Table Of ContentStocks & Commodities V. 9:6 (237-238): Comparing Indicators: Stochastics %K versus Williams' %R by Thom Hartle
Comparing Indicators: Stochastics %K versus
Williams' %R
by Thom Hartle
I
ronically, technicians today suffer from overabundance. Compared with the dearth of only a few years
ago, technical analysis packages today offer so many indicators that a trader can be overwhelmed. As a
consequence, building a trading system based on an array of technical indicators requires painstaking
investigation to assure that each indicator is appropriate for the task in question. A typical trading system,
for instance, could have long, intermediate- and short-term indicators intended to produce trading signals
with different time horizons. Now, many indicators have demonstrated unique rates of success for
individual markets for different time horizons. On one hand, a simple moving average is a good indicator
of the direction of a intermediate- to long-term trend, but it is ill-suited to forewarn of a possible reversal.
On the other hand, an oscillator will alert a trader of a loss of momentum setting the stage for a reversal,
but it will produce ineffective signals regarding the trend, perhaps signaling reversals while the trend
continues. The choice of technical studies can confuse more than enlight.
DOUBLE, DOUBLE
One problem arising from a surfeit of indicators is the possibility of two different indicators duplicating
signals. An example of this situation is the application of the stochastics indicator (%K) and Williams'
%R. Both indicators are overbought/oversold oscillators. In fact, both of these oscillators observe the
same thing.
(The stochastics oscillator has two components: %K and %D. Our concern here is directed toward %K,
because %D is simply a three-day smoothed version of the %K and not germane to the comparison of the
stochastics %K and Williams' %R.)
Article Text Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc. 1
Stocks & Commodities V. 9:6 (237-238): Comparing Indicators: Stochastics %K versus Williams' %R by Thom Hartle
The formula for the stochastics %K is:
(cid:230) C-L (cid:246)
%K=100(cid:231) 5 (cid:247)
Ł H -L ł
5 5
Where
C = Today's close
L5 = Lowest low in the last five trading days
H5 = Highest high in the last five trading days
Here, the value of the current close is compared with the lowest low in the last five trading days. Then the
difference between the highest high and lowest low of the last five trading days are determined. These
differences form a ratio that reflects a percentage of the closing price in relationship to the trading range
of the last five days. This percentage value is then multiplied by 100 to calculate %K.
The formula for the %R is:
(cid:230) H -C (cid:246)
%R=100=(cid:231) 5 (cid:247)
Ł H -L ł
5 5
Where
C = Today's close
L5 = Lowest low in the last five trading days
H5 = Highest high in the last five trading days
The difference between the ratios determined in the %K and %R
are inverse: %K compares the close to the lowest low, while %R
compares the close to the highest high.
I
n this equation, the close is compared with the highest high for the last five trading days. The
denominator is the same as in the formula for the stochastics %K, the highest high in the last five trading
days minus the lowest low in the last five trading days.
The difference between the ratios determined in the %K and %R are inverse: %K compares the close to
the lowest low, while %R compares the close to the highest high (Figure 1). The same high-low price
range is used for both indicators, and the only difference is that %K compares the close to the low, while
%R compares the close to the high. If you use the same n for the lookback period in calculating the two
indicators, you should produce the same graphs (Figure 2). Obviously, it's overkill to use both these
indicators for one task. You don't need two different technical studies telling you the same thing.
Diligent market participants need to look hard at the selected indicators to aid in trading decisions. Each
indicator should stand up to scrutiny based on its individual merits. There must be a balance between
Article Text Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc. 2
Stocks & Commodities V. 9:6 (237-238): Comparing Indicators: Stochastics %K versus Williams' %R by Thom Hartle
having too many indicators and not enough.
Thom Hartle is the Editor of STOCKS & COMMODITIES.
FIGURE 1: Both %K and %R determine where the current close is relative to the recent trading range.
The stochastic %K uses the difference between the close and the low, while %R uses the difference
between the close and the high. Consequently, the two indicators are the inverse of each other.
Figures Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc. 3
Stocks & Commodities V. 9:6 (237-238): Comparing Indicators: Stochastics %K versus Williams' %R by Thom Hartle
FIGURE 2: The upper chart is the daily bar chart of the June bond contract. The middle chart is the
five-day %K and the lower chart is the five-day %R Simple observation demonstrates that the two
indicators are the same. (Slight plotting differences are due to computer rounding.)
Figures Copyright (c) Technical Analysis Inc. 4
