4 Greek Mythology

111 Pages·2011·4.93 MB·English

Revised Edition: 2016
ISBN 978-1-283-49991-0
© All rights reserved.
Published by:
University Publications
48 West 48 Street, Suite 1116,
New York, NY 10036, United States
Email: [email protected]
Table of Contents

Chapter 1 - Introduction to Mythology
Chapter 2 - Comparative Mythology
Chapter 3 - Mythopoeic Thought & Myth and Ritual
Chapter 4 - Greek Mythology
Chapter 5 - Jesus Christ in Comparative Mythology
Chapter 6 - Religion and Mythology
Chapter 7 - Founding Myth & National Myth
WT
Chapter 8 - Legend
Chapter 9 - Folklore
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
Chapter- 1
Introduction to Mythology

WT

Prometheus (1868) by Gustave Moreau. The myth of Prometheus, first attested by
Hesiodus, later became the basis of a trilogy of tragedy plays, possibly by Aeschylus,
consisting of Prometheus Bound, Prometheus Unbound and Prometheus Pyrphoros
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
The term mythology can refer to either the study of myths, or to a body of myths. For
example, comparative mythology is the study of connections between myths from
different cultures, whereas Greek mythology is the body of myths from ancient Greece.
The term "myth" is often used colloquially to refer to a false story, but academic use of
the term generally does not pass judgment on truth or falsity. In the study of folklore, a
myth is a sacred narrative explaining how the world and humankind came to be in their
present form. Many scholars in other fields use the term "myth" in somewhat different
ways. In a very broad sense, the word can refer to any traditional story.
Nature of myths
Typical characteristics
The main characters in myths are usually gods or supernatural heroes. As sacred stories,
myths are often endorsed by rulers and priests and closely linked to religion. In the
society in which it is told, a myth is usually regarded as a true account of the remote past.
In fact, many societies have two categories of traditional narrative, "true stories" or
myths, and "false stories" or fables. Myths generally take place in a primordial age, when
the world haWd not yet achieved its current form, aTnd explain how the world gained its
current form and how customs, institutions and taboos were established.
Related concepts
Closely related to myth are legend and folktale. Myths, legends, and folktales are
different types of traditional story. Unlike myths, folktales can take place at any time and
any place, and they are not considered true or sacred by the societies that tell them. Like
myths, legends are stories that are traditionally considered true, but are set in a more
recent time, when the world was much as it is today. Legends generally feature humans
as their main characters, whereas myths generally focus on superhuman characters.
The distinction between myth, legend, and folktale is meant simply as a useful tool for
grouping traditional stories. In many cultures, it is hard to draw a sharp line between
myths and legends. Instead of dividing their traditional stories into myths, legends, and
folktales, some cultures divide them into two categories, one that roughly corresponds to
folktales, and one that combines myths and legends. Even myths and folktales are not
completely distinct. A story may be considered true (and therefore a myth) in one society,
but considered fictional (and therefore a folktale) in another society. In fact, when a myth
loses its status as part of a religious system, it often takes on traits more typical of
folktales, with its formerly divine characters reinterpreted as human heroes, giants, or
fairies.
Myth, legend, saga, fable, folktale, or marchens are only a few of the categories of
traditional stories. Other categories include anecdotes and some kinds of jokes.
Traditional stories, in turn, are only one category within folklore, which also includes
items such as gestures, costumes, and music.
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
Origins of myth
Euhemerism
One theory claims that myths are distorted accounts of real historical events. According
to this theory, storytellers repeatedly elaborated upon historical accounts until the figures
in those accounts gained the status of gods. For example, one might argue that the myth
of the wind-god Aeolus evolved from a historical account of a king who taught his people
to use sails and interpret the winds. Herodotus (5th century BC) and Prodicus made
claims of this kind. This theory is named "euhemerism" after the mythologist Euhemerus
(c.320 BC), who suggested that the Greek gods developed from legends about human
beings.
Allegory
Some theories propose that myths began as allegories. According to one theory, myths
began as allegories for natural phenomena: Apollo represents fire, Poseidon represents
water, and so on. According to another theory, myths began as allegories for philoso-
WT
phical or spiritual concepts: Athena represents wise judgment, Aphrodite represents
desire, etc. The 19th century Sanskritist Max Müller supported an allegorical theory of
myth. He believed that myths began as allegorical descriptions of nature, but gradually
came to be interpreted literally: for example, a poetic description of the sea as "raging"
was eventually taken literally, and the sea was then thought of as a raging god.
Personification
Some thinkers believe that myths resulted from the personification of inanimate objects
and forces. According to these thinkers, the ancients worshipped natural phenomena such
as fire and air, gradually coming to describe them as gods. For example, according to the
theory of mythopoeic thought, the ancients tended to view things as persons, not as mere
objects; thus, they described natural events as acts of personal gods, thus giving rise to
myths.
The myth-ritual theory
According to the myth-ritual theory, the existence of myth is tied to ritual. In its most
extreme form, this theory claims that myths arose to explain rituals. This claim was first
put forward by the biblical scholar William Robertson Smith. According to Smith, people
begin performing rituals for some reason that is not related to myth; later, after they have
forgotten the original reason for a ritual, they try to account for the ritual by inventing a
myth and claiming that the ritual commemorates the events described in that myth. The
anthropologist James Frazer had a similar theory. Frazer believed that primitive man
starts out with a belief in magical laws; later, when man begins to lose faith in magic, he
invents myths about gods and claims that his formerly magical rituals are religious rituals
intended to appease the gods.
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
Functions of myth
WT

Manuscript illustration of the Battle of Kurukshetra from the Hindu epic Mahabharata
Mircea Eliade argued that one of the foremost functions of myth is to establish models
for behavior and that myths may also provide a religious experience. By telling or
reenacting myths, members of traditional societies detach themselves from the present
and return to the mythical age, thereby bringing themselves closer to the divine.
Larui Honko asserts that, in some cases, a society will reenact a myth in an attempt to
reproduce the conditions of the mythical age. For example, it will reenact the healing
performed by a god at the beginning of time in order to heal someone in the present.
Similarly, Roland Barthes argues that modern culture explores religious experience.
Because it is not the job of science to define human morality, a religious experience is an
attempt to connect with a perceived moral past, which is in contrast with the
technological present.
Joseph Campbell defined myths as having four basic functions: the Mystical Function--
experiencing the awe of the universe; the Cosmological Function--explaining the shape
of the universe; the Sociological Function--supporting and validating a certain social
order; and the Pedagogical Function--how to live a human lifetime under any
circumstances.
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
The study of mythology: a historical overview
Historically, the important approaches to the study of mythology have been those of
Vico, Schelling, Schiller, Jung, Freud, Lévy-Bruhl, Lévi-Strauss, Frye, the Soviet school,
and the Myth and Ritual School.
Pre-modern theories
The critical interpretation of myth goes back as far as the Presocratics. Euhemerus was
one of the most important pre-modern mythologists. He interpreted myths as accounts of
actual historical events, distorted over many retellings. This view of myths and their
origin is criticised by Plato in the Phaedrus (229d), in which Socrates says that this
approach is the province of one who is "vehemently curious and laborious, and not
entirely happy . . ." The Platonists generally had a more profound and comprehensive
view of the subject. Sallustius, for example, divides myths into five categories –
theological, physical (or concerning natural laws), animastic (or concerning soul),
material and mixed. This last being those myths which show the interaction between two
or more of the previous categories and which, he says, are particularly used in initiations.
WT
Although Plato famously condemned poetic myth when discussing the education of the
young in the Republic, primarily on the grounds that there was a danger that the young
and uneducated might take the stories of Gods and heroes literally, nevertheless he
constantly refers to myths of all kinds throughout his writings. As Platonism developed in
the phases commonly called 'middle Platonism' and neoplatonism, such writers as
Plutarch, Porphyry, Proclus, Olympiodorus and Damascius wrote explicitly about the
symbolic interpretation of traditional and Orphic myths.
Interest in polytheistic mythology revived in the Renaissance, with early works on
mythography appearing in the 16th century, such as the Theologia mythologica (1532).
19th-century theories
The first scholarly theories of myth appeared during the second half of the 19th century.
In general, these 19th-century theories framed myth as a failed or obsolete mode of
thought, often by interpreting myth as the primitive counterpart of modern science.
For example, E. B. Tylor interpreted myth as an attempt at a literal explanation for
natural phenomena: unable to conceive of impersonal natural laws, early man tried to
explain natural phenomena by attributing souls to inanimate objects, giving rise to
animism. According to Tylor, human thought evolves through various stages, starting
with mythological ideas and gradually progressing to scientific ideas. Not all scholars —
not even all 19th century scholars — have agreed with this view. For example, Lucien
Lévy-Bruhl claimed that "the primitive mentality is a condition of the human mind, and
not a stage in its historical development."
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
Max Müller called myth a "disease of language". He speculated that myths arose due to
the lack of abstract nouns and neuter gender in ancient languages: anthropomorphic
figures of speech, necessary in such languages, were eventually taken literally, leading to
the idea that natural phenomena were conscious beings, gods.
The anthropologist James Frazer saw myths as a misinterpretation of magical rituals,
which were themselves based on a mistaken idea of natural law. According to Frazer,
man begins with an unfounded belief in impersonal magical laws. When he realizes that
his applications of these laws don't work, he gives up his belief in natural law, in favor of
a belief in personal gods controlling nature — thus giving rise to religious myths.
Meanwhile, man continues practicing formerly magical rituals through force of habit,
reinterpreting them as reenactments of mythical events. Finally, Frazer contends, man
realizes that nature does follow natural laws, but now he discovers their true nature
through science. Here, again, science makes myth obsolete: as Frazer puts it, man
progresses "from magic through religion to science".
Robert Segal asserts that by pitting mythical thought against modern scientific thought,
such theories implied that modern man must abandon myth.
WT
20th Century theories
Many 20th century theories of myth rejected the 19th-century theories' opposition of
myth and science. In general, "twentieth-century theories have tended to see myth as
almost anything but an outdated counterpart to science […] Consequently, moderns are
not obliged to abandon myth for science."
Swiss psychologist Carl Jung (1873–1961) tried to understand the psychology behind
world myths. Jung asserted that all humans share certain innate unconscious
psychological forces, which he called archetypes. Jung believed that the similarities
between the myths from different cultures reveals the existence of these universal
archetypes.
Joseph Campbell believed that there were two different orders of mythology: that there
are myths that, "are metaphorical of spiritual potentiality in the human being", and that
there are myths, "that have to do with specific societies".
Claude Lévi-Strauss believed that myths reflect patterns in the mind and interpreted those
patterns more as fixed mental structures — specifically, pairs of opposites (i.e. good/evil,
compassionate/callous) — than as unconscious feelings or urges.
In his appendix to Myths, Dreams and Mysteries, and in The Myth of the Eternal Return,
Mircea Eliade attributed modern man’s anxieties to his rejection of myths and the sense
of the sacred.
In the 1950s, Roland Barthes published a series of essays examining modern myths and
the process of their creation in his book Mythologies.
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________
Comparative mythology
WT

Old Belgian banknote, depicting Ceres, Neptune and caduceus.
Comparative mythology is the systematic comparison of myths from different cultures. It
seeks to discover underlying themes that are common to the myths of multiple cultures.
In some cases, comparative mythologists use the similarities between different mytho-
logies to argue that those mythologies have a common source. This common source may
be a common source of inspiration (e.g. a certain natural phenomenon that inspired
similar myths in different cultures) or a common "protomythology" that diverged into the
various mythologies we see today.
Nineteenth-century interpretations of myth were often highly comparative, seeking a
common origin for all myths. However, modern-day scholars tend to be more suspicious
of comparative approaches, avoiding overly general or universal statements about
mythology. One exception to this modern trend is Joseph Campbell's book The Hero
With a Thousand Faces (1949), which claims that all hero myths follow the same
underlying pattern. This theory of a "monomyth" is out of favor with the mainstream
study of mythology.
________________________WORLD TECHNOLOGIES________________________