Table Of Content$25.00
ISBN 978-0-292-79143-5
,!7IA2J2-hjbedf!:p;M;p;k;K
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 1 # 1
DINARCHUS, HYPERIDES, AND LYCURGUS
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 2 # 2
THE ORATORY OF CLASSICAL GREECE
TranslatedwithNotes (cid:1) MichaelGagarin,SeriesEditor
volume 5
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 3 # 3
D I N A RC H U S,
H Y P E R I D E S, A N D
LY C U RG U S
Translated by Ian Worthington,
Craig R. Cooper, & Edward M. Harris
university of texas press, austin
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 4 # 4
(cid:1)
Copyright 2001bytheUniversityofTexasPress
Allrightsreserved
PrintedintheUnitedStatesofAmerica
Firstedition,2001
Requestsforpermissiontoreproducematerialfrom
thisworkshouldbesenttoPermissions,University
ofTexasPress,Box7819,Austin,TX78713-7819.
(cid:2)(cid:1) Thepaperusedinthisbookmeetstheminimum
ansi/nisoz r
requirementsof 39.48-1992( 1997)
(PermanenceofPaper).
LibraryofCongressCataloging-in-PublicationData
Dinarchus,Hyperides,andLycurgus/translatedby
IanWorthington,CraigR.Cooper&EdwardM.
Harris.
p. cm.—(TheoratoryofclassicalGreece
v.5)
Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex.
isbn
0-292-79142-9(hardcover:alk.paper)—
isbn
0-292-79143-7(pbk.:alk.paper)
1.Speeches,addresses,etc.,Greek—Translations
intoEnglish. 2.Dinarchus—Translationsinto
English. 3.Hyperides—TranslationsintoEnglish.
4.Lycurgus—TranslationsintoEnglish. I.Worth-
ington,Ian. II.Cooper,CraigR.(CraigRichard),
1960– III.Harris,EdwardMonroe. IV.Title.
V.Series.
pa d
3633. 56 2001
(cid:3)
885 .0108—dc21 00-012082
Thisbookhasbeensupportedbyanendowment
dedicatedtoclassicsandtheancientworld,funded
bygrantsfromtheNationalEndowmentforthe
Humanities,theGladysKriebleDelmasFounda-
tion,theJamesR.Dougherty,Jr.Foundation,and
theRachaelandBenVaughanFoundation,andby
giftsfromMarkandJoAnnFinley,LucyShoe
Meritt,AnneByrdNalle,andotherindividual
donors.
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 5 # 5
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments vii
SeriesIntroduction ix
OratoryinClassicalAthens ix
TheOrators xii
TheWorksoftheOrators xv
GovernmentandLawinClassicalAthens xvii
TheTranslationofGreekOratory xxiv
Abbreviations xxv
NoteonCurrency xxv
BibliographyofWorksCited xxvi
SupplementaryBibliographyforVolume5 xxvii
DINARCHUS(IanWorthington) 1
IntroductiontoDinarchus 3
Bibliography 10
1.AgainstDemosthenes 11
2.AgainstAristogeiton 45
3.AgainstPhilocles 53
HYPERIDES(CraigR.Cooper) 59
IntroductiontoHyperides 61
1.InDefenseofLycophron 69
2.AgainstPhilippides 80
3.AgainstAthenogenes 87
4.OnBehalfofEuxenippus 102
5.AgainstDemosthenes 115
6.TheFuneralOration 128
Fragments 137
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 6 # 6
dinarchus, hyperides, & lycurgus
vi
LYCURGUS(EdwardM.Harris) 153
IntroductiontoLycurgus 155
1.AgainstLeocrates 159
Fragments 204
Index 219
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 7 # 7
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ThisisthefifthvolumeinaseriesoftranslationsofTheOratoryof
Classical Greece. The aim of the series is to make availableprimarily
for those who do not read Greek up-to-date, accurate, and readable
translationswithintroductionsandexplanatorynotesofallthesurviv-
ing works and major fragments of the Attic orators of the classical
bc
period (ca. 420–320 ): Aeschines, Andocides, Antiphon, Demos-
thenes,Dinarchus,Hyperides,Isaeus,Isocrates,Lycurgus,andLysias.
Thisvolumeisdevotedtoatriooforators,Dinarchus,Hyperides,and
Lycurgus, who together represent a good range of the materialfrom
thelastdecadesofourperiod.
Onbehalfofallthetranslators,IwouldliketothankAlanBoege-
hold,whoreadthevolumeforthePressandmademanyhelpfulcom-
mentsandsuggestions.Letmealsoacknowledgeonceagainthehelp
and support of the University of Texas Press, especially Director
Joanna Hitchcock, Humanities Editor Jim Burr, Managing Editor
CarolynWylie,andCopyeditorNancyMoore.
—M.G.
Forthis,myswansongonDinarchusIwouldthink,IthankMichael
Gagarin for his comments and eye for detail and also mywifeTracy
forhercontinuedsupport.
—I.W.
Iwouldliketoextendmythankstomycolleaguesandfriendsinthe
Department of Classics at the UniversityofWinnipegfortheircon-
tinued support and especially to Michael Gagarin for the manysug-
gestionshemadetoimprovethistranslation.
—C.R.C.
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 8 # 8
dinarchus, hyperides, & lycurgus
viii
IwouldliketothankmyfriendFrederickNaidenforreadingoverthe
entiretranslationwithasharpeyeandsavingmefromseveralmistakes
andMichaelGagarinforhiscarefulattentiontoeachandeveryword
of the translation. In a day when philological expertise is rare, he
maintainedthehigheststandardsofourprofession.
—E.M.H.
Name /T1613/T1613_FM 05/01/01 06:54AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 9 # 9
SERIES INTRODUCTION
GreekOratory
By MichaelGagarin
oratory in classical athens
From as early as Homer (and undoubtedly much earlier) the
Greeksplacedahighvalueoneffectivespeaking.EvenAchilles,whose
greatnesswasprimarilyestablishedonthebattlefield,wasbroughtup
to be ‘‘a speaker of words and a doer of deeds’’ (Iliad 9.443); and
Athenian leaders of the sixth and fifth centuries,1 such as Solon,
Themistocles,andPericles,wereallaccomplishedorators.MostGreek
literary genres—notably epic, tragedy, and history—underscorethe
importance of oratory by their inclusion of set speeches.Theformal
pleadingsoftheenvoystoAchillesintheIliad,themessengerspeeches
in tragedy reporting events like the battle of Salamis in Aeschylus’
PersiansorthegruesomedeathofPentheusinEuripides’Bacchae,and
thepowerfulpoliticaloratoryofPericles’funeralorationinThucydi-
desarebutafewofthemostnotableexamplesoftheGreeks’never-
ending fascination with formal public speaking, which was to reach
itsheightinthepublicoratoryofthefourthcentury.
In early times, oratory was not a specialized subject of study but
waslearnedbypracticeandexample.Theformalstudyofrhetoricas
an‘‘art’’(techn¯e)began,wearetold,inthemiddleofthefifthcentury
inSicilywiththeworkofCoraxandhispupilTisias.2Thesetwoare
1All dates in this volume are bc unless the contrary is either indicated or
obvious.
2SeeKennedy1963:26–51.Cole1991haschallengedthistraditionalpicture,
arguingthattheterm‘‘rhetoric’’wascoinedbyPlatotodesignateanddenigrate
anactivityhestronglyopposed.Cole’sownreconstructionisnotwithoutprob-
