Comparative anti-terrorism law and national security law

2006·0.24 MB·English

by  Roach, Kent

Y
R
A
R
B
LI

W
A
L

N
KI
S
A
L
A
R
O
B
COMPARATIVE ANTI-TERRORISM LAW
AND
NATIONAL SECURITY LAW
VOLUME 2
Professor Kent Roach
2006
Faculty of Law
University of Toronto

Comparative Anti-Terrorism and National Security Law
Professor Roach
[email protected]
416 946 5645
Table of Contents: Volume 2
6. American Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy
Patriot Act. 1
John Whitehead and Stephen Aden “Forfeiting ‘Enduring Freedom for Homeland
Security’” (2002) 51 American University Law Review 326, pp 1081-1133 .33
Ronald Dworkin “The Threat to Patriotism” New York Review of Books Feb 28, 2003
pp. 1-10.60
Ronald Dworkin “Terror and the Attack on Civil Liberties”, pp. 1-11.70
Rasul v. Bush.81
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.85
Hamdan v. United States.87
Roach and Trotter “Miscarriages of Justice in Terrorism Cases” (2005) 109 Penn. State
L.Rev., pp. 967-1041.107
Expert Reports from the Arar Commission.149
New York Times extracts.217
William Banks “United States Response to September 11”.235
7. Australia and New Zealand
George Williams “The rule of Law and the regulation of terrorism in Australia and New
Zealand,” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy.245
Human Rights Defender.255
Anti-Terrorism Bill (no 2) of 2005 (Aust).277
8. Singapore and Malaysia
Internal Security Act.345
Victor Ramraj “Terrorism, Security and Rights: A New Dialogue” [2002] Singapore
Journal of Legal Studies 1..353
Michael Hor “Terrorism and the Criminal Law: Singapore’s Solution” [2002] Singapore
Journal of Legal Studies 30, 30-55..361
Therese Lee “Malaysia and the Internal Security Act” [2002] Singapore Journal of Legal
Studies 56, pp. 56-72.374
9. Hong Kong and China
Young “Enacting security laws in Hong Kong”in Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy,
pp. 368-395.383
Roach ‘Old and New Visions of Security: Article 23 Compared to Post-September 11
Security Laws” in Hualing, Petersen and Young eds National Security and Fundamental
Freedoms (Hong Kong University Press, 2005), pp. 119-148.397
Fu Hualing “Counter-Revolutionaries, Subversives and Terrorists: China’s Evolving
National Security Law” in National Security and Fundamental Freedoms.413
10. Indonesia
Indonesian Anti-Terrorism Law.428
Leonard Sebastian “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Regulatons”.443
Hikmahanto Juwana “Indonesia’s Anti-Terrorism Law” in Global Anti-Terrorism Law
and Policy.446
Kent Roach “Some Eastern and Western Responses to September 11” in A. Sajo Militant
Democracy (Eleventh Publishing, 2005), 171-207.453
11. India and Arab states
Prevention of Terrorism Act of 2002 at
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/POTA.htm
Repeal of Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2004 at
http://\y\v\v.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/PTO.htm
Unlawful Activities Act, 2004 at
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/the unlawful
activities amendord2004.htm
Unlawful Activities Act, 1967 at
http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/india/document/actandordinances/the_unlawful_
activities_act 1967.htm
V. Vijayakumar, “Legal and institution responses to terrorism in Indian, in Global Anti-
Terrorism Law and Policy, pp. 351- 367...490
C. Raj Kumar “Human Rights Implications of National Security Laws in India” (2005)
33 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 195, pp. 1-32.499
Chris Gagne “POTA Lessons Learned From India’s Anti-Terror Act” (2005) 25 Boston
College Third World Law Journal 261.531
Lynn Welchman “Rocks, hard places and human rights: anti-terrorism law and policy in
Arab states, Global Anti-Terrorism Law and Policy pp. 581-608.576
12. South Africa
Protection of Constitutional Democracy Act, 2004.591
Cathy Powell “Terrorism and Governance in South and Eastern Africa “ in Global Anti-
Terrorism Law and Policy.611
Kent Roach “A Comparison of South African and Canadian Anti-Terrorism Legislation”
(2005) South African Journal of Criminal Justice.624