Table Of ContentUncertain subjects: Disabled women on B.C. income support 
 
by 
 
Sally Agnes Kimpson 
Bachelor of Science in Nursing, University of Victoria, 1989 
Master of Arts, University of Victoria, 1995 
 
A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment 
of the Requirements for the Degree of 
 
Doctor of Philosophy 
 
in Interdisciplinary Studies 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Sally Agnes Kimpson, 2015 
University of Victoria 
 
All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by 
photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author.
ii 
Supervisory Committee 
 
Uncertain subjects: Disabled women on B.C. income support 
 
by 
 
Sally Agnes Kimpson 
Bachelor of Science in Nursing, University of Victoria, 1989 
Master of Arts, University of Victoria, 1995 
 
 
 
 
Dr. Mary Ellen Purkis, Co-Supervisor 
School of Nursing 
 
Dr. Antoinette Oberg, Co-Supervisor 
Department of Curriculum and Instruction 
 
Dr. Carol McDonald, Departmental Member 
School of Nursing 
 
Dr. Katherine Teghtsoonian, Outside Member 
Studies in Policy and Practice
iii 
Abstract 
 
Supervisory Committee 
Dr. Mary Ellen Purkis, Co-Supervisor 
School of Nursing 
 
Dr. Antoinette Oberg, Co-Supervisor 
Department of Curriculum and Instruction 
 
Dr. Carol McDonald, Departmental Member 
School of Nursing 
 
Dr. Katherine Teghtsoonian, Outside Member 
Studies in Policy and Practice 
 
With an explicit focus on how power is enacted and what this produces in the everyday 
lives of chronically ill women living on B.C. disability income support (BC Benefits), 
this research is located at the contested juxtaposition of what I refer to as three fields of 
possibility; feminism, poststructuralism and critical disability studies. Each of these fields 
suggests methodological, empirical and interpretive readings that enable me to produce 
different knowledge, differently, about disabled women’s lives. Using verbatim narrative 
accounts from in-depth interviews focused on how each of four participants live their 
lives, take care of themselves, and make sense of and respond to the government policy 
and practices to which they are subject, reveals everyday, embodied practices of the self 
that constitute their subjectivities as disabled women. Together, these accounts along 
with critically interpretive reflections reveal/expose/make visible the lives of these 
women in response to exercises of power in ways that unseat, unsettle and disrupt taken-
for-granted understandings of those who are disabled, female and poor.  
Along with explicating power relations in the lives of disabled women and what these 
produce, I also link these critically to their health, socio-economic well-being and 
citizenship, while creating a disruptive reading that destabilizes common-sense notions 
about disabled women securing B.C. provincial income support benefits. Thus my 
research purposes and those of my disability activism are melded as these intersect within 
the (often-contested) borders of poststructural and social justice terrain. Despite public
iv 
claims by the B. C. government to foster the independence, participation in community 
and citizenship of disabled people in B.C., the intersection of government policy and 
practices and how they are read and taken up by the women, produce profound 
uncertainty in their lives, such that these women become uncertain subjects. Living 
poorly, they experience structural poverty, compromised well-being and “dis-citizenship” 
(Devlin & Pothier, 2006), all inconvenient facts reflecting a marked disjuncture between 
how government programs are publicly represented and their strategic effects.
v 
Table of Contents 
 
 
Supervisory	
  Committee	
   ii	
  
Abstract	
   iii	
  
Table	
  of	
  Contents	
   v	
  
Acknowledgements	
   vii	
  
Dedication	
   xi	
  
I	
  begin	
  here	
   1	
  
What	
  had	
  I	
  begun?	
   8	
  
Proceeding	
  towards	
  complexity:	
  Weaving	
  broad	
  tapestries	
   11	
  
Locating	
  in	
  field(s)	
  of	
  possibilities:	
  Poststructuralism,	
  feminism,	
  and	
  disability	
  studies	
   15	
  
(Fleshing	
  out)	
  women,	
  bodies,	
  disability	
   21	
  
Disabling	
  the	
  social	
  model	
   33	
  
The	
  subject(s)	
  of	
  bio-power	
   43	
  
The	
  conduct	
  of	
  (the)	
  research	
   52	
  
Imagining	
  and	
  recruiting	
  participants	
   61	
  
Why	
  disabled	
  women	
  living	
  with	
  chronic	
  illnesses?	
   63	
  
Navigating	
  interpretive	
  labyrinths,	
  finding	
  egress	
   71	
  
Impossible	
  stories	
   77	
  
Applying	
  for	
  benefits	
   80	
  
Laying	
  bare	
  the	
  disciplinary	
  process	
   101	
  
Im/personal	
  campaigns	
   111	
  
Translating	
  difficulty,	
  caring	
  for	
  self	
   133	
  
(Close)	
  Encounters	
  with	
  Ministry	
  workers,	
  and	
  Alternative	
  Means	
   155	
  
Being	
  caught:	
  And	
  a	
  Faustian	
  bargain?	
   177	
  
Limiting	
  changes,	
  juggling	
  limits	
   190	
  
Palimpsest:	
  From	
  the	
  ground	
  up	
  (v.	
  4)	
   200	
  
No	
  good	
  subjects	
  of	
  resistance	
   206	
  
Work	
  without	
  choice,	
  fear	
  and	
  distrust,	
  dependency	
   210	
  
Be	
  afraid,	
  be	
  very	
  afraid	
   213	
  
Dependency:	
  An	
  unintended	
  consequence	
   217	
  
Uncertain	
  subjects	
   224	
  
Challenging	
  Changes:	
  The	
  Disability	
  Designation	
  Review	
   228	
  
The	
  unknown,	
  known	
   233	
  
Advocacy	
  and	
  The	
  Review:	
  Strategizing	
  in	
  the	
  dark	
   241	
  
(Mis)understanding	
  The	
  Review	
   265	
  
Strategizing	
  (and)	
  The	
  Review	
   290	
  
Expediting	
  The	
  Review	
   301	
  
Pulling	
  up	
  short	
  and	
  thinking	
   314
vi 
Unsettling	
  well-being	
   316	
  
The	
  un/certainty	
  of	
  poverty	
   322	
  
Poverty,	
  revisited	
   324	
  
Disabled	
  citizen/subjects	
   327	
  
Concerning	
  ourselves	
  with	
  politics	
   335	
  
Coda	
   339	
  
I	
  end	
  (it)	
  here	
   343	
  
References	
   346	
  
Appendix	
  A:	
  Notes	
   362	
  
Appendix	
  B:	
  Letter	
  of	
  Invitation	
  and	
  Informed	
  Consent	
   366	
  
Appendix	
  C:	
  Interview	
  Guide	
   369	
  
Appendix	
  D:	
  Context	
  of	
  The	
  Review	
   370
vii 
Acknowledgments 
 
Interestingly, writing appreciation for those who have accompanied me in/during this 
lengthy process seems a somewhat daunting task, not because I am at a loss for words (as 
if), nor because there were only a few of you. Quite the opposite, and along with the 
diverse (and special) roles each of you play in my life, therein lies the challenge. 
Although I have space to name all of you, I may have to forgo written appreciation for 
each of your unique individual contributions to my life and/or studies.  
Yet there are those who I would be remiss not to mention in this way. 
I would first like to sincerely express how grateful I am to my four participants, Marion, 
Galya, Evelyne and Jocelyne for their participation in this research. Without their 
honesty, candour, passion and willingness to describe the difficult details of their lives, 
this dissertation would not be what it is. 
Likewise, I have deep appreciation and respect for my committee members and their 
willingness to remain with me over time and through the vagaries of conducting doctoral 
research at mid-life while living with a chronic illness. Special thanks to my brilliant co-
supervisors, Dr. Mary Ellen Purkis and Dr. Antoinette Oberg, for patiently and with 
exquisite timing and grace expertly encouraging, nudging, supporting, advocating, 
thinking, reflecting, discussing, understanding, accommodating, questioning, provoking, 
critiquing, and in uniquely flexible ways enabling me to proceed non-traditionally. To Dr. 
Katherine Teghtsoonian for your thoughtful and provocative engagement with me and 
my nascent understandings of feminist political theory during our directed study, and for 
continuing with me over time. And to Dr. Carol McDonald for generously volunteering 
to join my committee mid-degree, for reading my work with great heart, spirit and 
understanding, and for being there. 
I am blessed with many longstanding, deep and nurturing friendships, which comprise 
different communities and means of support. All of you willingly join me in whatever 
enjoyment there is to be had when we spend time together, usually a lot. From these 
communities I wish to thank all of you.
viii 
From the early days of my doctoral studies, my interdisciplinary doctoral women’s study 
group members (all now with earned doctorates), Wendy Donawa, Enid Elliott, Pat 
Rasmussen, Heather Hermanson and Joan Boyce, to whom I am deeply grateful for 
stimulating my intellect, supporting me in heartfelt ways and refusing the split. Latterly, 
thanks also to Carolyn Schellenberg and Connie Carter. And many thanks to Janet 
Sheppard and the members of the Thesis Completion Group for helping me to keep on 
track during the last two years. Deep gratitude and appreciation also goes to Connie Frey 
for nurturing my creativity. 
Thanks to four people (two former graduate students I taught) who keep me 
intellectually, socially and politically engaged, nourished, and my wine glass full—
Catherine van Mossel, Margaret Scaia, Lorelei Newton, and Karen Hurley—my life 
would be much diminished without each of you. Deep appreciation also goes to my dear 
friends Carmie Verdone and Susan Dempsey for walking closely beside me with great 
heart in our shared spiritual and embodied lives, and love of good food.  
From my life pre-disability come some of my most enduring friendships. We have come 
a long way together and all of you live deeply in my heart, including my two close 
friends from high school, and nursing school at the Hospital for Sick Children, Sharon 
Broughton and Jane McDonald. A few years ago when I decided I wanted to have more 
fun in my life I turned again to friends I lived and played with years ago (and you didn’t 
disappoint). Thanks to Pamela Ker, Jo-Anne Colquhoun & Tim Cooper, Doug Kelly 
(Isobel Doyle), Neil Smith (Deidre Björnson), and Susan Manchee, and from my earlier 
life in Rossland, BC, Raymond Gaudart and Jenny Baillie, for playfully reminding me 
who I am. Likewise to my dear friend, Denise Tarlier, old ski patrol pal and now nursing 
colleague. Appreciation also goes to Debbie Tippett, who has remained close (and 
immensely supportive) since our BSN days. Likewise to my quick-witted, cherished 
friend Martha Mackay, like me a former Torontonian who lived in Rossland and pursued 
a doctorate in nursing. 
From those in the disability studies community from whom I have learned much and 
whose support and counsel deepens my ongoing understandings of being a woman living
ix 
with disability, a deep debt of gratitude is offered to Kari Krogh, Susan Mahipaul and 
Kirsty Liddiard. 
A good life with disability means establishing trusted relationships with health care 
professionals and I am blessed to be connected with and cared for expertly by Louise 
Wood, Jim Tucker, David Attwell. Kavan Yu, Barbara Clearbridge, and Jacklin Houle. 
I also wish to thank my sisters Jill Kimpson and Molly Charko for the gift of love they 
give me, especially valued as our family diminishes in size with the loss of our parents. 
And thanks to my stepmother Joan Kimpson for believing in me, Corey and Joe Kimpson 
for taking such good care of Dad in his declining years, and my stepfather, Warren 
Jackman (d. 2009) who recognized with generosity the financial disadvantage being 
disabled has placed on my life. To my cherished companion animals, Puck (d. 2012) and 
Fionn, whose warm bodies, joyful exuberance, and unconditional acceptance have been a 
tonic during difficult times. 
Lastly (but not least ), I offer untold appreciation, gratitude and respect to my beloved 
partner Greg Mittag, who knows deeply what it means to live with and be uniquely and 
wholeheartedly able to support a loved one living with a disabling chronic illness while 
pursuing a doctorate, which he has accepted willingly and with kindness, and for which I 
will be forever grateful.
x 
 
 
 
This research was partially funded through the generous support of the following 
institutions, to which I am grateful:  
 
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Doctoral Fellowship, University of 
Victoria President’s Research Scholarship, the BC Health Research Foundation 
Studentship Grant, the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research/BC Medical 
Services Foundation Doctoral Trainee Award, the Ord & Linda Anderson 
Interdisciplinary Scholarship, University of Victoria Interdisciplinary Fellowship, the 
Coast Capital Citizenship Award, University of Victoria Graduate Teaching Awards (2), 
Leslie and Kaye Jowett Memorial Scholarship (for disabled graduate students), Ray 
Hadfield Memorial Fellowship, Canadian Career Development Foundation Leadership 
Scholarship (Stu Conger Award), and The Hospital for Sick Children Alumnae 
Association Hilda Rolstin Memorial Award (first recipient).
Description:dissertation reveals how I have exercised a certain level of risk in responding to one governing institution  disallow their full disability benefit (at the time, $461.42 plus $325 shelter maximum,. $786 total  done extensive reiki training—I am a reiki master—and my reiki master, she had the b