Table Of ContentBeneath
the
Arches:
Re-‐appropriating
the
Spaces
of
Infrastructure
in
Manchester
A
thesis
submitted
to
the
University
of
Manchester
for
the
degree
of
Doctor
of
Philosophy
in
the
Faculty
of
Humanities
2013
Brian
Rosa
Department
of
Geography
School
of
Environment,
Education
and
Development
Table
of
Contents
Table
of
Contents
...................................................................................................................
2
Table
of
Figures
......................................................................................................................
7
Appendices
............................................................................................................................
13
List
of
Acronyms
and
Abbreviations
.............................................................................
14
Abstract
...................................................................................................................................
15
Declaration
............................................................................................................................
16
Copyright
Statement
...........................................................................................................
16
Acknowledgements
.............................................................................................................
17
Chapter
1:
Introduction
.....................................................................................................
18
Chapter
2:
The
Tension
of
Fixity
and
Motion:
Theorising
Urban
Infrastructure
from
the
Ground
Up
............................................................................................................
30
2.1
Introduction
........................................................................................................................
30
2.2
Theorising
Urban
Infrastructure:
Relational
Conceptualisations
....................
31
2.3
Grounding
Infrastructure:
Spaces
and
Landscapes
of
Infrastructure
as
a
Distinctive
Category
.....................................................................................................................
34
2.3.1
Indeterminacy
and
the
Residual
Spaces
of
Infrastructure
........................................
38
2.4
Analysing
the
Social
Production
of
the
Urban
Built
Environment:
Political
and
Symbolic
Economy
...............................................................................................................
40
2.4.1
Landscape
and
Symbolic
Economy
......................................................................................
44
2.5
Conclusion,
Or,
What
it
Means
to
Rethink
Infrastructure
from
Below
............
48
Chapter
3:
Exploring
the
Discursive
Production
of
the
Built
Environment:
A
Mixed-‐Method,
Case
Study
Approach
...........................................................................
50
3.1
Introduction
........................................................................................................................
50
3.2
A
Mixed
Method,
Case
Study
Approach
......................................................................
51
3.2.1
Critical
Discourse
Analysis
......................................................................................................
52
3.3
Interpretive
Context:
The
Southern
Fringe
of
Manchester
as
a
Case
Study
..
55
3.4
Methods
of
Data
Collection
.............................................................................................
58
2
3.4.1
Preliminary
Desk
Research
.....................................................................................................
59
3.4.2
‘Helicopter
Interviews’
..............................................................................................................
59
3.4.3
Archival
Research
........................................................................................................................
60
3.4.4
Semi-‐Structured
Interviews
with
‘Key
Players’
..............................................................
62
3.4.5
Interviews
and
informal
discussions
with
owners,
employees
and
patrons
of
businesses
operating
from
railway
arches
......................................................................................
68
3.4.6
Visual
Methods:
Photographic
Surveys
..............................................................................
70
3.4.7
Ethnographic
Research
.............................................................................................................
71
3.5
Methods
of
Data
Analysis
................................................................................................
72
3.6
Limitations
...........................................................................................................................
74
3.7
Conclusion
............................................................................................................................
76
Chapter
4:
The
Spatial
Impacts
and
Social
Costs
of
the
Elevated
Railway
in
Industrial
Manchester:
1830
to
1945
...........................................................................
77
4.1
Introduction
........................................................................................................................
77
4.2
“Like
a
Spider’s
Web”:
The
Railway
and
Urbanisation
in
Manchester,
1830-‐
1899
78
4.3
Creative
Destruction:
On
the
Railways
‘Smashing
their
Way
Through’
Manchester
.....................................................................................................................................
81
4.3.1
The
Destructiveness
of
the
Railway:
Slum
Clearance
as
Elite
Consensus
...........
85
4.4
Railways
and
the
Mutual
Constitution
of
Slums
and
Suburbs
............................
90
4.5
Railway
Viaducts
and
their
Aftermath:
The
Southern
Fringe
of
Manchester
and
the
Persistence
of
Dereliction,
1835-‐1945
..................................................................
93
4.5.1
The
Construction
of
the
MSJ
Viaduct
...................................................................................
93
4.5.2
Confirming
Dereliction
and
Stagnant
Property
Values
...............................................
96
4.5.3
‘Improvements’
of
the
Late
1800s
as
Proto-‐‘Regeneration’
Strategies
................
98
4.5.4
The
1945
Nicholas
Plan
.........................................................................................................
102
4.6
Conclusion
..........................................................................................................................
104
Chapter
5:
Underneath
the
Arches:
Cultural
Representations
of
Urban
Railway
Viaducts
and
their
Arches
.............................................................................
105
5.1
Introduction
......................................................................................................................
105
5.2
Viaducts
as
Scenography:
From
the
Infrastructural
Sublime
to
Banal
Backdrops
(and
Back
Again)
..................................................................................................
106
3
5.2.1
Backdrop
to
Working
Class
Life
.........................................................................................
113
5.3
Looking
Down
on
the
City
.............................................................................................
118
5.4
Beneath
the
Arches:
The
Underside
of
Modernity
...............................................
121
5.4.1
The
Lock-‐up:
Dodgy
Dealings
and
the
Workingman’s
Milieu
................................
126
5.4.2
The
Urban
Gothic
......................................................................................................................
131
5.5
Commodifying
a
Negative
Image
................................................................................
133
5.6
This
City
Wall
....................................................................................................................
136
5.7
Conclusion
..........................................................................................................................
137
Chapter
6:
Railway
Viaducts
as
Monuments:
Heritage,
Design,
and
Revalorisation
in
Castlefield,
Manchester
...............................................................
139
6.1
Introduction
......................................................................................................................
139
6.2
The
Rise
of
Industrial
Heritage
...................................................................................
140
6.3
Castlefield
...........................................................................................................................
144
6.4
1967-‐1978:
The
Rising
Cultural
Value
of
Castlefield
as
a
Heritage
Landscape
147
6.5
1978-‐1988:
The
Emergence
of
a
New
Tourist
Landscape
..................................
149
6.6
1988-‐1996:
Commodifying
the
Heritage
Landscape:
The
Central
Manchester
Development
Corporation
and
the
Reimaging
of
the
Castlefield
Basin
...................
154
6.7
1996-‐Present:
The
Limits
of
Heritage
and
‘Killing
Castlefield’
........................
165
6.8
Discussion:
Castlefield
and
the
Contradictions
of
Treating
Infrastructure
as
Heritage
.........................................................................................................................................
172
Chapter
7:
From
Reluctant
Rentiers
to
Structural
Speculators:
Railway
Arches
as
Property
Estate
............................................................................................................
177
7.1
Introduction
......................................................................................................................
177
7.2
The
Ownership
of
Railway
Arches
in
Manchester
................................................
178
7.3
Railway
Arches:
Residual
Spaces
of
Infrastructure
as
Commercial
Property
180
7.4
Changing
Ownership
Regimes,
Management
Strategies,
and
Public
Sector
Intervention
in
Manchester’s
Railway
Arches
..................................................................
182
7.4.1
1969-‐1985:
Shedding
Surplus
Property
and
Entering
the
Market
....................
183
7.4.2
1985-‐1993:
Refurbishment
and
Industrial
Upgrading
............................................
184
4
7.5
Making
Spacia:
Privatisation
and
Strategic
Shifts
of
Railway
Arch
Management,
1993-‐2002
.........................................................................................................
190
7.5.1
Network
Rail:
From
Reluctant
Rentier
to
Structural
Speculator
(and
Back
Again):
2002-‐present
..............................................................................................................................
193
7.5.1.1
Examining
the
Slowdown
of
Railway
Arch
Refurbishment
............................................
195
7.6
Conclusion
..........................................................................................................................
197
Chapter
8:
Infrastructure
as
Barrier
to
Commercial
Expansion:
Reinventing
Gaythorn
..............................................................................................................................
200
8.1
Introduction
......................................................................................................................
200
8.2
Where
is
the
City
Centre
and
Why
Does
it
Need
to
Expand?
.............................
201
8.2.1
The
Imperative
for
Growth:
Economic
Restructuring
and
Neoliberal
Expansionism
.............................................................................................................................................
203
8.3
Reinventing
Gaythorn:
Attempts
to
Create
“A
New
City
Centre
Neighbourhood”
on
the
“Wrong
Side
of
the
Tracks”
.......................................................
208
8.3.1
Introducing
the
Site
.................................................................................................................
208
8.4
A
Barrier
to
Whom
(and
What)?
The
Permeability
Fix
......................................
231
8.5
Conclusion
..........................................................................................................................
234
Chapter
9:
Narrating
the
Symbolic
Economy
of
Railway
Arches:
From
Industrial
Gentrification
to
Post-‐Industrial
Aestheticisation
...........................
237
9.1
Introduction
......................................................................................................................
237
9.2
Contextualising
Gentrification
....................................................................................
239
9.2.1
The
Specificity
of
Industrial
Gentrification
....................................................................
241
9.3
Industrial
Displacement
as
Entrepreneurial
State
Strategy:
Tracing
Policy
in
Manchester
...................................................................................................................................
243
9.3.1
From
Industrial
Displacement
to
Industrial
Gentrification
...................................
245
9.4
The
Central
Role
of
Culture
and
Aestheticisation
in
the
Invention
of
the
Post-‐
Industrial
Railway
Arch
............................................................................................................
247
9.4.1
The
Countercultural
Narrative
of
the
Corridor’s
Reinvention
..............................
249
9.4.2
Competing
Images
of
Transgression,
Pacification,
and
Indoctrination
of
Culture
along
WSW
..................................................................................................................................................
257
9.4.3
Consuming
the
Postindustrial
Aesthetic:
Loft
Living
and
Railway
Arch
Chic
(1993-‐2003)
...............................................................................................................................................
261
5
9.5
The
Height
of
Railway
Arch
Chic
and
the
Rise
of
the
‘Independents’
.............
267
9.6
The
Shift
from
the
“Independents”
to
the
“Corporates”
and
the
Mainstreaming
of
the
Corridor:
2002-‐2011
......................................................................
274
9.7
A
New
Wave
of
Industrial
Gentrification?
2011-‐present
..................................
278
9.8
Conclusions
........................................................................................................................
283
Chapter
10:
Conclusions
.................................................................................................
285
10.1
Results
and
Key
Contributions
.................................................................................
285
10.2
Limitations
......................................................................................................................
291
10.3
Areas
for
Further
Research:
Striking
a
Chord
.....................................................
293
Bibliography
.......................................................................................................................
296
Word
Count:
87,414
6
Table
of
Figures
Figure
1:
Map
of
Manchester
city
centre
and
its
elevated
railway
infrastructure,
including
the
boundaries
of
the
study
area
in
relation
to
the
boundaries
of
the
Central
Manchester
Development
Corporation,
2013.
Image
source:
Graham
Bowden,
University
of
Manchester
Cartographic
Unit.
____
56
Figure
2:
Map
of
three
case
study
sub-‐areas
within
southern
fringe
study
area,
2013.
Image
source:
Graham
Bowden,
University
of
Manchester
Cartographic
Unit.
___________________________________________
58
Figure
3:
Table
of
interviewees
and
their
institutional
positions
_________________________________________
67
Figure
4:
The
Manchester
railway
network,
1910.
Image
source:
Railway
Clearing
House.
___________
81
Figure
5:
Workers
constructing
railway
viaducts,
1903.
Image
source:
transportarchive.org.uk
_____
81
Figure
6:
“Railway
Engineering,
Victoria
Railway
Arch,”
1850.
Image
source:
Local
Image
Collection,
MCC.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
84
Figure
7:
“The
Stockport
Viaduct,
just
south
of
Manchester,”
1910.
Often
considered
the
largest
brick
structure
in
Europe,
this
viaduct
was
constructed
by
the
Manchester
&
Birmingham
Railway
from
1837
to
1840.
Image
source:
Greater
Manchester
County
Records
Office.
_____________________________________
84
Figure
8:
A
cropped
selection
from
1904
map
of
housing
conditions.
Grey
signifies
business
premises,
while
the
conditions
of
housing
are
represented
in
a
gradient
from
dark
brown
to
yellow
(dark
brown
being
slums).
Image
source:
Marr
(1904).
_________________________________________________________________
88
Figure
9:
“Duke
St.,
Brick
arch
railway
bridge,”
1900.
Terraced
housing
backing
up
to
the
MSJ
viaduct
in
Castlefield,
with
viaduct
leading
to
Central
Station
passing
above.
Image
source:
Local
Image
Collection,
MCC.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
89
Figure
10:
“Ivy
Street,
near
Liverpool
Road,”
1900.
Image
source:
Local
Image
Collection,
MCC.
_____
89
Figure
11:
“Models
of
Manchester:
Faucher,
Engels
and
Marr
(based
on
information
in
Faucher,
1969;
Engels,
1969;
Marr,
1904).”
Image
source:
Dennis
1984,
p.82.
___________________________________________
92
Figure
12:
Housing
clustered
around
the
MSJ
viaduct
two
years
after
its
completion,
1851.
Image
source:
Ordnance
Survey.
____________________________________________________________________________________
95
Figure
13:
“Bugle
Street
off
Gaythorne
[sic]
St.,
Knott
Mill,”
1896.
Due
to
note
on
bottom
left,
it
appears
that
this
image
was
created
as
a
record
for
city
council
as
part
of
the
compulsory
purchase
process.
Image
source:
Greater
Manchester
County
Records
Office.
_____________________________________
99
Figure
14:
A.
Bradburn,
“Canals,
Rochdale
Canal,
looking
towards
central
station
city,
Manchester,”
1902.
Image
depicts
the
demolition
of
houses
along
Rochdale
Canal
associated
with
the
creation
of
WSW.
Image
source:
Local
Image
Collection,
MCC.
______________________________________________________
100
Figure
15:
Zoomed
selection
from
Marr’s
map
of
slums
in
Manchester.
Brown
represents
slum
housing,
with
the
MSJ
viaduct
and
Central
Station
at
the
top.
Image
source:
Marr,
1904.
______________________
102
Figure
16:
“New
Iron
Railway
Viaduct
at
Manchester,”
1851.
Original
description
from
the
Illustrated
London
News
reads
“This
stupendous
Viaduct
…carries
the
railway
traffic
over
the
good-‐station
of
7
those
Companies,
with
which
it
communicates
by
hoists.
It
consists
of
an
immense
platform…
supported
by
large
cast-‐iron
girders
resting
on
Doric
columns.”
Image
source:
http://www.victorianweb.org/periodicals/iln/26.html.
________________________________________________
109
Figure
17:
S.G.
Hughes,
after
T.T.
Bury.
“Entrance
Into
Manchester
Across
Water
Street,”
1831.
Image
source:
Science
&
Society
Picture
Library,
image
No.
10302187.
_______________________________________
109
Figure
18:
Image
from
1945
Nicholas
Plan
exemplifying
the
dreariness
of
railway
viaducts.
Image
source:
Nicholas
(1945).
__________________________________________________________________________________
111
Figure
19:
John
Phillips.
“52438
leads
the
Old
Manchester
Railtour
Around
the
Ardwick
Jn-‐Midland
Jn
Curve,”
1956.
Image
source:
http://flickr.com/photos/72213853@N03/6956300260/.
_____________
113
Figure
20:
Auguste
Valette.
“York
Street
Leading
to
Charles
Street,”
1913.
Image
source:
Manchester
Art
Gallery.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
115
Figure
21:
L.S.
Lowry,
“The
Viaduct,
Store
Street,
Manchester,”
1929.
The
mill
and
chimney
in
the
background,
as
well
as
the
viaduct
itself,
have
since
been
demolished.
Image
source:
Manchester
City
Art
Gallery.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
116
Figure
22:
L.S.
Lowry,
“The
Viaduct,
Stockport,”
1969-‐1972.
Image
source:
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/images/work/P/P03/P03279_10.jpg
____________________________________
117
Figure
23:
Gustave
Doré,
“Over
London
by
Rail,”
1872.
Image
source:
Science
&
Society
Picture
Library.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
120
Figure
24:
Augustus
Egg.
“Past
and
Present,
No.
3,”
1858.
Image
source:
http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/egg-‐past-‐and-‐present-‐no-‐3-‐n03280.
__________________________
123
Figure
25:
1932
Cover
of
Flanagan
and
Allen
sheet
music
published
by
Campbell,
Connelly
&
Co.
Ltd,
reused
under
fair
use
under
United
States
copyright
law.
Image
Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Underneath_the_Arches_sheet_music.jpg
_________________________
124
Figure
26:
Alf
Tupper
helps
a
man
with
a
broken-‐down
lorry.
Image
source:
http://www.toughofthetrack.net/
________________________________________________________________________
128
Figure
27:
“The
Other
Side
of
the
Street.”
A
map
of
Coronation
Street’s
imaginary
geography
in
1975.
Image
source:
Corriepedia
http://coronationstreet.wikia.com/wiki/File:Coronation-‐street-‐map-‐
1975.jpg
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
130
Figure
28:
Scene
from
crime
scene
investigation
in
Prime
Suspect.
Image
source:
screen
capture
by
Brian
Rosa.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
132
Figure
29:
Screen
capture
from
Network
Rail
Property’s
Location
Library
website.
Image
source:
http://filming.networkrail.co.uk/locationlibrary.aspx.
_________________________________________________
134
Figure
30
Screen
capture
from
Network
Rail
Property’s
Location
Library.
Image
source:
http://filming.networkrail.co.uk/locationlibrary/backbromleystreet.aspx?t=1&theme_22=on.
_____
135
Figure
31:
Image
from
Peel
Location
Guide.
Image
source:
Peel
(2011).
______________________________
136
8
Figure
32:
1889
Goad
insurance
map
of
the
Castlefield
Basin.
Image
source:
Digital
Archives
Association
CD-‐ROM,
accessed
at
the
Map
Library
of
the
John
Rylands
University
Library,
Manchester.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
144
Figure
33:
“Rochdale
Canal,”
1974.
Image
source:
Salford
Local
History
Library.
http://www.transportarchive.org.uk/getobject.php?rnum=T2384&searchitem=manchester&mtv=T2&
pnum=7.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
149
Figure
34:
Aerial
photograph
of
Castlefield,
1989.
Image
source:
Royal
Commission
on
the
Historic
Monuments
of
England,
courtesy
of
the
Greater
Manchester
Archaeological
Unit.
____________________
153
Figure
35:
An
illustrated
aerial
view
of
Castlefield’s
future
landscape,
1989.
Image
source:
LDR
International/CMDC
(1989).
______________________________________________________________________________
154
Figure
36:
Map
of
Castlefield,
including
railway
lines
and
the
boundaries
of
the
Conservation
area
and
Urban
Heritage
Park,
1998.
Image
source:
Gibson
and
Hardman
(1998,
p.42).
_______________________
155
Figure
37:
Recommendation
for
railway
arch
infill
from
Design
Guidelines.
Image
source:
LDR
International/CMDC
(1989).
______________________________________________________________________________
157
Figure
38:
Pedestrian
movement
diagram
in
Liverpool
Road
Environmental
Improvement
Strategy,
1990.
Image
source:
DEGW/CMDC
(1990).
_____________________________________________________________
159
Figure
39:
Illustration
of
possible
choices
for
viaduct
signage
in
a
Castlefield
branding
exercise,
1994.
Image
source:
L&R
Leisure
(1994)
________________________________________________________________________
160
Figure
40:
Castlefield
Junction,
viewed
from
a
train
window,
1990.
Note
the
signage
for
the
Southern
&
Darwent
timber
merchants,
who
were
soon
to
be
displaced
from
their
canal
side
location.
Image
source:
Derek
Brumhead.
__________________________________________________________________________________
161
Figure
41:
Executives
from
the
CMDC
reviewing
their
model
of
Castlefield’s
future,
1989.
Image
source:
CMDC
(1990a).
____________________________________________________________________________________
162
Figure
42:
A
new
viaduct
for
the
Metrolink
tram
clad
in
‘fake’
brick
arches,
2010.
Image
source:
Brian
Rosa.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
164
Figure
43:
Map
from
1998
Castlefield
Guide.
Image
source:
Law
(2007).
_____________________________
165
Figure
44:
The
Twisted
Med,
the
café-‐bar
that
succeed
Barça
at
Catalan
Square,
2010.
Image
source:
Brian
Rosa.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
167
Figure
45:
Recommendations
on
the
visual
framing
of
Castlefield’s
viaducts
in
the
Water
Street
Strategic
Regeneration
Framework,
2010.
Image
source:
AECOM
et.al.
(2010).
______________________
174
Figure
46:
A
Typical
Railway
Arch
Cross-‐section.
Image
source:
Hendey
(1987).
____________________
178
Figure
47:
An
example
of
an
un-‐refurbished
lock-‐up
in
one
of
the
“scruffy
bits”:
Ardwick,
Manchester,
2010.
Image
source:
Brian
Rosa.
_________________________________________________________________________
182
Figure
48:
1985
BRPB
ad.
Image
source:
Glasgow
Herald
(1985).
____________________________________
186
Figure
49:
The
Spacia
conversion
of
an
auto
repair
garage
into
a
letting
agency,
2000.
Image
source:
Len
Grant.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
192
9
Figure
50:
Cover
of
Spacia
Corporate
Overview,
approximately
2006.
Image
source:
Spacia
(no
date).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
193
Figure
51:
Breakdown
of
Spacia’s
commercial
properties
by
rental
values
and
occupier
type,
circa
approximately
2006.
Most,
but
not
all,
of
these
properties
are
railway
arches.
Image
source:
Spacia
(no
date).
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
194
Figure
52:
The
description
and
visual
imagery
of
railway
viaducts
as
boundaries
in
the
City
Centre
Map.
Source:
City
and
Council
Borough
of
Manchester
(1967).
________________________________________
202
Figure
53:
The
entire
area
of
the
city
centre
between
the
MSJ
viaduct
and
the
Mancunian
Way
were
exclusively
of
industrial
and
distribution-‐based
land
uses,
with
the
exception
of
the
educational
precincts
and
new
BBC
headquarters
on
Oxford
Road
and
the
newly
built
University
of
Manchester
Institute
of
Science
and
Technology
campus.
Equally
striking
is
the
clarity
in
which
the
railway
viaducts
hemmed
in
the
zones
of
shopping,
offices,
and
recreational
and
cultural
uses
of
the
city
centre.
Image
Source:
City
and
Council
Borough
of
Manchester
(1967).
_______________________________________
203
Figure
54:
An
image
of
Manchester
City
Centre’s
‘Evolving
Central
Core’
as
consensually
agreed
by
MCC,
property
developers,
architects
and
surveyors
as
presented
in
the
2008
Whitworth
Street
West
Strategic
Regeneration
Framework.
The
MSJ
viaduct
is
the
curving
black
line
at
the
southern
edge
of
the
2008
central
core.
Unfortunately,
the
image
in
the
publicly
available
PDF
is
of
low
resolution.
Source:
HKR
Architects
et
al.
(2008).
____________________________________________________________________
207
Figure
55:
“Aerial
Views,
Hulme,
Medlock
Street
District,
Gaythorn
Gas
Works,
Aerial
view,
Manchester,”
1930.
Image
depicts
MSJ
viaduct
diagonally
from
top
right
to
centre
left.
Gaythorn
Gasworks
and
MacIntosh
Mills
can
be
seen
to
the
South
of
the
viaduct,
with
the
limits
of
the
commercial
city
centre
ending
abruptly
at
the
viaduct.
Image
source:
Local
Image
Collection,
MCC
208
Figure
56:
Gaythorn
sub-‐area
of
the
1984
City
Centre
local
plan.
Northern
Boundary
is
defined
by
the
MSJ
viaduct.
Image
source:
MCC
(1984).
________________________________________________________________
209
Figure
57:
Planning
sub-‐areas
for
the
1984
City
Centre
Local
Plan.
The
MSJ
viaduct
not
only
defines
the
boundary
between
sub-‐areas
20
and
21,
but
also
between
19
and
18,
22
and
23,
and
part
of
17
and
15.
Image
source:
MCC
(1984).
__________________________________________________________________________
210
Figure
58:
The
Gaythorn
Site
in
the
late
1980s,
after
arches
were
cleared
but
before
environmental
remediation.
Image
source:
CMDC
(1996).
______________________________________________________________
210
Figure
59:
A
new
walkway
along
the
opened
arches
on
Gaythorn
site,
circa
approximately
1991.
Image
source:
CMDC
(1992).
______________________________________________________________________________
211
Figure
60:
Plaque
affixed
to
the
MSJ
viaduct
at
the
former
site
of
Artworks
from
the
Gasworks,
2012.
Image
source:
Brian
Rosa.
_________________________________________________________________________________
213
Figure
61:
One
of
the
‘Artworks
from
the
Gasworks’
installations,
circa
early
1990s.
Image
source:
Aidan
O’Rourke.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
214
10
Description:relation to built heritage and their relative importance to a city's overall image—marketing itself as 'the Other ethnographic methods included participant observation with guerrilla gardeners law, as part of each act governing the construction of railways in Manchester, railways were required
