not shared by all and change has not come easily.  "No
essential rights now enjoyed by working men and women were simply bestowed by
government;  rather,  they  were  won  through  struggle  (5-13)."  Lobbying  and
concerted action was and is still required to make the work place safe.
During the 1960's Congress enacted numerous pieces of safety legislation
However, each law was limited in scope to specific employers or industries.  Each
3
law may have been the product of some specific lobbying effort but cumulatively
the laws did not cover the majority of employers or employees.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHAct) was signed into law on
Dec. 29,  1970 and took effect on April 28,  1971.  This was landmark lcgislation
for the United States because  it created national safety policy for the first time.  It
was both comprehensive  in scope  and applicability.  While  other related federal
legislation may remain on the books, the OSHAct is now the major law mandating
construction  safety.  The  OSHAct  was  not  an  instant  solution  to  all  safety
problems.  Subsequent  amendments  have  added  teeth  to  the  enforcement
provisions in addition to continually improving specific safety requirements.
The OSHAct has been and probably always will be the subject of a great
deal of controversy.  There  are vocal advocates of the Act and its objectives and
there are certainly strong opponents.  The two sides of the issue battle continuously
over attempts to water down or strengthen the legislation.  No one is likely to voice
the opinion that workers should not be protected from unsafe conditions.  They are
much  more  likely  to  speak  of  free  enterprise,  cost-effectiveness,  unrealistic
demands,  government  interference  or ineptitude,  or  similar arguements.  OSHA
was the  target of much  crticism during its first decade  in existence  primarily for
ineffective  enforcement  and  pro-industry  positions  concerning  safety  standards.
4