Table Of Contentstob* or fm wm im i n
Ktmm. m M rm m rn m t
om tim m m m rm tc M?rmb
if
if on#
Butmttl^d in - fulfillment of
the require wnfct for the $m tm
Bootor of ^ seat to* ?a the
Sehool of g&ueettoa,
In $ term ®nlr®r$%tf9
Juoe* M!50
ProQuest Number: 10295222
All rights reserved
INFORMATION TO ALL USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
uest
ProQuest 10295222
Published by ProQuest LLC (2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
All rights reserved.
This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code
Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 - 1346
Accepted W tht fnm tt? of tht goh&ol of EdoootIon of
Indiana th&i varsity a.» fulfilling the thcci* rccttlra-
for the degree of Doctor of Evocation*
5 l?ifeto r 'oF fh o sts'
v
D o cto rate C om ! tto o t
i i
1 wists to m&kn&wappreciation to the
associate mmtMm of my doctoral committee for their
interest t» the study during the forasiivp stages of
th e m rit*
fo 0r# X*ewts# my wsjor adviser and m zm tttm
tih%lrmmp t m profoundly grateful tor the rtirivtleg*
of m Joying m4.m hit friendly and natfent guidance
an experience in educational research which has bem
m inspiration to mo* 1 urn esoeeially indebted to
him for the benefit of hi a untiring assistance in
counsel m i In critical ewluatloru
I extend my gratitude to the staff sse&bera of
the Laboratory and Qersteeyer Sigh Schools who assisted
In securing the data used in the study* to the of fie®
staff for their generotia cooperation, and to those friends
and swashers of my family nho lent tbelr aid vhenever
possible*
Si .near® fch&n&s for constant understanding ®nd
assistance are expressed to ay mother ®nd the on# rho
has been my mainstay of Inspiration mf fKieourage&ent
without which this study could never have been completed*
W* M. C.
H i
ta» « or comrmts
Page
T XfffWOCTtOtf » # # # 1
-k «
ImtTOtoetlof* mfi B tntm m t of m « * 1
* * • » * • * « « * * * • • 4
m& Ft*rp«n5« of the Btutfj * * * * * * IB
Sowett of Beit * * » * * » , * » * * * » £1
Sifnlflcrne# of tb* ittidy * * * * * * * ?!
f?m ® Of fcTTTOAITO* BB
I I ,
m m m rf • * • « » « i » « • « • • • • « S!
I I I , w se ix m c m o f th s stub* * * * ................... m
Coaetansefclon of ih# stin gs * * * * * * * B8
validity «»* a*iuM iity * * * * * * * * ax
BetreXof&manl of the Biudy » • * • • « « * 6S
IV. AmVSIi Of tm DATA MO BfmVS * * * * VS
ft*11ability of Seole^trle Bstittgjs # * * 01
Correlation ftftaulta » * * « * * « * * , 100
iuaHBiary * * • » « * » # » * * * • « * * TIB
SOVBAK* MB ^>Ta00IOg0 * * , Of4
ft«eoQMndati<ms for Further ftw^y * * * *
BimiOOBHPHI * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
kPfm m t a i . . . . . . ......................*
M TfUDII 1 ♦ !V,M j, f*sj<'f ^f*f
i v
??.*&,? Of CmfWSTS {Ccntimied)
Chsptnw ">?«
APPBSDTX C ........................... 8M
APPPIBXX B . . . . . . . . . . . . 2S5
ftfflSPIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . ”S8
Y
LIST 01' TABLES
Table Page
I* CLASSIFICATION OF CASES TAKING THE
ITODHR PRSFSB8NCE RECORD-PERSOni- and
IRS FIRST SOCIOMETRIC RATINGS . . . . m
I I , CLASSIFICATION OF CASES WITH COMPLETE
BATA FOB THE KODFR PREFERENCE RECORD-
PFRS0SAS. AND THE FIRST BOCIOSETRIC
RATINGS ..................... . . . . . . . . . 67
I l l , fRECORSCr DISTRIBUTION OF KOBE®
SOCIABLE SAW SCORES FOR ALL SZS
CASES IN THE STUDS’ . ............................ 30
iv , m o u e tc r distribution of sober PRAC
TICAL RAW SCORES FOR ALL 588 CASES
III TOE STORY . .......................................... SI
V, FR800S8CT SISTRIBOTION OF KCBBH
THEORETICAL RAW SCORES FOR ALL OSS
CASES IS TOE STtlDT ................................. 8?
VI, FSfOOWCY DISTRIBUTION OF KtJDWR
AGREEABLE RAW SCORES FOR ALL 888
CASES IN TEE STORY . . . . . . . . . 84
VTI. FRECUENCY DISTRIB0TIQ8 OF KODKR
DOMINANT RAW SCO BBS FOR ALL 888
CASES IN THE STUDY . . . ....................... 88
V III, FREOOENCY DISTRIBUTION OF QBOOP SOCIAL
DISTANCE RATINGS FOR ALL 588 CASES
IN THE STUDY ................... . . . . . . . 86
IX, fRECOBCCY DISTRIBUTION OF SELF SOCIAL
DISTANCE RAtraGS FOR ALL 588
CASES IN TIE ilTODY 87
X, FREOOSSCY DISTRIBUTION OP (CHOSEN
SOCIOMBTRIC RATINGS 50P: ALL 588
CASES IN THE STUDY . , ............................ 88
XI, VRiQOBICX DISTRIBUTION OF RECIPROCAL
SOCIOMOTRIC RATINGS FOR 448 CASES
IN THE STUDY ................................................... 90
vl
US? O'- TABLES (Continued)
Tabls Pasre
XII, BIVARIATR DIPTRIBnTIOH OF THE “If-ST
ill; GECQRB CFGOP SOCIAL DISTANCE
ftATIROS ..................................... 94
X III. BIVARIATE DI8TRIBOTI0S OF THE GECOHD
ISB THIRD GBOOP SOCIAL BISTMCE
M TJB68............................................. . . . 96
XIV. BI VAF.I AT5 DISTRIBOTIOH OF TAB FIRST
AHD THIRD 5ROGP SOCIAL DISTAHCGS
RATBtOS............................................................... 96
XV, BXVARIATB DISTRISOTIOH OF THE FIRST
MO SECOVC SELF SOCIAL DISTANCE
. . . . . . . . . ..........
BlTTHOS 100
XVI. BIVABTATE SISTSIBOTIOH OF THE SECOTO
ATO THIRD SELF SOCIAL DISTASCB
RATIftQS ................................................. 102
XVII. BIVARIATR DTSTRIBOTIOSS OF '”HF FIRST
ASD THIRD SELF SOCIAL DISTANCE
RATIS08 . ....................................................... 104
XVrll. BtVARIJWR BISTBIBOTIOR OF TffS FIRST
mi) SSCOR'D CHOSSS SOCIOHFTRIC
BATHOS 106
XIX, B1V1RIATR BKTSTBSTTOB OF THE FIRST
ATO SECOXS RECIPROCAL SGCIO'.T'TKIC
fiATHTGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
XX. BlVARMTE DISTfilBDTIOI OF SODS®
sociable scores asd oboop social
DISTJkHCE BATHOS .................................... 114
XXI. ElVASTATE DISTRIBOTIOH Of KODER
SOCIABLE SCOESS iSD SELF SOCIAL
DISTASCB RA TH G S..................................... 116
XXII. BXVA.RIATE DIBTRIBOTIOW OF SOBER
SOCIABLE SCORES AST; CSJOSES SOCIO-
SBTRXC BATHOS ......................... . , . 118
▼11
LIST OP TABLES (Continued)
Tabl* Pag*
m u * BXVARXATE DISTBIBUTIOH Of KODFB SOCIABLE
SCORES A8D RECIPROCAL BOCTOHETSIC
RATXSupS IPO
XXIV. JJXVASIATS DISTRIBUTION OF X0E2B SOCIABLE
SCORES A.'iD SCHOOL GRADES................................. 188
XXV* HVARtATE DISTRIBUTION OF RUDER SOCIABLE
SCORES ASP IBT5LLIG®CE (JOOTISSTB . . . 184
XXVI* BXVARIATB DI8TRIBUTTQB OR XODBB SOCIABLE
SCORES AXD TEACg.TR SOCIABLE RATISO0 . . IBS
XXVII, BXVARIATB DISTRISOTIOB OF XODER PRAC
TICAL SCORES AJfD GROUP SOCIAL DISTANCE
RATOTOS , ...................... 188
xxvm.
BXVABIATS DISTRIBUTION OF KUDER PRAC- *
TlCAL SCORES km SELF SOCIAL DISTAStCB
RATINGS . . . . . . . . . . . ................... 180
n n , BIVARIATE BI8TRIBOTIOB OP SUPER PRAC
TICAL SCORES A8D CfTOSSSt SOCIOIIETBIC
RATTSOB . . . . . . . . . . . 188
xxx. BIVARIATE DISTRIBOTIOB OP KUDSR PRAC
TICAL -SCORES Am RECIPROCAL 80CI0-
MBTRIC RA.tSCS............................................. 184
m i. BXVABIATR BISTRIBnTIOH OF SUMS PRAC
TICAL SCOPES AS I? SCHOOL 0RADE6 . . . . . 188
XXXII* BXVARIATB DISTRIBUTION OF KUDRK PRAC
TICAL SCORES JWO ISTSSLLIUafCE
QOOTiaSTS .................................. . . . . . . . 18®
r a m . BI VAR I ATS DISTRIBUTION OF KOffR ■’TAC
TICAL SCOR ES A-;D TEACH EH PRACTICAL
RATINGS 140
XXXIV, BXVARIATB DXSTRIBOTTOS OF KODEB
THEORETICAL SCORES W’D GROW SOCIAL
DISTANCE RATINGS ................................................... 14?
n u
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Table ?sge
r a r . BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTION OF CTf-FB THEO
RETICAL SCORES AND SELF SOCIAL DIS
TANCE RATINGS ................................................... 144
m e n , BXVARXATE DISTRIBUTION OP NO PER TBBO-
RRTICAL SCO BBS MP CHOSEN 8CCIOHSTRIC
RATINGS ................................................................. 146
>:.VXVII. BXVARXATE OISTRIBOTION OP NODES TSBO-
RBTICAL SCORES AND RECIPROCAL SOCIO-
aRTBIC RATINGS 148
XXXVIII, bivaeiate distribution op NODES THEO
RETICAL SCORES AND SCHOOL GRADES . . . ISO
XXXIX. BXVARIATB DISTRISOTIOB OP KODFR THEO
RETICAL SCORES AXD INTELLIGENCE
c o o n w r s ............................................ IBS
XL, BXVARIATB DISTRIBUTION OP KODER. THEO
RETICAL SCORES ML TRACKER THEORETICAL
RATINGS 154
XLI. BXVARXATE DISTRIBUTION Of KUDER AGREE
ABLE SCORES A»D GROUP SOCIAL DISTANCE
RATINGS ..................................... 156
XLII. RTVAMATE DISTRIBUTION 0?' KDDFR AGREE
ABLE SCOPES AND SEP SOCIAL DISTANCE
RATINGS « . . . . # • « * , . * » « 158
30.111. BtVARIATI DISTRISOTIOB OP K80S® AGREE
ABLE 3CGBES MB CBCSPN 80CI0VVTRTC
RATINGS » ............................... . . . . 160
XLXV, BXVARIATB DI8TRIBOTION OP KODER AOREB-
ABLE SCOPES MB RECIPROCAL SOCIDBPTRIC
R AT IN OS 168
XL?, BXVARIATB DISTRIBUTION OP NUDER aqrbb-
able scores « t> school shades . . . . 164
ix
